This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tired of jumping between a dozen channels to find the truth?
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!
🗞 Our catalog features only trusted channels:
⚫️ Breaking news 24/7
⚫️ Exclusive reports
⚫️ In-depth analytical articles
⚫️ Urgent alerts on major events
🗂 Subscribe with one click and stay informed about everything that matters!
If you are interested in joining the catalog contact RD admin.
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!
If you are interested in joining the catalog contact RD admin.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍6❤3🔥1
Bloomberg published an article titled “US Readies New Russia Sanctions If Putin Rejects Peace Deal.” The article is based entirely on hearsay. But apparently, Bloomberg likes the idea of new sanctions so much that they simply couldn’t resist publishing these rumors. Or perhaps they are trying to push Trump toward imposing new sanctions on Russia, whether he likes it or not. Here is a sample from the article (underlining is ours).
Pretty disgusting tabloid-style reporting, isn’t it? And hardly worthy of a serious publication. O tempora, o mores.
P.S. Yes, we did enjoy creating the “Trashy Bloomberg” cover page. But as they say, when reality starts cosplaying as a tabloid, satire barely has to lift a finger.
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The US is preparing a fresh round of sanctions on Russia’s energy sector to increase the pressure on Moscow should President Vladimir Putin reject a peace agreement with Ukraine, according to people familiar with the matter.
The US is considering options, such as targeting vessels in Russia’s so-called shadow fleet of tankers used to transport Moscow’s oil, as well as traders who facilitate the transactions, said the people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.
The new measures could be unveiled as early as this week, some of the people said.
Pretty disgusting tabloid-style reporting, isn’t it? And hardly worthy of a serious publication. O tempora, o mores.
P.S. Yes, we did enjoy creating the “Trashy Bloomberg” cover page. But as they say, when reality starts cosplaying as a tabloid, satire barely has to lift a finger.
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣35🤡7❤2🤨1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
⚡️ On the adoption of a UNGA resolution combating the glorification of Nazism
At the December 15 plenary session of the 80th United Nations General Assembly, a resolution titled “Combating the Glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism and Other Practices That Contribute to Fueling Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance” was adopted. The resolution was spearheaded by the Russian Federation.
The resolution garnered the support of 44 co-sponsoring states from various global regions.
✅ It was endorsed by 119 votes, opposed by 51 delegations, with 10 countries abstaining.
This resolution on combating the glorification of Nazism lays the groundwork for countering the falsification of history and efforts to revise the outcomes of the Second World War on an international platform.
It condemns the glorification of the Nazi movement and former SS members, including Waffen-SS units, deemed criminal by the Nuremberg Trials. The resolution expresses profound outrage at the rehabilitation of Hitler’s collaborators and attempts to elevate them to the status of national heroes, manifesting in torchlight processions, street renaming, and the erection of memorials.
The document articulates serious concern over the ongoing campaign against monuments dedicated to anti-Nazi and anti-fascist fighters and liberating soldiers in some countries, which has increasingly assumed the guise of state policy. Simultaneously, it expresses strong indignation at efforts by certain nations to prohibit symbols associated with Victory over Nazism.
The resolution particularly underscores that such actions desecrate the memory of the countless victims of Nazism, negatively impacting younger generations and being utterly incompatible with the obligations of UN member states under the Organisation’s Charter.
Furthermore, the resolution upholds the principle of inadmissibility of any ideology promoting the superiority of specific population groups based on racial, ethnic, religious affiliations, or similar criteria. This is particularly relevant in light of the persistent rise in Islamophobia, Christianophobia, Afro-phobia, Arabophobia, Russophobia, and anti-Semitism, notably in the collective West.
It is emblematic that this very political bloc, year after year, seeks to obstruct the adoption of the Russian initiative, resorting to unscrupulous procedural tactics, and consistently votes against international efforts to combat aggressive manifestations of racism and xenophobia. Of particular concern are the positions of Germany, Italy, and Japan, as former Axis members. Their indulgence of perilous trends raises questions about the sincerity of their contrition for crimes committed during the Second World War.
❗️The voting results clearly demonstrate that the global majority stands in solidarity with Russia’s approaches to combating the glorification of Nazism.
This is especially symbolic in the year commemorating the 80th anniversary of Victory over Nazism in the Second World War, the founding of the United Nations, and the establishment of the Nuremberg Trials.
