Bitcoin may have signaled the start of a new bull market.
BTC just closed a weekly candle above the 50W MA for the first time in 45 weeks. Historically, Alex Thorn (from Galaxy) says this move has often confirmed that the bottom is already in. 👀
All of this is great! But I just can’t wrap my head around how top companies with billions of dollars behind them, with the best researchers, analysts, coders, and minds in blockchain, determine the bottom of the main asset only when Bitcoin is already at $85,000! And their argument is the 50-week moving average crossover!😵
So, you had absolutely no arguments at $57–60K that this was the bottom?
Or were you quietly buying yourselves, staying silent, and now you need an audience because you’re opinion leaders — so you have to slowly, little by little, build up interest and then start with your usual narrative about $200K–$300K–$500K, gradually selling it to the crowd?
Secondhand embarrassment.
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
BTC just closed a weekly candle above the 50W MA for the first time in 45 weeks. Historically, Alex Thorn (from Galaxy) says this move has often confirmed that the bottom is already in. 👀
All of this is great! But I just can’t wrap my head around how top companies with billions of dollars behind them, with the best researchers, analysts, coders, and minds in blockchain, determine the bottom of the main asset only when Bitcoin is already at $85,000! And their argument is the 50-week moving average crossover!
So, you had absolutely no arguments at $57–60K that this was the bottom?
Or were you quietly buying yourselves, staying silent, and now you need an audience because you’re opinion leaders — so you have to slowly, little by little, build up interest and then start with your usual narrative about $200K–$300K–$500K, gradually selling it to the crowd?
Secondhand embarrassment.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🐳2
CRYPTO 4 LIGHT
BTC sandwich liquidations levels on D tf 🤔 🔥 Test full indicators set for FREE ✉️ DM to get an access - @crypto4lightfounder
All clusters over 80k done! All others on a screen (Fair line on W also today showed in video)
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍1
Regarding the Benjamin Cowen situation — all crypto influencers are now massively pushing this narrative and celebrating like crazy that Ben turned out to be wrong about his Bitcoin analysis. So much so that he probably said for the first time in a video that he was wrong, and then even made this post!
Like… what the fk???
Personally, I don’t always agree with Ben’s ideas. We look at charts differently. He relies more on historical patterns of asset behavior and moving averages, while I currently focus more on algorithmic indicator data, because I’m not a believer in Bitcoin pattern theories at all.
But I honestly don’t understand where people — and especially big accounts — get so much toxicity toward someone who is actually bigger than them in terms of media reach.
Nobody knows the future. We all work with probabilities!
You don’t even know, sitting at home, what can happen to you, your health, your job, your house, etc. in the next 10 minutes!
But we have price charts, tools to work with, and everyone simply analyzes the market the way they believe is appropriate.
And people forget the main idea of social media: we share ideas.
It doesn’t matter if you have an account with 100 followers or, like Ben, 2–3 million followers across social media. He is still just a person sharing his view.
Some ideas will be right. Some will be wrong.
Personally, the most important thing for me is that someone doesn’t just draw random arrows on a chart, but logically explains and argues their point of view.
THAT’S IT.
Time will show whether the analysis was right or wrong.
But instead, everyone starts pointing fingers and mocking Ben because he turned out to be wrong.
We are all right sometimes, and we are all wrong sometimes!
What matters is that you have reasoning behind your ideas. Over time, everyone develops their own perspective and EXPERIENCE.
One thing is Ben openly sharing an idea with an audience of millions.
Another thing is someone like Arthur Hayes intentionally pushing people into certain tokens in front of the same kind of massive audience — you remember those posts — and then systematically selling that same token.
THAT is negative influence and intentionally using your media reach.
Anyway, keep working, keep gaining experience, and don’t be toxic.
We’re all in the same boat.
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Like… what the fk???
Personally, I don’t always agree with Ben’s ideas. We look at charts differently. He relies more on historical patterns of asset behavior and moving averages, while I currently focus more on algorithmic indicator data, because I’m not a believer in Bitcoin pattern theories at all.
But I honestly don’t understand where people — and especially big accounts — get so much toxicity toward someone who is actually bigger than them in terms of media reach.
Nobody knows the future. We all work with probabilities!
You don’t even know, sitting at home, what can happen to you, your health, your job, your house, etc. in the next 10 minutes!
But we have price charts, tools to work with, and everyone simply analyzes the market the way they believe is appropriate.
And people forget the main idea of social media: we share ideas.
It doesn’t matter if you have an account with 100 followers or, like Ben, 2–3 million followers across social media. He is still just a person sharing his view.
Some ideas will be right. Some will be wrong.
Personally, the most important thing for me is that someone doesn’t just draw random arrows on a chart, but logically explains and argues their point of view.
THAT’S IT.
Time will show whether the analysis was right or wrong.
But instead, everyone starts pointing fingers and mocking Ben because he turned out to be wrong.
We are all right sometimes, and we are all wrong sometimes!
What matters is that you have reasoning behind your ideas. Over time, everyone develops their own perspective and EXPERIENCE.
One thing is Ben openly sharing an idea with an audience of millions.
Another thing is someone like Arthur Hayes intentionally pushing people into certain tokens in front of the same kind of massive audience — you remember those posts — and then systematically selling that same token.
THAT is negative influence and intentionally using your media reach.
Anyway, keep working, keep gaining experience, and don’t be toxic.
We’re all in the same boat.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
10👍7🔥2
$PEPE updates 🐸
▶️ https://youtu.be/5r-sdjUrfdY
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5🔥1
High leverages liquidation levels on $BTC now
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5
$ICP updates! ♾
▶️ https://youtu.be/AC8bJ81WMVM
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
10🔥1
nobody care about btc at 60 but everyone want to buy at 85! One pattern which work all the time
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5
CryptoQuant: Bull market confirmed!
BTC closed above its 365-day moving average for the first time since March 2023 (and this line has signaled every bull market since 2019).
I never stop being amazed at how this is even possible!
It was literally the same thing in 2022. Everyone was waiting for $12–10K while listening to Capo. Then, only a year later, in 2023, when Bitcoin was already around $30K, they started saying, “The bull market has finally begun.”
And now they’re doing the exact same thing again. They were waiting for $50–45K, Bitcoin reached $87K, and suddenly they come out and tell an audience of hundreds of thousands of people, “The bull market has begun.”
And the argument??? Drumroll, please… ONE MOVING AVERAGE LINE.
We have so many other tools for chart analysis, yet people are determining whether an asset should be bought based on a single moving average. Brilliant!
Could we have gone below $57K? Absolutely! But calling $57K the bottom and the beginning of the bull market — even from a probability perspective — makes more sense in terms of risk/reward than declaring the bottom and the start of the bull market at $87K, only after the fact.
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
BTC closed above its 365-day moving average for the first time since March 2023 (and this line has signaled every bull market since 2019).
I never stop being amazed at how this is even possible!
It was literally the same thing in 2022. Everyone was waiting for $12–10K while listening to Capo. Then, only a year later, in 2023, when Bitcoin was already around $30K, they started saying, “The bull market has finally begun.”
And now they’re doing the exact same thing again. They were waiting for $50–45K, Bitcoin reached $87K, and suddenly they come out and tell an audience of hundreds of thousands of people, “The bull market has begun.”
And the argument??? Drumroll, please… ONE MOVING AVERAGE LINE.
We have so many other tools for chart analysis, yet people are determining whether an asset should be bought based on a single moving average. Brilliant!
Could we have gone below $57K? Absolutely! But calling $57K the bottom and the beginning of the bull market — even from a probability perspective — makes more sense in terms of risk/reward than declaring the bottom and the start of the bull market at $87K, only after the fact.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍2🐳2✍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BTC at 58k
There are influencers who get paid to promote certain meme tokens, either through native promotion or much more aggressively, right? And they’re paid by the people behind those tokens.
And I’m starting to get the feeling that there might be some kind of organization paying top influencers who mainly cover Bitcoin to push complete nonsense when we’re near the bottom — and then promote ridiculous ideas like $500K Bitcoin when BTC is already extremely overheated.
It’s hard to believe that so many top crypto influencers on social media could all independently reach the exact same conclusions. When Bitcoin was around $58K, they were saying they had sold their Bitcoin because we were going to crash all the way down, almost to zero.
It’s difficult to believe that all these people are actually idiots.
The real question is: who could theoretically be funding this kind of coordinated narrative to create a specific sentiment and push a desired message across social media?
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
There are influencers who get paid to promote certain meme tokens, either through native promotion or much more aggressively, right? And they’re paid by the people behind those tokens.
And I’m starting to get the feeling that there might be some kind of organization paying top influencers who mainly cover Bitcoin to push complete nonsense when we’re near the bottom — and then promote ridiculous ideas like $500K Bitcoin when BTC is already extremely overheated.
It’s hard to believe that so many top crypto influencers on social media could all independently reach the exact same conclusions. When Bitcoin was around $58K, they were saying they had sold their Bitcoin because we were going to crash all the way down, almost to zero.
It’s difficult to believe that all these people are actually idiots.
The real question is: who could theoretically be funding this kind of coordinated narrative to create a specific sentiment and push a desired message across social media?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5✍4
CRYPTO 4 LIGHT
"Your lines are random"....
Ok. Alert triggered 100% accuracy
Ok. Alert triggered 100% accuracy
5👍6🔥2😎2🐳1
$UNI next move
▶️ https://youtu.be/NKeDm61U1B0
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino says the company is concerned about the requirement for “significant” stablecoin issuers to keep 60% of their reserves in commercial bank deposits.
According to Ardoino, this could actually increase risk rather than reduce it. EU deposit insurance only protects up to €100,000, while stablecoin reserves can be worth billions.
So Tether’s position is basically: why move a large portion of stablecoin reserves into the traditional banking system if that could make them less secure?
