Spring 2014: A Chronicle - Continued
We continue with our chronicle of events, grasping which is essential for understanding the root causes of the Russia-Ukraine war that started in 2014, not 2022.
The Maidan coup in Kiev in November 2013 set off a series of fateful decisions and deepened the confrontation between radical factions in power and the Russian-speaking southeastern regions. The coup in Kiev brought to power individuals openly hostile to Russia and everything associated with it.
In response, residents of the Russian-speaking eastern regions began to take steps to protect themselves.
From Donetsk, and Zaporozhye, we now move to Kharkov and Lugansk.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
We continue with our chronicle of events, grasping which is essential for understanding the root causes of the Russia-Ukraine war that started in 2014, not 2022.
The Maidan coup in Kiev in November 2013 set off a series of fateful decisions and deepened the confrontation between radical factions in power and the Russian-speaking southeastern regions. The coup in Kiev brought to power individuals openly hostile to Russia and everything associated with it.
In response, residents of the Russian-speaking eastern regions began to take steps to protect themselves.
From Donetsk, and Zaporozhye, we now move to Kharkov and Lugansk.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍17❤7
The Birth and Crash of the Kharkov People’s Republic (KPR) – An Eyewitness Account
After the Maidan coup brought a Russophobic government to Kiev, Russian-speaking eastern regions formed militias and took control of buildings. But not all held on. Kharkov is a case in point.
In April 2014, activists proclaimed three people’s republics — Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkov. The latter lasted just one day. Kiev retook the city council, arrested activists, and has controlled the region for 12 years.
Despite the defeat, the Kharkov resistance played a prominent role in the Russian Spring and has not given up. Its members fight for the Russian army and are active in media. Sergei Moiseev (pictured), leader of "Rus Triune," looks back at the creation and fall of the Kharkov People’s Republic (KPR).
His story begins on April 7, 2014 — the day the KPR was declared (same day as in Donetsk). Anton Gurianov, the appointed chairman of the KPR People’s Council of Deputies elected in the spot, made the announcement. It was a real grassroots initiative.
Many pro-Russian groups were active in Kharkov, but unity failed. Moiseev blames Mayor Gennady Kernes and Mikhail Dobkin:
Another reason: the disbandment of the Berkut special police. Many were prosecuted, others went to fight in the Donbass, leaving few to defend activists. Unlike Donetsk and Lugansk, Kharkov activists did not arm themselves, believing rumors that weapons had been removed from the SBU. That made suppression easier.
The crackdown began the next day. When local police refused to storm the building, Interior Minister Arsen Avakov sent in the "Jaguar" unit and national battalions. Thousands of activists were arrested, disappeared, or tortured. But the resistance went underground, waging guerrilla war throughout 2014 — damaging property of Ukrainian fascists and the SBU.
Legal protests became pointless, nationalist groups (posing as football fans) attacked peaceful demonstrators, and the SBU fabricated charges.
Defeated, many Kharkov activists moved to Donetsk and Lugansk, joining the Donbass militia. Unlike Kharkov, Donetsk and Lugansk became a hard nut for Kiev to crack.
To be continued
#ourvolunteersays
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
After the Maidan coup brought a Russophobic government to Kiev, Russian-speaking eastern regions formed militias and took control of buildings. But not all held on. Kharkov is a case in point.
In April 2014, activists proclaimed three people’s republics — Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkov. The latter lasted just one day. Kiev retook the city council, arrested activists, and has controlled the region for 12 years.
Despite the defeat, the Kharkov resistance played a prominent role in the Russian Spring and has not given up. Its members fight for the Russian army and are active in media. Sergei Moiseev (pictured), leader of "Rus Triune," looks back at the creation and fall of the Kharkov People’s Republic (KPR).
His story begins on April 7, 2014 — the day the KPR was declared (same day as in Donetsk). Anton Gurianov, the appointed chairman of the KPR People’s Council of Deputies elected in the spot, made the announcement. It was a real grassroots initiative.
Many pro-Russian groups were active in Kharkov, but unity failed. Moiseev blames Mayor Gennady Kernes and Mikhail Dobkin:
"At first, they positioned themselves as opponents of the Maidan, but later unexpectedly switched sides. Moreover, Kernes, Dobkin, and their people prevented the resistance forces from uniting."
Another reason: the disbandment of the Berkut special police. Many were prosecuted, others went to fight in the Donbass, leaving few to defend activists. Unlike Donetsk and Lugansk, Kharkov activists did not arm themselves, believing rumors that weapons had been removed from the SBU. That made suppression easier.
