🔴 Leilaz’s Account of the Late Larijani Before the Attack on Iran
✍️ Guest Commentary
🔻 “It was impossible for us to prevent the war. Impossible. Its timing might have been moved forward or pushed back, but because the Americans saw time as working against them and believed Iran was at its weakest possible point—militarily, economically, and in terms of domestic and international legitimacy—after the Dey protests, we were at the lowest point of domestic and international legitimacy.
They believed that time was working against the United States. America wants to focus on the issue of China starting in 2027. The speed at which China is gaining power is so great that if the United States did not confront Iran within the next year or two, it might never be able to do so.
Therefore, thinking that we could have prevented this war through diplomacy is a major mistake.
In October 2025, if I remember correctly, I received a call from Mr. Larijani’s office telling me, ‘Get up and come to the Supreme National Security Council. We have a meeting.’ We immediately went to see him that same day.
We were told that during the New York negotiations, with the mediation of Mr. Macron, we sat down with the American team and negotiated. Mr. Macron was also saying, ‘Come on, reach a compromise.’ Eventually, we reached an agreement.
When the American team took this agreement to Mr. Trump, he said:
They did not tell us the details. And I’m not like some of my friends who make things up. I repeat exactly what I hear.
We went back and forth again. We accepted the things Mr. Trump had requested. The Islamic Republic accepted them. This is not my statement, as Leilaz; these are the words of the late Larijani.
They took it to Mr. Trump again. He said:
By the third and fourth rounds, we became certain that the United States was not seeking a compromise. Mr. Macron is a witness to this and can verify Mr. Larijani’s account. We became convinced that the Americans were not seeking an agreement.
In October, he summoned us and said that based on this, we estimated that Iran would be attacked by the end of Dey—that is, by the end of 2025—and that a new military offensive would take place. War between Iran and the United States was inevitable.
We had been engaged in diplomacy for 30 years. For 30 years, we tried to prevent war, but we reached a point where it was no longer possible.
Why was it no longer possible? The U.S. government is, by their own description, a neoconservative government, and the Americans are preparing themselves for a confrontation with China.
Remember that in terms of foreign policy, there is very little difference between Democrats and Republicans. In fact, there is virtually no difference.
When Mr. Biden became president of the United States in 2020, from January 2021 onward he revoked almost all of the Trump administration’s decisions, except for three: the sanctions on Iran, the sanctions on China, and the sanctions on Cuba.
For the Americans to settle their affairs with China, they have no choice but to clear Iran as their rear flank. First, Iran is a major power; second, they need to cut off and control China’s oil lifeline, on which it depends—the Persian Gulf.
That is why, after Maduro’s fall in Venezuela, I consistently believed that the story of Iran would soon change.
🔻 In other words, the Americans cannot move toward confronting China while remaining uncertain about Iranian oil and the Strait of Hormuz.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3291
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ Guest Commentary
🔻 “It was impossible for us to prevent the war. Impossible. Its timing might have been moved forward or pushed back, but because the Americans saw time as working against them and believed Iran was at its weakest possible point—militarily, economically, and in terms of domestic and international legitimacy—after the Dey protests, we were at the lowest point of domestic and international legitimacy.
They believed that time was working against the United States. America wants to focus on the issue of China starting in 2027. The speed at which China is gaining power is so great that if the United States did not confront Iran within the next year or two, it might never be able to do so.
Therefore, thinking that we could have prevented this war through diplomacy is a major mistake.
In October 2025, if I remember correctly, I received a call from Mr. Larijani’s office telling me, ‘Get up and come to the Supreme National Security Council. We have a meeting.’ We immediately went to see him that same day.
We were told that during the New York negotiations, with the mediation of Mr. Macron, we sat down with the American team and negotiated. Mr. Macron was also saying, ‘Come on, reach a compromise.’ Eventually, we reached an agreement.
When the American team took this agreement to Mr. Trump, he said:
‘No, I don’t accept it. This isn’t enough. Add a little more to it.’
They did not tell us the details. And I’m not like some of my friends who make things up. I repeat exactly what I hear.
We went back and forth again. We accepted the things Mr. Trump had requested. The Islamic Republic accepted them. This is not my statement, as Leilaz; these are the words of the late Larijani.
They took it to Mr. Trump again. He said:
‘No, I don’t want it. This isn’t enough. Add more.’
By the third and fourth rounds, we became certain that the United States was not seeking a compromise. Mr. Macron is a witness to this and can verify Mr. Larijani’s account. We became convinced that the Americans were not seeking an agreement.
