Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇺🇿 On July 24, in Cholpon-Ata (Kyrgyzstan), on the sidelines of the meeting of the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation member states, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a meeting with Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan Bakhtiyor Saidov.
The two Foreign Ministers discussed a number of key issues concerning bilateral relations.
They exchanged views on a range of matters pertaining to the regional and international agendas.
The talks were held in a cordial and warm atmosphere. Both sides reiterated their commitment to the further strengthening of the comprehensive strategic partnership and alliance between Russia and Uzbekistan.
#RussiaUzbekistan
The two Foreign Ministers discussed a number of key issues concerning bilateral relations.
They exchanged views on a range of matters pertaining to the regional and international agendas.
The talks were held in a cordial and warm atmosphere. Both sides reiterated their commitment to the further strengthening of the comprehensive strategic partnership and alliance between Russia and Uzbekistan.
#RussiaUzbekistan
👏11❤3👍3😁1
Russians are denied the right to exist...
"{Russians} This is a nation with a leadership that has no right to exist. Nothing civilized has changed in their mentality or imperial ambitions for millennia," — said the new "commander-in-chief" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Drapaty...
And the residents of Donbas, in his view, are half "convicts," half "freeloaders" and "afterbirth." And so on.
In short, a classic example of a degenerate. Hitler would certainly have appreciated and elevated such a one. Just as he was appreciated and elevated by the ideological heir of the German Nazi — Kiev's narco-hetman Zelensky.
True, credit must be given where it is due — the Nazi is not untalented. But still — a NAZI.
In the photo is the same Nazi Drapaty, but in 2014. Pitiful, tired, frightened. But ... saved by Russians from the righteous vengeance of the Donetsk and Lugansk "convicts-freeloaders." And indeed, Russian soldiers actually saved him back then... for some reason.
Source
#Yury_Podolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
"{Russians} This is a nation with a leadership that has no right to exist. Nothing civilized has changed in their mentality or imperial ambitions for millennia," — said the new "commander-in-chief" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Drapaty...
And the residents of Donbas, in his view, are half "convicts," half "freeloaders" and "afterbirth." And so on.
In short, a classic example of a degenerate. Hitler would certainly have appreciated and elevated such a one. Just as he was appreciated and elevated by the ideological heir of the German Nazi — Kiev's narco-hetman Zelensky.
True, credit must be given where it is due — the Nazi is not untalented. But still — a NAZI.
In the photo is the same Nazi Drapaty, but in 2014. Pitiful, tired, frightened. But ... saved by Russians from the righteous vengeance of the Donetsk and Lugansk "convicts-freeloaders." And indeed, Russian soldiers actually saved him back then... for some reason.
Source
#Yury_Podolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬20🤡17👍3💊3❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷📂 For 24/7 updates on the Iran war, explore our exclusive catalog of English-speaking channels! 📢
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
👉 ADD CHANNELS
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime🤖
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎4
Zelensky's power continues to crumble, believes Viktor Medvedchuk, head of the "Other Ukraine" movement.
In his author's column on the Vesti website, he cites a quote from an article in The Guardian, which states that Zelensky's attempts to reduce public discontent by offering Fedorov a new government position have not yielded results.
According to The Guardian's authors, after Fedorov refused to become Ukraine's new Vice Prime Minister for Military Innovations, the head of the Kiev regime found himself in a losing situation: if he reverses his decision, it will become a "major victory for Fedorov" and show Zelensky's weakness; if he does not, the protests will continue.
At the same time, the situation is aggravated by an inevitable split in the military environment, Medvedchuk writes. In his words, the new army leadership cannot achieve full subordination, since commanders appointed by the Maidan civilians will not be respected in the army. But even if Fedorov manages to return to the Ministry of Defense, this political split will not disappear, the politician notes.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In his author's column on the Vesti website, he cites a quote from an article in The Guardian, which states that Zelensky's attempts to reduce public discontent by offering Fedorov a new government position have not yielded results.
