FYI:
In case you are using #MacOS and you still have not purchased Little Snitch, your next best ( free & easy option ) to stop this process from scanning your #photos is:

https://objective-see.org/products/lulu.html

#apple

Telegram messenger apps Foss and without the specific Google or Apple  appstore version censorship

Telegram-Foss (Android)
https://f-droid.org/app/org.telegram.messenger
Group: @tfossofftop

Others based on Telegram-FOSS and with privative components removed and with extra features:

Forkgram (Android or PC)
https://t.me/Libreware/754

Telegraher (Android)
https://t.me/Libreware/1057

NekoX (Android)
https://t.me/Libreware/755

Nagram (Android) (nekox fork)
https://t.me/Libreware/1108

Owlgram (Android)
https://t.me/OwlGramApp

Catogram (Android)
https://t.me/catogram
https://t.me/catogram_en
https://github.com/catogram/catogram


PC:

Kotatogram (PC)
https://t.me/kotatogram

TDesktop x64 (PC)
https://github.com/TDesktop-x64/tdesktop
https://t.me/tg_x64

Windows only:
Unigram
@unigram
@unigramappx
https://github.com/UnigramDev/Unigram

Telegram For Gnu Emacs [Unofficial]
https://github.com/zevlg/telega.el


⚠️ DON'T use plusmessenger: https://t.me/NoGoolag/3277

Regarding recent censorship controversies on Telegram, it is recommended to use non goolag playstore nor apple store version of telegram.
The official version from its website — like these alternatives — also has less censorship imposed by Google or Apple. You can get it at https://telegram.org

#tg #tgclients #telegram

#Australia Is Concerned It Can’t Stop “Misinformation” in Private Conversations

Australia’s authorities have updated their “misinformation code” but remain unhappy that large end-to-end encrypted apps are still not “regulated” in a way they would find satisfactory.

That’s despite the fact the “update” does what various governments like the most – leave a lot of room to interpret the rules as best suits them. Thus harm is now communication that represents “serious and credible” threat. And the previous definition is that this threat must also be imminent – however, that is no longer included in the wording.

The code in question, published late last month, is said to be “voluntary” and concerns combating whatever’s flagged as “disinformation and misinformation” – but now the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is making it clear that it is not nearly enough.

Currently, the “voluntary” reference has to do with the Digital Industry Group Inc (DIGI) and its members, such as Apple, Google, Facebook (Meta), TikTok and Twitter, “self-regulating” in a bid to find common ground with Australia’s government and avoid negative consequences to their business.

But now the regulator said that while the update is welcome, the work to gain powers necessary to force social media platforms to turn over data will continue.

At stake here are these companies revealing to state authorities how they fight against “misinformation,” and also, “how they respond to complaints.” Specifically, the push is to make those behind social media hand over information about “posts and audience.”

And that, in turn, the government claims, is necessary in its decision-making process, when it comes to making sure laws dealing with “misinformation” are ever stricter.

ACMA is particularly concerned with what they see as the lack of a “robust” framework that would expand the code to “cover the propagation of mis- and disinformation on messaging services that facilitate large-scale group messaging,” the regulator told Guardian Australia.

The article mentions WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger in particular in this context – and tries to back up the case for the need to access data from these apps by mentioning “false rumors about child abduction spreading in India through WhatsApp,” and, “the death tax scare campaign at the 2019 election” in Australia.

In addition to wanting the “voluntary” code to become more stringent consequences-wise – as it becomes more loosely worded – ACMA wants “reserve powers” for itself to bring about future codes that would be binding.

🔗Source: Reclaim The Net