Ardoino:
"When MiCA becomes safer for consumers and stablecoin issuers, then we may reconsider the decision"
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5
Iran and the US held talks at the UN General Assembly, according to Trump and *The Hill*. Rubio also confirmed that the US remains open to dialogue, although there is no new date for another meeting yet.
So, here’s a perfect example of how, when markets become overheated, the world apparently has nothing new to come up with except war! (Oh, right… and pandemics. )
The idea is simple: crash the markets, cool down investor interest, then spend a long time rocking the boat back and forth with negotiations, failed negotiations, escalating tensions, and so on. Accumulate stocks and crypto while prices are depressed.
Then, once everyone is still skeptical but the markets have already recovered — like Bitcoin gaining another $30K — start systematically pushing posts about peace, deals, negotiations, and how everything is about to get better.
And then what?
At Bitcoin’s peak somewhere around $150–200K, will we suddenly see the war in Ukraine coming to an end, Israel resolving all its issues with Palestine, and a new wave of narratives telling us that Bitcoin is ready for $500K and that the AI sector is only at the beginning of its growth?
I don’t know… but it’s hard to believe that everything happens organically.
Someone is always influencing the direction of the narrative — and, perhaps even more importantly, the timing of when that narrative appears.
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
So, here’s a perfect example of how, when markets become overheated, the world apparently has nothing new to come up with except war! (Oh, right… and pandemics. )
The idea is simple: crash the markets, cool down investor interest, then spend a long time rocking the boat back and forth with negotiations, failed negotiations, escalating tensions, and so on. Accumulate stocks and crypto while prices are depressed.
Then, once everyone is still skeptical but the markets have already recovered — like Bitcoin gaining another $30K — start systematically pushing posts about peace, deals, negotiations, and how everything is about to get better.
And then what?
At Bitcoin’s peak somewhere around $150–200K, will we suddenly see the war in Ukraine coming to an end, Israel resolving all its issues with Palestine, and a new wave of narratives telling us that Bitcoin is ready for $500K and that the AI sector is only at the beginning of its growth?
I don’t know… but it’s hard to believe that everything happens organically.
Someone is always influencing the direction of the narrative — and, perhaps even more importantly, the timing of when that narrative appears.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍3⚡2
A Trump-driven rally in risky assets is the main chance for Republicans to maintain their majority in Congress after the November 3rd elections.
Again, is this magic?
When it’s necessary, the media creates a narrative that altcoins are heading straight to zero and will be worthless.
And when it’s time to add a little positivity ahead of the elections, suddenly tokens start going up!
Coincidence? 👀
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Again, is this magic?
When it’s necessary, the media creates a narrative that altcoins are heading straight to zero and will be worthless.
And when it’s time to add a little positivity ahead of the elections, suddenly tokens start going up!
Coincidence? 👀
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍2
Twitter Theory: Crises that formed the bottom for $BTC
And it make sense! And this time 3 exchanges shut down and people waiting 45k...🤌
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
And it make sense! And this time 3 exchanges shut down and people waiting 45k...
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍4
BCH Price Analysis: Is Bitcoin Cash Ready for Another Move?
▶️ https://youtu.be/02f9AuB55hs
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍1
CRYPTO 4 LIGHT
This is becoming absolutely phenomenal! Top Bitcoin analytics websites are literally redrawing their charts just to make them look better. You'll say that all these lines are dynamic—and I agree! But just look at the Bitcoin price projection and the moving…
Sorry, but today I’m getting a cultural shock every time I open another tab!
These guys who were calling for a Bitcoin bottom at $36K later redrew the bottom at $58K after the fact just to make it look like they were right all along!
Now let’s compare their peak Bitcoin targets. On August 6, their target was $400K. Now, just a month and a half later, it’s already $566K!
What changed?
If we look at any indicator on the monthly chart, targets simply cannot change that dramatically. Moving averages, bands, etc. on the monthly timeframe update VERY slowly, because the indicators receive updated information with each new monthly or weekly candle.
But here we just have a random stream of numbers — and the higher the number, the more people seem to like it!
Of course, we all want Bitcoin at $500K in 2029. But we need to be a little more realistic and have stronger arguments than two moving averages and some drawing skills.
🔥 Use code 4LIGHT for up to 20% OFF
✉️ DM for access to indicators - @crypto4lightfounder
These guys who were calling for a Bitcoin bottom at $36K later redrew the bottom at $58K after the fact just to make it look like they were right all along!
Now let’s compare their peak Bitcoin targets. On August 6, their target was $400K. Now, just a month and a half later, it’s already $566K!
What changed?
If we look at any indicator on the monthly chart, targets simply cannot change that dramatically. Moving averages, bands, etc. on the monthly timeframe update VERY slowly, because the indicators receive updated information with each new monthly or weekly candle.
But here we just have a random stream of numbers — and the higher the number, the more people seem to like it!
Of course, we all want Bitcoin at $500K in 2029. But we need to be a little more realistic and have stronger arguments than two moving averages and some drawing skills.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5👍6