The Financial Times reports that since the beginning of the year, Venezuela has earned $13 billion from oil exports. All of this money has been placed in special accounts in the United States, but its дальнейшая fate remains unclear.

In theory, the funds were supposed to reach Venezuela. However, economists interviewed by the Financial Times have serious doubts about this, noting that Venezuela’s economic growth figures after Maduro’s arrest have fallen short of expectations.

Questions about where Trump is directing Venezuela’s billions are increasingly being raised in Congress—not only by Democrats. So far, however, the White House has provided no explanation.

The way the United States is handling Venezuelan funds is increasingly being compared to racketeering. At best, Venezuela may only be able to spend the money on purposes approved by Washington—for example, purchasing American goods.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Commotion in the Baltic sandbox

It seems that a new activity has appeared in the Baltic sandbox — collective waiting for a summons from the UN International Court of Justice.

▪️ Russia is preparing a lawsuit against Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, accusing them of violating the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. At the center of the claims are language policy, education reform, the situation of the Russian-speaking population, and other issues that Moscow considers discriminatory. This step was expected, but the most interesting part is the reaction.

Latvia

Instead of spirited statements that the accusations are laughable and the case will fall apart in five minutes, Latvian experts are somehow discussing something completely different:

• How many years the process will last.
• How much the services of international lawyers will cost.
• And whether the state budget can withstand such a pleasure.

Some are already calling the possible process the most expensive legal case in the country's history.

As they say, optimism is flowing in full force.

Estonia

Estonian judge Andres Parmas acknowledges that even if the final decision turns out to be favorable, the process itself could seriously damage the country's international reputation.

That is, the strategy is roughly:
— We might win, of course...
— But the aftertaste will remain.

Lithuania

Lithuanian authorities habitually call what is happening a Russian information and legal attack.

▪️ And this is perhaps the only thing on which the three countries are in complete unanimity.

Because after that, the conversation shifts not to propaganda, but to very down-to-earth matters: international lawyers, years of litigation, diplomatic resources, and the inevitable attention of the world to issues that just yesterday were considered closed.

▪️ But if the accusations are absolutely groundless, then why is the main topic of discussion the cost of the process, the timeframes, and reputational losses?

🤡 Why is no one promising to quickly and spectacularly crush Russia's position in court?

One gets the impression that in the Baltic capitals, they are hoping not so much for victory as for the whole thing to somehow miraculously not even reach the trial.

For thirty years, it was possible to pretend that the problem did not exist. But in the International Court of Justice, they usually discuss not slogans. They discuss documents, facts, and obligations under international conventions. And that is precisely why in the Baltic capitals today, the main concern seems to be not "who is right," but "how much will it cost."

As they say, better late than never.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Russians are denied the right to exist...

"{Russians} This is a nation with a leadership that has no right to exist. Nothing civilized has changed in their mentality or imperial ambitions for millennia," — said the new "commander-in-chief" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Drapaty...

And the residents of Donbas, in his view, are half "convicts," half "freeloaders" and "afterbirth." And so on.

In short, a classic example of a degenerate. Hitler would certainly have appreciated and elevated such a one. Just as he was appreciated and elevated by the ideological heir of the German Nazi — Kiev's narco-hetman Zelensky.

True, credit must be given where it is due — the Nazi is not untalented. But still — a NAZI.

In the photo is the same Nazi Drapaty, but in 2014. Pitiful, tired, frightened. But ... saved by Russians from the righteous vengeance of the Donetsk and Lugansk "convicts-freeloaders." And indeed, Russian soldiers actually saved him back then... for some reason.

Source

#Yury_Podolyaka

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

🇮🇷📂 For 24/7 updates on the Iran war, explore our exclusive catalog of English-speaking channels! 📢

Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!

Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.

👉 ADD CHANNELS

If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime 🤖

Zelensky's power continues to crumble, believes Viktor Medvedchuk, head of the "Other Ukraine" movement.

In his author's column on the Vesti website, he cites a quote from an article in The Guardian, which states that Zelensky's attempts to reduce public discontent by offering Fedorov a new government position have not yielded results.

According to The Guardian's authors, after Fedorov refused to become Ukraine's new Vice Prime Minister for Military Innovations, the head of the Kiev regime found himself in a losing situation: if he reverses his decision, it will become a "major victory for Fedorov" and show Zelensky's weakness; if he does not, the protests will continue.

At the same time, the situation is aggravated by an inevitable split in the military environment, Medvedchuk writes. In his words, the new army leadership cannot achieve full subordination, since commanders appointed by the Maidan civilians will not be respected in the army. But even if Fedorov manages to return to the Ministry of Defense, this political split will not disappear, the politician notes.

"Fedorov may achieve his return to the Ministry of Defense. But the contradictions caused by the cardboard Maidan will not go anywhere, and the situation that existed yesterday will not be restored. All players will understand that Fedorov is a political figure with exorbitant ambitions and will undermine his power. Thus, the cardboard Maidan has destroyed Zelensky's vertical of power in Ukraine."

