Can we see a bottom, then another bottom, and then another one? Of course!
What surprises me is the crowd consensus that we must go lower. According to some metrics people mention, we supposedly haven’t reached “capitulation” levels yet.
But I also remember the same crowd mindset in 2025, when everyone was saying we hadn’t reached the top of the market yet because we hadn’t hit some “euphoria” level.
So it feels like a game of extremes — always swinging from one side to the other.
And that looks a bit strange. The market doesn’t owe anyone anything, and with the arrival of Trump we can see that institutions are playing their own game, following their own rules, without really caring about things like 4-year cycles, halvings, and so on.
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
What surprises me is the crowd consensus that we must go lower. According to some metrics people mention, we supposedly haven’t reached “capitulation” levels yet.
But I also remember the same crowd mindset in 2025, when everyone was saying we hadn’t reached the top of the market yet because we hadn’t hit some “euphoria” level.
So it feels like a game of extremes — always swinging from one side to the other.
And that looks a bit strange. The market doesn’t owe anyone anything, and with the arrival of Trump we can see that institutions are playing their own game, following their own rules, without really caring about things like 4-year cycles, halvings, and so on.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥2
If you had invested $1000 in Monster Energy in 1994, you would have $2 million today.
The company's shares have risen by 200,000% over three decades, making it the most profitable investment of the last 30 years
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
The company's shares have risen by 200,000% over three decades, making it the most profitable investment of the last 30 years
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥4
In this video, I showed examples of several tokens that have already reached the Fundamental Value line, as well as 15 tokens that are still trading below this line. These are only selected examples.
I strongly recommend enabling the Take Profit indicator, opening the full list of tokens on your exchange, switching to the weekly timeframe, and using the guidelines from this video to scan all tokens that show strong potential while trading below the Fundamental Value line.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥3
The End of Altcoin Seasons? A New Crypto Reality
watch till the end! 🚨
▶️ https://youtu.be/BCIqUew4haA
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
watch till the end! 🚨
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍2🤯1🐳1😎1
The Easiest Trading Setup You'll Ever Need: BOS + The Missing Piece #education
▶️ https://youtu.be/-o_g7UZzYPA
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍3
How can anyone take crypto projects seriously?
We have hundreds of supposedly “fundamentally strong” projects that keep making new lows, while a random token placed in Binance’s Monitoring Zone, with a real risk of being delisted, rallies 900% in just two weeks — a move that many top-tier tokens may not be able to replicate this year or even next year.
The logic in the crypto market seems completely absent.
By the way in Syn video added take profit line alert on W tf. So we triggered)
We have hundreds of supposedly “fundamentally strong” projects that keep making new lows, while a random token placed in Binance’s Monitoring Zone, with a real risk of being delisted, rallies 900% in just two weeks — a move that many top-tier tokens may not be able to replicate this year or even next year.
The logic in the crypto market seems completely absent.
By the way in Syn video added take profit line alert on W tf. So we triggered)
5🤯2
I'll repeat again) FILTER your social FEED
According to The Wall Street Journal, Polymarket allegedly paid social media creators to promote fake betting wins using websites that closely resembled the real platform.
After reviewing over 1,100 videos, journalists found that none of the showcased bets were real. Influencers claimed nearly $900,000 in profits, while those same bets would have actually resulted in losses.
Creators were reportedly paid $2,000–$3,000 per month and were required not to disclose the partnership. The campaign primarily targeted U.S. users and generated over 140 million views across TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. 👀📈
With crypto coins always same things! Same story when influencers show you big pnls or opened positions on random exchanges (its not real money, cex will give you money to your main account so you can create an super engagement content)
I'm better watch and listen some boring content from 100 followers nerd than top hyped influencers
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
According to The Wall Street Journal, Polymarket allegedly paid social media creators to promote fake betting wins using websites that closely resembled the real platform.
After reviewing over 1,100 videos, journalists found that none of the showcased bets were real. Influencers claimed nearly $900,000 in profits, while those same bets would have actually resulted in losses.
