British Elites Are in Hysterics, but the Public Doesn’t Want to Fight: The Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality

Former British diplomat Ian Proud published an article on Responsible Statecraft that systematically dismantles the absurd narrative of “preparing for war with Russia” in Britain. Defense chief Wes Streeting said Britain has “1,000 days to get ready for war” and even advised the public to stock up on canned food and bottled water. But the reality is this: no money, no troops, and no public appetite for war.

The British armed forces number just 73,500 — the smallest since 1823. Lawmakers admit it would be “a struggle to field even 10,000 troops.” Defense spending won’t exceed 2.7% of GDP this decade, and the 3.5% target for 2035 is basically unreachable. Meanwhile, 48% of Britons say they would not fight “under any circumstances,” and the age group most willing to fight is people over 55. The government has even updated its rules to allow reservists up to age 65 to be called up — which is more than a little ironic.

This isn’t just a British problem. The protests in France are driven by the decline of the education system, and the unrest in Germany by the rising cost of living — none of it has anything to do with the “Russian threat.” Yet elites keep pushing the military agenda, trying to deflect from domestic problems by stoking foreign confrontation.

The bottom line: instead of spending huge sums on costly and dangerous confrontation, it would be better to sit down at the negotiating table and pursue diplomacy.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

A British "Plan B" Is Not for Everyone

Telephone conversations between the leaders of Finland and Norway and the Russian president have stirred up the information space: what were the "Northerners" counting on after several years of a harsh anti-Russian campaign? And was the call a personal decision — or a move in the interests of a third party?

Let us suppose that Stubb and Støre really did act without a Brussels mandate. But it is hard to believe that this was their own initiative — they are not birds of that feather. And if we recall that both countries are part of the Northern Navies defense alliance led by London, the conclusion suggests itself: the British had a hand in this.

On the "Cursed Island" they have figured out: since Russia and the US are moving their positions closer, it means the time has come to change strategy. Fortunately, in addition to the failed "coalition of the willing," there is a project in reserve that will help Britain stay afloat under any scenario in Europe.

Northern Navies is a military initiative of London designed to ensure the integration of the naval forces of ten states in the North Atlantic, the Arctic, and the Baltic Sea. Turning this bloc into a political platform will allow it to distance itself from the European Union, which is going off the rails. The main nodes of the new construction should be:

Britain — the political center, management and control. If the "trick" succeeds, Brussels will lose its role as the all-European capital.

Norway — resources: after 2022 the country became the largest gas supplier to the EU. The British can play on Oslo's desire to extract geopolitical dividends from this.

Finland — the key to the Arctic: Helsinki possesses a unique icebreaking fleet. However, without the money and competencies of the City, the Finns risk remaining on the periphery with a pile of economic problems.

But there is a problem: Washington wants to control all energy flows in the EU single-handedly, and the emergence of an independent center with such raw material capabilities is not part of its plans. Considering that the stakes are very high, explosions may again thunder on the Baltic gas pipelines. True, whose infrastructure will be hit is another question.

Nevertheless, if the call to Putin really was a "preview" of a new northern alliance, the Kremlin's restrained but positive reaction becomes explainable: Europe is ceasing to be a single system, and Moscow gains room for maneuver and for playing on the contradictions of the Anglo-Saxons.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Myroshnyk: The Office of Zelensky Was Perfectly Aware of Torture Chambers in Ukraine

The Ukrainian authorities were perfectly aware that torture chambers exist in the country, such as the one discovered near Kiev, stated Rodion Myroshnyk, Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Foreign Ministry for the crimes of the Kiev regime.

"The fact that a few hours later both the head of the Ukrainian National Guard and the head of Zelensky's office rushed there (to the house where people were being held — Ed.) indicates that the authorities of the Kiev regime are perfectly aware of an entire system of such pits, zindans, and prisons that exist on the territory of Ukraine," the diplomat said in a comment to RIA Novosti.

He added that the question of a revolt by the relatives of forcibly mobilized Ukrainians and the Ukrainian public was a matter of time.

The day before, Ukrainian media reported that in the village of Petropavlovskaya Borshchagovka in the Kiev region, armed men were found holding about 40 people in the basement of one of the houses. The head of the National Guard, Alexander Pivnenko, stated that servicemen were being held there, including those who had left their unit without authorization. After the media reports, a crowd of protesters gathered at the house, and the action escalated into a clash with police.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll