Forwarded from Andrew Bridgen
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
https://t.me/ABridgen
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
https://t.me/ABridgen
Telegram
Andrew Bridgen
Independent minded. abridgen.uk
❤7👍1
Forwarded from Andrew Bridgen
These are the words of more scientists that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change due to the corruption and pseudo science they were asked to endorse.
Dr Mike Hulme: “Claims such as ‘2500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous … The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was only a few dozen.
Dr Kiminori Itoh: “There are many factors which cause climate change. Considering only greenhouse gases is nonsense and harmful.”
Dr Yuri Izrael: “There is no proven link between human activity and global warming. I think the panic over global warming is totally unjustified. There is no serious threat to the climate.”
Dr Steven Japar: “Temperature measurements show that the climate model-predicted mid-troposphere hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them.”
Dr Georg Kaser: “This number [of receding glaciers reported by the IPCC] is not just a little bit wrong, it is far out by any order of magnitude … It is so wrong that it is not even worth discussing.”
Dr Aynsley Kellow: “I’m not holding my breath for criticism to be taken on board, which underscores a fault in the whole peer review process for the IPCC: there is no chance of a chapter [of the IPCC report] ever being rejected for publication, no matter how flawed it might be.”
Dr Madhav Khandekar: “I have carefully analysed adverse impacts of climate change as projected by the IPCC and have discounted these claims as exaggerated and lacking any supporting evidence.”
Dr Hans Labohm: “The alarmist passages in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers have been skewed through an elaborate and sophisticated process of spin-doctoring.”
Dr Andrew Lacis: “There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department.”
Dr Chris Landsea: “I cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”
Dr Richard Lindzen: “The IPCC process is driven by politics rather than science. It uses summaries to misrepresent what scientists say and exploits public ignorance.”
Dr Harry Lins: “Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. The case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated.”
Dr Philip Lloyd: “I am doing a detailed assessment of the IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science. I have found examples of a summary saying precisely the opposite of what the scientists said.
Dr Martin Manning: “Some government delegates influencing the IPCC Summary for Policymakers misrepresent or contradict the lead authors.”
Steven McIntyre: “The many references in the popular media to a ‘consensus of thousands of scientists’ are both a great exaggeration and also misleading.”
Dr Patrick Michaels: “The rates of warming, on multiple time scales, have now invalidated the suite of IPCC climate models. No, the science is not settled.”
Dr Nils-Axel Morner: “If you go around the globe, you find no sea level rise anywhere.”
Dr Johannes Oerlemans: “The IPCC has become too political. Many scientists have not been able to resist the siren call of fame, research funding and meetings in exotic places that awaits them if they are willing to compromise scientific principles and integrity in support of the man-made global-warming doctrine.”
https://t.me/ABridgen
Dr Mike Hulme: “Claims such as ‘2500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous … The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was only a few dozen.
Dr Kiminori Itoh: “There are many factors which cause climate change. Considering only greenhouse gases is nonsense and harmful.”
Dr Yuri Izrael: “There is no proven link between human activity and global warming. I think the panic over global warming is totally unjustified. There is no serious threat to the climate.”
Dr Steven Japar: “Temperature measurements show that the climate model-predicted mid-troposphere hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them.”
Dr Georg Kaser: “This number [of receding glaciers reported by the IPCC] is not just a little bit wrong, it is far out by any order of magnitude … It is so wrong that it is not even worth discussing.”
Dr Aynsley Kellow: “I’m not holding my breath for criticism to be taken on board, which underscores a fault in the whole peer review process for the IPCC: there is no chance of a chapter [of the IPCC report] ever being rejected for publication, no matter how flawed it might be.”
Dr Madhav Khandekar: “I have carefully analysed adverse impacts of climate change as projected by the IPCC and have discounted these claims as exaggerated and lacking any supporting evidence.”
Dr Hans Labohm: “The alarmist passages in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers have been skewed through an elaborate and sophisticated process of spin-doctoring.”
Dr Andrew Lacis: “There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department.”
Dr Chris Landsea: “I cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”
Dr Richard Lindzen: “The IPCC process is driven by politics rather than science. It uses summaries to misrepresent what scientists say and exploits public ignorance.”
Dr Harry Lins: “Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. The case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated.”
Dr Philip Lloyd: “I am doing a detailed assessment of the IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science. I have found examples of a summary saying precisely the opposite of what the scientists said.
Dr Martin Manning: “Some government delegates influencing the IPCC Summary for Policymakers misrepresent or contradict the lead authors.”
