🔴 #IMPORTANT | An Israeli Think Tank’s Report: “Weak and Passive Officials Should Surround Iran’s Leader”
Dr. Meysam Latifi:
🔻 The story dates back to 2012 (1391 in the Iranian calendar).
One of the Israeli think tanks had prepared a report, which one of our students translated.
The report raised a very important point. Pay close attention to this—it is extremely significant.
The Leader had said:
You’ve heard this before, and you probably remember it.
That Israeli think tank had analyzed this statement in a report of approximately 60 pages, asking what the Leader meant by saying that the Revolution would be brought to an Ashura-like conclusion.
This itself is a lesson for us: sometimes we need to learn from our enemies.
A single statement by the Leader—our martyred Imam—had been turned by an Israeli think tank into a major subject of analysis.
They examined what it meant when he said:
🔻 Interestingly, the report then pointed to a book attributed to the Leader concerning the peace treaty of Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (PBUH), sometimes described in the context of “heroic flexibility.”
The report discussed how Imam Hasan (PBUH), despite his personal wishes—and despite having served as a commander under Imam Ali (PBUH) in the Battles of Jamal and Siffin—was ultimately forced to make peace when confronted with the army of Syria.
Why did this happen?
Around 20–30 pages of the report were devoted to this question.
🔻 Then came the conclusion:
If we want to prevent the Islamic Revolution from reaching an Ashura-like uprising—one that could produce a new Hussein in history, a figure embodying both oppression and courage, allowing generations of Shi'a to draw inspiration from him and stand against injustice for another 1,400 years—then, according to the report, we must use the same model that was employed against Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (PBUH).
And what was that model?
This is where the report becomes particularly interesting.
It argued that:
The report explained that matters eventually reached a point where some of Imam Hasan’s companions, relatives, and fellow commanders abandoned their former spirit.
They gave up the courage, strength, and authority they should have demonstrated in confronting the enemy.
🔻 This is a very important point.
Look at why they intervened in certain political developments.
At certain periods, they completely reversed the distinction between the executioner and the martyr, portraying one as the other.
Why did they mobilize all their resources—thousands of internet platforms and satellite television networks?
Because they were precisely targeting and attempting to disrupt the people’s system of calculation and judgment.
But what they had not anticipated in their calculations was that this nation would rise and take matters to the point where it would hold its officials accountable.
It would create a situation in which officials would understand that:
Allahu Akbar! ✊
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3288
@ASRZOHUR110
@rahyafte_en
Dr. Meysam Latifi:
🔻 The story dates back to 2012 (1391 in the Iranian calendar).
One of the Israeli think tanks had prepared a report, which one of our students translated.
The report raised a very important point. Pay close attention to this—it is extremely significant.
The Leader had said:
“If one day the Revolution is to face extraordinary circumstances, we will bring this Revolution to its Ashura-like conclusion.”
You’ve heard this before, and you probably remember it.
That Israeli think tank had analyzed this statement in a report of approximately 60 pages, asking what the Leader meant by saying that the Revolution would be brought to an Ashura-like conclusion.
This itself is a lesson for us: sometimes we need to learn from our enemies.
A single statement by the Leader—our martyred Imam—had been turned by an Israeli think tank into a major subject of analysis.
They examined what it meant when he said:
“We want to bring the Revolution to an Ashura-like conclusion, and we will complete this mission in the spirit of Imam Hussein.”
🔻 Interestingly, the report then pointed to a book attributed to the Leader concerning the peace treaty of Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (PBUH), sometimes described in the context of “heroic flexibility.”
The report discussed how Imam Hasan (PBUH), despite his personal wishes—and despite having served as a commander under Imam Ali (PBUH) in the Battles of Jamal and Siffin—was ultimately forced to make peace when confronted with the army of Syria.
Why did this happen?
Around 20–30 pages of the report were devoted to this question.
🔻 Then came the conclusion:
If we want to prevent the Islamic Revolution from reaching an Ashura-like uprising—one that could produce a new Hussein in history, a figure embodying both oppression and courage, allowing generations of Shi'a to draw inspiration from him and stand against injustice for another 1,400 years—then, according to the report, we must use the same model that was employed against Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (PBUH).
And what was that model?
This is where the report becomes particularly interesting.
