🔴 The Difference Between "Harj al-Rum" and "Mariqa al-Rum"

🔻 #Audience_Question
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

Question: Could you explain the difference between "Harj al-Rum" and "Mariqa al-Rum" as mentioned in Islamic narrations?

Answer:
In our cultural discussions,the Arabic term "Harj" is closely associated with the Persian phrase "Harj-o-Marj" (chaos and turmoil). Therefore, "Harj al-Rum" essentially refers to conflict, killing, and sedition within Western nations or among the people of Rome/Byzantium (likely referring to the Christian Western world).

On the other hand, "Mariqa" comes from the root meaning "to deviate" or "to split off." Thus, "Mariqa al-Rum" refers to a deviant or separatist faction from among the Romans. This group sees itself as distinct and superior.

An important point from narrations is that this deviant faction, "Mariqa al-Rum," is expected to come to the aid of the Jews/Israelis in Palestine during the events leading to the End Times.

Key Difference:

· Harj al-Rum: Internal chaos and strife within the Western world.
· Mariqa al-Rum: A specific deviant/splinter group from the Western world that actively supports Israel.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1790
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en

🔴 What Is the Real Objective of the U.S. Military Buildup in the Region?
▪️ Trump and the Psychology of Revenge
🔻 #Audience_Question

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1812
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110


On my way today, I had a conversation with one of our followers who knows me. He asked a key question: Why has the United States deployed such a massive military force in the region? What is its real objective? Is it preparing for another war?

I answered him with an example.

Imagine you have a building as your main target. Your goal is to seize it—but for various reasons, a full takeover is not immediately possible. What do you do? You prioritize. You shift to precision strikes, targeting the most critical points inside that building first. Gradually, step by step, you attempt to take control.

If you pay close attention, this is exactly the strategy that many sincere analysts have recently pointed out regarding U.S. behavior. Even Trump himself—through his tweets, speeches, and interviews—has been openly laying the groundwork. He repeatedly uses a key term: assassination of leadership. This is precisely what we meant by “the building” and “precision targeting.”

God willing, this plan will not succeed.

History offers a clear parallel. Pharaoh was informed that his rule would collapse. What did he do? He ordered the massacre of newborn boys. Yet divine planning prevailed: the very child destined to destroy Pharaoh was raised in the palace itself, under the care of Pharaoh’s own wife. Thus, Pharaoh’s kingdom collapsed from within. When God wills something, it comes to pass.

So far, they have failed. Even during the 12-day war, one of the very first objectives targeted was the leadership—yet they did not succeed. And the Leader himself declared: “Indeed, my Lord is with me; He will guide me.” God willing, this will continue to be the case.

Going forward, much depends on evolving conditions and multiple factors. One major weakness of Trump is his massive economic and technological investment—especially in artificial intelligence—across the Middle East. This makes him highly cautious. He strongly avoids prolonged wars.

Look at Venezuela as an example: first, oil tankers and massive military vessels were deployed near its waters—classic deception. Then suddenly, the precision strike was executed, and the Venezuelan leader was taken away. Trump relies heavily on surprise.

Trump’s psychology alone deserves an entire book. This malicious and abnormal figure is deeply contradictory: he openly says shocking things, yet simultaneously conceals his real plans, keeping opponents in a state of ambiguity. He enjoys surprise and is extremely unpredictable.

Consider his statement: “If Iran tries to assassinate me…”—a strange and revealing keyword in future-oriented threat analysis—followed by: “My revenge would be to wipe Iran off the face of the Earth.” This is the type of person we are dealing with. He has no diplomatic filters; he says things bluntly and dangerously.

So what does he want to do now? In short, the U.S. military buildup in the region reflects multi-layered, multi-level strategies, not a single straightforward plan. The unfolding of events will depend on regional developments, the stance of resistance forces, and—at the top of this equation—the foresight of the steadfast leadership of Hezbollah.

We must watch carefully how the different sides of the Resistance Axis move within this complex chessboard of the Middle East’s future. Everything is interconnected.

Ya Ali.

✅ @rahyafte_en

🔴 A Sufyani Attack on Iran?
🔻 #Audience_Question

✅ Related post:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1833 (En)

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1834
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110

Salaam and peace be upon you 🌿
This is a very important and well-posed question.

It is often said that the Sufyani’s intention to attack Iran is mentioned only in non-Shi‘i (ʿāmma) sources. But the response requires deeper attention to the content and direction of the narrations, not just explicit naming.