Steven McIntyre: “The many references in the popular media to a ‘consensus of thousands of scientists’ are both a great exaggeration and also misleading.”
Dr Patrick Michaels: “The rates of warming, on multiple time scales, have now invalidated the suite of IPCC climate models. No, the science is not settled.”
Dr Nils-Axel Morner: “If you go around the globe, you find no sea level rise anywhere.”
Dr Johannes Oerlemans: “The IPCC has become too political. Many scientists have not been able to resist the siren call of fame, research funding and meetings in exotic places that awaits them if they are willing to compromise scientific principles and integrity in support of the man-made global-warming doctrine.”
https://t.me/ABridgen
Telegram
Andrew Bridgen
Independent minded. abridgen.uk
❤6👏4👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
László Szarka on the natural causes of climate change
László Szarka is a geophysicist and member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In this video, he summarizes several presentations that were given at a recent symposium of the Academy. He shows compelling evidence that changing solar irradiation has been the main driver of recent "global warming." Changes in the Antarctic land ice are due to local geothermal effects.
László also makes the case that mainstream climate science has lost its way by catering to political demands and pressures, and that it is time to restore the scientific method to its proper place.
László Szarka is a geophysicist and member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In this video, he summarizes several presentations that were given at a recent symposium of the Academy. He shows compelling evidence that changing solar irradiation has been the main driver of recent "global warming." Changes in the Antarctic land ice are due to local geothermal effects.
László also makes the case that mainstream climate science has lost its way by catering to political demands and pressures, and that it is time to restore the scientific method to its proper place.
💯6👏3❤1
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Katherine Watt’s Bailiwick News Substack account is now closed.
She has conducted crucial work analysing a century and more of federal law and regulations relating to public health and especially to “vaccination”.
Becoming aware of this work and it’s findings alone is sufficient to tell you that there has been long planned foul play on both public health and injections.
I have referred to her work extensively in my posts, occasionally articles and interviews.
You won’t find her Substack articles but she has archived all of her work relevant to this matter here.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/
To my knowledge, no other person in the world has conducted such thorough research. There is no other source than this of the proof of extraordinary, multigenerational corruption and criminality.
This has permanently corrupted not only the federal government’s regulatory bodies, starting with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). I think it should be assumed that all sibling organisations have likewise been corrupted, at least in relation to injected products called “vaccines”, none of which have ever been genuine human or animal therapeutics.
Anyone who is pro-vaccine simply doesn’t understand the history of this class of non-products.
If you don’t understand why this is, I strongly recommend some homework.
Katherine’s work is in my opinion extraordinary. I won’t pretend it’s easy to get to grips with, unless you’re willing to plough through her extensive archive, which is written to be thorough, rather than easily understood.
It’s not my work, so any opinion is just that. But this is a very powerful start. It’s among the very last things Katherine recorded. I salute her courage in doing this. I don’t think she’s at all comfortable in front of a camera.
https://rumble.com/v6uhtrl-the-surprising-law-changes-needed-to-end-govts-war-on-humanity.html
Best wishes
Mike
She has conducted crucial work analysing a century and more of federal law and regulations relating to public health and especially to “vaccination”.
Becoming aware of this work and it’s findings alone is sufficient to tell you that there has been long planned foul play on both public health and injections.
I have referred to her work extensively in my posts, occasionally articles and interviews.
You won’t find her Substack articles but she has archived all of her work relevant to this matter here.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/
To my knowledge, no other person in the world has conducted such thorough research. There is no other source than this of the proof of extraordinary, multigenerational corruption and criminality.
This has permanently corrupted not only the federal government’s regulatory bodies, starting with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). I think it should be assumed that all sibling organisations have likewise been corrupted, at least in relation to injected products called “vaccines”, none of which have ever been genuine human or animal therapeutics.
Anyone who is pro-vaccine simply doesn’t understand the history of this class of non-products.
If you don’t understand why this is, I strongly recommend some homework.
Katherine’s work is in my opinion extraordinary. I won’t pretend it’s easy to get to grips with, unless you’re willing to plough through her extensive archive, which is written to be thorough, rather than easily understood.
