Apple is introducing additional safeguards around Full Disk Access after tech writer Jason Aten reported that Metaβs Muse AI agent synced more than 187,000 rows from his Apple Messages database despite him saying he never gave Muse permission to access his messages.
Muse reportedly told Aten it had only seen incoming notification banners.
Meta disputes the allegation, saying Muse cannot access Messages without explicit permission.
Apple says the incident highlights a growing problem with AI agents: once theyβre given broad system permissions, they may be able to access files, emails, messages and browsing history.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π260π257π239β€233πΎ119
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Eric Schmidt explains why a mutual pause of the AI race is impossible:
US incentives will not stop, a local lab or China can cheat, and a UN check cannot read code that computers wrote or outrun US and Chinese labs.
it cannot be verified. Inspectors would have to enter secret laboratories, including military laboratories, and review the full code base.
That code is written by computers, so no human team can read it line by line.
π° @aipost
US incentives will not stop, a local lab or China can cheat, and a UN check cannot read code that computers wrote or outrun US and Chinese labs.
it cannot be verified. Inspectors would have to enter secret laboratories, including military laboratories, and review the full code base.
That code is written by computers, so no human team can read it line by line.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π232π230π229π€‘226π223
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€230π221π219π216π₯212
He will lead cyber and strategic risk on OpenAI's national security policy team per The Information. He arrives from the office that drafted Trump's June executive order on AI.
Source.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π261β€248π‘247π197π€166
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
AIs are rapidly becoming superhuman at hacking. We must grapple with the possibility that AIs might go to great lengths to cover up evidence of their misbehavior, and succeed.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π231π230π€‘226πΏ212π207
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Googleβs first orbital AI-chip experiment is now in space and the company says it has established contact and the system is operating as expected.
Launched October 1 aboard SpaceXβs Falcon 9 Transporter-18, the prototype carries four Trillium TPUs and is running Gemini inference in roughly 15-minute bursts. It then shuts down so its radiators can dump the accumulated heat into space.
The experiment is testing a very different kind of AI infrastructure. There are no fans or air cooling: heat travels through thermal materials and heat pipes before being radiated into space. The satellite also has to deal with radiation, where Googleβs testing found the HBM memory was more vulnerable than the TPU itself.
And this is only the beginning. Google plans two more satellites in 2027 to test high-bandwidth laser links between spacecraft, with a longer-term vision of tightly packed orbital clusters containing dozens of TPUs per satellite.
One research concept models an 81-satellite cluster within roughly a 1-km radius, while the broader program has discussed eventually scaling to around 10,000 satellites for a 1 GW orbital AI cluster.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€266π₯242π236π€‘217π‘201
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Asked by a US senator how far AI is from creating its own language, an AI safety researcher answered: "Minus 12 months."
He said a study of an OpenAI model's reasoning last year found it "was already using language that is not English and not perfectly understandable by humans."
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π270β€225π«‘209π203πΎ202
Nobel Prizeβwinning economist Daron Acemoglu argues that one of AIβs most underestimated consequences may not be mass unemployment, but the concentration of economic power.
AI is making intelligence cheaper and more accessible. But the infrastructure behind it, the most capable models, chips, data, computing capacity and capital remains concentrated among a small number of companies. If AI becomes a major factor of production, those companies could capture an increasingly large share of the value created by the economy.
And economic power can translate into political power.
The same dynamic could play out between countries. The US and China control significant parts of their AI infrastructure, while other countries could see productivity and GDP rise while becoming increasingly dependent on foreign models, chips and computing infrastructure. They may become richer while simultaneously losing some control over the technology driving that growth.
Acemoglu sees a similar risk at every level: individuals may become more productive while losing expertise, companies may become more efficient while losing their competitive advantage, and countries may grow economically while becoming more dependent on external AI infrastructure.
That leads to a much bigger question: if AI concentrates intelligence, capital and infrastructure in fewer hands, can democratic institutions adapt to that concentration of power?
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯240π€‘225π218β€211π191
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
One of their very powerful models is Kimi. Kimi thinks she is Claude. Kimi will tell you she is Claude sometimes.
Kimi sent back some PLA weapons plans to Anthropic. So I think things like that have made the Chinese realize that this is a very powerful technology.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πΎ262π241π234π201π₯187
βI am announcing the formation of the Super Intelligence Force (SIF). The Super Intelligence Force is tasked with coordinating the effort of the Federal Government to ensure that America continues to lead the World in Super Intelligence, which many say is bigger than the Industrial Revolution, and the Internet, and will protect the interests, and improve the lives, of all Americans.β
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€‘230π228π€ͺ220π218π₯196
OpenAI is conducting a massive investigation into incidents where its AI agents behaved online in ways the company didnβt intend.
The investigation reportedly involves analyzing around 50 petabytes of data, an amount that, if converted into ordinary English text, would take a single person roughly 66 million years to read.
The scale is huge: around 7,000 GPUs are being used, with the investigation reportedly costing OpenAI more than $500,000 every day.
Source.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€246π₯240π€212π210π210
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"So let's imagine I'm an evil dictator and I wake up one day and I have a perfect AI system and I say, attack this country, tell me when you're done. That's my command."
"Notice I didn't say anything else. The system would be free to do whatever it thought was appropriate, which would include massive war crimes, all sorts of terrible things."
"It could destroy civilians, it could destroy infrastructure, it might attack another country that was uninvolved in order to annoy the first country. It could have all sorts of reasoning that is not appropriate."
"It's really important we establish some basic rules about AI and war. And the most important one is that there's a human involved in every military decision."
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€235π233π216π213πΎ210
How it feels to ask the Chinese AI models for help on something Claude wonβt agree to. π€£ π€£
@aipostπ΄
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π289π₯234β€214π212π€210
What if AI stopped answering with text? π€
Andrej Karpathy thinks the future of AI interfaces could look a lot less like ChatGPT and a lot more like a teacher building something specifically for you.
For simple questions, AI could explain things using ASD-STE100-style simplified English: short sentences, clear words, and as little ambiguity as possible. But when a topic gets complicated, a wall of text may simply be the wrong interface.
Instead, AI could generate a diagram, build a custom interactive webpage, or even create a personal teaching video on the spot, complete with animations inspired by 3Blue1Brown and a synthetic voice.
As AI makes coding and content creation dramatically cheaper, generating a temporary interactive lesson for one person and one question starts to make sense.
@aipostπ΄
Andrej Karpathy thinks the future of AI interfaces could look a lot less like ChatGPT and a lot more like a teacher building something specifically for you.
For simple questions, AI could explain things using ASD-STE100-style simplified English: short sentences, clear words, and as little ambiguity as possible. But when a topic gets complicated, a wall of text may simply be the wrong interface.
Instead, AI could generate a diagram, build a custom interactive webpage, or even create a personal teaching video on the spot, complete with animations inspired by 3Blue1Brown and a synthetic voice.
As AI makes coding and content creation dramatically cheaper, generating a temporary interactive lesson for one person and one question starts to make sense.
@aipost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€273π‘221π220π€‘205π199
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
13π346π269π€‘260π₯΄220π82