Forwarded from Counter-Currents
David Zsutty proposes Zsutty's Maximum as a new rule of social science:
"Ingroup behavior sets the maximum for outgroup behavior."
In other words: Groups simply don’t treat outsiders better than they treat their own. Which is oftentimes quite nasty.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/06/zsuttys-maximum/
"Ingroup behavior sets the maximum for outgroup behavior."
In other words: Groups simply don’t treat outsiders better than they treat their own. Which is oftentimes quite nasty.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/06/zsuttys-maximum/
Forwarded from White Papers
If we banned immigration from every country that has a worse human trafficking record than the United States, the ban would cover all but 27-28 countries and the entire third world.
🔥3
Forwarded from David Zsutty
In another example of Zsutty's Maximum (or Z Max, that "Ingroup behavior sets the maximum for outgroup behavior"), absent extreme coercion, how will foreign peoples who routinely traffic each other treat us?
🔥2
One of the most important benefits of doing our own polling is that we have objective data to pushback when Leftists try to gaslight policymakers. Bovino is 100% right here.
Please like and repost on X.
Please like and repost on X.
👍2
Forwarded from Generation Identitær Danmark
🧕🏿Danish citizenship revoked and annulled after passport checks in ghetto areas!❌
👮 Today, passport checks were carried out in Danish ghetto areas.
❌ Several migrants had their Danish citizenship revoked because it had either been obtained on false grounds or failed to meet new, stricter requirements.
🎭 The passport checks were part of a happening to show a simple point:
⚖️ Citizenship should not be treated as sacred. What is granted by law may likewise be revoked by law.
💰Migrants who still hold Danish citizenship after this revision should be encouraged through even more pressing measures. We propose significant economic incentives and targeted programs for repatriation, just as it should be made nearly impossible to maintain a foreign culture.
👮 Today, passport checks were carried out in Danish ghetto areas.
❌ Several migrants had their Danish citizenship revoked because it had either been obtained on false grounds or failed to meet new, stricter requirements.
🎭 The passport checks were part of a happening to show a simple point:
⚖️ Citizenship should not be treated as sacred. What is granted by law may likewise be revoked by law.
💰Migrants who still hold Danish citizenship after this revision should be encouraged through even more pressing measures. We propose significant economic incentives and targeted programs for repatriation, just as it should be made nearly impossible to maintain a foreign culture.
❤5🔥1
Forwarded from Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
🇺🇸🇬🇧⚡️- "American patriot Asmongold read our entire Rape Gang Inquiry report to his millions of subscribers over seven hours. He has already done more than the entire British media establishment. An incredible effort." - Rupert Lowe thanking Zachariah "Asmongold" Hoyt for reading the Report in front over dozens of thousands of viewers on Twitch.
⚡11🫡2🤡1
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
📝 🇬🇧 🇮🇳 Sikhs Before and After Nowak | Millennial Woes
While leftists are happy with any and all minorities being in the country and replacing us, conservatives always have to rationalise their support for what is, after all, an existential threat to everything they hold dear. They tend to use the same rationale for every single minority group: “X-group are natural conservatives!” With Sikhs, the evidence is their traditional garb, religious piety, masculine presence, and apparent law-abiding nature.
But the main thing for conservatives is Sikhs being loyal to right-wing politics. In actuality, Sikhs vote decisively for left-wing parties. In the 2024 election only 23% of them voted right, with 49% voting left and 28% abstaining. In the run-up to that election, the Sikh Network produced a manifesto aimed at mobilising Sikhs and influencing British politicians. For the latter, it detailed how they could earn Sikh votes by pledging to fulfil certain demands. These demands included restricting freedom of speech for native Brits and increasing Sikh immigration into Britain, further changing the country and loosening our (native) hold on it. These people are “conservative” in the same way that Hindus are “conservative”, Muslims are “conservative” or right-wing Jews are “conservative”: they are profoundly ethnocentric and committed to the betterment of their ethnic group. Their conservatism has nothing to do with Britain.