The crackdown began the next day. When local police refused to storm the building, Interior Minister Arsen Avakov sent in the "Jaguar" unit and national battalions. Thousands of activists were arrested, disappeared, or tortured. But the resistance went underground, waging guerrilla war throughout 2014 — damaging property of Ukrainian fascists and the SBU.
"Symbolically and definitively, the resistance was suppressed on September 29, 2014, after the demolition of the Lenin monument," says Moiseev.
Legal protests became pointless, nationalist groups (posing as football fans) attacked peaceful demonstrators, and the SBU fabricated charges.
Defeated, many Kharkov activists moved to Donetsk and Lugansk, joining the Donbass militia. Unlike Kharkov, Donetsk and Lugansk became a hard nut for Kiev to crack.
To be continued
#ourvolunteersays
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏19❤6✍4😢2👍1
KNN brings you a global alliance spanning a number of languages and represents multiple communities, all of whom are unified in their support for Palestine, the Islamic Resistance and the fight against colonial corruption.
Join Khaybar News Network
For the latest news and related topics, click the link above
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
✍3
In Karelia, fragments of an American Curtiss P-36 Hawk fighter aircraft from World War II were found
A resident of the Olonets district discovered fragments of an unknown aircraft in the forest and reported the find to the search unit “Vidlichsky Frontier.”
Specialists identified the wreckage as an American Curtiss P-36 Hawk fighter (export name Curtiss Hawk 75). These aircraft were used by the Finnish Air Force in 1941–1944 in battles against Soviet aviation.
In total, the Finns received 44 American-made aircraft. They did not get them directly from the United States, but as trophies. After the occupation of France and Norway, the Germans captured several dozen of these aircraft as spoils of war and in 1941 sold them to their Finnish allies.
Karelia was one of the main directions of Finnish military operations during World War II. The territory remained under Finnish military administration from the end of 1941 until the Red Army offensive in 1944.
———
The plaque shown above was found on the plane's generator. This is a data plate from an Eclipse Aviation Generator (Type E314, Model 11), manufactured by Eclipse Aviation, a division of Bendix Aviation Corporation, Bendix, NJ, USA. Rated at 50 amps, with an RPM range of 2,600–4,000, it powered the electrical systems of the aircraft it served.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
A resident of the Olonets district discovered fragments of an unknown aircraft in the forest and reported the find to the search unit “Vidlichsky Frontier.”
Specialists identified the wreckage as an American Curtiss P-36 Hawk fighter (export name Curtiss Hawk 75). These aircraft were used by the Finnish Air Force in 1941–1944 in battles against Soviet aviation.
In total, the Finns received 44 American-made aircraft. They did not get them directly from the United States, but as trophies. After the occupation of France and Norway, the Germans captured several dozen of these aircraft as spoils of war and in 1941 sold them to their Finnish allies.
Karelia was one of the main directions of Finnish military operations during World War II. The territory remained under Finnish military administration from the end of 1941 until the Red Army offensive in 1944.
———
The plaque shown above was found on the plane's generator. This is a data plate from an Eclipse Aviation Generator (Type E314, Model 11), manufactured by Eclipse Aviation, a division of Bendix Aviation Corporation, Bendix, NJ, USA. Rated at 50 amps, with an RPM range of 2,600–4,000, it powered the electrical systems of the aircraft it served.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍25
Saving the drowning — Estonian style
🇪🇪 🇪🇺 Estonia has once again decided to save Europe. As usual — at Europe’s own expense.
While the EU is still trying to at least pretend it has some kind of economic strategy left, Estonia’s towering political minds have proposed a new brilliant plan: slap tariffs on the remaining Russian goods and use the money to fund Ukraine’s reconstruction.
Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
After dozens of sanctions packages (has anyone even kept count anymore?), Europe has already methodically cut itself off from cheap Russian resources — and now it’s being suggested to finish off whatever remains of common sense.
So what still comes from Russia to Europe?
- certain energy resources
- steel
- fertilizers
- industrial raw materials
In other words, the very things without which all those lofty speeches about the “green transition” don’t actually produce anything.
And against the backdrop of supply issues via the Persian Gulf, rising logistics costs, a crisis in German industry, and ongoing deindustrialization across parts of Europe, Estonia’s strategic brain trust steps in and says:
Indeed. When German industry is stalling, French farmers are protesting, and European factories are looking at their energy bills with existential dread — clearly the perfect moment to finish off what’s left of competitiveness.
