Is Remigration still unsayable?

CEO of the Institute for Remigration Martin Sellner is having a discussion with journalists at the Remigration Summit :

Denmark showed that remigration can be discussed openly and implemented politically. Across Europe, activists face persecution simply for talking about it. We need freedom of speech, the right to debate remigration, and an end to censorship.

Let's normalize the conversation.

Politics now is about who stays and who goes.

Kevin DeAnna and Paul Kersey discuss the Remigration Summit in Portugal — a massive success, especially after Greg Bovino made a surprise appearance and showed American support for the pro-European agenda.

Thank you to the organizers of the Remigration Summit in Portugal for an unforgettable weekend of camaraderie and collaboration, all with the goal of saving our shared civilization!

Follow and support them at @Resum25 on Telegram, or on X for video of all presentations (including ours!) out soon.

F. Roger Devlin on how the Remigration movement solidified at RESUM26.

https://counter-currents.com/2026/06/the-remigration-movement-solidifies/

Originally published on American Renaissance.

Follow RESUM26 on X.

"The problems you face in Europe are the same problems we face in the United States."

🇺🇸 Gregory Bovino, retired U.S. Border Patrol Commander, was in Porto for the Remigration Summit, present through the Voxeuropa network.

🔴 His assessment is straightforward : the problems facing Europe are the same ones facing the United States. He noted that Voxeuropa had done "a fantastic job in highlighting that" before adding that this movement is "special," and that he doesn't see it "stopping anytime soon."

INSTAGRAM | X | SUBSTACK

"This will constitute a replacement in the near future."

🇮🇹 Italy is not a monolith, its a mosaic of distinct traditions, histories and peoples. Andrea Ballarati argues that this mosaic is being undone: by a collapsing birth rate, and by the pace of mass immigration into a society that no longer has the numbers to absorb it.

🎤 In this interview, Ballarati makes the case plainly, and says the word most politicians avoid.

Interview conducted by Maddie for Voxeuropa, live from the Remigration Summit in Porto.
🎥 By Filmkunstkollektiv

INSTAGRAM | X | SUBSTACK

David Zsutty proposes Zsutty's Maximum as a new rule of social science:

"Ingroup behavior sets the maximum for outgroup behavior."

In other words: Groups simply don’t treat outsiders better than they treat their own. Which is oftentimes quite nasty.

https://counter-currents.com/2026/06/zsuttys-maximum/

If we banned immigration from every country that has a worse human trafficking record than the United States, the ban would cover all but 27-28 countries and the entire third world.

In another example of Zsutty's Maximum (or Z Max, that "Ingroup behavior sets the maximum for outgroup behavior"), absent extreme coercion, how will foreign peoples who routinely traffic each other treat us?

🇺🇸🇬🇧⚡️- "American patriot Asmongold read our entire Rape Gang Inquiry report to his millions of subscribers over seven hours. He has already done more than the entire British media establishment. An incredible effort." - Rupert Lowe thanking Zachariah "Asmongold" Hoyt for reading the Report in front over dozens of thousands of viewers on Twitch.

📝 🇬🇧 🇮🇳 Sikhs Before and After Nowak | Millennial Woes

While leftists are happy with any and all minorities being in the country and replacing us, conservatives always have to rationalise their support for what is, after all, an existential threat to everything they hold dear. They tend to use the same rationale for every single minority group: “X-group are natural conservatives!” With Sikhs, the evidence is their traditional garb, religious piety, masculine presence, and apparent law-abiding nature.

But the main thing for conservatives is Sikhs being loyal to right-wing politics. In actuality, Sikhs vote decisively for left-wing parties. In the 2024 election only 23% of them voted right, with 49% voting left and 28% abstaining. In the run-up to that election, the Sikh Network produced a manifesto aimed at mobilising Sikhs and influencing British politicians. For the latter, it detailed how they could earn Sikh votes by pledging to fulfil certain demands. These demands included restricting freedom of speech for native Brits and increasing Sikh immigration into Britain, further changing the country and loosening our (native) hold on it. These people are “conservative” in the same way that Hindus are “conservative”, Muslims are “conservative” or right-wing Jews are “conservative”: they are profoundly ethnocentric and committed to the betterment of their ethnic group. Their conservatism has nothing to do with Britain.

That we Whites are able to delude ourselves about Sikhs is a sign of how little we know them, because of how little we interact with them. In a macabre fashion, this situation was sustainable; if they stick to themselves, we don’t need to know anything about them at all, which is great, because most of us have absolutely no interest in foreign cultures. (How many of us even know what the word “dastaar” means?) The problem, of course, is that ignorance is not bliss. Sikhs change our country in a million tiny ways every day. But the conservative can live with that, just as he lives with any degradation if it happens slowly enough.

https://www.woes.blog/p/sikhs-before-and-after-nowak

🇫🇷⚡️- A group of five illegal immigrants ambushed a young French man in Narbonne earlier this week, with intent to kill him.

Louis, 17, died yesterday after three days in a coma.