It argued that:
“We must ensure that weak commanders and weak politicians surround Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba.”
The report explained that matters eventually reached a point where some of Imam Hasan’s companions, relatives, and fellow commanders abandoned their former spirit.
They gave up the courage, strength, and authority they should have demonstrated in confronting the enemy.
🔻 This is a very important point.
Look at why they intervened in certain political developments.
At certain periods, they completely reversed the distinction between the executioner and the martyr, portraying one as the other.
Why did they mobilize all their resources—thousands of internet platforms and satellite television networks?
Because they were precisely targeting and attempting to disrupt the people’s system of calculation and judgment.
But what they had not anticipated in their calculations was that this nation would rise and take matters to the point where it would hold its officials accountable.
It would create a situation in which officials would understand that:
If they make serious errors in their calculations, it is the people who will call them to account and set them back on the right path.
Allahu Akbar! ✊
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3288
@ASRZOHUR110
@rahyafte_en
Telegram
عصر ظهور | ASRZOHUR
🔴 #مهم / ماجرای گزارش اندیشکده اسرائیلی: باید چنین مسئولینی در ایران انتخاب شوند
✍️ مصطفی امیری
🔻جان کلام این بود: باید سیاستمداران منفعل بر ایران حاکم شوند!
▪️دکتر میثم لطیفی: در آن گزارش آمده رهبر شهید یک کتابی در مورد صلح امام حسن مجتبی(ع) دارند که…
✍️ مصطفی امیری
🔻جان کلام این بود: باید سیاستمداران منفعل بر ایران حاکم شوند!
▪️دکتر میثم لطیفی: در آن گزارش آمده رهبر شهید یک کتابی در مورد صلح امام حسن مجتبی(ع) دارند که…
🔴 An Example for the Channel’s “Previous Post” | What Happened in Venezuela
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
▪️ The fate of Venezuela following a covert coup—carried out, of course, with the cooperation of an infiltration network!
A meeting between the “interim president” and Israeli officers in Caracas.
Just like that.
🔻 Now, take a look at what we had predicted earlier:
🇺🇸 Trump & Plan A:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1926 (En)
🇺🇸 Trump & Plan B:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1927 (En)
🇺🇸 Trump & Plan C:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1928 (En)
🎙️ Audio File:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1929 (En)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3289
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
▪️ The fate of Venezuela following a covert coup—carried out, of course, with the cooperation of an infiltration network!
A meeting between the “interim president” and Israeli officers in Caracas.
Just like that.
🔻 Now, take a look at what we had predicted earlier:
🇺🇸 Trump & Plan A:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1926 (En)
🇺🇸 Trump & Plan B:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1927 (En)
🇺🇸 Trump & Plan C:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1928 (En)
🎙️ Audio File:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1929 (En)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3289
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Trump and the Control of the World’s Energy Resources
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
🔻 From the very beginning, this “wealth-hoarding, money-obsessed Croesus” was after controlling Iran. Just look at the record.
Trump had been thinking about Iran’s oil as far back as 1987. At that time, the issue was not Iran’s nuclear program, nor democracy or freedom.
Rather, the story was about oil from the very beginning—and about controlling the world’s energy resources.
That year, Iran and the United States became involved in serious confrontations in the Persian Gulf. In the middle of the Iran-Iraq War, Iran attacked some oil tankers.
The United States, claiming to protect its Arab allies, entered the conflict by sending warships to the region. Tensions escalated to the point where the United States attacked Iranian oil platforms.
🔻 It was in this context that Trump said at a meeting:
He later said on a program with Barbara Walters:
🔻 Trump has never let go of that old idea—or the desire to carry it out.
He wants to become the hero who fulfills that long-held promise of revenge.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3290
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
🔻 From the very beginning, this “wealth-hoarding, money-obsessed Croesus” was after controlling Iran. Just look at the record.
Trump had been thinking about Iran’s oil as far back as 1987. At that time, the issue was not Iran’s nuclear program, nor democracy or freedom.
Rather, the story was about oil from the very beginning—and about controlling the world’s energy resources.
That year, Iran and the United States became involved in serious confrontations in the Persian Gulf. In the middle of the Iran-Iraq War, Iran attacked some oil tankers.