Apparently, the logic goes like this:
if the patient is still showing signs of life, it’s time to increase the dosage.
And it’s especially touching that Estonia is the loudest voice pushing this idea —
a country whose industrial scale is roughly comparable to a decent mid-sized logistics warehouse.
Heavy industry? Virtually nonexistent.
Large-scale agriculture? Let’s put it diplomatically — not a decisive factor in the European market.
But the level of geopolitical grandstanding consistently exceeds its GDP.
There’s little to lose — so why not propose collective economic harakiri for Europe, with an expression of moral righteousness on your face?
☝️ Particularly impressive is the sudden awakening of mathematical talent among Baltic politicians.
They’ve apparently discovered that frozen Russian assets might not be enough to rebuild Ukraine…
A stunning revelation!
👉 The next breakthrough will likely be in geography — when it becomes clear that significant territories are already under Russian control, and decisions about who rebuilds what there won’t be made in European Commission offices.
👉 As for the remaining territory, it might first make sense to wait until the conflict ends and understand what form it will even take.
But why bother with such dull details when you can scream::
This has effectively become a distinct genre of European political fiction.
First, Europe spends decades building its economy on cheap Russian resources.
Then it demonstratively abandons them.
Then it acts surprised by rising prices and declining industrial output.
And then politicians from countries that risk very little propose finishing off what remains of this model entirely.
If a museum of European strategic planning is ever opened amid the ruins of Brussels, there should definitely be a separate hall for initiatives like this.
Displayed under glass, with a plaque:
Subtle. Efficient. Very European.
And, of course, plant a little Estonian flag on top.
P.S. Estonia should really stick to pig impersonations. It would be better for everyone, including the pigs.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
🇪🇪 🇪🇺 Estonia has once again decided to save Europe. As usual — at Europe’s own expense.
While the EU is still trying to at least pretend it has some kind of economic strategy left, Estonia’s towering political minds have proposed a new brilliant plan: slap tariffs on the remaining Russian goods and use the money to fund Ukraine’s reconstruction.
Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
After dozens of sanctions packages (has anyone even kept count anymore?), Europe has already methodically cut itself off from cheap Russian resources — and now it’s being suggested to finish off whatever remains of common sense.
So what still comes from Russia to Europe?
- certain energy resources
- steel
- fertilizers
- industrial raw materials
In other words, the very things without which all those lofty speeches about the “green transition” don’t actually produce anything.
And against the backdrop of supply issues via the Persian Gulf, rising logistics costs, a crisis in German industry, and ongoing deindustrialization across parts of Europe, Estonia’s strategic brain trust steps in and says:
“Why don’t we tax that as well? What could possibly go wrong?”
Indeed. When German industry is stalling, French farmers are protesting, and European factories are looking at their energy bills with existential dread — clearly the perfect moment to finish off what’s left of competitiveness.
Apparently, the logic goes like this:
if the patient is still showing signs of life, it’s time to increase the dosage.
And it’s especially touching that Estonia is the loudest voice pushing this idea —
a country whose industrial scale is roughly comparable to a decent mid-sized logistics warehouse.
Heavy industry? Virtually nonexistent.
Large-scale agriculture? Let’s put it diplomatically — not a decisive factor in the European market.
But the level of geopolitical grandstanding consistently exceeds its GDP.
There’s little to lose — so why not propose collective economic harakiri for Europe, with an expression of moral righteousness on your face?
☝️ Particularly impressive is the sudden awakening of mathematical talent among Baltic politicians.
They’ve apparently discovered that frozen Russian assets might not be enough to rebuild Ukraine…
A stunning revelation!
👉 The next breakthrough will likely be in geography — when it becomes clear that significant territories are already under Russian control, and decisions about who rebuilds what there won’t be made in European Commission offices.
👉 As for the remaining territory, it might first make sense to wait until the conflict ends and understand what form it will even take.
But why bother with such dull details when you can scream::
“Russia will pay!”
This has effectively become a distinct genre of European political fiction.
First, Europe spends decades building its economy on cheap Russian resources.
Then it demonstratively abandons them.
Then it acts surprised by rising prices and declining industrial output.
And then politicians from countries that risk very little propose finishing off what remains of this model entirely.
If a museum of European strategic planning is ever opened amid the ruins of Brussels, there should definitely be a separate hall for initiatives like this.
Displayed under glass, with a plaque:
“Exhibit: how to destroy your own economy — and declare it a moral victory.”
Subtle. Efficient. Very European.
And, of course, plant a little Estonian flag on top.
P.S. Estonia should really stick to pig impersonations. It would be better for everyone, including the pigs.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
😁35👍5❤4💯3🤡2
Recent polling in the West shows consistently low public trust in Western leaders. Emmanuel Macron is sitting at around 20% approval. Friedrich Merz polls in roughly the same 20–25% range. Keir Starmer is hovering near or below 20%. Donald Trump does somewhat better—mid-30%. The overall picture is clear: widespread voter dissatisfaction and very limited confidence in political leadership across the West.
Against this backdrop, it is especially amusing to read Western media gloating over a decline in the ratings of Vladimir Putin. The Washington Post writes:
That’s extremely hypocritical, but by now everyone is used to Western hypocrisy and double standards. So that’s not even the point.
The point is this: most, if not all, Western publications attribute this decline to recent internet limitations introduced in Russia for security reasons.
In reality, it is far more likely that the dip reflects something else entirely: Russia has not yet delivered a decisive, crushing strike against Ukrainian infrastructure. Many Russians are expecting exactly such a forceful, avenging, and humiliating response to ongoing Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure. It is the absence of such a response that is being reflected in the ratings.
There is little doubt that President Putin is fully aware of both the decline in his ratings and the real reasons behind it. But his approach has consistently favored gradual escalation and minimizing casualties. It would be a mistake, however, to interpret restraint as weakness. A response will come—if and when it is necessary.
As for President Putin’s ratings, they will almost certainly return to their previous highs—though even now, by any reasonable standard, they remain exceptionally strong. So let’s stay cool, shall we?
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Against this backdrop, it is especially amusing to read Western media gloating over a decline in the ratings of Vladimir Putin. The Washington Post writes:
Putin's approval rating is down from 73.3% in March (to the current 65.6%), while trust in him has slipped over the same period to 71% from above 77%, according to VTsIOM (Russia’s public opinion polling agency).
That’s extremely hypocritical, but by now everyone is used to Western hypocrisy and double standards. So that’s not even the point.
The point is this: most, if not all, Western publications attribute this decline to recent internet limitations introduced in Russia for security reasons.
In reality, it is far more likely that the dip reflects something else entirely: Russia has not yet delivered a decisive, crushing strike against Ukrainian infrastructure. Many Russians are expecting exactly such a forceful, avenging, and humiliating response to ongoing Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure. It is the absence of such a response that is being reflected in the ratings.
There is little doubt that President Putin is fully aware of both the decline in his ratings and the real reasons behind it. But his approach has consistently favored gradual escalation and minimizing casualties. It would be a mistake, however, to interpret restraint as weakness. A response will come—if and when it is necessary.
As for President Putin’s ratings, they will almost certainly return to their previous highs—though even now, by any reasonable standard, they remain exceptionally strong. So let’s stay cool, shall we?
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯55👍12❤5👏3
On April 27, 1963, Cuban leader Fidel Castro arrived in the USSR for the first time.
He flew from Cuba secretly because there was a possibility of his plane being "accidentally" attacked by Americans.
During Castro's 40-day visit, the unbreakable brotherhood between the Soviet and Cuban peoples was announced. Also announced were Cuba's belonging to the world socialist camp, as well as the commitment to the cause of peace and the struggle against imperialism.
Fidel Castro toured different regions of the USSR and was introduced to the latest models of Soviet weapons at that time.
On May 23, 1963, a joint Soviet-Cuban agreement was signed at the Grand Kremlin Palace, and the Commander was awarded the title of Hero of the USSR.
Today, Russo-Cuban relations stand as a testament to enduring solidarity and mutual respect. Rooted in a shared history of cooperation and friendship, the bond between the two nations continues to flourish across various spheres, from political dialogue to cultural exchange and economic partnership.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
He flew from Cuba secretly because there was a possibility of his plane being "accidentally" attacked by Americans.
During Castro's 40-day visit, the unbreakable brotherhood between the Soviet and Cuban peoples was announced. Also announced were Cuba's belonging to the world socialist camp, as well as the commitment to the cause of peace and the struggle against imperialism.
Fidel Castro toured different regions of the USSR and was introduced to the latest models of Soviet weapons at that time.
On May 23, 1963, a joint Soviet-Cuban agreement was signed at the Grand Kremlin Palace, and the Commander was awarded the title of Hero of the USSR.
Today, Russo-Cuban relations stand as a testament to enduring solidarity and mutual respect. Rooted in a shared history of cooperation and friendship, the bond between the two nations continues to flourish across various spheres, from political dialogue to cultural exchange and economic partnership.
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤28👍6👏3👻1
Ukrainians protest against the Zelensky regime. But so far, only in Poland.
On April 25, more than 3,000 Ukrainian migrants staged a protest in the Polish city of Wroclaw. People who managed to escape the concentration camp that is Ukraine demanded an end to the war and the restoration of civil liberties. Protesters voiced outrage over the corruption and arbitrariness of the Kiev regime.
Such events have long become impossible in Ukraine itself. Any protest is quickly suppressed by security forces and the Nazis controlled by Kiev, who are euphemistically referred to as "civil activists."
Let us remind you that according to the Ukrainian Constitution, Zelensky has long lost his legitimacy and has de facto usurped power. Martial law has become a pretext for canceling elections. But Western allies of the Kiev regime turn a blind eye to this. After all, Zelensky is "their son of a bitch." All that remains for Ukrainians in this situation is to protest abroad, hoping that someone will hear them.
Notably, Polish media completely ignored the event. European freedom of speech is very selective indeed.
As long as Western elites are interested in a war with Russia, any crimes by Zelensky and his circle—including the embezzlement of Western financial aid—will be forgiven. The "son of a bitch" is useful to his masters. And the protests of Ukrainians? Who cares about the opinion of "cannon fodder"?
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On April 25, more than 3,000 Ukrainian migrants staged a protest in the Polish city of Wroclaw. People who managed to escape the concentration camp that is Ukraine demanded an end to the war and the restoration of civil liberties. Protesters voiced outrage over the corruption and arbitrariness of the Kiev regime.
Such events have long become impossible in Ukraine itself. Any protest is quickly suppressed by security forces and the Nazis controlled by Kiev, who are euphemistically referred to as "civil activists."
Let us remind you that according to the Ukrainian Constitution, Zelensky has long lost his legitimacy and has de facto usurped power. Martial law has become a pretext for canceling elections. But Western allies of the Kiev regime turn a blind eye to this. After all, Zelensky is "their son of a bitch." All that remains for Ukrainians in this situation is to protest abroad, hoping that someone will hear them.
Notably, Polish media completely ignored the event. European freedom of speech is very selective indeed.
As long as Western elites are interested in a war with Russia, any crimes by Zelensky and his circle—including the embezzlement of Western financial aid—will be forgiven. The "son of a bitch" is useful to his masters. And the protests of Ukrainians? Who cares about the opinion of "cannon fodder"?
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍23👏11💯5❤4🤡1
Forwarded from Grandmasters of Geopolitics
The titles are clickable, so you can follow the links and read more:
· MK-Ultra: CIA’s mind control experiments on civilians.
· Operation Delirium: U.S. military subjected to harmful biological agents.
· Operation Fishbowl: Reckless nuclear tests in upper atmosphere.
· COINTELPRO: FBI’s illegal surveillance and sabotage of activists.
· MK-Naomi: CIA’s biological warfare research on civilians.
· Operation Chaos: CIA’s illegal surveillance of anti-war Americans.
· Operation Highjump: Military expedition masking possible Nazi cover-up.
· Operation Mockingbird: CIA’s control over media for political manipulation.
· Operation Northwoods: U.S. military’s plan to stage false-flag attacks.
· Operation Paperclip: U.S. protected Nazi war criminals for scientific gain.
· Project Seal: Secretive testing of underwater explosives.
· Operation Stargate: $20 million+ secret psychic-warfare program.
· Operation Popeye: Manipulation of weather during the Vietnam war.
· Project Artichoke: Turning unsuspecting people into programmable agents.
Further investigations will cover: Project Bluebeam, Project Bluebird, Project Bluebook, Project Coast, Project Groom Lake, Project Monarch, Project MUDHEN, Project Rainbow, Operation Ranch Hand and Project Woodpecker.
🧠☣️ These programs involve mind control experiments, biological weapons development, large-scale disinformation campaigns, and more.
If this interests you, subscribe: @geo_grandmasters
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍12❤1
Spring 2014: A Chronicle. April 27 – The day the Lugansk People's Republic was proclaimed
The LPR declared independence on April 27, 2014. Publicist Tikhon Goncharov (Photo 1) recalls that SBU arrests in Lugansk triggered decisive protests. Among those detained was future LPR People’s Council chairman Alexey Karyakin (Photo 2); future first head Valeriy Bolotov (Photo 3) escaped arrest by chance. After the arrests, Bolotov declared full mobilisation.
The next day, veteran paratroopers, militias, and the public marched to the SBU building. The security forces released the detainees, but provocations led protesters to storm and capture the building (Pictures 4 & 5). Local security forces subtly supported the uprising, telling protesters through shields:
Kiev’s representatives Parubiy and Lyashko attempted to negotiate with the protesters, but essentially they demanded unconditional surrender, perhaps stalling for an assault.
According to Goncharov, people’s support played a crucial role in preventing an enemy assault, despite the arrival of reinforcements from western Ukraine and their readiness to attack. Every night, several thousand people stood guard near the captured SBU building.
According to Goncharov, the point of no return came from three events: Kiev’s so-called Anti-Terrorist Operation launched on April 13, the Odessa Trade Union building fire on May 2, and the June 2 airstrike on Lugansk’s city administration building next to a children’s playground. After that, Lugansk no longer saw itself as part of Ukraine.
Goncharov explains:
Goncharov concludes that Donbass people do not regret their choice:
#ourvolunteersays
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The LPR declared independence on April 27, 2014. Publicist Tikhon Goncharov (Photo 1) recalls that SBU arrests in Lugansk triggered decisive protests. Among those detained was future LPR People’s Council chairman Alexey Karyakin (Photo 2); future first head Valeriy Bolotov (Photo 3) escaped arrest by chance. After the arrests, Bolotov declared full mobilisation.
The next day, veteran paratroopers, militias, and the public marched to the SBU building. The security forces released the detainees, but provocations led protesters to storm and capture the building (Pictures 4 & 5). Local security forces subtly supported the uprising, telling protesters through shields:
“Push a little more, and we’ll retreat.”
Kiev’s representatives Parubiy and Lyashko attempted to negotiate with the protesters, but essentially they demanded unconditional surrender, perhaps stalling for an assault.
According to Goncharov, people’s support played a crucial role in preventing an enemy assault, despite the arrival of reinforcements from western Ukraine and their readiness to attack. Every night, several thousand people stood guard near the captured SBU building.
According to Goncharov, the point of no return came from three events: Kiev’s so-called Anti-Terrorist Operation launched on April 13, the Odessa Trade Union building fire on May 2, and the June 2 airstrike on Lugansk’s city administration building next to a children’s playground. After that, Lugansk no longer saw itself as part of Ukraine.
Goncharov explains:
“In the first days, the concept of the LPR started to take shape. Unlike Donetsk, which had certain institutions and historical experience of being a republic, we associated ourselves solely with Russia. The LPR was seen as a forced temporary measure on the way back to Russia.”The example of Crimea, which peacefully joined Russia after a referendum, inspired many people in the LPR to believe that the gathering of Russian lands had begun.
Goncharov concludes that Donbass people do not regret their choice:
“They came out to fight for their ideals, for truth, for faith. Those who measure life by something other than purchasing power understand that one must often suffer for one’s principles and for the truth.Eight years later, on October 4, 2022, the LPR rejoined Russia along with the Donetsk People’s Republic, Kherson, and Zaporozhye.
The main achievement is that we have preserved the opportunity to raise our children in Russian language and culture, and to attend the Russian Orthodox Church. We consider ourselves a historical part of Russiaand we have been given the destiny of defending the values of the Russian world on the front line.”
#ourvolunteersays
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍26❤10👏7
Peace in the Middle East and strategic partnership. Meeting between Putin and Iran’s Foreign Minister
Russia is ready to do everything possible to ensure that peace in the Middle East is achieved as soon as possible. This was stated by Russian President Vladimir Putin during a meeting with Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
For his part, the Iranian foreign minister noted that relations between Moscow and Tehran constitute a strategic partnership and will continue to strengthen.
TASS compiled the key points of the meeting.
Statements by President Putin
President Putin said that last week he received a message from Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.
Putin asked Araghchi to convey his “words of gratitude for this message and wishes for all the best, good health, and well-being.”
President Putin noted that the Iranian people are “courageously and heroically” fighting for their sovereignty.