If we carefully examine the narrations, we see that the hatred and hostility of the Sufyani is directed toward the Shi‘a—and the Shi‘a are not limited to Iraq alone. The Shi‘a of Iran are at the forefront.

Another strong indication is found in the narrations about the uprising of the People of the East (the Iranians). These narrations clearly state that:

• They rise,
• They demand their right twice,
• When denied, they place their swords upon their shoulders,
• They enter armed confrontation,
• Their slain are described as martyrs,
• And ultimately, they deliver the banner to Imam al-Mahdi.

This is further reinforced by other narrations that speak of:

• The banners of Khurasan,
• A group from among the companions of al-Qa’im,
• And the act of presenting the banner of allegiance (bay‘ah) to Imam al-Mahdi at the time of his reappearance—mentioned even in al-Ghaybah of Shaykh al-Tusi.

Moreover, in the well-known narration reported in al-Mustadrak of al-Nishapuri, it is explicitly stated that:

• The Sufyani pursues the people of Khurasan,
• While the people of Khurasan rise in pursuit of the Mahdi.

What a profound and meaningful contrast: 👉 The Sufyani seeks the Iranians…
👉 But the Iranians seek Imam al-Mahdi.

Taken together, these multiple Qur’anic-historical signs, narrations, and contextual indicators strongly support the idea of military confrontation, even if the name “Iran” is not explicitly mentioned in every Shi‘i narration.

And Allah knows best.

السلام علیکم، یا علی 🤍

✅ @rahyafte_en

🔴 “Maybe the Reappearance Is a Thousand Years Away.”
🔻 #Audience_Question
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1882
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110

Yes, the Leader of the Revolution has a clear statement on this. He explains that there are certain beliefs within Mahdism that are like the soul within the body and blood within the veins of a nation. One of the most critical of these elements is hope.

The Leader explicitly says:
👉 If hope is taken away from a nation, that nation will no longer take any action.

Now look at the current conditions: economic pressure, inflation, and the corruption of some officials. In such circumstances, the only remaining spark of hope for many people is the belief that this Revolution is preparing the ground for the Reappearance, that it is a divine revolution connected to Imam al-Mahdi.

If religious institutions and elites fail to explain and protect this belief—if they take it away from the people—then foreign enemies will easily dominate. Why would people resist? What motivation would remain?

Economic motivation? As the Leader himself says, we are far behind in justice.
So if we say: “This revolution may not be connected to the Reappearance; maybe it’s a thousand years away,” what incentive is left for the people?

Why should someone defend this revolution?
Why should someone stand with their life in their hands at a missile base, exposed to American F-35 fighter jets?

Is that person satisfied with the economy?
Is he fighting for material comfort?

No.
He stands there because he believes this is a divine revolution, supported by Imam al-Mahdi, and a prelude to the Reappearance.

If we take this belief away from a nation, then—according to the Leader—we have taken away hope.
And the result?

👉 That nation will no longer act.
👉 It will surrender to foreign powers.

This is why the claim “maybe the Reappearance is a thousand years away” is not an innocent statement—it is a direct strike at the heart of resistance and perseverance.

https://t.me/asrzohur110/1882
@ASRZOHUR110
@rahyafte_en

🔴 "Three Signs" Glad Tidings of the Near Appearance

▪️ By: Mostafa Amiri

🔻 When Do We Enter the "Year of Appearance"?

▪️ #Audience_Question

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1922
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en

---

If you want to understand how close the Reappearance (Zohur) really is, I can offer you three highly influential factors. These are not ordinary events, but signs that carry deep meaning:

1️⃣ Dispute in Saudi Arabia: Look for major internal conflict and division within the Arabian Peninsula, particularly in Saudi Arabia. This signifies the crumbling of unity among the opposing forces.

2️⃣ The "Fitan" of Rome (Harj al-Rum): On a global scale, watch for the great strife and conflict known as Haraj al-Rum (the turmoil of the West/Rome). This refers to widespread chaos and infighting among global powers, which is a prophesied precursor.

3️⃣ Extraordinary Celestial Signs: Observe supernatural phenomena—unusual lunar and solar eclipses occurring during the holy month of Ramadan. These are not natural, predictable events, but divine signs that occur out of the ordinary.

---

🔻 These three signs—internal division in Arabia, global Roman/Western strife, and miraculous eclipses in Ramadan—are among the most impactful indicators that we are approaching the great divine promise.

Stay vigilant and aware.