Creators were reportedly paid $2,000–$3,000 per month and were required not to disclose the partnership. The campaign primarily targeted U.S. users and generated over 140 million views across TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. 👀📈
With crypto coins always same things! Same story when influencers show you big pnls or opened positions on random exchanges (its not real money, cex will give you money to your main account so you can create an super engagement content)
I'm better watch and listen some boring content from 100 followers nerd than top hyped influencers
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍1🤯1
BTC net capital inflow by years
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥1
So...Strategy sold 32 BTC (2.5 mln $) in a next days BTC dumped -24%
Now Saylor purchased 520 BTC (35 mln $) BTC reaction 3% if we count even from bottom Asia session...
So almost zero reaction! How it works?
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Now Saylor purchased 520 BTC (35 mln $) BTC reaction 3% if we count even from bottom Asia session...
So almost zero reaction! How it works?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍1
Aptos Price Analysis: This Is the Signal We've Been Waiting for All Year!
▶️ https://youtu.be/5vfziOVWGoM
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥3👍1
XRP Price Analysis: The Market Is Missing This Signal on M timeframe (first time in a history)
▶️ https://youtu.be/YazSl_h9qDU
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥3
Since 2022, I've been repeating that with each passing year (not even each cycle), Bitcoin's percentage gains become smaller than in previous cycles. That's only logical, because the asset keeps getting heavier. It's much harder to pump an asset with a $1 trillion market cap than a token with a $1 billion market cap.
Only recently, after comments from CZ suggesting that Bitcoin doesn't have to experience the same 75–80% drawdowns as in previous cycles, have more people started to think about this possibility.
Everything tends to scale proportionally: lower upside potential also means lower downside potential. Over time, Bitcoin's growth curve becomes more rounded, and sooner or later it may behave more like the S&P 500, where a 20% annual gain is considered a strong result.
Looking at the MVRV Z-Score, we can see that the realized price is currently around $49,000–$50,000. Does that mean Bitcoin must revisit those levels? Not really. Could it happen? Absolutely.
What's also interesting is that every cycle, the post-peak declines are occurring at progressively higher levels. That suggests the percentage drawdowns are becoming smaller over time.
For now, we watch and observe.
One thing I can repeat once again: don't rely too heavily on old cycles or Bitcoin's historical behavior from 2017 or even 2021. In fact, you can go back and review ideas I shared on the channel 2–3 years ago. The market is evolving, and Bitcoin is evolving with it. 📈🚀
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Only recently, after comments from CZ suggesting that Bitcoin doesn't have to experience the same 75–80% drawdowns as in previous cycles, have more people started to think about this possibility.
Everything tends to scale proportionally: lower upside potential also means lower downside potential. Over time, Bitcoin's growth curve becomes more rounded, and sooner or later it may behave more like the S&P 500, where a 20% annual gain is considered a strong result.
Looking at the MVRV Z-Score, we can see that the realized price is currently around $49,000–$50,000. Does that mean Bitcoin must revisit those levels? Not really. Could it happen? Absolutely.
What's also interesting is that every cycle, the post-peak declines are occurring at progressively higher levels. That suggests the percentage drawdowns are becoming smaller over time.
For now, we watch and observe.
One thing I can repeat once again: don't rely too heavily on old cycles or Bitcoin's historical behavior from 2017 or even 2021. In fact, you can go back and review ideas I shared on the channel 2–3 years ago. The market is evolving, and Bitcoin is evolving with it. 📈🚀
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥6
I was just thinking about how controlled the market might actually be.
The crypto market trades 24/7, 365 days a year without stopping. That means someone, somewhere, knows the exact day — and perhaps even the exact time — when a reversal begins.
At some point, the broader altcoin market will start moving higher. Markets always move up and down. Just think about how many assets there are on Binance alone — over 300 trading pairs. There will inevitably be a moment when many of them begin reversing at the same time.
And when that happens, part of the world will be asleep because of different time zones. Others won't be looking at their phones or computers. Yet somehow, on a single one-minute candle, buying pressure appears and prices start moving higher. Only later does the crowd notice and begin chasing the move.
But someone has to buy first.
How is it possible that hundreds of assets can react almost simultaneously? It makes you wonder whether the charts we see are largely algorithmic patterns with only a portion of genuine market activity behind them.