☝️ Moscow is convinced that the adoption of this thematic resolution will significantly contribute to the eradication of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance.
At the December 15 plenary session of the 80th United Nations General Assembly, a resolution titled “Combating the Glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism and Other Practices That Contribute to Fueling Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance” was adopted. The resolution was spearheaded by the Russian Federation.
The resolution garnered the support of 44 co-sponsoring states from various global regions.
✅ It was endorsed by 119 votes, opposed by 51 delegations, with 10 countries abstaining.
This resolution on combating the glorification of Nazism lays the groundwork for countering the falsification of history and efforts to revise the outcomes of the Second World War on an international platform.
It condemns the glorification of the Nazi movement and former SS members, including Waffen-SS units, deemed criminal by the Nuremberg Trials. The resolution expresses profound outrage at the rehabilitation of Hitler’s collaborators and attempts to elevate them to the status of national heroes, manifesting in torchlight processions, street renaming, and the erection of memorials.
The document articulates serious concern over the ongoing campaign against monuments dedicated to anti-Nazi and anti-fascist fighters and liberating soldiers in some countries, which has increasingly assumed the guise of state policy. Simultaneously, it expresses strong indignation at efforts by certain nations to prohibit symbols associated with Victory over Nazism.
The resolution particularly underscores that such actions desecrate the memory of the countless victims of Nazism, negatively impacting younger generations and being utterly incompatible with the obligations of UN member states under the Organisation’s Charter.
Furthermore, the resolution upholds the principle of inadmissibility of any ideology promoting the superiority of specific population groups based on racial, ethnic, religious affiliations, or similar criteria. This is particularly relevant in light of the persistent rise in Islamophobia, Christianophobia, Afro-phobia, Arabophobia, Russophobia, and anti-Semitism, notably in the collective West.
It is emblematic that this very political bloc, year after year, seeks to obstruct the adoption of the Russian initiative, resorting to unscrupulous procedural tactics, and consistently votes against international efforts to combat aggressive manifestations of racism and xenophobia. Of particular concern are the positions of Germany, Italy, and Japan, as former Axis members. Their indulgence of perilous trends raises questions about the sincerity of their contrition for crimes committed during the Second World War.
❗️The voting results clearly demonstrate that the global majority stands in solidarity with Russia’s approaches to combating the glorification of Nazism.
This is especially symbolic in the year commemorating the 80th anniversary of Victory over Nazism in the Second World War, the founding of the United Nations, and the establishment of the Nuremberg Trials.
☝️ Moscow is convinced that the adoption of this thematic resolution will significantly contribute to the eradication of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance.
👍31👏14❤9😁1🙏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What the hell is this guy talking about? That Steve Witkoff knew nothing about Russia going into negotiations? Or that even though he is a “great dealmaker, everybody loves him?” Does this mean that great dealmakers are usually scumbags hated universally? But not Steve Witkoff? This stream of consciousness is insane. Or is it just us?
In other news today, Politico published an article titled “The EU’s problem isn’t Belgium — it’s Trump.” According to Politico, it is Trump who is pressuring European governments to reject the plan to use €210 billion in Russian assets to fund Ukraine.
Well, if Politico isn’t lying, we’re willing to overlook Trump’s tirade about Witkoff — just this once.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In other news today, Politico published an article titled “The EU’s problem isn’t Belgium — it’s Trump.” According to Politico, it is Trump who is pressuring European governments to reject the plan to use €210 billion in Russian assets to fund Ukraine.
Well, if Politico isn’t lying, we’re willing to overlook Trump’s tirade about Witkoff — just this once.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁34👍7🤡3😎3😱1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ukraine has awakened the “sleeping bear” and will be forced to make peace — Lukashenko
The fighting in Ukraine will continue until Kiev is compelled to enter peace negotiations, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said in an interview with the U.S. television channel Newsmax. He described Russia as a “sleeping bear” that was “needlessly awakened” and expressed confidence in its victory.
Key statements by Alexander Lukashenko:
— Russia is winning this confrontation, and Vladimir Putin wants peace;
— Ukraine simply gave up on Crimea, while its authorities decided to “silence” the Russian-speaking population;
— Prolonging the crisis threatens the very existence of Ukraine and risks a global conflict;
— Moscow seeks to conclude a durable peace treaty that would permanently rule out a resumption of hostilities.