#Zohur #ImamMahdi #SignsOfAppearance #IslamicProphecy #Ramadan #Eclipses #EndTimes #AkhirZaman

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1922
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en

🔴 What Is the Real Objective of the U.S. Military Buildup in the Region?
▪️ Trump and the Psychology of Revenge
🔻 #Audience_Question

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1812
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110


On my way today, I had a conversation with one of our followers who knows me. He asked a key question: Why has the United States deployed such a massive military force in the region? What is its real objective? Is it preparing for another war?

I answered him with an example.

Imagine you have a building as your main target. Your goal is to seize it—but for various reasons, a full takeover is not immediately possible. What do you do? You prioritize. You shift to precision strikes, targeting the most critical points inside that building first. Gradually, step by step, you attempt to take control.

If you pay close attention, this is exactly the strategy that many sincere analysts have recently pointed out regarding U.S. behavior. Even Trump himself—through his tweets, speeches, and interviews—has been openly laying the groundwork. He repeatedly uses a key term: assassination of leadership. This is precisely what we meant by “the building” and “precision targeting.”

God willing, this plan will not succeed.

History offers a clear parallel. Pharaoh was informed that his rule would collapse. What did he do? He ordered the massacre of newborn boys. Yet divine planning prevailed: the very child destined to destroy Pharaoh was raised in the palace itself, under the care of Pharaoh’s own wife. Thus, Pharaoh’s kingdom collapsed from within. When God wills something, it comes to pass.

So far, they have failed. Even during the 12-day war, one of the very first objectives targeted was the leadership—yet they did not succeed. And the Leader himself declared: “Indeed, my Lord is with me; He will guide me.” God willing, this will continue to be the case.

Going forward, much depends on evolving conditions and multiple factors. One major weakness of Trump is his massive economic and technological investment—especially in artificial intelligence—across the Middle East. This makes him highly cautious. He strongly avoids prolonged wars.

Look at Venezuela as an example: first, oil tankers and massive military vessels were deployed near its waters—classic deception. Then suddenly, the precision strike was executed, and the Venezuelan leader was taken away. Trump relies heavily on surprise.

Trump’s psychology alone deserves an entire book. This malicious and abnormal figure is deeply contradictory: he openly says shocking things, yet simultaneously conceals his real plans, keeping opponents in a state of ambiguity. He enjoys surprise and is extremely unpredictable.

Consider his statement: “If Iran tries to assassinate me…”—a strange and revealing keyword in future-oriented threat analysis—followed by: “My revenge would be to wipe Iran off the face of the Earth.” This is the type of person we are dealing with. He has no diplomatic filters; he says things bluntly and dangerously.

So what does he want to do now? In short, the U.S. military buildup in the region reflects multi-layered, multi-level strategies, not a single straightforward plan. The unfolding of events will depend on regional developments, the stance of resistance forces, and—at the top of this equation—the foresight of the steadfast leadership of Hezbollah.

We must watch carefully how the different sides of the Resistance Axis move within this complex chessboard of the Middle East’s future. Everything is interconnected.

Ya Ali.

✅ @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question | Is Trump a descendant of Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan?

✍️ Mustafa Amiri

▪️ In the previous post, you said: "Throughout history, only the names of individuals change, while the movements and currents remain, because the confrontation between Truth and Falsehood is everlasting."

▪️ Could it be possible that Trump's lineage also traces back to Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan? I read in the channel that Professor Abedini also stated: "The Umayyads were Roman."

🔻 The answer:

▪️ We will not enter into specific claims about individuals. However, who knows? Perhaps Trump's ancestry does trace back to Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan. And Allah knows best.

▪️ Many centuries have passed, and generations have changed. Who can know with certainty exactly which historical figure a person's lineage may return to?

▪️ However, it is certain that the Umayyad dynasty ruled Andalusia in Europe for several centuries (around 300 years), and descendants of the Umayyads were born and spread throughout Europe and Western countries.

▪️ Ordinary people do not know whose ancestry may connect to which historical figure.

▪️ Of course, according to this view, Satan and the Zionist think tanks know—the same forces that allegedly brought the "Roman Umayyads" to dominate Muslim affairs in early Islamic history.

🔻 Furthermore, as we have repeatedly stated: Look at the matter as a historical current and movement. This confrontation has taken many forms and witnessed many individuals throughout history.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3090
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question | Three "Trigger Signs" Before the Definitive Signs of the Reappearance

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🔻Question: What events will trigger the main sequence leading to the Reappearance and the definitive signs?