The United States, claiming to protect its Arab allies, entered the conflict by sending warships to the region. Tensions escalated to the point where the United States attacked Iranian oil platforms.
🔻 It was in this context that Trump said at a meeting:
“Why don’t we go in and take some of their oil?”
He later said on a program with Barbara Walters:
“Go take one of their big oil installations; take it and keep it.”
🔻 Trump has never let go of that old idea—or the desire to carry it out.
He wants to become the hero who fulfills that long-held promise of revenge.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3290
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Telegram
عصر ظهور | ASRZOHUR
🔴 ترامپ و کنترل منابع انرژی دنیا
✍️ مصطفی امیری
🔻از همون اول این «قارونصفت ثروتاندوز پولپرست»، دنبال کنترل ایران بود. خودتان ببینید.
ترامپ از سال ۱۹۸۷ میلادی به فکر نفت ایران بود. اون موقع قضیه ایران نه بحث هستهای مطرح بود و نه دموکراسی و آزادی. بلکه…
✍️ مصطفی امیری
🔻از همون اول این «قارونصفت ثروتاندوز پولپرست»، دنبال کنترل ایران بود. خودتان ببینید.
ترامپ از سال ۱۹۸۷ میلادی به فکر نفت ایران بود. اون موقع قضیه ایران نه بحث هستهای مطرح بود و نه دموکراسی و آزادی. بلکه…
17:32 / September 5
🔴 Strategic Assessment: Tensions between Iran and the United States are increasingly moving toward an uncontrollable situation.
Trump has intensified military and economic pressure on Iran, hoping to gain the upper hand ahead of the U.S. congressional midterm elections.
Iran, meanwhile, has adopted a more aggressive posture and is now taking preemptive military action in response to U.S. planning.
The United States is preparing for a decisive strike toward the end of September, but it is unlikely that Iran and the Resistance will allow Washington to determine the time and place of the next confrontation.
The situation in Lebanon and Iraq has further strengthened the inclination in Iran and among the Resistance toward higher-risk options.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3248
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
19:28 / September 5
⚠️ Iran has begun its military response to the maritime blockade, successfully targeting two U.S. warships with ballistic missiles.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3249
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
19:37 / September 5
📍 The latest field reports indicate that the Ali al-Taher area has not fallen, and the regime's claims to the contrary are false.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3250
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Strategic Assessment: Tensions between Iran and the United States are increasingly moving toward an uncontrollable situation.
Trump has intensified military and economic pressure on Iran, hoping to gain the upper hand ahead of the U.S. congressional midterm elections.
Iran, meanwhile, has adopted a more aggressive posture and is now taking preemptive military action in response to U.S. planning.
The United States is preparing for a decisive strike toward the end of September, but it is unlikely that Iran and the Resistance will allow Washington to determine the time and place of the next confrontation.
The situation in Lebanon and Iraq has further strengthened the inclination in Iran and among the Resistance toward higher-risk options.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3248
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
19:28 / September 5
⚠️ Iran has begun its military response to the maritime blockade, successfully targeting two U.S. warships with ballistic missiles.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3249
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
19:37 / September 5
📍 The latest field reports indicate that the Ali al-Taher area has not fallen, and the regime's claims to the contrary are false.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3250
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Leilaz’s Account of the Late Larijani Before the Attack on Iran
✍️ Guest Commentary
🔻 “It was impossible for us to prevent the war. Impossible. Its timing might have been moved forward or pushed back, but because the Americans saw time as working against them and believed Iran was at its weakest possible point—militarily, economically, and in terms of domestic and international legitimacy—after the Dey protests, we were at the lowest point of domestic and international legitimacy.
They believed that time was working against the United States. America wants to focus on the issue of China starting in 2027. The speed at which China is gaining power is so great that if the United States did not confront Iran within the next year or two, it might never be able to do so.
Therefore, thinking that we could have prevented this war through diplomacy is a major mistake.
In October 2025, if I remember correctly, I received a call from Mr. Larijani’s office telling me, ‘Get up and come to the Supreme National Security Council. We have a meeting.’ We immediately went to see him that same day.
We were told that during the New York negotiations, with the mediation of Mr. Macron, we sat down with the American team and negotiated. Mr. Macron was also saying, ‘Come on, reach a compromise.’ Eventually, we reached an agreement.