The fighting in Ukraine will continue until Kiev is compelled to enter peace negotiations, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said in an interview with the U.S. television channel Newsmax. He described Russia as a “sleeping bear” that was “needlessly awakened” and expressed confidence in its victory.
Key statements by Alexander Lukashenko:
— Russia is winning this confrontation, and Vladimir Putin wants peace;
— Ukraine simply gave up on Crimea, while its authorities decided to “silence” the Russian-speaking population;
— Prolonging the crisis threatens the very existence of Ukraine and risks a global conflict;
— Moscow seeks to conclude a durable peace treaty that would permanently rule out a resumption of hostilities.
❤37👍24👏4❤🔥3
🚨 New Rules podcast is back with two episodes that push boundaries - check them out:
🎤 Scott Ritter - why Venezuela could be a U.S. nightmare.
🎤 Gen. Apti Alaudinov - offers a firsthand view of the war in Ukraine and explains how it differs from the conflict in Gaza.
✅ Support our partners with a follow @NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤🔥10❤8🫡5
The collapse of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defenses is inevitable; Western handlers of Kiev understand this, Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov stated at an expanded meeting of the Defense Ministry’s board. His remarks were reported by the ministry’s press service on its Telegram channel.
According to him, over the course of the current year the Russian army has taken control of more than 300 populated areas and over 6,000 square kilometers of territory. This is one-third higher than last year’s figures, the minister explained. Moreover, the rate of advance of the “Vostok,” “Tsentr,” and “Zapad” force groupings compared with 2024 has increased by one and a half to two times, he added.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
“Ultimately, what was obvious from the very beginning has been confirmed — the collapse of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defenses is inevitable,” Belousov said.
According to him, over the course of the current year the Russian army has taken control of more than 300 populated areas and over 6,000 square kilometers of territory. This is one-third higher than last year’s figures, the minister explained. Moreover, the rate of advance of the “Vostok,” “Tsentr,” and “Zapad” force groupings compared with 2024 has increased by one and a half to two times, he added.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥41❤20👏14👍5
On December 18, 1833, the new anthem of the Russian Empire, "God Save the Tsar!" (Боже, царя храни!), was publicly performed for the first time.
For a long time, Russia did not have its own anthem. Until the 17th century, Orthodox church hymns were performed at state ceremonies. During the reign of Peter I, "vivat cantos" began to be heard at celebrations. In the 18th century, the pan-European hymn "Te Deum" (Тебя, Бога, хвалим) served as an anthem.
The first unofficial anthem in the Russian Empire appeared in 1791. It was the march-polonaise "Thunder of Victory, Resound" (Гром победы раздавайся), written by Osip Kozlovsky to the words of Gavriil Derzhavin.
The first version of the Russian Empire’s state anthem was written in 1815. Vasily Zhukovsky’s poem "The Prayer of the Russians" was set to the music of the British anthem "God Save the King." In 1833, Nicholas I tasked composer Alexey Lvov with writing new music for the anthem.
The updated anthem, "God Save the Tsar," was first performed on December 18, 1833, and became the official anthem of the Russian Empire, remaining so until March 1917.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
For a long time, Russia did not have its own anthem. Until the 17th century, Orthodox church hymns were performed at state ceremonies. During the reign of Peter I, "vivat cantos" began to be heard at celebrations. In the 18th century, the pan-European hymn "Te Deum" (Тебя, Бога, хвалим) served as an anthem.
The first unofficial anthem in the Russian Empire appeared in 1791. It was the march-polonaise "Thunder of Victory, Resound" (Гром победы раздавайся), written by Osip Kozlovsky to the words of Gavriil Derzhavin.
The first version of the Russian Empire’s state anthem was written in 1815. Vasily Zhukovsky’s poem "The Prayer of the Russians" was set to the music of the British anthem "God Save the King." In 1833, Nicholas I tasked composer Alexey Lvov with writing new music for the anthem.
The updated anthem, "God Save the Tsar," was first performed on December 18, 1833, and became the official anthem of the Russian Empire, remaining so until March 1917.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤30👍12
December 18, 1892: Premiere of the ballet "The Nutcracker"
The premiere of Pyotr Tchaikovsky's ballet The Nutcracker took place at the Mariinsky Theatre in St. Petersburg, alongside the opera Iolanta.
