Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
2.15K subscribers
15.9K photos
4.24K videos
107 files
8.52K links
Welcome to the official channel of the Edoardo Agnelli Islamic Association, dedicated to Islam and the stories of converts.

Connect with us:
Telegram: @fbistouni
Website: http://rahyafteha.ir/en
#Edoardo_Agnelli #IslamicAssociation
Download Telegram
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ماجرای محجبه شدن دختر تازه مسلمان دانمارکی و شیعه شدن
💗 کانال رهیافتگان ( انجمن شهید ادواردو آنیلی( مهدی) را به دوستان خود معرفی کنید.
@rahyafte_com
🌐 rahyafteha.ir

Part 1: https://t.me/rahyafte_en/34269

🆔 @rahyafte_en
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🪖تجربه جالب و عجیب بانوی تازه مسلمان دانمارکی از زندگی در ایران
💗 کانال رهیافتگان ( انجمن شهید ادواردو آنیلی( مهدی) را به دوستان خود معرفی کنید.
@rahyafte_com
🌐 rahyafteha.ir

Part 2: https://t.me/rahyafte_en/34344

🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Did you ever imagine that a U.S. Senate candidate would quote Imam Ali (AS) and Nahj al-Balagha during an election campaign?!

🔹 The current Democratic Party nominee for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, speaking at the 2018 UMAA International Conference in Detroit, Michigan, reflects on the timeless words of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) from Letter 53 of Nahj al-Balagha.

📚✨ The timeless wisdom of Imam Ali (AS), reaching beyond borders and generations.

@rahyafte_com
🌐 rahyafteha.ir

🔗 https://t.me/rahyafte_com/73624

🆔 @rahyafte_en
♨️ A Remarkable Story of How a Sunni Scholar Came to Embrace Shia Islam — As Recounted by Professor Tijani 🌍

📚 Professor Muhammad al-Tijani al-Samawi, a Tunisian scholar born in 1936, was originally a follower of the Maliki school of Sunni Islam. After traveling to Saudi Arabia, he became influenced by Wahhabism and began promoting its teachings. However, following a journey to Najaf and discussions with Shia scholars, he ultimately embraced Shia Islam.

🎙️ The Story of a Remarkable Encounter

Professor Tijani recounts meeting a Sunni religious leader who had studied Sahih al-Bukhari in its entirety, had followers of his own, and served as an imam leading people in prayer.

Tijani gave him a copy of his book, Then I Was Guided (Thumma Ihtadaytu), and encouraged him to read it, saying:

💬 “My dear brother, read this book. Perhaps you will find some errors in it, and you may be able to correct them.”

🕊️ Two months into the war in Gaza, Professor Tijani met him again and asked:

— “Have you read my book?”

— “No, I haven't.”

The man then asked:

— “Would you like to know whether I have become Shia?”

— “Yes! What's wrong with that?” Tijani replied.

The man answered:

💥 “I became Shia even before reading your book!”

Surprised, Professor Tijani asked:

— “How come?”

The man explained that he had looked at the situation surrounding Palestine and reached his own conclusion:

💬 “Look at who is standing up for Palestine: Iran is Shia, Hezbollah is Shia, the Houthis in Yemen are Shia, and the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq are Shia. They are fighting Israel and striving to liberate Jerusalem. Meanwhile, Sunni-majority countries are normalizing relations with Israel.”

He said that seeing this contrast had convinced him to embrace Shia Islam—even before opening the book.

✨ For him, the events surrounding Palestine had become the turning point in his religious journey.

📌 Professor Muhammad al-Tijani al-Samawi.

@rahyafte_com
🌐 rahyafteha.ir

🔗 https://t.me/rahyafte_com/73627

🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 A Fair Word to the “Opponents” of Imam Khomeini’s Revolution

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

1️⃣ Some time ago, Ms. Faezeh Hashemi quoted Ayatollah Sistani and referred to a meeting between Mr. Rafsanjani and Iraq’s Grand Religious Authority (Marjaʿ al-Taqlid). (1) The statement was not denied by supporters of the “Najaf School”; rather, it was widely circulated. (2)

Of course, the chain of transmission suggests that this quotation may not be authentic, especially given that Mr. Rafsanjani was known for recounting “isolated recollections” supported only by chains of transmission that ultimately traced back to himself.