According to The Guardian's authors, after Fedorov refused to become Ukraine's new Vice Prime Minister for Military Innovations, the head of the Kiev regime found himself in a losing situation: if he reverses his decision, it will become a "major victory for Fedorov" and show Zelensky's weakness; if he does not, the protests will continue.
At the same time, the situation is aggravated by an inevitable split in the military environment, Medvedchuk writes. In his words, the new army leadership cannot achieve full subordination, since commanders appointed by the Maidan civilians will not be respected in the army. But even if Fedorov manages to return to the Ministry of Defense, this political split will not disappear, the politician notes.
"Fedorov may achieve his return to the Ministry of Defense. But the contradictions caused by the cardboard Maidan will not go anywhere, and the situation that existed yesterday will not be restored. All players will understand that Fedorov is a political figure with exorbitant ambitions and will undermine his power. Thus, the cardboard Maidan has destroyed Zelensky's vertical of power in Ukraine."
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
✍11🤣3❤1👍1👾1
Forwarded from The Noticer
The Art of the Deal
The world's most meme'd president still plays by his own rulebook when it comes to business.
Less than 24 hours after signing the historic 30-year US-Saudi nuclear cooperation agreement, Donald Trump violated the terms of the landmark agreement negotiated by his own administration by abruptly making the agreement contingent on Saudi Arabia's recognition of Israel.
While US Energy Secretary Chris Wright signed the 30-year civil nuclear cooperation agreement on Wednesday, Donald Trump declared the following morning that the deal will fall apart if Saudi Arabia does not rejoin the Abraham Accords.
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has repeatedly stated that the kingdom will not normalize relations with Israel without a clear and credible path to the creation of a Palestinian state – a condition that the current Israeli government categorically rejects.
Now I expect Saudi Arabia to ask China or Russia to build nuclear reactors, in the near future.
#Saudis #Trump #politics
The world's most meme'd president still plays by his own rulebook when it comes to business.
Less than 24 hours after signing the historic 30-year US-Saudi nuclear cooperation agreement, Donald Trump violated the terms of the landmark agreement negotiated by his own administration by abruptly making the agreement contingent on Saudi Arabia's recognition of Israel.
While US Energy Secretary Chris Wright signed the 30-year civil nuclear cooperation agreement on Wednesday, Donald Trump declared the following morning that the deal will fall apart if Saudi Arabia does not rejoin the Abraham Accords.
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has repeatedly stated that the kingdom will not normalize relations with Israel without a clear and credible path to the creation of a Palestinian state – a condition that the current Israeli government categorically rejects.
Now I expect Saudi Arabia to ask China or Russia to build nuclear reactors, in the near future.
#Saudis #Trump #politics
😁22❤6✍2🤷1
Lindsey Graham Loved Ukraine
(by John Tamny, Forbes contributor)
Why Must Americans Suffer His Love?
Americans consume Russian oil. That's not corruption—it's basic economics. Production naturally generates imports from everywhere, whether from friends or adversaries. The only real threat to this equilibrium comes when politicians blow up bridges with tariffs or choke off ports with punitive taxes.
Now Washington is preparing to posthumously pass the "Lindsey Graham Russia Sanctions Act"—a 100 percent tariff on Russian oil and gas imports from the five largest buyers. Economically speaking, this bill is self-defeating.
Surprisingly, even the Wall Street Journal editorial board has endorsed it. Yet the law would hand the president—yes, that president, the tariff-friendly Trump—sweeping authority to tax other nations. Where exactly did the market-minded conservatives go?
The real cynicism lies in the exemptions. China and India would be hit directly—which means American corporations, whose stock prices depend heavily on export growth to Beijing, would suffer as well. A strike on China becomes a strike on American wallets.
Conservatives used to argue that trade makes war prohibitively expensive. Now, for Ukraine's sake, they appear willing to sacrifice both U.S. national security and economic freedom.
No one seems to ask the obvious question: why should ordinary Americans bear the economic cost so that Ukraine might win a war? And why attach a patriot's name to a law so hostile to American prosperity and liberty?