The production was choreographed by ballet master Lev Ivanov. In the first performance, the role of Clara (Masha) was danced by ballerina Stanislava Belinskaya, Fritz by Vasily Stukolkin, the Nutcracker by Sergey Legat, the Sugar Plum Fairy by Antonietta Dell’Era, Prince Coqueluche by Pavel Gerdt, and Drosselmeyer by Timofey Stukolkin. The music was conducted by Riccardo Drigo.
The audience warmly received the new ballet, though critics were less enthusiastic. Over time, however, The Nutcracker became a timeless masterpiece of classical ballet, performed hundreds of times each year worldwide. The New York City Ballet alone typically stages 47 performances annually.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The premiere of Pyotr Tchaikovsky's ballet The Nutcracker took place at the Mariinsky Theatre in St. Petersburg, alongside the opera Iolanta.
The production was choreographed by ballet master Lev Ivanov. In the first performance, the role of Clara (Masha) was danced by ballerina Stanislava Belinskaya, Fritz by Vasily Stukolkin, the Nutcracker by Sergey Legat, the Sugar Plum Fairy by Antonietta Dell’Era, Prince Coqueluche by Pavel Gerdt, and Drosselmeyer by Timofey Stukolkin. The music was conducted by Riccardo Drigo.
The audience warmly received the new ballet, though critics were less enthusiastic. Over time, however, The Nutcracker became a timeless masterpiece of classical ballet, performed hundreds of times each year worldwide. The New York City Ballet alone typically stages 47 performances annually.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤36👍7👏3
The Trump administration has made it clear to European countries that it wants to use frozen Russian assets for a peace settlement in Ukraine, according to The Washington Post. The article notes that this stance increases the risk of disputes with European leaders.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣41🤡10🔥4
Farmers' protests have swept across Europe.
In Greece, farmers are blocking roads, with convoys of agricultural machinery creating traffic jams stretching dozens of kilometers.
Mass protests have also reached the island of Crete: agricultural workers have blocked the airports in Heraklion and Chania.
Greek police are cracking down harshly on local farmers' protests. A demonstration attended by thousands of farmers was dispersed using batons and tear gas.
The reason for the mass demonstrations is Brussels' decision to cancel agricultural subsidies. Production in the country has become unprofitable, and local farmers see these subsidies as their last chance to survive in any way possible.
Farmers are also protesting against rising production costs and low purchase prices for their products.
“No farmers, no food”: Following Greece, columns of tractors have taken to the roads in the Netherlands. In the city of 's-Hertogenbosch, farmers are protesting against stricter livestock regulations.
On November 14th, mass farmers' protests began in Poland. Dozens of rallies have already taken place in many villages and cities.
The issue concerns the European Union's trade agreements with Ukraine and South American countries.
The farmers' demand is to reduce the inflow of cheap food from these countries. The food they supply is not subject to EU standards. For example, Ukraine permits the use of pesticides or fertilizers that are banned in the European Union.
Farmers are calling for fair and transparent competition.
A protest action by farmers in France was also triggered by unpopular government decisions. For instance, a decree was issued regarding herds found to have nodular dermatitis. Police identify such farms and demand the mass culling of livestock.
In France alone, 10% of farms have gone bankrupt this year, while 75% are in serious financial difficulty.
Large-scale farmers' protests have been taking place across Europe since 2024 due to rising costs (fuel, fertilizers), strict EU environmental norms, cheap imports (especially from Ukraine), and bureaucracy.
All of this significantly reduces their income and threatens the very existence of farms.
#InfoDefense_Author
#Avrora
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In Greece, farmers are blocking roads, with convoys of agricultural machinery creating traffic jams stretching dozens of kilometers.
Mass protests have also reached the island of Crete: agricultural workers have blocked the airports in Heraklion and Chania.
Greek police are cracking down harshly on local farmers' protests. A demonstration attended by thousands of farmers was dispersed using batons and tear gas.
The reason for the mass demonstrations is Brussels' decision to cancel agricultural subsidies. Production in the country has become unprofitable, and local farmers see these subsidies as their last chance to survive in any way possible.
Farmers are also protesting against rising production costs and low purchase prices for their products.
“No farmers, no food”: Following Greece, columns of tractors have taken to the roads in the Netherlands. In the city of 's-Hertogenbosch, farmers are protesting against stricter livestock regulations.
On November 14th, mass farmers' protests began in Poland. Dozens of rallies have already taken place in many villages and cities.