2️⃣ The office of Ayatollah Sistani also considers reports attributed to him unreliable. (3) Nevertheless, in order to enlighten public opinion, a scholarly discussion entitled “The Najaf School and a Minimalist Perspective on the Process of the Advent” was prepared and published. (4)

3️⃣ Respecting the supreme religious authority of Iraq, Ayatollah Sistani, is an obligation incumbent upon everyone.

However, this discussion is directed at the “opponents of preparing the ground for the Advent” who have concealed themselves under the banner of the Najaf School. This quotation became an excuse for them to once again openly express their opposition to Imam Khomeini’s Revolution.

4️⃣ Regarding the legitimacy of uprising during the Occultation, there are two major viewpoints:

▪️ A. The legitimacy of uprising during the Occultation.

▪️ B. The illegitimacy of uprising during the Occultation.

5️⃣ And now, a third viewpoint:

▪️ C. The legitimacy of an uprising with specific characteristics that occurs only once in history.

This third viewpoint maintains that the default principle is that God does not approve of uprisings during the Occultation—except for an uprising possessing specific, clearly defined, and purposeful characteristics within the process leading to the Advent.

To elaborate, even if the opponents of the Revolution subscribe to the second viewpoint, they must ultimately acknowledge that, according to authentic hadiths (5), including narrations recorded in Kitab al-Ghaybah by al-Nuʿmani, an uprising by Shiites from Iran will take place before the Advent. The aspiration of this Revolution will be to hand over the banner to the Imam of the Age (Imam al-Mahdi, may God hasten his reappearance):

«كَأَنِّي بِقَوْمٍ قَدْ خَرَجُوا بِالْمَشْرِقِ ... وَ لَايَدْفَعُونَهَا إِلَّا إِلَى صَاحِبِكُمْ قَتْلَاهُمْ شُهَدَاءُ» (6)


“It is as though I can see a people who have risen in the East ... They will not hand it over to anyone except your Master, and their slain will be martyrs.”

6️⃣ If someone objects that the term “the lands of the East” encompasses a broader region than Iran, the answer is: Yes, but Iran is unquestionably among the lands of the East. (7)

Indeed, the specialized Mahdism Research Center in Najaf al-Ashraf also identifies Iran as part of the eastern lands and associates it with the Khurasani army. (8) This army will enter Iraq to fight the army of the Sufyani, which is supported by Western powers. Following the Advent, the banner of the Iranian Revolution will be presented to the Imam of the Age as a pledge of allegiance. (9)

7️⃣ Furthermore, according to the opening verses of Surah al-Isra (10), as well as the hadiths explaining these verses—including those recorded in Al-Kafi by al-Kulayni—God will choose a people before the Advent who will proclaim their readiness to fight the Jews and avenge the wrongs committed against the Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet’s Household). (11)

Imam al-Sadiq swears three times by a solemn oath that these people are the Shiites of Iran, specifically the people of Qom. (12)

8️⃣ Upon examining the hadiths, we discover that the uprising of the Iranian Shiites begins with a man from Qom who calls his followers to the truth. (13)

The conclusion of this Revolution is adorned with the Qur’anic phrase:

وَالْعَاقِبَةُ لِلْمُتَّقِينَ
“And the ultimate outcome belongs to the God-conscious.”
This bears a remarkable correspondence with the narration describing the handing over of the banner to the Imam of the Age:

«وَ لَايَدْفَعُونَهَا إِلَّا إِلَى صَاحِبِكُمْ قَتْلَاهُمْ شُهَدَاءُ» (14)


“They will not hand it over to anyone except your Master, and their slain will be martyrs.”

9️⃣ Therefore, the uprising of the eastern peoples and the Revolution of the Iranian Shiites aspire to the liberation of Palestine. They will fight the corrupting forces among the Jews, and their Revolution will ultimately connect with the establishment of the Imam of the Age’s global government.

🔟 Consequently, even when viewed through the lens of those who deny the legitimacy of uprisings during the Occultation, they are compelled to acknowledge the following:

If an uprising emerges in Iran and possesses specific characteristics—including the aspiration to liberate Palestine—it falls outside the scope of the hadiths prohibiting uprisings during the Occultation.

Accordingly, even on the basis of their own principles, they ought to support this Shiite uprising as part of the process leading to the Advent.

1️⃣1️⃣ Allamah Majlisi also understood Iran to be a force preparing the ground for the Advent. (16) The issue, however, lies in his mistaken identification of the historical instance. (17)

The Safavid state did not possess the characteristics required to complete the “puzzle of the Advent.”

Consider history: Did the Safavids aspire to liberate Palestine? No.

Yet, as explained above, one of the most important characteristics of a Revolution preparing the ground for the Advent—according to the verses of Surah al-Isra—is a confrontation between the Iranian Shiites and the Jews residing in Palestine, centered on Al-Aqsa Mosque. (18)

1️⃣2️⃣ In the book The Middle East in the Age of the Advent, particularly in the chapter entitled “Iran,” the characteristics and defining features of the “Revolution preparing the ground for the Advent” are examined through documented research and independent scholarly reasoning (ijtihad).

The discussion avoids arbitrary attempts to force historical events into preconceived interpretations and instead relies exclusively on rigorous scholarly examination and hadith analysis. (19)

1️⃣3️⃣ Of course, compared with the sun of the Imam of the Age, Imam Khomeini’s Revolution is like the light of a candle. (20)

But is it right to extinguish even this candle in the darkness of the Occultation, arguing that the sun is destined to rise tomorrow?

1️⃣4️⃣ It is also essential to distinguish between the political system and the Revolution. (21)

A system stripped of the Revolution’s foundational principles becomes something superficial and merely formal. (22)

Therefore, supporting the Revolution is obligatory only insofar as it serves the process leading to the Advent—not blindly endorsing every statement or action, however trivial or substantial, made in the name of Islam by certain officials of the political establishment.

🔻 Read Part Two for the documentary evidence and references supporting this article.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3480
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 The Participation of the Imam of the Age’s Closest Companions in the Iranian Army Sent to Iraq

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🔻 The duty of the Shiites is to join those preparing the ground for the Advent and rally under the banners of guidance before the Reappearance.

For this very reason, some of the Imam of the Age’s closest companions are present in the Iranian army dispatched to Iraq to confront the enemy:

📜 Arabic:
«يَبْعَثُ السُّفْيَانِيُّ جَيْشاً إِلَى الْكُوفَةِ ... فَبَيْنَا هُمْ كَذَلِكَ إِذْ أَقْبَلَتْ رَايَاتٌ مِنْ قِبَلِ خُرَاسَانَ ... وَمَعَهُمْ نَفَرٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ الْقَائِم»



Translation:
“The Sufyani will dispatch an army to Kufa ... While they are in this situation, suddenly banners will advance from the direction of Khurasan ... and among them will be a group of the companions of the Qa’im (the Imam who will rise).”

📚 Al-Nuʿmani, Kitab al-Ghaybah, p. 280

❓ Question One

If uprising during the Occultation is absolutely illegitimate, then how can the “companions of the Qa’im” be present and participate in the Iranian army dispatched to Iraq in the period preceding the Advent?

Opponents of the Revolution, let them answer this question if they can!

Do they not claim that the Infallible Imam said:

“If I were to live through that era, I would preserve myself for the time of the Advent”?

If so, why would the companions of the Qa’im and the Imam’s closest supporters disobey this instruction?

Furthermore, those killed in the uprising of the Iranians are explicitly described as martyrs:

📜 Arabic:
«قَتْلَاهُمْ شُهَدَاءُ»


Translation:
“Their slain are martyrs.”

📚 Al-Nuʿmani, Kitab al-Ghaybah, p. 273

🔻 Question Two

How can an uprising deemed illegitimate be one whose fallen are described by the Infallible Imam as attaining the rank of martyrs?

