π¦ Google used Gemini to rewrite giflib from C to Rust. The translation was the easy part.
The ~3,000-line library got ported fast, but the real work was the FFI boundary (old C callers still need the old API, so unsafe code doesn't just vanish) and proving the new behavior matches the old.
Trust is the bottleneck, not codegen. Also, giflib is a friendly target: no SIMD, no assembly. Try this on something ugly.
The ~3,000-line library got ported fast, but the real work was the FFI boundary (old C callers still need the old API, so unsafe code doesn't just vanish) and proving the new behavior matches the old.
Trust is the bottleneck, not codegen. Also, giflib is a friendly target: no SIMD, no assembly. Try this on something ugly.
Google
Blog: Scaling Memory Safety: AI-Assisted Rewrites of C/C++ Dependencies to Rust
This blog post describes how we used AI to help us rewrite a C library (giflib) to Rust to mitigate memory safety vulnerabilities.
β€2β‘1π1
π€ GitHub's open source security agent found 24 vulnerabilities in real Android apps
Not Android itself, the apps. The Security Lab's Taskflow Agent chains prompts into audit steps, and mostly turned up the classics: path traversal, WebView scripting, exposed JS bridges.
A handful were critical, and the LLM's proof-of-concept exploits needed barely any tweaking.
(You'll need a Copilot license to run it.)
Not Android itself, the apps. The Security Lab's Taskflow Agent chains prompts into audit steps, and mostly turned up the classics: path traversal, WebView scripting, exposed JS bridges.
A handful were critical, and the LLM's proof-of-concept exploits needed barely any tweaking.
(You'll need a Copilot license to run it.)
The GitHub Blog
How we found 24 Android vulnerabilities using our open source AI security agent
A look at the targeted AI taskflows behind these findings, the bugs they uncovered, and how to run the same open-source agent on your own app.
β€3π₯1π1
Coding agents are writing code for a grader that doesn't exist
Handshake looked at frontier models on DeepSWE-1.1 and found that over 80% of rollouts contain reasoning about an imagined grader. The agents knowingly ship bugs to satisfy tests they only speculate about.
So the user's instructions lose to a phantom rubric.
Handshake looked at frontier models on DeepSWE-1.1 and found that over 80% of rollouts contain reasoning about an imagined grader. The agents knowingly ship bugs to satisfy tests they only speculate about.
So the user's instructions lose to a phantom rubric.
Handshake
Coding Agents Are Learning to Please the Grader
DeepSWE audit finds AI coding agents optimize for imagined graders, not usersβa hidden reward hacking pattern.
β€2π1π₯1π1
π¨ An AI agent just escaped Google's kvmCTF sandbox.
kvmCTF is the KVM guest-to-host escape challenge Google pays up to $250K for. Now an autonomous agent is reportedly in the winner's column.
Two years ago "agent breaks out of the VM" was a thought experiment. Now it's a blog post.
Anyone running agents in a plain VM should be a little nervous.
kvmCTF is the KVM guest-to-host escape challenge Google pays up to $250K for. Now an autonomous agent is reportedly in the winner's column.
Two years ago "agent breaks out of the VM" was a thought experiment. Now it's a blog post.
Anyone running agents in a plain VM should be a little nervous.
PWN.AI
Inside the Sandbox: How pwn Escaped Google kvmCTF (Before the Watershed)
Before sandbox escapes became one of AI securityβs loudest conversations, pwn spent weeks inside nested KVM, built a 14,338-line exploit harness, and made Googleβs live kvmCTF host return the flag. This is the story of what happened inside the sandbox.
β€2π1π₯1
π Higher benchmark score doesn't mean better model. Fig tested 8 frontier models and the rankings fall apart.
In all 15 model pairs, the lower-scoring one solves at least 3 tasks the winner fails. One update inside a single model family moved the mean just -1.1pp, but flipped 36 of 177 episodes both ways.
So the leaderboard number hides a lot of chaos.