The same applies to market tops. There were people who seemed to know exactly when Bitcoin would reach a certain level and then reverse. Obviously, it's not a trader sitting in an office manually pressing a sell button to start a major move. Everything is driven by software, algorithms, and bots.
But software and bots don't configure themselves.
A huge portion of market liquidity is tied to the same key factors:
* Bitcoin
* Stablecoins
* Market makers
* Algorithmic trading strategies
* Exchange market makers
* Funds and large traders
When Bitcoin starts moving, thousands of algorithms around the world react automatically. Not because they received some secret signal, but because they are programmed to respond in similar ways. As a result, a synchronization effect emerges across the market.
In reality, the market often looks less like chaos and more like a system where:
- 80–90% of trading volume is generated by algorithms;
- Large players have a much deeper view of order books and liquidity;
- Most market participants react with a delay.
This is why markets can sometimes appear highly coordinated, even when there is no single entity directly controlling every move. 📈
Which raises an interesting question: if these systems are programmed and adjusted by people, does that mean a certain group has access to information, liquidity flows, or insights that allow them to influence market direction — not only in terms of price, but also timing?
Just a thought.
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
The crypto market trades 24/7, 365 days a year without stopping. That means someone, somewhere, knows the exact day — and perhaps even the exact time — when a reversal begins.
At some point, the broader altcoin market will start moving higher. Markets always move up and down. Just think about how many assets there are on Binance alone — over 300 trading pairs. There will inevitably be a moment when many of them begin reversing at the same time.
And when that happens, part of the world will be asleep because of different time zones. Others won't be looking at their phones or computers. Yet somehow, on a single one-minute candle, buying pressure appears and prices start moving higher. Only later does the crowd notice and begin chasing the move.
But someone has to buy first.
How is it possible that hundreds of assets can react almost simultaneously? It makes you wonder whether the charts we see are largely algorithmic patterns with only a portion of genuine market activity behind them.
The same applies to market tops. There were people who seemed to know exactly when Bitcoin would reach a certain level and then reverse. Obviously, it's not a trader sitting in an office manually pressing a sell button to start a major move. Everything is driven by software, algorithms, and bots.
But software and bots don't configure themselves.
A huge portion of market liquidity is tied to the same key factors:
* Bitcoin
* Stablecoins
* Market makers
* Algorithmic trading strategies
* Exchange market makers
* Funds and large traders
When Bitcoin starts moving, thousands of algorithms around the world react automatically. Not because they received some secret signal, but because they are programmed to respond in similar ways. As a result, a synchronization effect emerges across the market.
In reality, the market often looks less like chaos and more like a system where:
- 80–90% of trading volume is generated by algorithms;
- Large players have a much deeper view of order books and liquidity;
- Most market participants react with a delay.
This is why markets can sometimes appear highly coordinated, even when there is no single entity directly controlling every move. 📈
Which raises an interesting question: if these systems are programmed and adjusted by people, does that mean a certain group has access to information, liquidity flows, or insights that allow them to influence market direction — not only in terms of price, but also timing?
Just a thought.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
6🔥5👍3
Asian markets lost over $1.2 TRILLION in a single day - one of the biggest crashes in the region's history. (its like a BTC market cap) in one day!!
The drop occurred amid profit-taking after the AI rally and fears of an overheating in the tech sector.
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
The drop occurred amid profit-taking after the AI rally and fears of an overheating in the tech sector.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🤯3
Brain $DOT
▶️ https://youtu.be/oVPooIucE_o
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🤯2
Hearings on the CLARITY Act, which is intended to define the rules for regulating digital assets in the USA and delineate the powers of the SEC and CFTC, have been scheduled by the US House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services for July 17th.
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍1
More gambling.....
Meta is developing an app for the prediction (betting) market, which will compete with Polymarket and Kalshi.
The app has a working name of Arena, and its creation was initiated by Mark Zuckerberg himself. After the years ill be not surpise if Meta will create own blockchain and token.
post from 2023 in chat - click
🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE
✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
Meta is developing an app for the prediction (betting) market, which will compete with Polymarket and Kalshi.
The app has a working name of Arena, and its creation was initiated by Mark Zuckerberg himself. After the years ill be not surpise if Meta will create own blockchain and token.
post from 2023 in chat - click
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🤯1