That we Whites are able to delude ourselves about Sikhs is a sign of how little we know them, because of how little we interact with them. In a macabre fashion, this situation was sustainable; if they stick to themselves, we don’t need to know anything about them at all, which is great, because most of us have absolutely no interest in foreign cultures. (How many of us even know what the word “dastaar” means?) The problem, of course, is that ignorance is not bliss. Sikhs change our country in a million tiny ways every day. But the conservative can live with that, just as he lives with any degradation if it happens slowly enough.
https://www.woes.blog/p/sikhs-before-and-after-nowak
While leftists are happy with any and all minorities being in the country and replacing us, conservatives always have to rationalise their support for what is, after all, an existential threat to everything they hold dear. They tend to use the same rationale for every single minority group: “X-group are natural conservatives!” With Sikhs, the evidence is their traditional garb, religious piety, masculine presence, and apparent law-abiding nature.
But the main thing for conservatives is Sikhs being loyal to right-wing politics. In actuality, Sikhs vote decisively for left-wing parties. In the 2024 election only 23% of them voted right, with 49% voting left and 28% abstaining. In the run-up to that election, the Sikh Network produced a manifesto aimed at mobilising Sikhs and influencing British politicians. For the latter, it detailed how they could earn Sikh votes by pledging to fulfil certain demands. These demands included restricting freedom of speech for native Brits and increasing Sikh immigration into Britain, further changing the country and loosening our (native) hold on it. These people are “conservative” in the same way that Hindus are “conservative”, Muslims are “conservative” or right-wing Jews are “conservative”: they are profoundly ethnocentric and committed to the betterment of their ethnic group. Their conservatism has nothing to do with Britain.
That we Whites are able to delude ourselves about Sikhs is a sign of how little we know them, because of how little we interact with them. In a macabre fashion, this situation was sustainable; if they stick to themselves, we don’t need to know anything about them at all, which is great, because most of us have absolutely no interest in foreign cultures. (How many of us even know what the word “dastaar” means?) The problem, of course, is that ignorance is not bliss. Sikhs change our country in a million tiny ways every day. But the conservative can live with that, just as he lives with any degradation if it happens slowly enough.
https://www.woes.blog/p/sikhs-before-and-after-nowak
www.woes.blog
Sikhs Before and After Nowak
While technically a religious group, Sikhs are in reality - or rather, in human perceptual reality - an ethnic group.
Forwarded from Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
🇫🇷⚡️- A group of five illegal immigrants ambushed a young French man in Narbonne earlier this week, with intent to kill him.
Louis, 17, died yesterday after three days in a coma.
Louis, 17, died yesterday after three days in a coma.
Forwarded from Martin Sellner (english)
Louis will never be 18.
His life was cut down by the great replacement.
If you are older than 18 or have a son who is older than 18, know that it could have been you or it could have been your son.
That's why you should be as mad if it would have been your son or your friend. Luis was one of us.
Change your life and make it 100% about remigration.
Sign our Save Europe Act and help us to create the biggest European movement for remigration!
https://save-europe-act.com/
#JusticePourLouis
His life was cut down by the great replacement.
If you are older than 18 or have a son who is older than 18, know that it could have been you or it could have been your son.
That's why you should be as mad if it would have been your son or your friend. Luis was one of us.
Change your life and make it 100% about remigration.
Sign our Save Europe Act and help us to create the biggest European movement for remigration!
https://save-europe-act.com/
#JusticePourLouis
👍4
Forwarded from Martin Sellner (english)
Our beautiful youth, cut down by them.
They would all be alive without them.
They must go by the millions.
Remigration now.
They would all be alive without them.
They must go by the millions.
Remigration now.
👍6
Forwarded from White Papers
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
🇺🇸⚡- The Supreme Court has permitted President Trump to strip Syrians and Haitians of TPS (Temporary Protected Status) in a 6-3 decision.
The decision was made based on the Congressional precedent of stripping TPS. Justice Samuel Alito also commented on the lower court's injunction having little merit, as its injunction was filed due to the claim that stripping TPS was a form of racial discrimination against Haitians.
The decision will likely give way to the process of stripping Ethiopia, Myanmar, Somalia, South Sudan, Venezuela, and Nepal of their TPS.
The decision was made based on the Congressional precedent of stripping TPS. Justice Samuel Alito also commented on the lower court's injunction having little merit, as its injunction was filed due to the claim that stripping TPS was a form of racial discrimination against Haitians.