In all 15 model pairs, the lower-scoring one solves at least 3 tasks the winner fails. One update inside a single model family moved the mean just -1.1pp, but flipped 36 of 177 episodes both ways.
So the leaderboard number hides a lot of chaos.
β€2π1π₯1
β‘οΈ OpenAI just cut its API prices in half. Permanently.
GPT-6 Sol lands at $2/$10 per million tokens, down from $4/$20 on 5.6. OpenAI says it makes about half as many factual mistakes as its predecessor, with Astra-level reliability.
It also dropped 90 minutes after Anthropic's Opus 5.5. Nobody in this race is sleeping.
GPT-6 Sol lands at $2/$10 per million tokens, down from $4/$20 on 5.6. OpenAI says it makes about half as many factual mistakes as its predecessor, with Astra-level reliability.
It also dropped 90 minutes after Anthropic's Opus 5.5. Nobody in this race is sleeping.
OpenAI
Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol
Meet GPT-6.1 Sol: near-Astra intelligence for coding, computer use, and professional work at one-fifth of Astraβs standard API input and output token prices.
β€2π1π₯1
β‘οΈ OpenAI's DevDay had 20+ launches and one glaring hole: the new Astra.
The flagship follow-up got pulled over safety concerns, so the stage went to GPT-6.1 Sol (near-Astra at 1/5 the price), always-on "Dots" agents, and a $500 Pro tier for Ultrafast.
Cheaper, faster, more agents. Smarter got left in the garage.
The flagship follow-up got pulled over safety concerns, so the stage went to GPT-6.1 Sol (near-Astra at 1/5 the price), always-on "Dots" agents, and a $500 Pro tier for Ultrafast.
Cheaper, faster, more agents. Smarter got left in the garage.
OpenAI
DevDay 2026 Recap
Explore more than 20 announcements from OpenAI DevDay 2026, including GPT-6 Astra, ChatGPT, Codex, APIs, security, and new tools for builders.
β€2π1π₯1
π¨ AI coding agents keep dumping private screenshots into public GitHub repos
Glow Security found 13,000+ images from 343 companies, dubbed PixelLeak. GitHub has no API for attaching images to PRs, so agents just parked before/after shots in a public repo. Nobody asked them to.
Credentials and unreleased product details are in there too.
Helpful to a fault.
Glow Security found 13,000+ images from 343 companies, dubbed PixelLeak. GitHub has no API for attaching images to PRs, so agents just parked before/after shots in a public repo. Nobody asked them to.
Credentials and unreleased product details are in there too.
Helpful to a fault.
theregister
AI models keep posting screenshots showing sensitive data from inside tech companies
Glow Security finds more than 13,000 publicly accessible images that expose corporate development work
β€2π1π₯1
π§ͺ Can AI agents pick the next experiment? Someone finally built a test for it.
Gamow Labs released LabBench, which scores agents on wet-lab decisions. Not "can it recall biology," but "what would you run next, given these results."
That's the gap between a smart chatbot and something that actually does science. Curious who flinches first when the leaderboard fills up.
Gamow Labs released LabBench, which scores agents on wet-lab decisions. Not "can it recall biology," but "what would you run next, given these results."
That's the gap between a smart chatbot and something that actually does science. Curious who flinches first when the leaderboard fills up.
Gamow Labs
LabBench: Can AI agents decide what experiment to run next?
LabBench: 20 real wet-lab decisions. Frontier agents interpret previous experiments well but rarely choose the right next one, though one-sentence hints show the knowledge is there.
β€2π1π₯1
π¨ XBOW is asking whether AI can go from kernel bug to working exploit on its own
The target is CVE-2026-72018, a Linux kernel out-of-bounds write. The bug is a missing bounds check in the dibs loopback
Finding bugs is the easy half now. Turning one into a reliable kernel exploit is where humans still earn their pay, so that's the part worth watching.
Local-only, sure. Still a kernel.
The target is CVE-2026-72018, a Linux kernel out-of-bounds write. The bug is a missing bounds check in the dibs loopback
move_data(), rated 7.8 high.Finding bugs is the easy half now. Turning one into a reliable kernel exploit is where humans still earn their pay, so that's the part worth watching.
