Ирыстон
https://iron_rus.enacademic.com/7973/%D0%98%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD
via enacademic.com
https://iron_rus.enacademic.com/7973/%D0%98%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD
Осетия. academic2.ru RU. EN; DE; FR; ES; Запомнить сайтMediavia enacademic.com
Словари и энциклопедии на Академике
Ирыстон 🎓²
Осетия
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
https://ift.tt/2X4qi9G
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes LtdCourtHouse of LordsCitation(s)[2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 A.C. 1101, [2009] 3 W.L.R. 267Case historyPrior action(s)[2008] EWCA Civ 183, [2008] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 387Case opinionsLord Hope, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Baroness HaleKeywordsInterpretation<code>Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract.</code>Contents<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Facts">1 Facts<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Judgment">2 Judgment<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#See_also">3 See also<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Notes">4 Notes<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#References">5 References<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#External_links">6 External links<code>Facts</code><code>Persimmon Homes Ltd claimed that a contract it had to develop Chartbrook Ltd's land should be interpreted differently, so that they would be paid more. The contract said Persimmon Ltd was entitled to an "Additional Residential Payment", which was defined to mean "23.4% of the price achieved for each Residential Unit in excess of the Minimum Guaranteed Residential Unit Value less the Costs and Incentives".</code><code>The High Court and Court of Appeal agreed with Chartbrook's interpretation. Persimmon Ltd appealed on the interpretation given and argued that if they failed on those grounds, the contract should be construed in light of previous negotiations, or that the court should allow for the document to be rectified, because it was clear that the intentions of the parties was different from that found. Accordingly it contended that the rule in Prenn v Simmonds[1] that pre contractual negotiations should be ignored, was an illogical rule and should be overturned.</code><code>Judgment</code><code>The House of Lords allowed the appeal by Persimmon Ltd, and agreed that properly construed the contract should mean they would get paid more. Interpretation according to ordinary syntax made no commercial sense. The ARP had to mean the amount by which 23.4% of the achieved price exceeded the minimum guaranteed residential unit value. It was only necessary, to achieve this interpretation, that it be clear something had gone wrong with the language used, and that one should interpret according to what a reasonable person would understand, following ICS v West Bromwich BS. There was no limit to the amount of "red ink", no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. Accordingly it was not necessary to resort to evidence of negotiations or rectification in this case.</code><code>By way of obiter dicta, their Lordships also held that, following Prenn v Simmonds, while a theory of objective interpretation could accommodate reference to negotiations, and while prima facie negotiations were relevant background to construing a contractual document (as in BCCI v Ali[2]) it remains inadmissible because it is usually irrelevant to determine what a reasonable person would take the language of a contract to mean. Here there was no need to depart from the rule excluding negotiations, even though it might mean that in some cases parties would be bound by a contract in terms which, upon a full investigation of the course of negotiations, a reasonable observer would not have taken them to have intended. The power to depart from the rule…
https://ift.tt/2X4qi9G
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes LtdCourtHouse of LordsCitation(s)[2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 A.C. 1101, [2009] 3 W.L.R. 267Case historyPrior action(s)[2008] EWCA Civ 183, [2008] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 387Case opinionsLord Hope, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Baroness HaleKeywordsInterpretation<code>Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract.</code>Contents<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Facts">1 Facts<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Judgment">2 Judgment<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#See_also">3 See also<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Notes">4 Notes<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#References">5 References<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#External_links">6 External links<code>Facts</code><code>Persimmon Homes Ltd claimed that a contract it had to develop Chartbrook Ltd's land should be interpreted differently, so that they would be paid more. The contract said Persimmon Ltd was entitled to an "Additional Residential Payment", which was defined to mean "23.4% of the price achieved for each Residential Unit in excess of the Minimum Guaranteed Residential Unit Value less the Costs and Incentives".</code><code>The High Court and Court of Appeal agreed with Chartbrook's interpretation. Persimmon Ltd appealed on the interpretation given and argued that if they failed on those grounds, the contract should be construed in light of previous negotiations, or that the court should allow for the document to be rectified, because it was clear that the intentions of the parties was different from that found. Accordingly it contended that the rule in Prenn v Simmonds[1] that pre contractual negotiations should be ignored, was an illogical rule and should be overturned.</code><code>Judgment</code><code>The House of Lords allowed the appeal by Persimmon Ltd, and agreed that properly construed the contract should mean they would get paid more. Interpretation according to ordinary syntax made no commercial sense. The ARP had to mean the amount by which 23.4% of the achieved price exceeded the minimum guaranteed residential unit value. It was only necessary, to achieve this interpretation, that it be clear something had gone wrong with the language used, and that one should interpret according to what a reasonable person would understand, following ICS v West Bromwich BS. There was no limit to the amount of "red ink", no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. Accordingly it was not necessary to resort to evidence of negotiations or rectification in this case.</code><code>By way of obiter dicta, their Lordships also held that, following Prenn v Simmonds, while a theory of objective interpretation could accommodate reference to negotiations, and while prima facie negotiations were relevant background to construing a contractual document (as in BCCI v Ali[2]) it remains inadmissible because it is usually irrelevant to determine what a reasonable person would take the language of a contract to mean. Here there was no need to depart from the rule excluding negotiations, even though it might mean that in some cases parties would be bound by a contract in terms which, upon a full investigation of the course of negotiations, a reasonable observer would not have taken them to have intended. The power to depart from the rule…
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
Court House of Lords Citation(s) [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 A.C. 1101, [2009] 3 W.L.R. 267 Case history Prior action(s) [2008] EWCA Civ 183, [2008] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 387
enacademic.com 🎓²
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd https://ift.tt/2X4qi9G Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes LtdCourtHouse of LordsCitation(s)[2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 A.C. 1101, [2009] 3 W.L.R. 267Case historyPrior action(s)[2008] EWCA Civ 183, [2008] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 387Case…
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
https://ift.tt/2X4qi9G
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes LtdCourtHouse of LordsCitation(s)2009 UKHL 38, 2009 1 A.C. 1101, 2009 3 W.L.R. 267Case historyPrior action(s)2008 EWCA Civ 183, 2008 2 All E.R. (Comm) 387Case opinionsLord Hope, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Baroness HaleKeywordsInterpretation<code>Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd 2009 UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract.</code>Contents<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Facts">1 Facts<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Judgment">2 Judgment<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Seealso">3 See also<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Notes">4 Notes<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#References">5 References<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Externallinks">6 External links<code>Facts</code><code>Persimmon Homes Ltd claimed that a contract it had to develop Chartbrook Ltd's land should be interpreted differently, so that they would be paid more. The contract said Persimmon Ltd was entitled to an "Additional Residential Payment", which was defined to mean "23.4% of the price achieved for each Residential Unit in excess of the Minimum Guaranteed Residential Unit Value less the Costs and Incentives".</code><code>The High Court and Court of Appeal agreed with Chartbrook's interpretation. Persimmon Ltd appealed on the interpretation given and argued that if they failed on those grounds, the contract should be construed in light of previous negotiations, or that the court should allow for the document to be rectified, because it was clear that the intentions of the parties was different from that found. Accordingly it contended that the rule in Prenn v Simmonds1 that pre contractual negotiations should be ignored, was an illogical rule and should be overturned.</code><code>Judgment</code><code>The House of Lords allowed the appeal by Persimmon Ltd, and agreed that properly construed the contract should mean they would get paid more. Interpretation according to ordinary syntax made no commercial sense. The ARP had to mean the amount by which 23.4% of the achieved price exceeded the minimum guaranteed residential unit value. It was only necessary, to achieve this interpretation, that it be clear something had gone wrong with the language used, and that one should interpret according to what a reasonable person would understand, following ICS v West Bromwich BS. There was no limit to the amount of "red ink", no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. Accordingly it was not necessary to resort to evidence of negotiations or rectification in this case.</code><code>By way of obiter dicta, their Lordships also held that, following Prenn v Simmonds, while a theory of objective interpretation could accommodate reference to negotiations, and while prima facie negotiations were relevant background to construing a contractual document (as in BCCI v Ali2) it remains inadmissible because it is usually irrelevant to determine what a reasonable person would take the language of a contract to mean. Here there was no need to depart from the rule excluding negotiations, even though it might mean that in some cases parties would be bound by a contract in terms which, upon a full investigation of the course of negotiations, a reasonable observer would not have taken them to have intended. The power to depart from the rule…
https://ift.tt/2X4qi9G