In October, he summoned us and said that based on this, we estimated that Iran would be attacked by the end of Dey—that is, by the end of 2025—and that a new military offensive would take place. War between Iran and the United States was inevitable.
We had been engaged in diplomacy for 30 years. For 30 years, we tried to prevent war, but we reached a point where it was no longer possible.
Why was it no longer possible? The U.S. government is, by their own description, a neoconservative government, and the Americans are preparing themselves for a confrontation with China.
Remember that in terms of foreign policy, there is very little difference between Democrats and Republicans. In fact, there is virtually no difference.
When Mr. Biden became president of the United States in 2020, from January 2021 onward he revoked almost all of the Trump administration’s decisions, except for three: the sanctions on Iran, the sanctions on China, and the sanctions on Cuba.
For the Americans to settle their affairs with China, they have no choice but to clear Iran as their rear flank. First, Iran is a major power; second, they need to cut off and control China’s oil lifeline, on which it depends—the Persian Gulf.
That is why, after Maduro’s fall in Venezuela, I consistently believed that the story of Iran would soon change.
🔻 In other words, the Americans cannot move toward confronting China while remaining uncertain about Iranian oil and the Strait of Hormuz.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3291
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Has Iran Acquired a “Tactical Nuclear Weapon”?
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Political analysts are reporting the possibility that the United States could use a “tactical nuclear bomb” to attack Iran and its nuclear facilities at Mount Kolang in Isfahan.
It is reportedly said that the arrival of the Omani delegation in Tehran represents the latest efforts to negotiate with Iran and persuade it to accept Washington’s new conditions.
2️⃣ And now for the second piece of news, which went viral on social media, particularly on Instagram:
General Hisham Jaber: “While I was in Europe, I learned that Iran had acquired tactical nuclear weapons.”
The late Imam Khamenei had said some time ago:
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3294
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Political analysts are reporting the possibility that the United States could use a “tactical nuclear bomb” to attack Iran and its nuclear facilities at Mount Kolang in Isfahan.
It is reportedly said that the arrival of the Omani delegation in Tehran represents the latest efforts to negotiate with Iran and persuade it to accept Washington’s new conditions.
2️⃣ And now for the second piece of news, which went viral on social media, particularly on Instagram:
General Hisham Jaber: “While I was in Europe, I learned that Iran had acquired tactical nuclear weapons.”
The late Imam Khamenei had said some time ago:
“No matter at what level the enemy attacks, we will respond at the same level.”
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3294
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Telegram
عصر ظهور | ASRZOHUR
🔴 آیا ایران به «سلاح اتمی تاکتیکی» دست یافته است؟
✍️ مصطفی امیری
1️⃣ تحلیلگران سیاسی، از احتمال استفاده آمریکا از «بمب اتمی تاکتیکی» برای حمله به ایران و تأسیسات هستهای در کوه کلنگ اصفهان خبر میدهند.
گفته میشود ورود تیم عمان به تهران آخرین تلاشها…
✍️ مصطفی امیری
1️⃣ تحلیلگران سیاسی، از احتمال استفاده آمریکا از «بمب اتمی تاکتیکی» برای حمله به ایران و تأسیسات هستهای در کوه کلنگ اصفهان خبر میدهند.
گفته میشود ورود تیم عمان به تهران آخرین تلاشها…
🕣 20:31 / September 6
⚠️ Strategic Assessment:
The Israeli regime, relying on the MEK network and through the activities of the Aman network in the Persian-language online space, is seeking to increase calls for protests through the end of September.
The regime’s strategy is to have one of these calls, combined with intelligence operations and economic pressure, turn into a security-driven protest inside Iran.
The regime has reportedly given up on the prospect of large-scale popular participation in protests and intends, once a security flashpoint is created, to deploy an organized network of armed rioters into major cities.
In the regime’s security terminology, this is described as the creation of a “mutated version of January 8” (18 Dey).
The regime has promised the United States that by creating such chaos, Iran will be pushed toward negotiations and concessions to Trump.
However, intelligence indicates that the regime’s hidden objective is to draw Trump back into a war with Iran once the unrest has been created.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3251
🆔 @rahyafte_en
⚠️ Strategic Assessment:
The Israeli regime, relying on the MEK network and through the activities of the Aman network in the Persian-language online space, is seeking to increase calls for protests through the end of September.
The regime’s strategy is to have one of these calls, combined with intelligence operations and economic pressure, turn into a security-driven protest inside Iran.
The regime has reportedly given up on the prospect of large-scale popular participation in protests and intends, once a security flashpoint is created, to deploy an organized network of armed rioters into major cities.