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
(by John Tamny, Forbes contributor)
Why Must Americans Suffer His Love?
Americans consume Russian oil. That's not corruption—it's basic economics. Production naturally generates imports from everywhere, whether from friends or adversaries. The only real threat to this equilibrium comes when politicians blow up bridges with tariffs or choke off ports with punitive taxes.
Now Washington is preparing to posthumously pass the "Lindsey Graham Russia Sanctions Act"—a 100 percent tariff on Russian oil and gas imports from the five largest buyers. Economically speaking, this bill is self-defeating.
Surprisingly, even the Wall Street Journal editorial board has endorsed it. Yet the law would hand the president—yes, that president, the tariff-friendly Trump—sweeping authority to tax other nations. Where exactly did the market-minded conservatives go?
The real cynicism lies in the exemptions. China and India would be hit directly—which means American corporations, whose stock prices depend heavily on export growth to Beijing, would suffer as well. A strike on China becomes a strike on American wallets.
Conservatives used to argue that trade makes war prohibitively expensive. Now, for Ukraine's sake, they appear willing to sacrifice both U.S. national security and economic freedom.
No one seems to ask the obvious question: why should ordinary Americans bear the economic cost so that Ukraine might win a war? And why attach a patriot's name to a law so hostile to American prosperity and liberty?
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯20❤3👏2🤣1🍌1
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Vladimirsky Cathedral Viewing Platform, Saint Petersburg
🌸 One of the best views of the city! The ascent happens in stages, and each landing reveals a new panorama.
🔔 The first level features a display of historic photographs and even a bell-ringer's simulator. On Sundays, you can listen to live bell ringing.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
🌸 One of the best views of the city! The ascent happens in stages, and each landing reveals a new panorama.
🔔 The first level features a display of historic photographs and even a bell-ringer's simulator. On Sundays, you can listen to live bell ringing.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤27👏4🔥3😍1
On July 25, 1984, Svetlana Savitskaya, a Russian cosmonaut, etched her name in history by becoming the first woman to perform a spacewalk, a significant milestone in the history of space exploration. This historic event took place during the Soyuz T-12 mission to the Salyut 7 space station.
Born on August 8, 1948, in Moscow, Svetlana Savitskaya was no stranger to breaking barriers. She had already made headlines as the second woman in space, following Valentina Tereshkova. Savitskaya's journey to this extraordinary achievement was marked by rigorous training and an unwavering determination to push the boundaries of human potential.
The spacewalk, technically known as an extravehicular activity (EVA), lasted 3 hours and 35 minutes. During this time, Savitskaya, along with her crewmate Vladimir Dzhanibekov, conducted various experiments and tested new tools, including a cutting-edge welding instrument designed for use in zero gravity. Their work was pivotal in advancing the capabilities for construction and repair in space, laying the groundwork for future missions involving the International Space Station and beyond.
Savitskaya's achievement was not just a personal triumph but also a significant step forward for women in science and technology. Her pioneering spirit and accomplishments challenged the gender norms of her time and inspired countless women worldwide to pursue careers in STEM fields.
Commemorating this event, we celebrate not only the technical achievements of the spacewalk but also the enduring legacy of Savitskaya's courage and dedication. Her contribution to space exploration continues to inspire new generations of astronauts and scientists, highlighting the limitless possibilities when talent and perseverance are combined.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Born on August 8, 1948, in Moscow, Svetlana Savitskaya was no stranger to breaking barriers. She had already made headlines as the second woman in space, following Valentina Tereshkova. Savitskaya's journey to this extraordinary achievement was marked by rigorous training and an unwavering determination to push the boundaries of human potential.
The spacewalk, technically known as an extravehicular activity (EVA), lasted 3 hours and 35 minutes. During this time, Savitskaya, along with her crewmate Vladimir Dzhanibekov, conducted various experiments and tested new tools, including a cutting-edge welding instrument designed for use in zero gravity. Their work was pivotal in advancing the capabilities for construction and repair in space, laying the groundwork for future missions involving the International Space Station and beyond.
