🚨 Anthropic asks Australia to let AI train on local content unless owners opt out
In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, Anthropic proposes that rights holders block crawlers via robots.txt. The ABC says that treatment will "accelerate the cannibalisation" of Australian news.
SBS says robots.txt signals are routinely ignored or bypassed. Canberra already ruled out a text-and-data-mining exception, so this is the workaround.
In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, Anthropic proposes that rights holders block crawlers via robots.txt. The ABC says that treatment will "accelerate the cannibalisation" of Australian news.
SBS says robots.txt signals are routinely ignored or bypassed. Canberra already ruled out a text-and-data-mining exception, so this is the workaround.
the Guardian
Anthropic pushes for opt-out model for Australian content as ABC warns of ‘cannibalisation’ of news
Maker of Claude claims AI could transform economy but ABC and SBS say the technology should be subject to media regulations
🤖 DeepSeek open-sources an always-on coding agent that lives in one GitHub repo
DeepSeek released dsh-superagent, a research prototype that listens to GitHub and Feishu, opens a work item per request, and answers with pull requests or messages when its rules allow. It's built to need minimal human attention, and the repo ships setup instructions plus docs on its architecture.
DeepSeek released dsh-superagent, a research prototype that listens to GitHub and Feishu, opens a work item per request, and answers with pull requests or messages when its rules allow. It's built to need minimal human attention, and the repo ships setup instructions plus docs on its architecture.
GitHub
GitHub - deepseek-ai/dsh-superagent-prototype: Towards a More Autonomous Agent System
Towards a More Autonomous Agent System. Contribute to deepseek-ai/dsh-superagent-prototype development by creating an account on GitHub.
🤖 Wikimedia tells a court that both sides of an AI copyright fight are wrong
In a roughly 5,800-word amicus brief, the foundation calls both parties' positions "overbroad" and pushes a middle path:
• It already has paid training deals with Amazon, Meta, Mistral, Perplexity and Microsoft
• A blanket win for AI firms could gut Wikipedia's license-based model
• Its general counsel warns that sloppy fair use rulings threaten free knowledge
In a roughly 5,800-word amicus brief, the foundation calls both parties' positions "overbroad" and pushes a middle path:
• It already has paid training deals with Amazon, Meta, Mistral, Perplexity and Microsoft
• A blanket win for AI firms could gut Wikipedia's license-based model
• Its general counsel warns that sloppy fair use rulings threaten free knowledge
Gizmodo
Wikimedia Foundation Tries to Save Itself From Oblivion by Brokering AI Copyright Deal
Call it the Great Copyright Compromise.
🚨 OpenAI merges ChatGPT and Codex into one shared usage allowance
Per OpenAI's help page, a long Codex session can now eat the quota you'd use for plain chat. Same goes the other way, including deep research and image generation.
Separate limits were a big reason devs picked ChatGPT over Claude Code. Claude already works this way.
Per OpenAI's help page, a long Codex session can now eat the quota you'd use for plain chat. Same goes the other way, including deep research and image generation.
Separate limits were a big reason devs picked ChatGPT over Claude Code. Claude already works this way.
OpenAI Help Center
Understanding ChatGPT and Codex usage limits | OpenAI Help Center