When the American team took this agreement to Mr. Trump, he said:
They did not tell us the details. And I’m not like some of my friends who make things up. I repeat exactly what I hear.
We went back and forth again. We accepted the things Mr. Trump had requested. The Islamic Republic accepted them. This is not my statement, as Leilaz; these are the words of the late Larijani.
They took it to Mr. Trump again. He said:
By the third and fourth rounds, we became certain that the United States was not seeking a compromise. Mr. Macron is a witness to this and can verify Mr. Larijani’s account. We became convinced that the Americans were not seeking an agreement.
In October, he summoned us and said that based on this, we estimated that Iran would be attacked by the end of Dey—that is, by the end of 2025—and that a new military offensive would take place. War between Iran and the United States was inevitable.
We had been engaged in diplomacy for 30 years. For 30 years, we tried to prevent war, but we reached a point where it was no longer possible.
Why was it no longer possible? The U.S. government is, by their own description, a neoconservative government, and the Americans are preparing themselves for a confrontation with China.
Remember that in terms of foreign policy, there is very little difference between Democrats and Republicans. In fact, there is virtually no difference.
When Mr. Biden became president of the United States in 2020, from January 2021 onward he revoked almost all of the Trump administration’s decisions, except for three: the sanctions on Iran, the sanctions on China, and the sanctions on Cuba.
For the Americans to settle their affairs with China, they have no choice but to clear Iran as their rear flank. First, Iran is a major power; second, they need to cut off and control China’s oil lifeline, on which it depends—the Persian Gulf.
That is why, after Maduro’s fall in Venezuela, I consistently believed that the story of Iran would soon change.
🔻 In other words, the Americans cannot move toward confronting China while remaining uncertain about Iranian oil and the Strait of Hormuz.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3291
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ Guest Commentary
🔻 “It was impossible for us to prevent the war. Impossible. Its timing might have been moved forward or pushed back, but because the Americans saw time as working against them and believed Iran was at its weakest possible point—militarily, economically, and in terms of domestic and international legitimacy—after the Dey protests, we were at the lowest point of domestic and international legitimacy.
They believed that time was working against the United States. America wants to focus on the issue of China starting in 2027. The speed at which China is gaining power is so great that if the United States did not confront Iran within the next year or two, it might never be able to do so.
Therefore, thinking that we could have prevented this war through diplomacy is a major mistake.
In October 2025, if I remember correctly, I received a call from Mr. Larijani’s office telling me, ‘Get up and come to the Supreme National Security Council. We have a meeting.’ We immediately went to see him that same day.
We were told that during the New York negotiations, with the mediation of Mr. Macron, we sat down with the American team and negotiated. Mr. Macron was also saying, ‘Come on, reach a compromise.’ Eventually, we reached an agreement.
When the American team took this agreement to Mr. Trump, he said:
‘No, I don’t accept it. This isn’t enough. Add a little more to it.’
They did not tell us the details. And I’m not like some of my friends who make things up. I repeat exactly what I hear.
We went back and forth again. We accepted the things Mr. Trump had requested. The Islamic Republic accepted them. This is not my statement, as Leilaz; these are the words of the late Larijani.
They took it to Mr. Trump again. He said:
‘No, I don’t want it. This isn’t enough. Add more.’
By the third and fourth rounds, we became certain that the United States was not seeking a compromise. Mr. Macron is a witness to this and can verify Mr. Larijani’s account. We became convinced that the Americans were not seeking an agreement.
In October, he summoned us and said that based on this, we estimated that Iran would be attacked by the end of Dey—that is, by the end of 2025—and that a new military offensive would take place. War between Iran and the United States was inevitable.
We had been engaged in diplomacy for 30 years. For 30 years, we tried to prevent war, but we reached a point where it was no longer possible.
Why was it no longer possible? The U.S. government is, by their own description, a neoconservative government, and the Americans are preparing themselves for a confrontation with China.
Remember that in terms of foreign policy, there is very little difference between Democrats and Republicans. In fact, there is virtually no difference.
When Mr. Biden became president of the United States in 2020, from January 2021 onward he revoked almost all of the Trump administration’s decisions, except for three: the sanctions on Iran, the sanctions on China, and the sanctions on Cuba.