1️⃣ The events of the Fitnah of al-Sham (the Levant), including the developments following the Khasf of Jabiyah.

2️⃣ A large-scale war between the Shi'a Axis and Israel following the Harj al-Rum and the events in Palestine, ultimately leading to the involvement of the Mariqah al-Rum.

3️⃣ Internal disputes within the Āl Banī Fulān in Saudi Arabia, after which, through a series of developments, the Sufyani will emerge.

🔻#Glad_Tidings

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3106
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question

▪️Question:

Salam. Imam Khamenei said: "The Zionist regime will not exist 25 years from now," not merely that Israel would be weakened.

▪️In light of this statement by the Leader, can it be said that the Reappearance will take place within that time frame?

🔻Answer:

We have great hope in this statement of Imam Khamenei. Very great hope.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3112
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question | When will the Sufyani attack Iraq?

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

▪️ The Sufyani’s attack on Iraq takes place after the Battle of Qarqisiya:

“The Sufyani... has no concern except moving toward Iraq. His army passes through Qarqisiya, where they engage in battle.”

▪️ In this Battle of Qarqisiya, the Shia are not present. As both sides are described as “tyrants,” the armies of the enemies will inflict heavy losses upon each other. Ultimately, the Sufyani’s army will emerge victorious in eastern Syria.

“A hundred thousand of the tyrants will be killed there.”

▪️ Then, the Sufyani sends seventy thousand soldiers toward Iraq:

“The Sufyani sends an army toward Kufa, and their number is seventy thousand.”

▪️ During the month of Ramadan before the emergence of Imam al-Mahdi, the process of the Sufyani’s attack on the Shia regions of Iraq reaches its peak:

“When Rajab comes, turn to Allah... and if you wish to delay until Sha’ban, there is no harm... and the Sufyani is sufficient for you as a sign.”

▪️ After the months of Rajab and Sha’ban have passed, events should be monitored. It is also possible to strengthen military forces until Ramadan, because during this period the Sufyani is engaged in battles. The Sufyani is also considered a “punishment and retribution” against your enemies, and he will kill many of them:

“The Sufyani is sufficient as a punishment for you from your enemy, and he is among the signs for you... after his emergence, you would remain for a month or two without harm until he kills many people before reaching you.”

🔻 Analysis of the narrations:

● “The Sufyani is sufficient for you as a sign” = “He is among the signs for you.”

● “A hundred thousand of the tyrants will be killed there” = “He will kill many people before reaching you.”

● “Rajab, Sha’ban, fasting will be stronger for you” = “Two months after his emergence, there will be no harm upon you.”

🔻 Therefore, the Sufyani’s attack on Iraq reaches its peak in the month of Ramadan before the emergence of Imam al-Mahdi.

✅ References:

1. Al-Nu’mani, Al-Ghaybah, p. 280
2. Al-Nu’mani, Al-Ghaybah, p. 280
3. Al-Nu’mani, Al-Ghaybah, p. 280
4. Al-Kulayni, Al-Kafi, vol. 8, p. 264
5. Al-Nu’mani, Al-Ghaybah, p. 300

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3127
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question

▪️What if Trump were killed before the Appearance?

▪️#Answer: So much the better.

🔻According to what can be inferred from the narrations, the Sufyani is killed after the Appearance.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3163
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question / The “70,000-Strong” Army of the Sufyani and the Attack on Iraq?

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

▪️ Mr. Amiri, don’t you think that seventy thousand troops is a very small number?

🔻 #Answer:

▪️ Following Harj al-Rum and the subsequent world war, it is only natural that the powers of the world would be weakened. Both the Eastern and Western blocs would be weakened.

1️⃣ The Deployment of a 70,000-Strong Army to Iraq

▪️ Therefore, the deployment of a 70,000-strong army by the Sufyani to Iraq itself raises a question: How could the Sufyani, who is supported by the Western powers, equip and bring such an army and military force into Iraq?

▪️ This indicates that he has suffered less damage from Harj al-Rum and the world war.

▪️ There is even further evidence supporting this:

2️⃣ The Presence of the Marqa al-Rum in Palestine

▪️ The military presence of the Marqa al-Rum in Palestine occurs after Harj al-Rum.

▪️ This is another indication that the principal supporter of Israel—the Marqa al-Rum—has suffered less damage from the events of the world war.

3️⃣ The Dispatch of Military Forces to Saudi Arabia

▪️ The deployment and dispatch of military forces to Saudi Arabia in support of the Al Bani-Fulan government is yet another indication that this power has suffered the least damage from the events of the world war and Harj al-Rum.

✅ Special Terminology:

▪️ Harj al-Rum: Discord, killing, and turmoil among the Western powers.

▪️ Marqa al-Rum: The principal supporter of Israel, which enters the unfolding events of the geography of the Advent and the Levantine Fitna in defense of the Jews.

🔻 Sufyani: A figure supported by the Western powers who, seeking “revenge” against the Shiites, attacks Iraq and marches his forces toward Mecca and Medina in defense of the Saudi government.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3176
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question

🔻 Don’t We Get Tired of All These “End-Times” References!? — Part One

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3343
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

“Don’t we get tired of all these end-times comparisons?”

Hello, and I hope you are all doing well. First, I would like to thank Mr. Taheri. I do not know him personally, but let me make one point clear:

Regardless of who is asking the question, we have encountered questions like this many times. We have been working in media for more than 10 years, and during this period, particularly in discussions about Mahdism, we have encountered all kinds of people and perspectives—from those who had not even resolved the basic question of the existence of Imam al-Mahdi in their minds, to those who, naturally, had even greater doubts about the signs of his Advent.

So, with thanks to Mr. Taheri, what I am saying here is not a personal response to him. I am speaking generally.

There are essentially two ways to respond to questions of this kind, depending on who is asking.

If the person asking is among those who support the Islamic Revolution led by Imam Khomeini, we respond in one way.

If the person is among the opponents of the Revolution, sometimes the answer is very brief. Ultimately, depending on the circumstances, we may simply give them the Qur’anic response:

“For you is your religion, and for me is my religion.”

Sometimes, however, we emphasize certain points precisely so that their subconscious may be encouraged to think:

“Wait a minute…”

Because if someone does not even accept the idea that the Iranian Revolution has a role in preparing the ground for the Advent, then what exactly are we supposed to discuss with them?

But let us assume that the questioner belongs to the first group—that they are genuinely asking out of a desire to understand, rather than sarcasm.

Now, consider what Imam Khomeini said about the Islamic government in Iran. He explained that the ultimate objective of the Revolution is the establishment of a global Islamic government and the Advent of Imam al-Mahdi.

Likewise, as the Supreme Leader stated in the Second Step of the Revolution, the goal is the “rising of the sun of Supreme Wilayah.”

And if someone deviates from this path, Imam Khomeini described it in extremely serious terms—even referring to it as betrayal.

So, when people ask, “Why all these end-times references?”—these are not concepts invented by us. Imam Khomeini and the Supreme Leader have repeatedly used such terminology themselves.

Take the issue of Palestine, for example. The Supreme Leader has described the Palestinian issue as connected to the opening of the doors of Divine Deliverance for the Muslim Ummah.

These are not merely “end-times keywords.”

In another audio recording by Imam Khomeini—which I hope to share separately—he discusses the narrations concerning the Book of Fatimah and explains that it contains knowledge concerning past and future events and is now in the possession of Imam al-Mahdi.

I will share Imam Khomeini’s own audio so that you can hear his words directly; it is more eloquent that way.

And perhaps—though this is my own inference—the events surrounding the Iranian Revolution may also have been among the events referred to in that book.

We also hear similar expressions from the Supreme Leader.

The problem is that we become so immersed in our daily political news—news that becomes outdated within 24 hours—that we sometimes completely lose sight of the larger purpose.

A story that dominates the news today becomes stale tomorrow. Yet in the process, we sometimes push the very idea that the Revolution was intended to prepare the ground for the Advent into the background and eventually forget it.

For example, what do figures such as Javad Zarif and others say?

When Zarif writes about a “paradigm shift,” he is referring to a particular intellectual framework. And certain strategists associated with some previous governments have even asked:

🔴 #Audience_Question

🔻 Aren’t We Tired of These Apocalyptic Analogies?! / Final Part

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3352
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.

We were talking about a statement made by a respected individual who asked: “Aren’t we tired of these apocalyptic analogies?”

Of course, our remarks are not directed at him personally. Rather, his statement became an incentive for us to publish these discussions and audio recordings on the channel.

🔹 In the previous posts on our channel, we talked about messianism in the West, particularly in America.

Contrary to what we Iranians sometimes assume—that Americans are largely irreligious—that is not actually the case. The futurist Protestants, or what are commonly known as the Evangelicals, are largely centered in the United States.

Do you realize what they believe?