✅ If you wish, support the creation of more content.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3481
🆔 @AsrZohur110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 JD Vance, Trump’s Vice President: “I Wouldn’t Be Surprised If the Antichrist Were Among Us”

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🔻 In an interview with an evangelical podcast, JD Vance, Vice President of the United States, stated:

“I have no problem with our actions leading to a ‘biblical end-times event.’”

He added:

“As fascinated as I am by this, if I think about this question too much, it would be spiritually unhealthy for me. Instead, for now, I’m focused on doing as much of ‘God’s work’ as possible.”

He went on to say:

“The way things are unfolding in the world right now, I wouldn’t be surprised or shocked if the ‘Antichrist’ were among us.”

🔻 These remarks by a prominent member of the U.S. administration about the Antichrist, the Christian end times, and his interpretation of global developments have once again drawn attention to his worldview.

It is worth noting that some Christian movements portray the Antichrist as the savior of Muslims.

✅ Related Articles:

▪️ Peter Thiel: The World Is Approaching the Threshold of the “Coming of the Antichrist”
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/1579 (En)

▪️ Christian Zionism and the Prophecy of the “Year of the Advent”
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/1589 (En)

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3482
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 From “Nuclear Iran” to “Antichrist”: Mysterious Projects in Washington

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🔻 In Western civilization, it is portrayed as though “Iran intends to unleash an apocalyptic war.” [1]

Trump, too, keeps beating this hollow drum, declaring: “If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, half the world will be destroyed.” [2]

Yet, following Vance’s recent remarks and his reference to the “Antichrist”—a figure who, in the American evangelical tradition, is associated with the “savior of Muslims”—the narrative takes on a different dimension. This is despite the fact that impartial researchers dismiss such claims. [3]

In practice, it has now become clear that it is the United States and Israel that are working toward an “apocalyptic war project.” [4]

🔻 In our book, “The Apocalypse According to Zionism,” we explained in detail the prerequisites for this project and the plans being laid for the future of the world:

“From Famine and War to a Global Population Reset” [5]

✅ References & Further Reading:

1. https://t.me/asrzohur110/2715
2. https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/44827
3. https://t.me/asrzohur110/2717
4. https://t.me/asrzohur110/1440 (En)
5. https://nashremaaref.ir/product/417006/

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3484
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Rosenberg, American Politician: “Iran’s Leader” Seeks Mass Killings in the Christian World

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

▪️ Did you read the channel’s previous post? Did you notice how the presenter and the London-based member kept emphasizing one key phrase: “Apocalyptic Islam.”

▪️ Now, follow this line of rhetoric, and things get even more interesting. See what Rosenberg, an American politician associated with the Zionist evangelical movement—whose statements we have featured on this channel several times—has to say:

▪️ “The Iranians, led by Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, are promoting apocalyptic Islam in an attempt to plunge the world into chaos, particularly by destroying Israel. On the other hand, by carrying out mass killings in the United States, the center of Christianity, they seek to create the conditions for the appearance of the Twelfth Imam.”

▪️ Evangelicals falsely claim that Shiites will stop at nothing—not even violence and genocide—to achieve their apocalyptic objectives.

▪️ Likewise, to justify war against Iran in the eyes of the Western public, Zionists portray Shiite Islam as seeking the destruction of Christianity.

🔻 Yet Zionism itself subscribes to the idea of a global nuclear war and the Battle of Armageddon as a means of hastening the coming of the Messiah.

Isn’t this a contradiction?

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 https://t.me/asrzohur110/3485
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Christian Zionism and the Prophecy of the “Year of Jesus’ Second Coming”

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

▪️Futurist Protestant Christianity divides history into seven dispensations【1】 and is known as the school of Dispensationalism【2】.

▪️According to Christian Zionist beliefs, the world is currently in the sixth dispensation, which prepares the ground for the Second Coming of Christ.

▪️This sixth period began with the crucifixion of Jesus and will end with the ignition of the Battle of Armageddon【3】. After two thousand years, Christ will return again【4】.

▪️After the Rapture near the end of the sixth dispensation, the world will enter the era of the Great Tribulation, which culminates in the decisive war of Armageddon. Then, during the seventh dispensation, Jesus will establish global peace — a peace that, in their view, emerges through war; the same doctrine of “peace through power.”

▪️Based on this thinking, Armageddon must occur two thousand years after the crucifixion. Hence, some Christian theologians — though a minority — believe the preliminary stages of a global nuclear conflict must begin around 2026–2027【5】, continuing until the return of Christ.

▪️Hal Lindsey, in his book “The Prophecies of the Bible: Where Is America?”, claims that the United States will lead the Armageddon war in order to establish a Messianic New World Order【6】.

▪️If one subtracts the four to eight years of uncertainty in the Gregorian calendar (since Jesus was born several years before year one) from the age of 33 at the crucifixion, the result lies between 25–29 AD. Adding two millennia leads to 2025–2029.

Christian theologians have even stated:

“Christ will return by the year 2030, two thousand years after the crucifixion.”【7】


▪️Although this interpretation of Scripture is scientifically inconsistent and contradicts official Church doctrine, it represents the chaotic dream that Zionist movements strive to fulfill.

▪️Jewish and Christian Zionism, which today dominate parts of the Middle East and confront the Shi’a Axis, seem determined to push their agenda to completion.
The question is: What actions are they preparing for?

▪️From their perspective, the precondition for Jesus’ return is the destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque, the unveiling of the Third Temple, and the launch of the final Armageddon, a global nuclear war.

✅ References:

1. Dispensations

2. Dispensationalism

3. Luke 22:20

4. Khavass, Comparative Theology, p. 92

5 and 6. Shiroudi, Evangelical Christianity, Iranian Shiism, and the Future of Humanity, Mashreq-e-Mouood Journal, No. 1, pp. 106 & 108

7. Khavass, Comparative Theology, pp. 91–94

✅ Optional: Support content production

https://t.me/asrzohur110/1589
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en
🔴 #Audience_Questions

▪️ Have Westerners envisioned a world war through the lens of Armageddon?

▪️ What is Islam’s perspective on this? And are the relevant hadiths authentic?

✅ Related Topic:

🔻 From “Ronald” to “Donald”:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/2697

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3487
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

📌 A Brief Explanation

We have examined this subject in our book World War Before the Appearance (of the Mahdi), subtitled The End Times According to Zionism, where we explain the Islamic perspective alongside the viewpoints found in Jewish and Christian religious studies.

In brief, all three religions acknowledge a scenario involving war, chaos, and the deaths of billions of people. However, there is a crucial difference.

Judaism and Christianity differ in their interpretations, but the particular Christian current under discussion here is Protestant Christianity as represented by the dominant evangelical movement in the United States. Please note this distinction carefully: we are not referring to Catholic Christianity or Eastern Orthodox Christianity, such as that practiced in Russia.

Keep these three major branches of Christianity clearly in mind:

▪️ Protestantism
▪️ Catholicism
▪️ Eastern Orthodoxy

The Protestant evangelical movement, which is allied with Zionism, constitutes a major force within the broader Zionist axis. In some respects, its commitment to Zionism can be even more fervent than that of Jewish Zionists themselves.

To return to the main point: this current maintains that chaos must precede the coming of the Messiah or Savior. According to this view, peace will emerge from the very heart of war.

⚠️ Keep this principle in mind: Peace is believed to be born out of war.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 The War That Will “Reset” the World?

✍️ Mostafa Amiri

🔻 Video Commentary:

World War is a scenario shaped by the Zionist interpretation of the Torah and the Bible—an interpretation that, from the Islamic perspective, is not considered authoritative.

Whether such an event comes to pass depends on humanity’s free will and its ability to prevent it from happening.

Islam does not endorse the slaughter of more than half of the world’s population. Rather, it merely foretells the schemes and plans of the devils of this world.

However, if Zionists seek to turn this “disturbing dream” of nuclear war into reality, the issue will go beyond academic analysis and theoretical writings on paper and begin to take on the character of concrete, real-world action.

✅ For Further Reading:

🔻 The “Four Horsemen” of the End Times in the Book of Revelation:
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3013

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/3488
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🆔 @rahyafte_en