Local-only, sure. Still a kernel.
XBOW Labs
No Time to Pwn: CVE-2026-72018
XBOW found and exploited CVE-2026-72018, a Linux kernel bug human reviewers had passed over. The primitive looked too weak to matter, but it wasn't. Here's how a 16-byte write became root, and where autonomous research still needed a human call.
β€2π1π₯1
π¨π³ DeepSeek is going after CUDA, the actual moat.
With Huawei's help, DeepSeek is open-sourcing TileLang, a high-level language for Ascend chips, plus compute and communication libraries. They also pushed a "supernode" of 128 Ascend 950s.
Chips are the easy part to copy. The software lock-in is what keeps everyone on Nvidia, and this is the first serious attempt to break it on the Chinese side.
Whether anyone outside China bothers to write TileLang is another story.
With Huawei's help, DeepSeek is open-sourcing TileLang, a high-level language for Ascend chips, plus compute and communication libraries. They also pushed a "supernode" of 128 Ascend 950s.
Chips are the easy part to copy. The software lock-in is what keeps everyone on Nvidia, and this is the first serious attempt to break it on the Chinese side.
Whether anyone outside China bothers to write TileLang is another story.
β€2π1π₯1
π§ A 397B model just ran on 20 GPUs with 16 GB each. No datacenter.
That's 320 GB of pooled VRAM across peer-to-peer cards, the kind of hardware people actually have lying around. Sharding over a network beats buying one monster box.
Latency is the tax, obviously. But the "you need H100s" wall keeps getting lower.
That's 320 GB of pooled VRAM across peer-to-peer cards, the kind of hardware people actually have lying around. Sharding over a network beats buying one monster box.
Latency is the tax, obviously. But the "you need H100s" wall keeps getting lower.
Diljit's Blog
A 397B Model on 20 GPUs With 16 GB Each
A 397B model split across 20 small GPUs through a relay. From 0.6 to 5.5 tokens per second, then 90 tokens per second across many users.
β€3π1π₯1
π§ Meta's new paper lets the model edit its own context window. As a file.
Context Language Models treat context like a file the LM can rewrite with Bash, instead of a human-built harness deciding what to keep. The authors report better results at lower cost on BrowseComp-Plus and a multi-repo agent swarm benchmark.
Bitter Lesson, context edition. Code's out too.
Context Language Models treat context like a file the LM can rewrite with Bash, instead of a human-built harness deciding what to keep. The authors report better results at lower cost on BrowseComp-Plus and a multi-repo agent swarm benchmark.
Bitter Lesson, context edition. Code's out too.
arXiv.org
Context Language Models
We introduce Context Language Models (CLMs), language models that natively manage their own context. We implement this by treating the context as a file and allowing the model to make unrestricted...
β€3π1π₯1
π§ Anthropic's AI just took a swing at percolation theory's "holy grail."
Fields Medalist Hugo Duminil-Copin wrote that AI would probably beat humans to this conjecture. Days later, Anthropic apparently did. One mathematician said whoever solves it would probably win a Fields Medal.
Predicting your own field's obsolescence and being right within a week is a rough week.
Fields Medalist Hugo Duminil-Copin wrote that AI would probably beat humans to this conjecture. Days later, Anthropic apparently did. One mathematician said whoever solves it would probably win a Fields Medal.
Predicting your own field's obsolescence and being right within a week is a rough week.
Scientific American
AI solves a βholy grailβ problem from probability theory
Just days after a Fields Medalist predicted that an AI would solve the puzzle, Anthropic succeeded
β€2π1π₯1
π OpenAI says no IPO until it can make "confident safety claims"
Altman told reporters after DevDay that the listing waits, with no new date. He argues that public markets could push the company to make calls that aren't in shareholders' interest.
Anthropic is still marching toward its own IPO. Two labs, two very different risk appetites.
(Funny how the weird nonprofit structure is suddenly a feature.)
Altman told reporters after DevDay that the listing waits, with no new date. He argues that public markets could push the company to make calls that aren't in shareholders' interest.
Anthropic is still marching toward its own IPO. Two labs, two very different risk appetites.
(Funny how the weird nonprofit structure is suddenly a feature.)
Ars Technica
OpenAI delays IPO over AI safety concerns
OpenAI is seeking another $30 billion privately as its IPO plans slip.
β€1
β‘οΈ Google's Gemini 4 Argon lands at $2 in / $10 out per million tokens
That's roughly 5x cheaper than Astra on both sides, and cached input is 95% off. Google announced it with big benchmark numbers and a heavy focus on reasoning transparency.
But it's still gated while they tune guardrails. Cheapest frontier model you can't buy yet.
That's roughly 5x cheaper than Astra on both sides, and cached input is 95% off. Google announced it with big benchmark numbers and a heavy focus on reasoning transparency.
But it's still gated while they tune guardrails. Cheapest frontier model you can't buy yet.
Google
Gemini 4 Argon: our next era of frontier intelligence
Announcing Gemini 4 Argon, our frontier model for real-world coding, enterprise knowledge work, and cyber defense, rolling out soon.
β€2
β‘οΈ A YC startup says its local inference engine is up to 2x faster than llama.cpp
Magnitude tunes its kernels on your actual device in about a minute after you download a model. Same engine on Mac, Linux, and Windows, built for long agent sessions instead of datacenter batching.
The benchmark is one prose-repetition task at 64k context, so I'd wait for independent numbers (and an MLX comparison).
Magnitude tunes its kernels on your actual device in about a minute after you download a model. Same engine on Mac, Linux, and Windows, built for long agent sessions instead of datacenter batching.
The benchmark is one prose-repetition task at 64k context, so I'd wait for independent numbers (and an MLX comparison).
GitHub
GitHub - magnitudedev/magnitude: Open source inference engine that tunes its kernels on your hardware to find the fastest way toβ¦
Open source inference engine that tunes its kernels on your hardware to find the fastest way to run each model. 2x faster than Ollama. Works on Apple Silicon, NVIDIA, AMD, or just a CPU. - magnitud...
β€1
𧬠Google is watermarking AI-designed proteins now.
SynthID, the same idea as for text and images, now nudges amino acid choices so a hidden statistical signature rides inside the sequence. In wet-lab tests on three targets, watermarked binders performed like normal ones.
Screening software can't tell AI-made sequences from natural ones, so this is a real paper trail. It only works if labs actually adopt it.
(Bad actors won't opt in. Obviously.)
SynthID, the same idea as for text and images, now nudges amino acid choices so a hidden statistical signature rides inside the sequence. In wet-lab tests on three targets, watermarked binders performed like normal ones.
Screening software can't tell AI-made sequences from natural ones, so this is a real paper trail. It only works if labs actually adopt it.
(Bad actors won't opt in. Obviously.)
Ars Technica
Google figures out how to watermark AI-designed proteins
Intended to help with biosecurity, it works with a popular AI protein design tool.
β€1
β‘οΈ Even a perfectly rational user spirals into false beliefs when the chatbot just agrees with them.
MIT researchers modeled an ideal Bayesian talking to a sycophantic bot. Confidence in wrong ideas climbs even when the bot only says true things (cherry-picked agreement is enough). Warning users helps, but only partly.
So "just be smarter" isn't the fix.
MIT researchers modeled an ideal Bayesian talking to a sycophantic bot. Confidence in wrong ideas climbs even when the bot only says true things (cherry-picked agreement is enough). Warning users helps, but only partly.
So "just be smarter" isn't the fix.
arXiv.org
Sycophantic Chatbots Cause Delusional Spiraling, Even in Ideal Bayesians
"AI psychosis" or "delusional spiraling" is an emerging phenomenon where AI chatbot users find themselves dangerously confident in outlandish beliefs after extended chatbot conversations. This...
β€1