They believe that certain events must take place in the world before the Second Coming of Christ, with the first and most important of these being the establishment of Israel, which they regard as the fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

These are subjects we have discussed at length.

🔻 But our real question is this: Why has it reached the point where a young Iranian would make such a statement?

Why have we failed to do enough?

Where have we failed to make proper use of our potential?

Why do humorous and entertainment channels have millions of followers, while channels dealing with the future of this very Iranian youth have only twenty or thirty thousand members?

And then this person—or people like him—sometimes, out of a lack of study and awareness, come forward and ask:

“Why are we even getting involved in these apocalyptic discussions?”

This is the real question: Why have we neglected this field?

🔹 Let me emphasize this again.

The late Imam Khomeini described the great objective of the Islamic Revolution in very serious terms. He stated that if officials were to deviate from this responsibility even for a moment, it would constitute a great danger and a grave betrayal.

Why did Imam Khomeini use such strong language?

Because he understood that if an Iranian youth is not properly informed and intellectually equipped, they will not have the necessary resilience when confronted with the West. A sense of doubt and instability will enter their heart.

There is also an important statement from Ayatollah Khamenei. He said that he had seen a document produced by colonial powers. Let me summarize what it said:

“Take Mahdism away from a nation, and no hope will remain for it. When a nation has no hope left, it will no longer resist.”

Think about that.

They know exactly where to weaken us—to the point that our youth begin asking:

“Why are we even talking about these apocalyptic subjects?”

🔻 Now look at what the opposing side has done to understand our beliefs about Mahdism and the End Times.

Let me give you an example.

Former U.S. President Joe Biden himself reportedly acknowledged in an interview with the media that, in order to become familiar with the Shiite belief in the Twelfth Imam, he had a professor come and teach him every week.

Look at that.

We are not even telling our Iranian youth:

📚 “Study Mahdism every week.”

We could simply say:

“Read one book about Mahdism each year.”

Is that really so difficult?

Alongside all the novels, all the fictional stories, and all the daily political news that you read today and then lose the motivation to read again tomorrow, you spend all day forwarding political channels and posts to one another.

What value does that have if you remain unfamiliar with the fundamental ideas that shape your civilization and its future?

At the very least, look at what the opposing side is doing.

🔹 Let me give you another example, this time concerning Mohammed bin Salman.

His interviews are available on YouTube and elsewhere, and some have even been subtitled in Persian.

🔴 #Audience_Question | The Saudi Government’s Cooperation with the Sufyani in Destroying the Kaaba?

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🔻 Hello, and thank you for your efforts. I have a question. According to the post you shared, in addition to seeking to kill Imam al-Mahdi, the Sufyani also intends to destroy the Kaaba.

▪️ Since Saudi Arabia derives part of its annual national income from managing the Hajj pilgrimage, why would it allow the Sufyani to carry out such an act?

#Answer:

▪️ First, the narrations do not state that the Saudi government will agree to this. Rather, they describe the Sufyani’s intention as such.

▪️ The government of the Hijaz will be so weakened and destabilized at that time that the very foundations of its rule will collapse.

▪️ For such a government, preserving the Kaaba would no longer be the priority. Instead, the focus would be on eliminating the person who seeks to overthrow and bring down the rule of the House of So-and-So — namely, killing Imam al-Mahdi.

▪️ The Kaaba has been destroyed several times throughout history, so this would not be the first time. Moreover, the Sufyani only intends to destroy it, but will not succeed. His army will be swallowed up by the earth at al-Bayda (Khusuf al-Bayda).

▪️ The Sufyani is also likened to the army of Abraha, which intended to destroy the Kaaba.

🔻 More importantly, the Sufyani is described as a pawn of the Jews seeking to implement the “Nile to Euphrates” project. Under this plan, Medina and Mecca would also be included, and therefore, according to this view, Islamic landmarks would naturally have to be erased to pave the way for the objectives attributed to the Jews.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3423
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔴 #Audience_Question / Who Is the Sufyani?

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🚩 Question:
Given that the Sufyani has never seen Mecca or Medina and is driven by a desire for revenge, which figure do you consider to be most closely associated with the Sufyani?

#Answer:

We will not get into specific individuals or identities.

Of course, the content already published on the channel is sufficient for those who genuinely seek the truth.

Look at the Sufyani phenomenon as a broader movement, although the prominent figure is emphasized in the narrations.

🔻 The main enemy of Imam al-Mahdi is Western, Israeli, and Arab Zionism.
And the Sufyani will emerge from within the current formed by this triangle.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3426
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en