In the regime’s security terminology, this is described as the creation of a “mutated version of January 8” (18 Dey).
The regime has promised the United States that by creating such chaos, Iran will be pushed toward negotiations and concessions to Trump.
However, intelligence indicates that the regime’s hidden objective is to draw Trump back into a war with Iran once the unrest has been created.
🔗 https://eitaa.com/dolfiniran/3251
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Forwarded from Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
Page 416
Parhizkar
🔴 #Scientific_Analysis / From Theology to Geopolitics: The Impact of “Christian Zionism” on U.S. Foreign Policy
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
🔻 American Evangelicalism, through its particular interpretation of the Bible, has had a significant influence on U.S. foreign policy. This movement, based on a literal interpretation of Scripture, seeks to interpret contemporary events—particularly those concerning the Jewish people in the land of Palestine—through biblical prophecies.
For this reason, it regards support for Israel not as a political choice, but as a message of the Gospel.
▪️ Accordingly, the key foundational components of this American ideology—which has now reached its peak under the Trump administration—can be outlined as follows:
1. God’s Covenant in the Bible
God’s covenant with Israel is eternal. Therefore, the promise of the land granted to the Jewish people—from the Nile to the Euphrates—can never be revoked.
The Church did not replace Israel, and despite the Israelites’ breach of the covenant, God’s covenant with the Jewish people was never annulled.
In fact, there are two valid covenants in the world: one is God’s covenant with Moses, and the other is God’s covenant with Jesus Christ. The New Covenant does not, in any way, invalidate the Old Covenant.
2. From the Church to the Divine Promise
God’s original purpose has been the “eternal salvation of Israel.” When the people of Israel failed to follow Jesus Christ, the Church emerged.
However, at the time of Christ’s return, the Church Age will come to an end. The monotheists will become united, and Israel will become the principal instrument for carrying out God’s purposes in the world.
3. Support for the Jewish People and Israel
Failure to support Israel will bring divine wrath and punishment. Christians must accept literally what is stated in the Book of Genesis concerning the people of Israel:
4. Events Preceding Christ’s Return
The prophecies contained in the Gospel do not merely refer to events that have already occurred throughout history; they also describe future events.
Dispensational Theology divides history into seven periods. American Zionism maintains that we are currently living in the sixth period—the gathering of the Jews in Palestine and the construction of Solomon’s Temple.
After that, with the return of Christ, the seventh period will begin: the thousand-year Messianic reign of peace.
Accordingly, human history is believed to undergo major stages and upheavals:
▪️ The Church Age
▪️ The establishment of Israel
▪️ The construction of the Temple and the Great Tribulation
▪️ The Battle of Armageddon
▪️ The thousand-year Messianic Kingdom
5. Israel as the Fulfillment of Gospel Promises
The establishment of a Jewish state in the land of Palestine is believed to accelerate the fulfillment of biblical promises.
Therefore, humanity should expect the collapse of civilizations, the rise of evil, the disappearance of peace and existing international arrangements, and a test of loyalty to Israel.
Most importantly, political alliances will determine the position of the forces of good in the decisive battle of Armageddon.
6. The “Geopolitical Consequences” of Evangelicalism for U.S. Foreign Policy
▪️ Moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem
▪️ Supporting Israeli settlements
▪️ Opposing the establishment of an independent Palestinian state
▪️ Supporting plans associated with “Greater Israel”
🔻 The ultimate outcome of this American project is, in effect, a final blow to the issue of Palestine and peace in the Middle East.
✅ For further reading:
1. Religious Developments in Judaism and Christianity at the Beginning of the Third Millennium, pp. 311–312.
2. Reformed Church in America (RCA), Addressing Christian Zionism for the Sake of a Just Peace, General Synod, 2004. (Link)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3296
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
🔻 American Evangelicalism, through its particular interpretation of the Bible, has had a significant influence on U.S. foreign policy. This movement, based on a literal interpretation of Scripture, seeks to interpret contemporary events—particularly those concerning the Jewish people in the land of Palestine—through biblical prophecies.
For this reason, it regards support for Israel not as a political choice, but as a message of the Gospel.
▪️ Accordingly, the key foundational components of this American ideology—which has now reached its peak under the Trump administration—can be outlined as follows:
1. God’s Covenant in the Bible
God’s covenant with Israel is eternal. Therefore, the promise of the land granted to the Jewish people—from the Nile to the Euphrates—can never be revoked.
The Church did not replace Israel, and despite the Israelites’ breach of the covenant, God’s covenant with the Jewish people was never annulled.