It’s not my work, so any opinion is just that. But this is a very powerful start. It’s among the very last things Katherine recorded. I salute her courage in doing this. I don’t think she’s at all comfortable in front of a camera.
https://rumble.com/v6uhtrl-the-surprising-law-changes-needed-to-end-govts-war-on-humanity.html
Best wishes
Mike
Rumble
The Surprising Law Changes Needed to End Govt’s War on Humanity
Please Support Our Sponsors! Everybody needs the miracle molecule, nitric oxide, and with Cardio Miracle, it's never been easier and never tasted better. It’s Hope in a Glass. Just two scoops twice da
❤6
Forwarded from Haags Licht | Robbert Clignett
Searching for peace
A documentary by Robbert Clignett
1917 was a turning point, marking the rise of propaganda and geopolitics in world affairs. In that same year, Rudolf Steiner proposed an alternative: The Threefold Social Order. This film explores the contrast between power and humanity, manipulation and awareness.
To make this documentary possible, I have launched a crowdfunding campaign. If you would like to support me, you can make a donation through my website. You can also subscribe to my newsletter to stay informed about the project’s progress. Both the crowdfunding page and a short teaser can be found on my website www.opzoeknaarvrede.nl. If you have any questions, feel free to email me on mail@haagslicht.nl.
A documentary by Robbert Clignett
1917 was a turning point, marking the rise of propaganda and geopolitics in world affairs. In that same year, Rudolf Steiner proposed an alternative: The Threefold Social Order. This film explores the contrast between power and humanity, manipulation and awareness.
To make this documentary possible, I have launched a crowdfunding campaign. If you would like to support me, you can make a donation through my website. You can also subscribe to my newsletter to stay informed about the project’s progress. Both the crowdfunding page and a short teaser can be found on my website www.opzoeknaarvrede.nl. If you have any questions, feel free to email me on mail@haagslicht.nl.
❤5👍2
Forwarded from 📡 VIDA y CONSCIENCIA
László Szarka sobre las causas naturales del cambio climático. "El emperador está desnudo"
László Szarka es geofísico y miembro de la Academia Húngara de Ciencias. En este video, resume varias presentaciones que se dieron en un simposio reciente de la Academia. Muestra evidencia convincente de que el cambio en la irradiación solar ha sido el principal impulsor del reciente "calentamiento global". Los cambios en el hielo terrestre antártico se deben a efectos geotérmicos locales.
László también argumenta que la ciencia climática convencional se ha desviado del camino al atender las demandas y presiones políticas, y que es hora de restaurar el método científico a su lugar apropiado.
_____________________
Es muy interesante escuchar la historia del consenso científico sobre las causas del cambio climático establecido hace 40 años y que sin más consideraciones se estableció que los gases de efecto invernadero eran los causantes del denominado cambio y el origen antropogénico la principal causa sin considerar ninguna variable exterior al planeta que pudiera tener influencia alguna.
Desde 1985 no se ha variado la hipótesis de partida a pesar del conocimiento científico acumulado desde entonces.
El Dr. Szarka podría considerarse un científico de la oficialidad y que ha organizado una conferencia en Hungría para discutir todas las posibles variables donde participó Javier Vinós con sus estudios termodinámicos.
László Szarka es geofísico y miembro de la Academia Húngara de Ciencias. En este video, resume varias presentaciones que se dieron en un simposio reciente de la Academia. Muestra evidencia convincente de que el cambio en la irradiación solar ha sido el principal impulsor del reciente "calentamiento global". Los cambios en el hielo terrestre antártico se deben a efectos geotérmicos locales.
László también argumenta que la ciencia climática convencional se ha desviado del camino al atender las demandas y presiones políticas, y que es hora de restaurar el método científico a su lugar apropiado.
_____________________
Es muy interesante escuchar la historia del consenso científico sobre las causas del cambio climático establecido hace 40 años y que sin más consideraciones se estableció que los gases de efecto invernadero eran los causantes del denominado cambio y el origen antropogénico la principal causa sin considerar ninguna variable exterior al planeta que pudiera tener influencia alguna.
Desde 1985 no se ha variado la hipótesis de partida a pesar del conocimiento científico acumulado desde entonces.
El Dr. Szarka podría considerarse un científico de la oficialidad y que ha organizado una conferencia en Hungría para discutir todas las posibles variables donde participó Javier Vinós con sus estudios termodinámicos.
Odysee
László Szarka sobre las causas naturales del cambio climático. "El emperador está desnudo"
László Szarka es geofísico y miembro de la Academia Húngara de Ciencias. En este video, resume varias presentaciones que se dieron en un simposio reciente de la Academia. Muestra evidencia convincente...
👍4❤3
Mark Skidmore's presentation on weather modification with Spanish subtitles
Forwarded from 📡 VIDA y CONSCIENCIA
Mark Skidmore. Modificación del clima y geoingeniería
En este video, Mark Skidmore, profesor de economía en la Universidad Estatal de Michigan, habla sobre su investigación de los programas de modificación del clima actuales y pasados. Muchos países, así como varios estados en los EE. UU., tienen programas de siembra de nubes en curso, la mayoría de los cuales tienen como objetivo aumentar la lluvia o evitar el granizo. Mark discute tanto las consecuencias intencionales como las no intencionales de dichos programas.
Original
En este video, Mark Skidmore, profesor de economía en la Universidad Estatal de Michigan, habla sobre su investigación de los programas de modificación del clima actuales y pasados. Muchos países, así como varios estados en los EE. UU., tienen programas de siembra de nubes en curso, la mayoría de los cuales tienen como objetivo aumentar la lluvia o evitar el granizo. Mark discute tanto las consecuencias intencionales como las no intencionales de dichos programas.
Original
Odysee
Mark Skidmore. Modificación del clima y geoingeniería
👍4❤3
Forwarded from Edward Dowd
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
56% of likely voters still think the vaccine likely caused a significant number of unexplained deaths.
72% of Trump voters.
The only explanation I can think of is that he is surrounded by people that tell him how great it was.
EDWARD DOWD
72% of Trump voters.
The only explanation I can think of is that he is surrounded by people that tell him how great it was.
EDWARD DOWD
🤣8👍6❤2🤡1
Forwarded from Zeee Media 🎙
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is seething at the World Economic Forum over growing numbers of people refusing vaccines, calling it a “new religion.”
He says he’s deeply concerned and frustrated, blasting what he describes as religion-driven, anti-science rhetoric.
Bourla claims the only solution is to immediately replace RFK Jr.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
He says he’s deeply concerned and frustrated, blasting what he describes as religion-driven, anti-science rhetoric.
Bourla claims the only solution is to immediately replace RFK Jr.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
🤣19💩10👎7❤3🤡3🖕2
Forwarded from UK Medical Freedom Alliance
❗️UKMFA's Dr Liz Evans Exposes the Shocking Truth about The Current State of Medical Ethics ❗️❗️
• Unethical End of Life Policies REVEALED
• Big Pharma's Grip on Healthcare EXPOSED
• NHS Whistle-blowers SILENCED
• Patients DEHUMANISED with Digitisation of NHS
• Healthy People Medicated for PROFIT
🔔 CALLS TO ACTION 🔔
- WATCH now and share widely! https://rumble.com/v71zh48-the-controlled-demolition-of-medical-ethics-and-silencing-of-ethical-doctor.html
- DONATE today to help us fight for informed consent & medical choice - donorbox.org/ukmfa_podcast
• Unethical End of Life Policies REVEALED
• Big Pharma's Grip on Healthcare EXPOSED
• NHS Whistle-blowers SILENCED
• Patients DEHUMANISED with Digitisation of NHS
• Healthy People Medicated for PROFIT
🔔 CALLS TO ACTION 🔔
- WATCH now and share widely! https://rumble.com/v71zh48-the-controlled-demolition-of-medical-ethics-and-silencing-of-ethical-doctor.html
- DONATE today to help us fight for informed consent & medical choice - donorbox.org/ukmfa_podcast
Rumble
The Controlled Demolition of Medical Ethics & Silencing of Ethical Doctors
https://rumble.com/v6056un-ukmfa-disclaimer.html CEO of UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Dr Liz Evans, speaking at the UK Column “On Location” event in York, UK on 18th October 2025. The topic of Dr Evans
❤4
Forwarded from Geopolitics Prime
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💉 Vaccine profits are tanking without US market access - Moderna CEO
Stephane Bancel is fuming over the fact that Moderna’s mRNA-based vaccines, likened in some reports to “biological weapons of mass destruction," are no longer recommended for children due to overhauled US guidelines.
He confesses that this has caused the vaccine business to take a hit.
👍 @geopolitics_prime | Follow us on X
Stephane Bancel is fuming over the fact that Moderna’s mRNA-based vaccines, likened in some reports to “biological weapons of mass destruction," are no longer recommended for children due to overhauled US guidelines.
He confesses that this has caused the vaccine business to take a hit.
💬 “We have said very publicly to our investors that we do not foresee investing in new phase three study in the foreseeable futures in vaccines because you cannot make a return on investment if you don't have access to the US market.”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥9👍4🤮2👏1
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak Media
The Prosecution of Dutch MP Gideon van Meijeren: Where Media, Political, and Legal Corruption Converge
"While Van Meijeren has enjoyed a successful term challenging the current government as a Member of the House of Representatives, his battles against the establishment also extend to the courtroom, where he has been defending himself against charges of incitement since 2023. This high-stakes case not only has the potential to shape the Dutch political scene, it also seeks to indirectly grant new power to the courts to document, assess, and place value judgments on political opinions deemed unacceptable or potentially threatening. The case against Gideon van Meijeren is more than just a legal matter—it is the culmination of when a dishonest media meets corrupt politicians and malleable prosecutors."
Check out my full report: https://solari.com/the-prosecution-of-dutch-mp-gideon-van-meijeren-where-media-political-and-legal-corruption-converge/
"While Van Meijeren has enjoyed a successful term challenging the current government as a Member of the House of Representatives, his battles against the establishment also extend to the courtroom, where he has been defending himself against charges of incitement since 2023. This high-stakes case not only has the potential to shape the Dutch political scene, it also seeks to indirectly grant new power to the courts to document, assess, and place value judgments on political opinions deemed unacceptable or potentially threatening. The case against Gideon van Meijeren is more than just a legal matter—it is the culmination of when a dishonest media meets corrupt politicians and malleable prosecutors."
Check out my full report: https://solari.com/the-prosecution-of-dutch-mp-gideon-van-meijeren-where-media-political-and-legal-corruption-converge/
Solari Report
The Prosecution of Dutch MP Gideon van Meijeren: Where Media, Political, and Legal Corruption Converge | Solari Report
🤬4👍1
Forwarded from Andrija Klarić
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This Sunday, Feb 8 at 2:00 PM on Z1 TV — a new episode of SLOBODNI with Mary Holland, attorney and author of “The HPV Vaccine on Trial: Seeking Justice for a Generation Betrayed.”
In this interview, she challenges the most repeated claims about the HPV vaccine and raises questions that rarely make it into mainstream coverage, including:
the claim that it has never been proven to protect proven against cancer in clinical trials
the argument that trials focused on surrogate endpoints, not cancer outcomes
allegations of serious adverse events, including deaths
allegations that trial participants were misled about safety and about what the “placebo” actually was
the broader issue of accountability when public health policy moves toward mandates
🎥 Teaser below.
Watch the full episode and decide for yourself.
#HPV #Gardasil #Vaccines #MaryHolland #SLOBODNI #Z1TV #PublicHealth #InformedConsent
In this interview, she challenges the most repeated claims about the HPV vaccine and raises questions that rarely make it into mainstream coverage, including:
the claim that it has never been proven to protect proven against cancer in clinical trials
the argument that trials focused on surrogate endpoints, not cancer outcomes
allegations of serious adverse events, including deaths
allegations that trial participants were misled about safety and about what the “placebo” actually was
the broader issue of accountability when public health policy moves toward mandates
🎥 Teaser below.
Watch the full episode and decide for yourself.
#HPV #Gardasil #Vaccines #MaryHolland #SLOBODNI #Z1TV #PublicHealth #InformedConsent
👍4❤2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mary Holland on US Health Policy and Health Freedom Movement
Mary Holland is the CEO and President of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In this video, she offers her perspective on US health policies and CHD's legal actions against policies and measures violating fundamental human rights.
She first discusses the health policy changes on vaccines and nutrition after Robert Kennedy took office as the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Mary then gives an overview of various lawsuits which CHD is involved to defend religious and medical rights, but not limited to vaccine exemptions. Mary Holland further elaborates on the ambiguity on liability around vaccine policy, which arises from competing regulations and recommendations issued by state and federal authorities.
At the end of her talk, she summarizes CHD’s principled stand on the vaccine issue: “You decide what goes in your body and your minor children; prior, free and informed consent.”
Mary Holland is the CEO and President of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In this video, she offers her perspective on US health policies and CHD's legal actions against policies and measures violating fundamental human rights.
She first discusses the health policy changes on vaccines and nutrition after Robert Kennedy took office as the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Mary then gives an overview of various lawsuits which CHD is involved to defend religious and medical rights, but not limited to vaccine exemptions. Mary Holland further elaborates on the ambiguity on liability around vaccine policy, which arises from competing regulations and recommendations issued by state and federal authorities.
At the end of her talk, she summarizes CHD’s principled stand on the vaccine issue: “You decide what goes in your body and your minor children; prior, free and informed consent.”
❤7👍1🤔1
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NOW – CEO of the Gates Foundation, Mark Suzman, says the grants they give out ($9B) is more than the UN budget. "Our mission is a belief that every person deserves the chance to have a healthy and productive life."
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
💩19🖕7🤡5