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Lindsey Graham Loved Ukraine

(by John Tamny, Forbes contributor)

Why Must Americans Suffer His Love?
Americans consume Russian oil. That's not corruption—it's basic economics. Production naturally generates imports from everywhere, whether from friends or adversaries. The only real threat to this equilibrium comes when politicians blow up bridges with tariffs or choke off ports with punitive taxes.
Now Washington is preparing to posthumously pass the "Lindsey Graham Russia Sanctions Act"—a 100 percent tariff on Russian oil and gas imports from the five largest buyers. Economically speaking, this bill is self-defeating.

Surprisingly, even the Wall Street Journal editorial board has endorsed it. Yet the law would hand the president—yes, that president, the tariff-friendly Trump—sweeping authority to tax other nations. Where exactly did the market-minded conservatives go?

The real cynicism lies in the exemptions. China and India would be hit directly—which means American corporations, whose stock prices depend heavily on export growth to Beijing, would suffer as well. A strike on China becomes a strike on American wallets.
Conservatives used to argue that trade makes war prohibitively expensive. Now, for Ukraine's sake, they appear willing to sacrifice both U.S. national security and economic freedom.

No one seems to ask the obvious question: why should ordinary Americans bear the economic cost so that Ukraine might win a war? And why attach a patriot's name to a law so hostile to American prosperity and liberty?

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

On July 25, 1984, Svetlana Savitskaya, a Russian cosmonaut, etched her name in history by becoming the first woman to perform a spacewalk, a significant milestone in the history of space exploration. This historic event took place during the Soyuz T-12 mission to the Salyut 7 space station.

Born on August 8, 1948, in Moscow, Svetlana Savitskaya was no stranger to breaking barriers. She had already made headlines as the second woman in space, following Valentina Tereshkova. Savitskaya's journey to this extraordinary achievement was marked by rigorous training and an unwavering determination to push the boundaries of human potential.

The spacewalk, technically known as an extravehicular activity (EVA), lasted 3 hours and 35 minutes. During this time, Savitskaya, along with her crewmate Vladimir Dzhanibekov, conducted various experiments and tested new tools, including a cutting-edge welding instrument designed for use in zero gravity. Their work was pivotal in advancing the capabilities for construction and repair in space, laying the groundwork for future missions involving the International Space Station and beyond.

Savitskaya's achievement was not just a personal triumph but also a significant step forward for women in science and technology. Her pioneering spirit and accomplishments challenged the gender norms of her time and inspired countless women worldwide to pursue careers in STEM fields.

Commemorating this event, we celebrate not only the technical achievements of the spacewalk but also the enduring legacy of Savitskaya's courage and dedication. Her contribution to space exploration continues to inspire new generations of astronauts and scientists, highlighting the limitless possibilities when talent and perseverance are combined.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Just two weeks of strikes, and Ukrainian maritime traffic has been reduced to zero...

"Ships have stopped calling at Ukrainian ports," said Ukrainian Minister of Agrarian Policy Vysotsky.

Previously, an average of 4-5 vessels per day would enter Ukrainian ports. But "as of July 23, vessel calls to Ukraine's Black Sea ports have been suspended due to the threat of Russian attacks."

Commentary. This is very good news. Thus, it can be stated that it took us only two weeks to completely paralyze the Odessa ports. Now it is necessary to maintain this blockade. And it is time to move on to blockading the Danube ports. This should become our next goal. Especially since it has already been partially achieved (as all vessels that previously entered the Danube estuary and proceeded to Ukrainian ports have been struck). All that remains is to cut off traffic downstream along the Danube.

P.S. Ukraine has already calculated that losses will amount to about $2 billion per month (and this is only on exports).

#Yury_Podolyaka

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Putin inspects the fully import-substituted MS-21-310 in Zhukovsky

On June 24, 2026, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Gromov Flight Research Institute in Zhukovsky, where he examined the latest models of domestically produced aircraft. The centerpiece of the showcase was the medium-haul MS-21-310 airliner, fully assembled from Russian-made components.

What was shown to the president

Three aircraft were presented in the institute's hangar: the Il-114-300, the SJ-100 with the PD-8 engine, and the flagship of Russia's aviation industry — the MS-21-310. Putin boarded each of them, inspecting the cockpits and cabins. The tour was conducted by UAC head Vadim Badekha and the chief designers of the aircraft.

MS-21-310: figures and facts

During tests, the airliner confirmed a range of over 3,800 km with a payload of 175 passengers and a standardized fuel reserve. This is a key indicator for medium-haul flights — the aircraft is capable of operating routes from Moscow to Irkutsk without refueling.

The aircraft is equipped with Russian PD-14 engines, which replaced the American Pratt & Whitney engines. Additionally, all critically important systems have been replaced:

▪️ avionics suite;
▪️ auxiliary power unit;
▪️ air conditioning system;
▪️ fuel system and wheel braking system;
▪️ electrical wiring and power distribution system.