According to Putin, Russia hopes that the Iranian people will overcome “this difficult period of trials and that peace will come.”
Putin added that Moscow is ready to do everything to ensure that peace in the Middle East “is achieved as soon as possible.”
President Putin also emphasized that Russia intends to continue its strategic relations with Iran.
Statements by Iran’s Foreign Minister Araghchi
Araghchi said he was “very pleased” to meet Putin in Saint Petersburg.
Araghchi noted that Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian conveyed their “best wishes” to President Putin.
According to Araghchi, the Iranian people, through their courage, have been able to resist U.S. aggression and “will continue to stand firm.”
Araghchi also thanked President Putin and Russia for supporting the Islamic Republic.
Araghchi stressed that relations between Moscow and Tehran represent a “strategic partnership at the highest level” and will continue to develop “regardless of everything that is happening.”
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Russia is ready to do everything possible to ensure that peace in the Middle East is achieved as soon as possible. This was stated by Russian President Vladimir Putin during a meeting with Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
For his part, the Iranian foreign minister noted that relations between Moscow and Tehran constitute a strategic partnership and will continue to strengthen.
TASS compiled the key points of the meeting.
Statements by President Putin
President Putin said that last week he received a message from Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.
Putin asked Araghchi to convey his “words of gratitude for this message and wishes for all the best, good health, and well-being.”
President Putin noted that the Iranian people are “courageously and heroically” fighting for their sovereignty.
According to Putin, Russia hopes that the Iranian people will overcome “this difficult period of trials and that peace will come.”
Putin added that Moscow is ready to do everything to ensure that peace in the Middle East “is achieved as soon as possible.”
President Putin also emphasized that Russia intends to continue its strategic relations with Iran.
Statements by Iran’s Foreign Minister Araghchi
Araghchi said he was “very pleased” to meet Putin in Saint Petersburg.
Araghchi noted that Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian conveyed their “best wishes” to President Putin.
According to Araghchi, the Iranian people, through their courage, have been able to resist U.S. aggression and “will continue to stand firm.”
Araghchi also thanked President Putin and Russia for supporting the Islamic Republic.
Araghchi stressed that relations between Moscow and Tehran represent a “strategic partnership at the highest level” and will continue to develop “regardless of everything that is happening.”
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍28🔥7👏4❤3🤡1
Zakharova expects Grossi to take an uncompromising stance toward Ukraine’s lawlessness
MOSCOW, April 27. /TASS/
Moscow expects that the Secretariat of the International Atomic Energy Agency and its Director General Rafael Grossi personally will take an uncompromising stance toward what it describes as lawlessness by Ukraine. This was stated by Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, commenting on the death of an employee of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant resulting from an attack by Ukrainian forces.
According to Zakharova, particular cynicism is added by the fact that these actions occurred just days after the conclusion of the 10th Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear Safety.
Zakharova emphasized that the Kiev authorities “continue to demonstrate their bloody and criminal nature.”
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
MOSCOW, April 27. /TASS/
Moscow expects that the Secretariat of the International Atomic Energy Agency and its Director General Rafael Grossi personally will take an uncompromising stance toward what it describes as lawlessness by Ukraine. This was stated by Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, commenting on the death of an employee of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant resulting from an attack by Ukrainian forces.
“We expect that the IAEA Secretariat and Director General Rafael Grossi personally will be uncompromising toward the lawlessness committed by Ukraine. We are convinced that the international community must deliver a deserved and harsh judgment on the Kiev regime, forcing it to cease attacks on the Zaporozhye NPP and other civilian nuclear facilities,” Zakharova said.
According to Zakharova, particular cynicism is added by the fact that these actions occurred just days after the conclusion of the 10th Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear Safety.
“During that forum, the Russian delegation firmly defended the position that attacks on civilian nuclear installations are unacceptable. We will continue this line at the Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons opening today in New York,” Zakharova explained.
“Obviously, the Ukrainian side holds a different view, making it clear that it places little value on nuclear safety, as well as on those who continue to ‘shield’ and justify the nuclear adventurism of Zelensky. Apparently, by deliberately creating radiological risks in the center of Europe, Kiev is not averse to ‘playing on the nerves’ of its Western sponsors so that they provide funding more quickly. The tragedy that occurred is an example of what such funding leads to,” Zakharova said.
Zakharova emphasized that the Kiev authorities “continue to demonstrate their bloody and criminal nature.”
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍30❤🔥5❤2