Number of possible Equivalence Relations on a finite set
An equivalence relation is Reflexive, Symmetric and Transitive. Before counting the number of possible equivalence relations on a set |A|=n, let us see an example of a equivalence relation and identify Equivalence Classes in it.
Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4} be a set and R = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (4, 3), (4, 4)} be an equivalence relation on A. we see here that the total relation T = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4)} over the set C1 = {1, 2} which is the subset of A is present in R, i.e subset of R. And also there is no such total relation Tโ>=T over set C1โ>=C1 which is present in R i.e subset of R. Hence we found an equivalence class E1 = {1, 2} over relation R.
Similarly there is another equivalence class E2 = {3, 4} over R. And no more such equivalence classes are present in R. Notice here that E1 and E2 are disjoint sets and this is always true because {E1, E2} i.e {{1, 2}, {3, 4}} is one of the possible partition of the set A.
Hence above equivalence relation R corresponds to the partition {{1, 2}, {3, 4}} of the set A. Similarly each and every equivalence relation on A corresponds to one of the partition of A. In fact this mapping is Bijective.
Now we come to our question of finding number of possible equivalence relations on a finite set which is equal to the number of partitions of A. The Bell Numbers count the same. Starting with B0 = B1 = 1, the first few Bell numbers are:
1, 1, 2, 5, 15, 52, 203, 877, 4140, 21147, 115975, 678570, 4213597, 27644437, 190899322, 1382958545, 10480142147, 82864869804, 682076806159, 5832742205057โฆ etc.
The Bell numbers appear on both the left and right sides of the triangle.
Example โ There are five integer partitions of 4: 4, 3+1, 2+2, 2+1+1, 1+1+1+1. So we just need to calculate the number of ways of placing the four elements of our set into these sized bins.
4
There is just one way to put four elements into a bin of size 4. This represents the situation where there is just one equivalence class (containing everything), so that the equivalence relation is the total relationship: everything is related to everything.
3+1
There are four ways to assign the four elements into one bin of size 3 and one of size 1. The corresponding equivalence relationships are those where one element is related only to itself, and the others are all related to each other. There are clearly 4 ways to choose that distinguished element.
2+2
There are (42)/2=6/2=3(42)/2=6/2=3 ways. The equivalence relations we are looking at here are those where two of the elements are related to each other, and the other two are related to themselves. So, start by picking an element, say 1. Then there are three things that 1 could be related to. Once that element has been chosen, the equivalence relation is completely determined.
2+1+1
There are (42)=6(42)=6 ways.
1+1+1+1
Just one way. This is the identity equivalence relationship.
Thus, there are, in total 1+4+3+6+1=15 partitions on {1, 2, 3, 4}{1, 2, 3, 4}, and thus 15 equivalence relations.
Note โ This sort of counting argument can be quite tricky, or at least inelegant, especially for large sets. There is no direct formula to do so.
An equivalence relation is Reflexive, Symmetric and Transitive. Before counting the number of possible equivalence relations on a set |A|=n, let us see an example of a equivalence relation and identify Equivalence Classes in it.
Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4} be a set and R = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (4, 3), (4, 4)} be an equivalence relation on A. we see here that the total relation T = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4)} over the set C1 = {1, 2} which is the subset of A is present in R, i.e subset of R. And also there is no such total relation Tโ>=T over set C1โ>=C1 which is present in R i.e subset of R. Hence we found an equivalence class E1 = {1, 2} over relation R.
Similarly there is another equivalence class E2 = {3, 4} over R. And no more such equivalence classes are present in R. Notice here that E1 and E2 are disjoint sets and this is always true because {E1, E2} i.e {{1, 2}, {3, 4}} is one of the possible partition of the set A.
Hence above equivalence relation R corresponds to the partition {{1, 2}, {3, 4}} of the set A. Similarly each and every equivalence relation on A corresponds to one of the partition of A. In fact this mapping is Bijective.
Now we come to our question of finding number of possible equivalence relations on a finite set which is equal to the number of partitions of A. The Bell Numbers count the same. Starting with B0 = B1 = 1, the first few Bell numbers are:
1, 1, 2, 5, 15, 52, 203, 877, 4140, 21147, 115975, 678570, 4213597, 27644437, 190899322, 1382958545, 10480142147, 82864869804, 682076806159, 5832742205057โฆ etc.
The Bell numbers appear on both the left and right sides of the triangle.
Example โ There are five integer partitions of 4: 4, 3+1, 2+2, 2+1+1, 1+1+1+1. So we just need to calculate the number of ways of placing the four elements of our set into these sized bins.
4
There is just one way to put four elements into a bin of size 4. This represents the situation where there is just one equivalence class (containing everything), so that the equivalence relation is the total relationship: everything is related to everything.
3+1
There are four ways to assign the four elements into one bin of size 3 and one of size 1. The corresponding equivalence relationships are those where one element is related only to itself, and the others are all related to each other. There are clearly 4 ways to choose that distinguished element.
2+2
There are (42)/2=6/2=3(42)/2=6/2=3 ways. The equivalence relations we are looking at here are those where two of the elements are related to each other, and the other two are related to themselves. So, start by picking an element, say 1. Then there are three things that 1 could be related to. Once that element has been chosen, the equivalence relation is completely determined.
2+1+1
There are (42)=6(42)=6 ways.
1+1+1+1
Just one way. This is the identity equivalence relationship.
Thus, there are, in total 1+4+3+6+1=15 partitions on {1, 2, 3, 4}{1, 2, 3, 4}, and thus 15 equivalence relations.
Note โ This sort of counting argument can be quite tricky, or at least inelegant, especially for large sets. There is no direct formula to do so.
1074) Which of the following groups do not have the metals of the same crystal structure?
Anonymous Quiz
27%
Sodium, Vanadium, Niobium
26%
Magnesium, Zinc, Cadmium
29%
Platinum, Calcium, Tungsten
18%
Manganese, Silver, Copper
1075) The most dense cubic crystal system is.......
Anonymous Quiz
17%
Simple Cubic
40%
Body Centred Cubic
34%
Face Centred Cubic
9%
End Centred Cubic
1076) By 'sceleroscope test' which of the following properties of a material is measured?
Anonymous Quiz
34%
Tensile Strength
23%
Hardness
27%
Fatigue strength
16%
Creep resistance
1077) The pair of parameters temperature T, Pressure P, Volume V and Work W characterises the thermodynamic state of matter are
A. T,P
B. T,V C. T,W D. P,W
A. T,P
B. T,V C. T,W D. P,W
Anonymous Quiz
44%
A & B
28%
A&C
17%
B& C
11%
A&D
1066) Ore of Aluminium is _______________
#SAIL_RSP_22
#SAIL_RSP_22
Anonymous Quiz
17%
Galena
29%
Hematite
9%
Chalcopyrite
45%
Bauxite
1067) Ore of Copper is _____________
#SAIL_RSP_22
#SAIL_RSP_22
Anonymous Quiz
34%
Chalcopyrite
23%
Galena
36%
Bauxite
7%
Rutile
1068) Effective no. of atoms (n) in HCP unit cell --------
#SAIL_RSP_22
#SAIL_RSP_22
Anonymous Quiz
32%
6
31%
4
23%
8
14%
12
Forwarded from UPSC IAS NOTES EXAMMAP
NCERT ALL SUBJECTS NOTES (1).pdf
933.8 KB
Forwarded from GATE EXAM PDF