For the Americans to settle their affairs with China, they have no choice but to clear Iran as their rear flank. First, Iran is a major power; second, they need to cut off and control China’s oil lifeline, on which it depends—the Persian Gulf.
That is why, after Maduro’s fall in Venezuela, I consistently believed that the story of Iran would soon change.
🔻 In other words, the Americans cannot move toward confronting China while remaining uncertain about Iranian oil and the Strait of Hormuz.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3291
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Has Iran Acquired a “Tactical Nuclear Weapon”?
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Political analysts are reporting the possibility that the United States could use a “tactical nuclear bomb” to attack Iran and its nuclear facilities at Mount Kolang in Isfahan.
It is reportedly said that the arrival of the Omani delegation in Tehran represents the latest efforts to negotiate with Iran and persuade it to accept Washington’s new conditions.
2️⃣ And now for the second piece of news, which went viral on social media, particularly on Instagram:
General Hisham Jaber: “While I was in Europe, I learned that Iran had acquired tactical nuclear weapons.”
The late Imam Khamenei had said some time ago:
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3294
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Political analysts are reporting the possibility that the United States could use a “tactical nuclear bomb” to attack Iran and its nuclear facilities at Mount Kolang in Isfahan.
It is reportedly said that the arrival of the Omani delegation in Tehran represents the latest efforts to negotiate with Iran and persuade it to accept Washington’s new conditions.
2️⃣ And now for the second piece of news, which went viral on social media, particularly on Instagram:
General Hisham Jaber: “While I was in Europe, I learned that Iran had acquired tactical nuclear weapons.”
The late Imam Khamenei had said some time ago:
“No matter at what level the enemy attacks, we will respond at the same level.”
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3294
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Telegram
عصر ظهور | ASRZOHUR
🔴 آیا ایران به «سلاح اتمی تاکتیکی» دست یافته است؟
✍️ مصطفی امیری
1️⃣ تحلیلگران سیاسی، از احتمال استفاده آمریکا از «بمب اتمی تاکتیکی» برای حمله به ایران و تأسیسات هستهای در کوه کلنگ اصفهان خبر میدهند.
گفته میشود ورود تیم عمان به تهران آخرین تلاشها…
✍️ مصطفی امیری
1️⃣ تحلیلگران سیاسی، از احتمال استفاده آمریکا از «بمب اتمی تاکتیکی» برای حمله به ایران و تأسیسات هستهای در کوه کلنگ اصفهان خبر میدهند.
گفته میشود ورود تیم عمان به تهران آخرین تلاشها…
🕣 20:31 / September 6
⚠️ Strategic Assessment:
The Israeli regime, relying on the MEK network and through the activities of the Aman network in the Persian-language online space, is seeking to increase calls for protests through the end of September.
The regime’s strategy is to have one of these calls, combined with intelligence operations and economic pressure, turn into a security-driven protest inside Iran.
The regime has reportedly given up on the prospect of large-scale popular participation in protests and intends, once a security flashpoint is created, to deploy an organized network of armed rioters into major cities.
In the regime’s security terminology, this is described as the creation of a “mutated version of January 8” (18 Dey).
The regime has promised the United States that by creating such chaos, Iran will be pushed toward negotiations and concessions to Trump.
However, intelligence indicates that the regime’s hidden objective is to draw Trump back into a war with Iran once the unrest has been created.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3251
🆔 @rahyafte_en
⚠️ Strategic Assessment:
The Israeli regime, relying on the MEK network and through the activities of the Aman network in the Persian-language online space, is seeking to increase calls for protests through the end of September.
The regime’s strategy is to have one of these calls, combined with intelligence operations and economic pressure, turn into a security-driven protest inside Iran.
The regime has reportedly given up on the prospect of large-scale popular participation in protests and intends, once a security flashpoint is created, to deploy an organized network of armed rioters into major cities.
In the regime’s security terminology, this is described as the creation of a “mutated version of January 8” (18 Dey).
The regime has promised the United States that by creating such chaos, Iran will be pushed toward negotiations and concessions to Trump.
However, intelligence indicates that the regime’s hidden objective is to draw Trump back into a war with Iran once the unrest has been created.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3251
🆔 @rahyafte_en