The decision will likely give way to the process of stripping Ethiopia, Myanmar, Somalia, South Sudan, Venezuela, and Nepal of their TPS.
👏8
Forwarded from Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
🇺🇸⚡- In an additional decision, the Supreme Court, in another 6-3 ruling, ruled that non-citizens arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border did not automatically register as asylum seekers, and can be turned away.
👏11
Forwarded from American Renaissance
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The most effective promoter of remigration, Martin Sellner, gives Jared Taylor a long, insightful interview.
❤9
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
🚷 🇫🇷 🗳 83% of French people are in favor of negative immigration
90% of 15-24 year olds are in favor of negative immigration
Should certain categories of foreigners already present in France be deported, particularly delinquents, criminals, or the long-term unemployed? According to a CSA poll for Europe 1, CNews, and the JDD, a very large majority of French people are in favor. In fact, 83% say they support this. Men are in favor at 82%, and women at 84%. Those in higher socioeconomic groups (CSP+) support this at 78%, those in lower socioeconomic groups (CSP-) at 84%, and the unemployed at 87%.
Looking at the age pyramid, support for negative immigration is fairly consistent among a certain category of foreigners. Apart from the 35-49 age group, 77% of whom are in favor, all other age groups are above 80%: 25-34 year olds are at 81%, 50-64 year olds at 83%, and 65 and over at 87%.
Those aged 18-24 are the most supportive of implementing negative immigration policies, with 90% expressing a favorable opinion. Looking at political opinions, the possibility of deporting foreign offenders, criminals, or long-term unemployed individuals also far exceeds the majority, regardless of their political leanings.
On the left, 69% of voters are in favor (66% for La France Insoumise, 75% for the Socialist Party, and 68% for the Greens). On the right, this support is even stronger, with 96% of those who cast a ballot for Les Républicains wanting the process implemented. National Rally voters follow closely behind with 93% in favor.
https://www.europe1.fr/societe/sondage-83-des-francais-sont-favorables-a-limmigration-negative-960984
90% of 15-24 year olds are in favor of negative immigration
Should certain categories of foreigners already present in France be deported, particularly delinquents, criminals, or the long-term unemployed? According to a CSA poll for Europe 1, CNews, and the JDD, a very large majority of French people are in favor. In fact, 83% say they support this. Men are in favor at 82%, and women at 84%. Those in higher socioeconomic groups (CSP+) support this at 78%, those in lower socioeconomic groups (CSP-) at 84%, and the unemployed at 87%.
Looking at the age pyramid, support for negative immigration is fairly consistent among a certain category of foreigners. Apart from the 35-49 age group, 77% of whom are in favor, all other age groups are above 80%: 25-34 year olds are at 81%, 50-64 year olds at 83%, and 65 and over at 87%.
Those aged 18-24 are the most supportive of implementing negative immigration policies, with 90% expressing a favorable opinion. Looking at political opinions, the possibility of deporting foreign offenders, criminals, or long-term unemployed individuals also far exceeds the majority, regardless of their political leanings.
On the left, 69% of voters are in favor (66% for La France Insoumise, 75% for the Socialist Party, and 68% for the Greens). On the right, this support is even stronger, with 96% of those who cast a ballot for Les Républicains wanting the process implemented. National Rally voters follow closely behind with 93% in favor.
https://www.europe1.fr/societe/sondage-83-des-francais-sont-favorables-a-limmigration-negative-960984
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Europe 1
SONDAGE - 83% des Français sont favorables à l'immigration négative
Selon un sondage CSA pour Europe 1, CNews et le JDD, 83% des Français sont pour le renvoi de certaines catégories d'étrangers déjà présents en France, notamment des
Forwarded from Dries Van Langenhove
In Paris, people biking to work get soaked with buckets of water. When they stop and complain, they get beat up.
In Antwerp, random passersby get sprayed with bleach as a ‘joke’, leaving them with damaged eyes and clothes.
Children’s mischief used to be funny and innocent. Since the Great Replacement, it can mean permanently damaged eyes or death.
In Antwerp, random passersby get sprayed with bleach as a ‘joke’, leaving them with damaged eyes and clothes.
Children’s mischief used to be funny and innocent. Since the Great Replacement, it can mean permanently damaged eyes or death.