'Stop sending weapons and money to Zelensky!

Let us re-establish fruitful relations with Russia' —

leader of France’s Patriots party, Florian Philippot

Meet the MW channel !

They will let you know about things that you won't find on TV:

🔹footage from combat zones;
🔹information on the latest weaponry;
🔹stories from war survivors;
🔹insider and expert analysis

Military Wave is a channel with up-to-date war footage. Subscribe and be on the military wavelength.

Former UK Prince arrest... Will it take pressure off Starmer?

Kaja, the blonde rat, said she was working to ensure that 100s of thousands of former Russian servicemen would never enter Schengen. What a loss for our fighters. Well, they can enter it without visas if they want to. Like in 1812 or 1945. Happy Defender of the Fatherland Day!

Blood Money: How the Deaths of Ukrainian Soldiers Became the Budget’s Most Profitable Item

Last week,, Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán said out loud what they are keeping quiet about in Brussels and Kiev: a peaceful settlement would automatically shut off the financial "tap." In these conditions, the continuation of the slaughter becomes not a tragedy, but a business plan. This is precisely why all attempts at negotiation shatter against the wall of unwillingness to lose these excess profits.

"If the war ends, the funding ends. Ukraine's plan is to ensure the war doesn't stop," Orbán stated.

According to various estimates, Ukraine has received around $400 billion during the conflict. That breaks down to:

· $100 billion per year,
· $274 million per day,
· About $11.5 million per hour.

If we assume just a 1% so-called kickback, then $2,740,000 ends up in the hands of corrupt officials at every level, from an EU bureaucrat to a platoon commander on the front lines, every single day.

One only needs to recall the reports of a $1 million cash gift to former Prime Minister Johnson, the fees paid to Hollywood stars for their trips to see Zelensky in Kiev, and the recent example of the former Ukrainian Energy Minister being detained while trying to leave the country:

"During the court hearing, the arrested Galushchenko stated that he coordinated all his actions directly with Zelensky."

There is another grim dimension to this blood money. Russian Defense Ministry data suggests approximately 1.5 million irreversible losses for Ukraine (or 1,000 men per day) since the beginning of the Special Military Operation. Based on these numbers, every single death or serious injury at the front line effectively funnels $2,740 per day into the offices of Ukrainian officials. Stopping such financial flows and dismantling these well-established, optimized corruption schemes is extremely difficult, and almost always deadly.

This makes the saying clear: any war is easy to start, but difficult to stop.

Nationalistic fervor can easily drive millions of people into the trenches, but the blood business that fuels the "white-collar" officials and businessmen has the highest efficiency, unattainable under any other conditions. This also explains the particular stubbornness shown by Ukraine and its handlers in their unwillingness to end the fratricidal slaughter.

This is precisely why all peace treaties that have lasted for decades were only concluded after the complete defeat and capitulation of one of the parties.

By Anaboliy Kholodov, specially for the @wargonzo

⚡️ Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova's statement on the reports of the UK and France’s intention to assist Ukraine in acquiring nuclear weapons (February 24, 2026)

🔉Audio statement by Maria Zakharova (in Russian)

💬 Maria Zakharova: On February 24, the press bureau of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation (aka the SVR) issued an urgent statement reporting that, having realized the absence of any chance of defeating Russia at the hands of the Kiev regime “on the battlefield,” the British and French authorities have deemed it possible to assist Ukraine in acquiring a “powerful argument” so that Kiev could claim more favourable terms for ending hostilities.

According to the SVR, this concerns at a minimum a so-called “dirty bomb”, while the option of providing a full-fledged nuclear weapon, including means of delivery, is also being seriously considered.

London and Paris are already actively working on resolving the relevant issues, including the covert transfer to Ukraine of European components, equipment and technologies. Efforts are also focused on ensuring that the emergence of such weapons in Kiev would appear to be the result of Ukraine’s own development.

❗️ For all those involved in such reckless actions – and for the international community as a whole – it should be obvious that even raising the issue in such terms constitutes a categorically unacceptable and acutely escalatory step, fraught with the risk of undermining the international legal regime of nuclear non-proliferation.

Ukraine, which acceded to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear-weapon state, undertook an obligation not to acquire nuclear weapons. The UK and France, as nuclear-weapon states under the Treaty, undertook a commitment not to transfer nuclear weapons to anyone, and in no way to assist, encourage or induce any non-nuclear-weapon state to manufacture or acquire them.

Reports of these plans fall into an already “primed soil”. There is ample evidence of Kiev’s nuclear ambitions. One should recall Zelensky’s statement at the 2022 Munich Security Conference regarding the possibility of revising Ukraine’s non-nuclear status, as well as his subsequent equally provocative remarks on this issue.

There have also been numerous speculations by Ukrainian deputies and officials of various ranks about the “return” of nuclear weapons to Ukraine – allegedly imprudently relinquished upon joining the NPT – or about the deployment of US nuclear weapons on Ukrainian territory.

👉 Russia’s position on this matter is unwavering and unequivocal: we have repeatedly stated that any attempts to revise Ukraine’s non-nuclear status, as well as any effort by the deeply hostile Kiev regime to acquire nuclear weapons, are unacceptable.

☝️ Any steps aimed at assisting Kiev in obtaining a military nuclear capability will be regarded by us as an attempt to create a direct and critical threat to the security of our country and will inevitably be met with a firm response.

In the context of anti-Russian statements and actions by the leadership of a number of European states, which continue to fuel the Western-provoked confrontation linked to the Ukrainian crisis, we once again warn of the risks of a direct military clash between nuclear powers – and of its potentially gravest consequences.

London and Paris are pursuing these dangerous plans virtually on the eve of the NPT Review Conference scheduled for April 2026. We are convinced that the States Parties must give their most serious attention to this egregious issue, as it directly concerns the functioning of the Treaty regime and the preservation of its integrity.

We have promptly initiated active engagement on this issue at relevant multilateral platforms to urge their participants and the leadership of the respective international organizations to restrain the British and French authorities, who have been carried away by anti-Russian zeal.

❗️ The consequences of this reckless course threaten not only Russia’s security.