In fact, there are two valid covenants in the world: one is God’s covenant with Moses, and the other is God’s covenant with Jesus Christ. The New Covenant does not, in any way, invalidate the Old Covenant.
2. From the Church to the Divine Promise
God’s original purpose has been the “eternal salvation of Israel.” When the people of Israel failed to follow Jesus Christ, the Church emerged.
However, at the time of Christ’s return, the Church Age will come to an end. The monotheists will become united, and Israel will become the principal instrument for carrying out God’s purposes in the world.
3. Support for the Jewish People and Israel
Failure to support Israel will bring divine wrath and punishment. Christians must accept literally what is stated in the Book of Genesis concerning the people of Israel:
“I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse.”
Genesis 12:3
4. Events Preceding Christ’s Return
The prophecies contained in the Gospel do not merely refer to events that have already occurred throughout history; they also describe future events.
Dispensational Theology divides history into seven periods. American Zionism maintains that we are currently living in the sixth period—the gathering of the Jews in Palestine and the construction of Solomon’s Temple.
After that, with the return of Christ, the seventh period will begin: the thousand-year Messianic reign of peace.
Accordingly, human history is believed to undergo major stages and upheavals:
▪️ The Church Age
▪️ The establishment of Israel
▪️ The construction of the Temple and the Great Tribulation
▪️ The Battle of Armageddon
▪️ The thousand-year Messianic Kingdom
5. Israel as the Fulfillment of Gospel Promises
The establishment of a Jewish state in the land of Palestine is believed to accelerate the fulfillment of biblical promises.
Therefore, humanity should expect the collapse of civilizations, the rise of evil, the disappearance of peace and existing international arrangements, and a test of loyalty to Israel.
Most importantly, political alliances will determine the position of the forces of good in the decisive battle of Armageddon.
6. The “Geopolitical Consequences” of Evangelicalism for U.S. Foreign Policy
▪️ Moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem
▪️ Supporting Israeli settlements
▪️ Opposing the establishment of an independent Palestinian state
▪️ Supporting plans associated with “Greater Israel”
🔻 The ultimate outcome of this American project is, in effect, a final blow to the issue of Palestine and peace in the Middle East.
✅ For further reading:
1. Religious Developments in Judaism and Christianity at the Beginning of the Third Millennium, pp. 311–312.
2. Reformed Church in America (RCA), Addressing Christian Zionism for the Sake of a Just Peace, General Synod, 2004. (Link)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3296
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 How Did “Biblical Interpretation” Become America’s “War Machine”?
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
❓ A key question in Western theology:
How did a new interpretation of the Bible lay the ideological foundations for Christian Zionism and a war-oriented theology in the United States?
1️⃣ The Starting Point: Protestant Futurist Interpretation
2️⃣ Selective Interpretation of the Bible and its transformation into a “political project”
3️⃣ Turning Interpretation into Policy-Making
4️⃣ Turning Ideology into a “Military Strategy”
5️⃣ Transforming Apocalyptic Interpretations into a “Theology of War”
6️⃣ Why Is This American Ideology Dangerous?
7️⃣ The Idea of Rebuilding Solomon’s Temple and the Destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque
8️⃣ The Foundation of America’s “Theology” in the Middle East: Peace Through War
🔻 The infographic and images were generated using artificial intelligence (AI).
✅ Suitable for:
● #Schools
● #Teenagers
● #Cultural_Centers
● #Rubika #Instagram
🔻 High-quality file, #Suitable_for_Printing:
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/44005
✅ For further information:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3233 (En)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3303
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
✍️ Mostafa Amiri
❓ A key question in Western theology:
How did a new interpretation of the Bible lay the ideological foundations for Christian Zionism and a war-oriented theology in the United States?
1️⃣ The Starting Point: Protestant Futurist Interpretation
2️⃣ Selective Interpretation of the Bible and its transformation into a “political project”
3️⃣ Turning Interpretation into Policy-Making
4️⃣ Turning Ideology into a “Military Strategy”
5️⃣ Transforming Apocalyptic Interpretations into a “Theology of War”
6️⃣ Why Is This American Ideology Dangerous?
7️⃣ The Idea of Rebuilding Solomon’s Temple and the Destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque
8️⃣ The Foundation of America’s “Theology” in the Middle East: Peace Through War
🔻 The infographic and images were generated using artificial intelligence (AI).
✅ Suitable for:
● #Schools
● #Teenagers
● #Cultural_Centers
● #Rubika #Instagram
🔻 High-quality file, #Suitable_for_Printing:
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/44005
✅ For further information:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3233 (En)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3303
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en