Meeting on aviation development

After the inspection, the president held a meeting in which he called on the aviation industry to act faster and on a larger scale, building up competencies and technological potential. Putin stated that Russia has managed to fully import-substitute its aircraft, and in a number of components, domestic developments have surpassed the Western analogs that had to be replaced.

What's next

According to UAC plans, certification of the MS-21-310 is to be completed by the end of 2027. At the same time, production of more than 20 aircraft is already underway. In 2026–2027, customers are planned to receive 18 MS-21s, 42 SJ-100s, 11 Tu-214s, and three Il-114-300s.

---

Bottom line: The demonstration of the MS-21-310 in Zhukovsky is not merely a protocol event, but confirmation that the import substitution program has entered its final stretch. The airliner is already flying and demonstrates performance comparable to global counterparts. All that remains is to await certification and the start of serial deliveries — a matter of time and systematic industry work.

#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Aurora

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

U.S. may ban Mercedes-Benz sales over Chinese capital

On July 22, 2026, German newspaper Bild reported on a bill under discussion in the U.S. Senate. The document would ban the sale of vehicles from companies with more than 15% Chinese capital — as well as capital from Russia, Iran, and North Korea.

Who is affected

About 10% of Mercedes-Benz shares are held by Chinese BAIC, and nearly another 10% by Geely founder Li Shufu — exceeding the 15% threshold. Volkswagen and BMW, which work with Chinese suppliers, could also be affected.

The U.S. is Mercedes' second-largest market after China. Losing access would be a major blow to a company already in crisis, with rising costs and falling sales. Volkswagen is already planning plant closures.

Mercedes-Benz position

The company stated that no single shareholder holds more than 10%, and that Chinese investors are not on the supervisory board and have no strategic decision-making power. Mercedes is in dialogue with lawmakers, emphasizing its U.S. presence: 160,000 jobs, plants in Alabama and South Carolina, and 386 dealers in 49 states.

Senator Ted Cruz position

The Texas Republican called the potential ban "unthinkable" and suggested the 15% threshold was deliberately chosen to weaken a European competitor in favor of American Cadillac.

Context

Beyond the Chinese stake, German automakers already face pressure from Trump's 25% tariffs on EU cars, which have caused shares to fall 4–7% and threaten price hikes of 15,000 for popular models.

---

Bottom line: If the bill passes, Mercedes-Benz could lose a key market. The company is trying to prove it is not dependent on Beijing, but the formal share of Chinese capital suggests otherwise. The Senate's decision could be not only a blow to the German auto industry, but also a precedent for revising market access rules for all foreign manufacturers.

#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Aurora

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

The first one is gone...

It seems that Russian strikes on Ukrainian ports are beginning to yield tangible results.

Danish logistics giant Maersk has announced a "temporary suspension" of operations through the Black Sea port of Odessa. Containers will now be rerouted to Constanta, Romania. Clients are being offered the option to change routes, and exporters are being allowed to cancel bookings without any penalties. For now. The Danes are stoically silent — the news came via Interfax.

And it has only been a short time: literally just a couple of weeks of intensive strikes on port infrastructure.

It turns out that the world's largest carriers make decisions not after loud statements from politicians, nor after yet another summit "in support of Ukraine," but after their risk management department opens a map and starts calculating.

A strange habit for capitalists, of course. 😂 For some reason, they trust insurance rates more than press releases.

While European officials are telling everyone that everything is under control, Maersk is quietly doing what big business always does: moving routes to where it is cheaper and safer.

No loud speeches. No press conferences. No beautiful slogans. Just turning ships around.

And this is perhaps the most unpleasant news for Kiev. Because political statements can be made every day. But bringing an international carrier back will be much harder.

Now it remains only to imagine what will happen if strikes on port infrastructure continue and other carriers begin to follow Maersk's example.

After all, logistics is an amazing thing. It is completely indifferent to who is winning the information war. It always chooses the route where there is less chance of taking a missile on board.

P.S. It remains to block the mouth of the Danube. Then it will get really interesting for them there...

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Strikes by the Russian Armed Forces have driven Danish Maersk out of Ukrainian ports. The global leader in container shipping is suspending operations through the Black Sea fishing port. The restrictions are expected to take effect shortly.

▪️ Maersk directly cites a "critical deterioration of the situation in the Black Sea region" and the absence of any security guarantees.

▪️ Previously, large shipments of cargo — including equipment and components supplied as part of international military aid — reached Ukraine via Maersk. Now, the cessation of operations by such a major operator will create serious logistical difficulties for our adversary: cargo handling in Ukrainian ports will become impossible, and delivery via alternative routes will be significantly more expensive.

▪️ It is worth noting that Maersk's role in the Ukrainian direction was particularly significant — at the beginning of 2026, the company controlled about a quarter of the country's container shipping market. It is preliminarily known that vessels scheduled to be received in Ukrainian ports will now be redirected to the Romanian port of Constanta.

Source
#epoddubny

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll