A Nationalist Energy Policy

Energy independence requires real dedication to nationalist principles

Wind and solar have markedly lower energy capacities than traditional sources

Nuclear energy has been sidelined

And a global oil market predates upon the Western world

Energy independence requires real dedication to nationalist principles.

Contracts which secure domestic prices, increases in exploration and consumption, investment in new technologies, and the development of a coherent energy strategy are all required to avoid disaster.

Read more in our full piece here on Substack:

We’ve all heard the claim that a National Divorce isn’t feasible because Red states supposedly couldn’t survive without federal funding. In our latest article, Executive Director David Zsutty breaks down how federal funding is a fancy rebate at best, and closer to a thief using his plunder to coerce and gas light his victims.

https://homelandinstitute.org/2024/04/texas-doesnt-need-federal-money-deconstructing-the-myth-of-federal-funding/

You can also follow the Homeland Institute on X: https://twitter.com/HomelandInst

With tensions rising, it would be wise to heed how an overwhelming majority of respondents in our poll opposed direct intervention in the Israel-Hamas War with boots on the ground or airstrikes.

Even more Republicans were opposed to direct military intervention than in favor. https://homelandinstitute.org/polls/foreign-policy-non-interventionism-and-the-draft/

As conflict heats up even further in the Middle East it is important to remember one thing above all else: Israel is not a friend to the West.

Iran is certainly no friend of Whites either, but they make no pretense of that. Israeli officials and Western politicians will spend the coming days praising and offering unlimited support to the Israelis, despite them being hostile and parasitic upon White countries.

In America's Appalling Ally we detail how the United States has been spied on, undermined, had its national security compromised, and been targeted by Israel.

From giving away American technology to US adversaries to spying on the American people and politicians, Israel is no friend to the American people.

American politicians have given away nearly 300 billion dollars in White tax dollars to Israel. Yet, Israel still commits widespread economic espionage against American companies.

Since the war in Gaza began Israel and its political sympathizers in the West have lobbied to move millions of Palestinians into Europe and American. Which we cover in Palestinian Mass Migration, Courtesy of Israel.

Israel politicians , including former Mossad administrators and diplomats, are imploring the West to take in Palestinian refugees because, to quote: “Europe and the U.S. accepted millions who fled earlier wars.”

The Middle East is nothing but a hole into which White blood, treasure, and lives are thrown without care.

Time to cut ties with Israel, and ignore the conflicts of that region. White interests must come first.

How do we raise white America’s birth rate? To what extent can demographic decline be solved through state intervention, if at all? Are pro-natalist policies electorally viable?

People have pondered these questions for years. Now, our latest Homeland Institute poll provides hard data to guide the discussion. Key findings are that:

Of white Americans aged 18 to 35, 87.3% of Democrats, 85.1% of Independents, and 72.2% of Republicans plan on below-replacement reproduction, meaning 2 or fewer children.

33.2% of all respondents, 35.9% of Democrats, 38.5% of Independents, and 23.1% of Republicans said that the financial cost of raising children overall was a barrier to having children.

9% of all respondents said that the financial cost of raising children overall was their single biggest barrier to having children.

Republicans were more likely to vote for a candidate with pro-natalist policies at 37.5% than those who were less likely at 18.5%. Independents were more likely to vote for a candidate with pro-natalist policies at 28.4% than those who were less likely at 21.4%.

22.5% of all respondents and 26.9% of Republicans ranked lifetime income tax breaks for parents as the incentive most likely to induce them to have children.

These and many more details are available in our exciting poll report: https://homelandinstitute.org/polls/460/

Eva Vlaardingerbroek's speech at CPAC Hungary has thrust the Great Replacement and birth rates into the news. Juicing the above posts will help propel our cutting edge research on these issues into the public discourse.

🇫🇷 This is Mathis Marchais.
An Afghan migrant tried to rob him. Mathis fought him off and ran away.

The Afghan chased him down and stabbed him to death.

Despite a history of other crimes, the French courts had recently let the Afghan back on the streets.

Mathis was 15 years old.

Always remember their names and always remember that our cause is a just and moral duty.

22.5% of all respondents and 26.9% of Republicans ranked lifetime income tax breaks for parents as the incentive most likely to induce them to have children.

An income tax break was the cornerstone of Hungary's natalist policies which raised their birth rate.

Natalism works.

While Democrats were extremely hostile towards pro-natalist policies, Republicans and Independents who were more likely to vote for a candidate with natalist policies outnumbered those who were less likely.

Natalism is electorally viable.

Huge crowd in Dublin for today's anti immigration protest. Speeches being given at the customs house now

This Saturday, I had the great honor of going on The Political Cesspool with James Edwards to discuss the findings of the Homeland Institute's latest poll on natalism:

https://thepoliticalcesspool.org/radio-show-hour-1-2024-05-04/
https://homelandinstitute.org/polls/460/

It would be really nice if James Edwards was unbanned over on X!

To commemorate the Pioneer Mother who with unfaltering trust in God suffered the hardship of the unknown west to prepare for us a homeland of peace and plenty.

Happy Mother's Day!

An issue has arisen of indecent ads being displayed on Telegram channels. These ads are automatic and owners have no control over them. We do not endorse the content of any uncouth ads, and encourage you report any which you see of an indecent nature by clicking the three dots next to them.