As Russia continues to advance and strikes continue to intensify, the zone of mandatory evacuation for families with children in Donetsk Oblast was expanded yesterday, to include the town of Novodonetske, additional parts of Slovyansk, and some nearby villages.
This added evacuation zone is around 159 km² in size, decreasing the area of Ukrainian-controlled Donetsk Oblast without evacuation orders to just ~1,451 km², which equates to around ~5.47% of Donetsk Oblast, or just ~2.73% of Donbas.
The evacuation zone now includes the town of Novodonetske, the villages of Iverske, Shostakivka, Novosamarske, Adamivka, Mykilske, Khrestyshche, and Hlyboka Makatykha, and part of the village of Sukhanivka.
It also includes most of the northern suburbs of Slovyansk, with around 41.5% of the city now being under evacuation order, an increase from 27.7%. Around 10% of Kramatorsk city remains under evacuation orders for families with children.
This added evacuation zone is around 159 km² in size, decreasing the area of Ukrainian-controlled Donetsk Oblast without evacuation orders to just ~1,451 km², which equates to around ~5.47% of Donetsk Oblast, or just ~2.73% of Donbas.
The evacuation zone now includes the town of Novodonetske, the villages of Iverske, Shostakivka, Novosamarske, Adamivka, Mykilske, Khrestyshche, and Hlyboka Makatykha, and part of the village of Sukhanivka.
It also includes most of the northern suburbs of Slovyansk, with around 41.5% of the city now being under evacuation order, an increase from 27.7%. Around 10% of Kramatorsk city remains under evacuation orders for families with children.
❤87👍23🔥17🤔5💔5😁3🙏3👎2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Ukrainian fibre-optic FPV drone flies uncontested over the Russian regional capital city of Belgorod.
🤬144👍86🔥38🤮11💯9❤6😁6
The Ukrainian command has sent reinforcements to Orikhiv to try stabilise the rapidly deteriorating situation.
It's unclear which sector of the frontline they were pulled from. Perhaps the Komar direction.
It's unclear which sector of the frontline they were pulled from. Perhaps the Komar direction.
👀128🤣28👍24❤7🤬3
A Su-35 is trying to shoot down a Ukrainian tactical aircraft in eastern Dnipropetrovsk Oblast with an R-37/77 air-to-air missile.
The Ukrainian aircraft was launching glide-bombs at Kostyantynivka.
The Ukrainian aircraft was launching glide-bombs at Kostyantynivka.
❤93🔥42🙏11👍10🤬3🤣3👎2
A Russian Geran-4 jet-drone just struck the Yagodyn Border Crossing in Volyn Oblast, connecting Poland with Ukraine.
Sirens sounded in Lublin, eastern Poland, as the drone approached the border, however it did not cross into Polish airspace.
Sirens sounded in Lublin, eastern Poland, as the drone approached the border, however it did not cross into Polish airspace.
👏150👍26
During last night's Russian combined missile attack on Kyiv, all three of the Oniks-M cruise missiles that were launched missed their targets, landing in open areas near residential buildings and a school.
At least one of the RM-48U S-400 ballistic missiles also missed its target.
At least one of the RM-48U S-400 ballistic missiles also missed its target.
🔥79🙏28👀20🤣18🤬16🤔10💔9😁8👍6❤4🎉3
The ruins of Kostyantynivka, September 2026.
Almost nothing in the city remains intact.
Almost nothing in the city remains intact.
💔177🔥47🤬16👍9🙏8❤5🤣5🫡4
Today, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk made a very interesting and rather surprising claim about Ukrainian casualties. In this post, I will analyse this statement and apply some related statistics to get a clearer picture on the current manpower situation within the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
According to Tusk, due to new Russian tactics and improved technical capabilities, Ukraine's casualties have increased to around 27,000 killed and wounded per month. He says that this information came from Poland's "partners from Ukraine".
Is this claim true? Well, you may remember that Budanov stated in August that Ukraine would need to mobilise 30,000 soldiers per month in order to maintain the current strength of it's armed forces. This gives a lot of credibility to Tusk's claim of 27,000 Ukrainian casualties per month. Additionally, with Poland being an ally of Ukraine (regardless of what people say about their cultural/historical tensions), Tusk has no incentive to lie about such a high number that directly contradicts the ludicrous claims made by Zelensky.
While we don't know the monthly casualty rate before August, if we were to assume that it has been 27,000 per month on average for the entirety of the war, it would give us a figure of about 1.46 million.
Do I think that 1.46 million is the true casualty count for Ukraine? No. I think it's less, and that Ukrainian casualties have increased since the failed 2023 summer counteroffensive and the rapid increase in glide-bomb and drone usage by Russia.
However, for the longest time, I have estimated that Ukraine and Russia's casualties are MUCH closer to 1:1 than either side wants to admit, probably with Ukraine having slightly more than Russia due to Russia's superior firepower capabilities and capacity. Casualties for both sides have increased significantly since the beginning of the attritional phase of the war in late-2022, and will likely continue to increase this year and into 2027. My personal estimates (which of course, are largely baseless and just educated guesses from my thousands of hours of covering this war) would put Russian and Ukrainian casualties each at around 700,000, or around half of this 1.46 million figure.
However, it's important to mention the replacement rates Russia and Ukraine both have. According to NATO estimates (so, the bare minimum number, as they have an incentive to understate this), Russia recruits - via financial incentives - anywhere between 30,000 and 40,000 soldiers per month. This was also repeatedly backed up by Syrskyi's own claims about the total number of Russian personnel within Ukraine, as this number he gave increased each time he made a statement about it.
According to my information from sources within Ukraine who analysed the recent mobilisation activity though local tracking services, Ukraine forcibly mobilises a little less than 1,000 soldiers per day - a rate that has increased substantially since July due to a new campaign against military-aged men in Kyiv, western Ukraine, and some smaller towns. When taking into account the small number of volunteers who still sign up to join the AFU, that figure would probably reach around 1,000 per day, or 30,000 per month.
So, in theory, both sides are *likely* able to maintain their current army sizes, right? Well, no. At least not for Ukraine. There's always all this talk about Ukrainian manpower shortages. Why is this?
(Post continues below) ⬇️
According to Tusk, due to new Russian tactics and improved technical capabilities, Ukraine's casualties have increased to around 27,000 killed and wounded per month. He says that this information came from Poland's "partners from Ukraine".
Is this claim true? Well, you may remember that Budanov stated in August that Ukraine would need to mobilise 30,000 soldiers per month in order to maintain the current strength of it's armed forces. This gives a lot of credibility to Tusk's claim of 27,000 Ukrainian casualties per month. Additionally, with Poland being an ally of Ukraine (regardless of what people say about their cultural/historical tensions), Tusk has no incentive to lie about such a high number that directly contradicts the ludicrous claims made by Zelensky.
While we don't know the monthly casualty rate before August, if we were to assume that it has been 27,000 per month on average for the entirety of the war, it would give us a figure of about 1.46 million.
Do I think that 1.46 million is the true casualty count for Ukraine? No. I think it's less, and that Ukrainian casualties have increased since the failed 2023 summer counteroffensive and the rapid increase in glide-bomb and drone usage by Russia.
However, for the longest time, I have estimated that Ukraine and Russia's casualties are MUCH closer to 1:1 than either side wants to admit, probably with Ukraine having slightly more than Russia due to Russia's superior firepower capabilities and capacity. Casualties for both sides have increased significantly since the beginning of the attritional phase of the war in late-2022, and will likely continue to increase this year and into 2027. My personal estimates (which of course, are largely baseless and just educated guesses from my thousands of hours of covering this war) would put Russian and Ukrainian casualties each at around 700,000, or around half of this 1.46 million figure.
However, it's important to mention the replacement rates Russia and Ukraine both have. According to NATO estimates (so, the bare minimum number, as they have an incentive to understate this), Russia recruits - via financial incentives - anywhere between 30,000 and 40,000 soldiers per month. This was also repeatedly backed up by Syrskyi's own claims about the total number of Russian personnel within Ukraine, as this number he gave increased each time he made a statement about it.
According to my information from sources within Ukraine who analysed the recent mobilisation activity though local tracking services, Ukraine forcibly mobilises a little less than 1,000 soldiers per day - a rate that has increased substantially since July due to a new campaign against military-aged men in Kyiv, western Ukraine, and some smaller towns. When taking into account the small number of volunteers who still sign up to join the AFU, that figure would probably reach around 1,000 per day, or 30,000 per month.
So, in theory, both sides are *likely* able to maintain their current army sizes, right? Well, no. At least not for Ukraine. There's always all this talk about Ukrainian manpower shortages. Why is this?
(Post continues below) ⬇️
❤116🤣38👍36✍9🤔8💯8👎6👀5👏3😁1