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes LtdCourtHouse of LordsCitation(s)2009 UKHL 38, 2009 1 A.C. 1101, 2009 3 W.L.R. 267Case historyPrior action(s)2008 EWCA Civ 183, 2008 2 All E.R. (Comm) 387Case opinionsLord Hope, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Baroness HaleKeywordsInterpretation<code>Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd 2009 UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract.</code>Contents<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Facts">1 Facts<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Judgment">2 Judgment<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Seealso">3 See also<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Notes">4 Notes<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#References">5 References<a href="https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11523208#Externallinks">6 External links<code>Facts</code><code>Persimmon Homes Ltd claimed that a contract it had to develop Chartbrook Ltd's land should be interpreted differently, so that they would be paid more. The contract said Persimmon Ltd was entitled to an "Additional Residential Payment", which was defined to mean "23.4% of the price achieved for each Residential Unit in excess of the Minimum Guaranteed Residential Unit Value less the Costs and Incentives".</code><code>The High Court and Court of Appeal agreed with Chartbrook's interpretation. Persimmon Ltd appealed on the interpretation given and argued that if they failed on those grounds, the contract should be construed in light of previous negotiations, or that the court should allow for the document to be rectified, because it was clear that the intentions of the parties was different from that found. Accordingly it contended that the rule in Prenn v Simmonds1 that pre contractual negotiations should be ignored, was an illogical rule and should be overturned.</code><code>Judgment</code><code>The House of Lords allowed the appeal by Persimmon Ltd, and agreed that properly construed the contract should mean they would get paid more. Interpretation according to ordinary syntax made no commercial sense. The ARP had to mean the amount by which 23.4% of the achieved price exceeded the minimum guaranteed residential unit value. It was only necessary, to achieve this interpretation, that it be clear something had gone wrong with the language used, and that one should interpret according to what a reasonable person would understand, following ICS v West Bromwich BS. There was no limit to the amount of "red ink", no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. Accordingly it was not necessary to resort to evidence of negotiations or rectification in this case.</code><code>By way of obiter dicta, their Lordships also held that, following Prenn v Simmonds, while a theory of objective interpretation could accommodate reference to negotiations, and while prima facie negotiations were relevant background to construing a contractual document (as in BCCI v Ali2) it remains inadmissible because it is usually irrelevant to determine what a reasonable person would take the language of a contract to mean. Here there was no need to depart from the rule excluding negotiations, even though it might mean that in some cases parties would be bound by a contract in terms which, upon a full investigation of the course of negotiations, a reasonable observer would not have taken them to have intended. The power to depart from the rule…
ubiquitous - Collocations dictionary
https://ift.tt/3dfgyyT
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/3dfgyyT
Oct 21, 2019 - Look at other dictionaries: Ubiquitous — U*biq ui*tous, a. [See {Ubiquity}.] Existing or being everywhere, or in all places, at the same time; omnipresent. {U*biq ...via enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
ubiquitous
adj. Ubiquitous is used with these nouns: ↑presence
Listeners never hear any good of themselves.
https://ift.tt/2SbMbka.
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2SbMbka.
Oct 22, 2019 - Prov. If you eavesdrop on people who are talking about you, chances are that you will hear them say unfavorable things about you. (This implies that you should ...via enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Listeners never hear any good of themselves.
enacademic.com (@enacademiccom) - Пост #17909 - TGStat
https://ift.tt/3dwJgeu
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/3dwJgeu
9 годин тому - enacademic.com. 3 Jun, 00:39 (сегодня). Статистика публикации #17909: Ни один из каналов не поделился данной публикацией. Просмотры публикации ...via enacademic.com
tgstat.ru
enacademic.com (@enacademiccom) - Пост #17909 - Статистика записи.
Полная статистика телеграм-публикации #17909 в канале @enacademiccom на Telegram Analytics
List of medical roots, suffixes and prefixes
https://ift.tt/3bkX6iE
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/3bkX6iE
This is a list of roots, suffixes, and prefixes used in medical terminology, their meanings, and their etymology.There are a few rules when using medical roots.Firstly, prefixes and suffixes, primarily in Greek, but also in Latin, have a droppable -o-.Mediavia enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
List of medical roots, suffixes and prefixes
This is a list of roots, suffixes, and prefixes used in medical terminology, their meanings, and their etymology. There are a few rules when using medical roots. Firstly, prefixes and suffixes, primarily in Greek, but also in Latin, have a…
enacademic.com (@enacademiccom) - Post #17924 - TGStat
https://ift.tt/2U7Qxtv
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2U7Qxtv
23 квіт. 2020 р. - enacademiccom: Download Soviet-East European Dialogue - N. Jamgotch on ... https://ift.tt/36UVAlY 2 дні тому - Northern Group of Forces - enacademic.com.via enacademic.com
Tgstat
enacademic.com (@enacademiccom) - Post #17924
@enacademiccom: Download Soviet-East European Dialogue - N. Jamgotch on ... https://ift.tt/36UVAlY 2 дні тому - Northern Group of Forces - enacademic.com. His studies focus on international politics, US Foreign Polic... - Публикация на Telegram Analytics
enacademic.com (@enacademiccom) - Пост #17925 - TGStat
https://ift.tt/3gY3akG
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/3gY3akG
17 годин тому - ... to russian — 1 https://ift.tt/2XV9h0a Translation — мемсаиб — from english — to russian — 1... via enacademic.com - Публикация на Telegram Analytics.via enacademic.com
tgstat.ru
enacademic.com (@enacademiccom) - Пост #17925
@enacademiccom: Translation — мемсаиб — from english — to russian — 1 https://ift.tt/2XV9h0a Translation — мемсаиб — from english — to russian — 1... via enacademic.com - Публикация на Telegram Analytics
Rehoboth - etymology.enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2L5eCfq
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2L5eCfq
Rehoboth — Details … Deutsch Wikipedia. Rehoboth — Namibia town, central Namibia. The town is located about 52 miles (84 km) south of Windhoek, the national capital, and lies on the banks of the dry, sandy bed of the Rehoboth River at an elevation of 4,544 …via enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Rehoboth
Heb. Rehobhoth, lit. wide places (Gen. xxvi.22)
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
https://ift.tt/2RUGy9C
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2RUGy9C
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, [1] also known as the McDonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, is a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the U.S. over tort reform after a jury awarded $160,000 to cover medical expenses and compensatory damages (in addition to $2.7 million in punitive damages) to Liebeck who suffered 3rd degree burns on a ...via enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
Full case name Stella Liebeck v. McDonald s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald s International, Inc. Date decided Aug. 18, 1994 Citation(s) 1994 Extra LEXIS 23 (Bernalillo County, N.M. Dist. Ct. 1994), 1995 WL 360309 (Bernalillo County, N.M.…
trigger - Collocations dictionary
https://ift.tt/3cK3yAa
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/3cK3yAa
Dec 31, 2019 - {Roman}}I.{{/Roman}} noun VERB + TRIGGER ▫ press, pull, squeeze ▫ tighten on ▫ Her finger tightened on the trigger as she heard footsteps approaching.via enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
trigger
{{Roman}}I.{{/Roman}} noun VERB + TRIGGER ▪ press, pull, squeeze ▪ tighten on ▪ Her finger tightened on the trigger as she heard footsteps approaching. TRIGGER + NOUN
I Am Accusing the Coalition of Alawite-Iranian-Hezbollah ...
https://ift.tt/2z41Zyu
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2z41Zyu
30 черв. 2019 р. - Lanham. http://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11507915. [39] BBC News (2016) Syria: The Story of the Conflict. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east- ...via enacademic.com
uskogrudan - Hrvatski jezični portal
https://ift.tt/2SEXYHN
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2SEXYHN
27‏/12‏/2019 - ȕskogrūdan prid. <odr. dnī> DEFINICIJA koji je uskih, ograničenih pogleda; uskogrud ETIMOLOGIJA usko + v. grudi.via enacademic.com
Enacademic
uskogrudan
ȕskogrūdan prid. <odr. dnī> DEFINICIJA koji je uskih, ograničenih pogleda; uskogrud ETIMOLOGIJA usko + v. grudi
glass cockpit - Aviation dictionary
https://aviation_dictionary.enacademic.com/3197/glass_cockpit
via enacademic.com
https://aviation_dictionary.enacademic.com/3197/glass_cockpit
An aircraft cockpit that has a number of multicolored displays instead of conventional instruments. A typical glass cockpit of a wide bodied aircraft.Mediavia enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
https://ift.tt/33zgV2I
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/33zgV2I
EN. RU · DE · FR · ES. Remember this site. All languages, Abkhaz, Adyghe, Afrikaans, Ainu, Akan, Albanian, Alsatian, Altaic, Arabic, Aragonese, Armenian ...Mediavia enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Translation — — —
Translation — — — — 1
directive on the enforcement of intellectual …
https://ift.tt/2X9jUMu
via enacademic.com
https://ift.tt/2X9jUMu
EU Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights LAW EU-Richtlinie f 2004/48/EG zur Durchsetzung der Rechte des geistigen Eigentums (IPR Enforcement Directive, Enforcement Directive)Mediavia enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Translation — directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights — from english —
Translation — directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights — from english — — 1
Site-Covering - Eine Alternative zur Blickregistrierung? (Site-Covering – A Substitute to Eyetracking?)
http:///10.1524/icom.2.1.11.19043
via enacademic.com
http:///10.1524/icom.2.1.11.19043
Thorsten Wilhelm,Miriam Yom,Dorit Beger, 2003, 'Site-Covering - Eine Alternative zur Blickregistrierung? (Site-Covering – A Substitute to Eyetracking?)', i-com, vol. 2, no. 1/2003, pp. 11-16via enacademic.com
показное проявление | Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
https://psychology_ru_en.enacademic.com/23381/%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%8F%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5
via enacademic.com
https://psychology_ru_en.enacademic.com/23381/%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%8F%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5
Remember this site. All languages Abkhaz Adyghe Afrikaans Ainu Akan Albanian Alsatian Altaic Arabic Aragonese Armenian Aromanian Asturian Aymara Azerbaijani Bagobo Bashkir Basque Belarusian...Mediavia enacademic.com
Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
показное проявление
ostentation
Efeito da suplementação com minerais antioxidantes em pacientes com aterosclerose tratados com estatinas
http:///10.11606/t.9.2011.tde-19012011-162846
via enacademic.com
http:///10.11606/t.9.2011.tde-19012011-162846
Karine Evangelista, 'Efeito da suplementação com minerais antioxidantes em pacientes com aterosclerose tratados com estatinas'via enacademic.com