The issue concerns the European Union's trade agreements with Ukraine and South American countries.
The farmers' demand is to reduce the inflow of cheap food from these countries. The food they supply is not subject to EU standards. For example, Ukraine permits the use of pesticides or fertilizers that are banned in the European Union.
Farmers are calling for fair and transparent competition.
"If we have introduced certain standards, then let them apply to all goods imported into Poland," says Witold Opila, one of the main organizers of the protests in Poland.
A protest action by farmers in France was also triggered by unpopular government decisions. For instance, a decree was issued regarding herds found to have nodular dermatitis. Police identify such farms and demand the mass culling of livestock.
In France alone, 10% of farms have gone bankrupt this year, while 75% are in serious financial difficulty.
Large-scale farmers' protests have been taking place across Europe since 2024 due to rising costs (fuel, fertilizers), strict EU environmental norms, cheap imports (especially from Ukraine), and bureaucracy.
All of this significantly reduces their income and threatens the very existence of farms.
#InfoDefense_Author
#Avrora
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏43👍20❤11😢3🥰1
This is according to Reuters:
No doubt that this arms sale to Taiwan will be seen in China as a blatant provocation and a grave violation of China’s sovereignty. Beijing will undoubtedly issue stern and uncompromising diplomatic protests, condemning the United States for arming a breakaway province and interfering in China’s internal affairs. Such actions flagrantly disregard the “One China” principle and threaten regional peace and stability.
Among the Chinese public, outrage will be widespread. Citizens will view the sale as an insulting attempt by the U.S. to challenge China’s territorial integrity, and the local media will amplify this perception, portraying the move as a hostile act that demands a firm response. Social commentary and public discourse will call for strong countermeasures and unwavering defense of national unity, reinforcing collective support for the government’s stance.
Beijing will likely accelerate military exercises near the Taiwan Strait, demonstrating its resolve to safeguard sovereignty against foreign interference. Politically, the leadership will frame the incident as yet another example of external forces seeking to destabilize China, reinforcing domestic legitimacy and national pride. In the eyes of the Chinese government and people, this arms sale is not merely a transaction—it is an affront to China’s dignity, a threat to peace, and a challenge that demands a decisive and resolute response.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The United States approved an $11.1 billion arms package for Taiwan, the largest ever, amid rising military pressure from China. The deal includes HIMARS rocket systems, howitzers, Javelin anti-tank missiles, loitering munition drones, and spare parts, and is now at the Congressional notification stage.
The sale is the second under President Trump’s current administration and supports Taiwan’s shift toward asymmetric warfare—mobile, lower-cost weapons designed to deter a larger invading force. U.S. officials say the package advances American security interests by helping Taiwan modernize its forces and maintain a credible defense.
Taiwan welcomed the decision and recently announced $40 billion in additional defense spending (2026–2033). China has not yet commented, but U.S. arms sales to Taiwan remain a major source of U.S.–China tension.
The announcement followed a quiet visit by Taiwan’s foreign minister to the Washington area. Despite concerns that Trump’s deal-focused approach could weaken support for Taiwan, U.S. officials say weapons sales will increase beyond Trump’s first term to deter China.
No doubt that this arms sale to Taiwan will be seen in China as a blatant provocation and a grave violation of China’s sovereignty. Beijing will undoubtedly issue stern and uncompromising diplomatic protests, condemning the United States for arming a breakaway province and interfering in China’s internal affairs. Such actions flagrantly disregard the “One China” principle and threaten regional peace and stability.
Among the Chinese public, outrage will be widespread. Citizens will view the sale as an insulting attempt by the U.S. to challenge China’s territorial integrity, and the local media will amplify this perception, portraying the move as a hostile act that demands a firm response. Social commentary and public discourse will call for strong countermeasures and unwavering defense of national unity, reinforcing collective support for the government’s stance.
Beijing will likely accelerate military exercises near the Taiwan Strait, demonstrating its resolve to safeguard sovereignty against foreign interference. Politically, the leadership will frame the incident as yet another example of external forces seeking to destabilize China, reinforcing domestic legitimacy and national pride. In the eyes of the Chinese government and people, this arms sale is not merely a transaction—it is an affront to China’s dignity, a threat to peace, and a challenge that demands a decisive and resolute response.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯35❤7👍4😁2🤬1
Forwarded from The Duran
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Kupyansk ebb and flow. Huliaipole falling fast
❤20👍11