Savitskaya's achievement was not just a personal triumph but also a significant step forward for women in science and technology. Her pioneering spirit and accomplishments challenged the gender norms of her time and inspired countless women worldwide to pursue careers in STEM fields.
Commemorating this event, we celebrate not only the technical achievements of the spacewalk but also the enduring legacy of Savitskaya's courage and dedication. Her contribution to space exploration continues to inspire new generations of astronauts and scientists, highlighting the limitless possibilities when talent and perseverance are combined.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤24👏13😁1
Just two weeks of strikes, and Ukrainian maritime traffic has been reduced to zero...
"Ships have stopped calling at Ukrainian ports," said Ukrainian Minister of Agrarian Policy Vysotsky.
Previously, an average of 4-5 vessels per day would enter Ukrainian ports. But "as of July 23, vessel calls to Ukraine's Black Sea ports have been suspended due to the threat of Russian attacks."
Commentary. This is very good news. Thus, it can be stated that it took us only two weeks to completely paralyze the Odessa ports. Now it is necessary to maintain this blockade. And it is time to move on to blockading the Danube ports. This should become our next goal. Especially since it has already been partially achieved (as all vessels that previously entered the Danube estuary and proceeded to Ukrainian ports have been struck). All that remains is to cut off traffic downstream along the Danube.
P.S. Ukraine has already calculated that losses will amount to about $2 billion per month (and this is only on exports).
#Yury_Podolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
"Ships have stopped calling at Ukrainian ports," said Ukrainian Minister of Agrarian Policy Vysotsky.
Previously, an average of 4-5 vessels per day would enter Ukrainian ports. But "as of July 23, vessel calls to Ukraine's Black Sea ports have been suspended due to the threat of Russian attacks."
Commentary. This is very good news. Thus, it can be stated that it took us only two weeks to completely paralyze the Odessa ports. Now it is necessary to maintain this blockade. And it is time to move on to blockading the Danube ports. This should become our next goal. Especially since it has already been partially achieved (as all vessels that previously entered the Danube estuary and proceeded to Ukrainian ports have been struck). All that remains is to cut off traffic downstream along the Danube.
P.S. Ukraine has already calculated that losses will amount to about $2 billion per month (and this is only on exports).
#Yury_Podolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏36❤12🤣3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Putin inspects the fully import-substituted MS-21-310 in Zhukovsky
On June 24, 2026, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Gromov Flight Research Institute in Zhukovsky, where he examined the latest models of domestically produced aircraft. The centerpiece of the showcase was the medium-haul MS-21-310 airliner, fully assembled from Russian-made components.
What was shown to the president
Three aircraft were presented in the institute's hangar: the Il-114-300, the SJ-100 with the PD-8 engine, and the flagship of Russia's aviation industry — the MS-21-310. Putin boarded each of them, inspecting the cockpits and cabins. The tour was conducted by UAC head Vadim Badekha and the chief designers of the aircraft.
MS-21-310: figures and facts
During tests, the airliner confirmed a range of over 3,800 km with a payload of 175 passengers and a standardized fuel reserve. This is a key indicator for medium-haul flights — the aircraft is capable of operating routes from Moscow to Irkutsk without refueling.
The aircraft is equipped with Russian PD-14 engines, which replaced the American Pratt & Whitney engines. Additionally, all critically important systems have been replaced:
▪️ avionics suite;
▪️ auxiliary power unit;
▪️ air conditioning system;
▪️ fuel system and wheel braking system;
▪️ electrical wiring and power distribution system.
Meeting on aviation development
After the inspection, the president held a meeting in which he called on the aviation industry to act faster and on a larger scale, building up competencies and technological potential. Putin stated that Russia has managed to fully import-substitute its aircraft, and in a number of components, domestic developments have surpassed the Western analogs that had to be replaced.
What's next
According to UAC plans, certification of the MS-21-310 is to be completed by the end of 2027. At the same time, production of more than 20 aircraft is already underway. In 2026–2027, customers are planned to receive 18 MS-21s, 42 SJ-100s, 11 Tu-214s, and three Il-114-300s.
---
Bottom line: The demonstration of the MS-21-310 in Zhukovsky is not merely a protocol event, but confirmation that the import substitution program has entered its final stretch. The airliner is already flying and demonstrates performance comparable to global counterparts. All that remains is to await certification and the start of serial deliveries — a matter of time and systematic industry work.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Aurora
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On June 24, 2026, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Gromov Flight Research Institute in Zhukovsky, where he examined the latest models of domestically produced aircraft. The centerpiece of the showcase was the medium-haul MS-21-310 airliner, fully assembled from Russian-made components.
What was shown to the president
Three aircraft were presented in the institute's hangar: the Il-114-300, the SJ-100 with the PD-8 engine, and the flagship of Russia's aviation industry — the MS-21-310. Putin boarded each of them, inspecting the cockpits and cabins. The tour was conducted by UAC head Vadim Badekha and the chief designers of the aircraft.
MS-21-310: figures and facts
During tests, the airliner confirmed a range of over 3,800 km with a payload of 175 passengers and a standardized fuel reserve. This is a key indicator for medium-haul flights — the aircraft is capable of operating routes from Moscow to Irkutsk without refueling.
The aircraft is equipped with Russian PD-14 engines, which replaced the American Pratt & Whitney engines. Additionally, all critically important systems have been replaced:
▪️ avionics suite;
▪️ auxiliary power unit;
▪️ air conditioning system;
▪️ fuel system and wheel braking system;
▪️ electrical wiring and power distribution system.
Meeting on aviation development
After the inspection, the president held a meeting in which he called on the aviation industry to act faster and on a larger scale, building up competencies and technological potential. Putin stated that Russia has managed to fully import-substitute its aircraft, and in a number of components, domestic developments have surpassed the Western analogs that had to be replaced.
What's next
According to UAC plans, certification of the MS-21-310 is to be completed by the end of 2027. At the same time, production of more than 20 aircraft is already underway. In 2026–2027, customers are planned to receive 18 MS-21s, 42 SJ-100s, 11 Tu-214s, and three Il-114-300s.
---
Bottom line: The demonstration of the MS-21-310 in Zhukovsky is not merely a protocol event, but confirmation that the import substitution program has entered its final stretch. The airliner is already flying and demonstrates performance comparable to global counterparts. All that remains is to await certification and the start of serial deliveries — a matter of time and systematic industry work.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Aurora
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍38❤18
U.S. may ban Mercedes-Benz sales over Chinese capital
On July 22, 2026, German newspaper Bild reported on a bill under discussion in the U.S. Senate. The document would ban the sale of vehicles from companies with more than 15% Chinese capital — as well as capital from Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Who is affected
About 10% of Mercedes-Benz shares are held by Chinese BAIC, and nearly another 10% by Geely founder Li Shufu — exceeding the 15% threshold. Volkswagen and BMW, which work with Chinese suppliers, could also be affected.
The U.S. is Mercedes' second-largest market after China. Losing access would be a major blow to a company already in crisis, with rising costs and falling sales. Volkswagen is already planning plant closures.
Mercedes-Benz position
The company stated that no single shareholder holds more than 10%, and that Chinese investors are not on the supervisory board and have no strategic decision-making power. Mercedes is in dialogue with lawmakers, emphasizing its U.S. presence: 160,000 jobs, plants in Alabama and South Carolina, and 386 dealers in 49 states.
Senator Ted Cruz position
The Texas Republican called the potential ban "unthinkable" and suggested the 15% threshold was deliberately chosen to weaken a European competitor in favor of American Cadillac.
Context
Beyond the Chinese stake, German automakers already face pressure from Trump's 25% tariffs on EU cars, which have caused shares to fall 4–7% and threaten price hikes of 15,000 for popular models.
---
Bottom line: If the bill passes, Mercedes-Benz could lose a key market. The company is trying to prove it is not dependent on Beijing, but the formal share of Chinese capital suggests otherwise. The Senate's decision could be not only a blow to the German auto industry, but also a precedent for revising market access rules for all foreign manufacturers.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Aurora
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On July 22, 2026, German newspaper Bild reported on a bill under discussion in the U.S. Senate. The document would ban the sale of vehicles from companies with more than 15% Chinese capital — as well as capital from Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Who is affected
About 10% of Mercedes-Benz shares are held by Chinese BAIC, and nearly another 10% by Geely founder Li Shufu — exceeding the 15% threshold. Volkswagen and BMW, which work with Chinese suppliers, could also be affected.
The U.S. is Mercedes' second-largest market after China. Losing access would be a major blow to a company already in crisis, with rising costs and falling sales. Volkswagen is already planning plant closures.
Mercedes-Benz position
The company stated that no single shareholder holds more than 10%, and that Chinese investors are not on the supervisory board and have no strategic decision-making power. Mercedes is in dialogue with lawmakers, emphasizing its U.S. presence: 160,000 jobs, plants in Alabama and South Carolina, and 386 dealers in 49 states.
Senator Ted Cruz position
The Texas Republican called the potential ban "unthinkable" and suggested the 15% threshold was deliberately chosen to weaken a European competitor in favor of American Cadillac.
Context
Beyond the Chinese stake, German automakers already face pressure from Trump's 25% tariffs on EU cars, which have caused shares to fall 4–7% and threaten price hikes of 15,000 for popular models.
---
Bottom line: If the bill passes, Mercedes-Benz could lose a key market. The company is trying to prove it is not dependent on Beijing, but the formal share of Chinese capital suggests otherwise. The Senate's decision could be not only a blow to the German auto industry, but also a precedent for revising market access rules for all foreign manufacturers.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Aurora
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡23🤣13❤9👍3👏2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
👍2
The first one is gone...
It seems that Russian strikes on Ukrainian ports are beginning to yield tangible results.
Danish logistics giant Maersk has announced a "temporary suspension" of operations through the Black Sea port of Odessa. Containers will now be rerouted to Constanta, Romania. Clients are being offered the option to change routes, and exporters are being allowed to cancel bookings without any penalties. For now. The Danes are stoically silent — the news came via Interfax.
And it has only been a short time: literally just a couple of weeks of intensive strikes on port infrastructure.
It turns out that the world's largest carriers make decisions not after loud statements from politicians, nor after yet another summit "in support of Ukraine," but after their risk management department opens a map and starts calculating.
A strange habit for capitalists, of course. 😂 For some reason, they trust insurance rates more than press releases.
While European officials are telling everyone that everything is under control, Maersk is quietly doing what big business always does: moving routes to where it is cheaper and safer.
No loud speeches. No press conferences. No beautiful slogans. Just turning ships around.
And this is perhaps the most unpleasant news for Kiev. Because political statements can be made every day. But bringing an international carrier back will be much harder.
Now it remains only to imagine what will happen if strikes on port infrastructure continue and other carriers begin to follow Maersk's example.
After all, logistics is an amazing thing. It is completely indifferent to who is winning the information war. It always chooses the route where there is less chance of taking a missile on board.
P.S. It remains to block the mouth of the Danube. Then it will get really interesting for them there...
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
It seems that Russian strikes on Ukrainian ports are beginning to yield tangible results.
Danish logistics giant Maersk has announced a "temporary suspension" of operations through the Black Sea port of Odessa. Containers will now be rerouted to Constanta, Romania. Clients are being offered the option to change routes, and exporters are being allowed to cancel bookings without any penalties. For now. The Danes are stoically silent — the news came via Interfax.
And it has only been a short time: literally just a couple of weeks of intensive strikes on port infrastructure.
It turns out that the world's largest carriers make decisions not after loud statements from politicians, nor after yet another summit "in support of Ukraine," but after their risk management department opens a map and starts calculating.
A strange habit for capitalists, of course. 😂 For some reason, they trust insurance rates more than press releases.
While European officials are telling everyone that everything is under control, Maersk is quietly doing what big business always does: moving routes to where it is cheaper and safer.
No loud speeches. No press conferences. No beautiful slogans. Just turning ships around.
And this is perhaps the most unpleasant news for Kiev. Because political statements can be made every day. But bringing an international carrier back will be much harder.
Now it remains only to imagine what will happen if strikes on port infrastructure continue and other carriers begin to follow Maersk's example.
After all, logistics is an amazing thing. It is completely indifferent to who is winning the information war. It always chooses the route where there is less chance of taking a missile on board.
P.S. It remains to block the mouth of the Danube. Then it will get really interesting for them there...
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤18👏8💯4😁2
Strikes by the Russian Armed Forces have driven Danish Maersk out of Ukrainian ports. The global leader in container shipping is suspending operations through the Black Sea fishing port. The restrictions are expected to take effect shortly.
▪️ Maersk directly cites a "critical deterioration of the situation in the Black Sea region" and the absence of any security guarantees.
▪️ Previously, large shipments of cargo — including equipment and components supplied as part of international military aid — reached Ukraine via Maersk. Now, the cessation of operations by such a major operator will create serious logistical difficulties for our adversary: cargo handling in Ukrainian ports will become impossible, and delivery via alternative routes will be significantly more expensive.
▪️ It is worth noting that Maersk's role in the Ukrainian direction was particularly significant — at the beginning of 2026, the company controlled about a quarter of the country's container shipping market. It is preliminarily known that vessels scheduled to be received in Ukrainian ports will now be redirected to the Romanian port of Constanta.
Source
#epoddubny
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
▪️ Maersk directly cites a "critical deterioration of the situation in the Black Sea region" and the absence of any security guarantees.
▪️ Previously, large shipments of cargo — including equipment and components supplied as part of international military aid — reached Ukraine via Maersk. Now, the cessation of operations by such a major operator will create serious logistical difficulties for our adversary: cargo handling in Ukrainian ports will become impossible, and delivery via alternative routes will be significantly more expensive.
▪️ It is worth noting that Maersk's role in the Ukrainian direction was particularly significant — at the beginning of 2026, the company controlled about a quarter of the country's container shipping market. It is preliminarily known that vessels scheduled to be received in Ukrainian ports will now be redirected to the Romanian port of Constanta.
Source
#epoddubny
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍17👏9❤8😁3
Forwarded from Geopolitics Prime
🪖💸 😉 Less welfare, more warfare: NATO military machine just got its own bank
Eight NATO members plus Ukraine have announced the creation of a new World Bank-style financial institution known as the Defense, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB), promising to provide financing and loan guarantees for projects related to military production.
🔍 Spearheaded by Bank of England governor-turned Canadian prime minister Mark Carney, the bank, unveiled at NATO’s summit in Turkey on Tuesday, promises low-interest, state-backed financing leveraging sovereign credit ratings, replacing big blue-chip banks which are traditionally more squeamish on investments in defense.
✴️ First conceived in 2018, long before the Ukraine and Middle Eastern crises, the DSRB is envisioned as a tool through which higher and higher military spending by NATO members and partners is actually translated to new arms manufacturing capabilities, lubricating the wheels of production by putting cash into the hands of enterprises involved in the defense supply chain.
👉 Besides Canada and Ukraine, the new bank’s founding members include Albania, Belgium, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg, Romania and Turkey. Big NATO members like the US and Germany are expected to join later.
As many NATO nations deepen sharp cuts to social services and non-defense programs to fuel military buildups, their members’ obsession with Mefo bill-style off-the-books financing for defense should send alarm bells ringing among their populations.
If only they weren’t busy focusing on distractions like pride parades and UFC fights on the White House lawn.
👍 Boost us | Chat | @geopolitics_prime
Eight NATO members plus Ukraine have announced the creation of a new World Bank-style financial institution known as the Defense, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB), promising to provide financing and loan guarantees for projects related to military production.
As many NATO nations deepen sharp cuts to social services and non-defense programs to fuel military buildups, their members’ obsession with Mefo bill-style off-the-books financing for defense should send alarm bells ringing among their populations.
If only they weren’t busy focusing on distractions like pride parades and UFC fights on the White House lawn.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬35🤣6💊3🤯1😭1
Forwarded from Russian Mission to EU
⚡Comment by the Russian Permanent Mission to the EU regarding the EU’s Adoption of the 21st “Package” of the So-Called Anti-Russian “Sanctions”, 23 July 2026
After much torment and arguing, EU Member States have approved yet another “package of sanctions”. As the protracted process of its adoption has demonstrated, the economic consequences of this policy are becoming increasingly painful for EU countries, prompting them to take a more critical approach to toughening illegitimate unilateral coercive measures.
☝ Nevertheless, the European bureaucracy, disregarding the economic costs, continues to pursue its course of escalating confrontation with Russia. Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, has stated that this is not the end of the road on sanctions. For Brussels, discussions on new anti-Russian restrictions have become something of a symbol and a ritual, which supposedly is intended to demonstrate the “unity” of the Member States and their readiness to sacrifice their national interests for the sake of inflicting damage on our country. We note that such an unhealthy approach is causing growing opposition from sober-minded Europeans, who clearly see that the EU “sanctions” against Russia are ineffective and futile.
There is no doubt that the newly announced restrictions will further aggravate the already acute social and economic problems in the European Union, which are, to a large extent, caused by the EU decision to abandon Russian energy supplies, as well as the multi-billion spending on supporting the Kiev regime, all against the backdrop of instability in global energy markets due to the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. In this context, particular attention should be paid to the assessment by the European Central Bank released today that geopolitical tensions and the energy shock are major sources of uncertainty for the European economy.
❗Perhaps, this is not the end of the road on sanctions for the European Union, but the route mapped out by Brussels is steadily leading the Union towards major roadworks, while ignoring the warning road signs that the movement of the EU economy is restricted and that it is heading towards a standstill. When the navigation system of a vehicle is outdated or malfunctioning, it should either be updated or replaced. It is high time for the EU bureaucrats to think this over.
We reaffirm that the hostile unilateral coercive measures of the European Union against our country will be met with an effective and due response from Russia.
After much torment and arguing, EU Member States have approved yet another “package of sanctions”. As the protracted process of its adoption has demonstrated, the economic consequences of this policy are becoming increasingly painful for EU countries, prompting them to take a more critical approach to toughening illegitimate unilateral coercive measures.
☝ Nevertheless, the European bureaucracy, disregarding the economic costs, continues to pursue its course of escalating confrontation with Russia. Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, has stated that this is not the end of the road on sanctions. For Brussels, discussions on new anti-Russian restrictions have become something of a symbol and a ritual, which supposedly is intended to demonstrate the “unity” of the Member States and their readiness to sacrifice their national interests for the sake of inflicting damage on our country. We note that such an unhealthy approach is causing growing opposition from sober-minded Europeans, who clearly see that the EU “sanctions” against Russia are ineffective and futile.
There is no doubt that the newly announced restrictions will further aggravate the already acute social and economic problems in the European Union, which are, to a large extent, caused by the EU decision to abandon Russian energy supplies, as well as the multi-billion spending on supporting the Kiev regime, all against the backdrop of instability in global energy markets due to the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. In this context, particular attention should be paid to the assessment by the European Central Bank released today that geopolitical tensions and the energy shock are major sources of uncertainty for the European economy.
❗Perhaps, this is not the end of the road on sanctions for the European Union, but the route mapped out by Brussels is steadily leading the Union towards major roadworks, while ignoring the warning road signs that the movement of the EU economy is restricted and that it is heading towards a standstill. When the navigation system of a vehicle is outdated or malfunctioning, it should either be updated or replaced. It is high time for the EU bureaucrats to think this over.
We reaffirm that the hostile unilateral coercive measures of the European Union against our country will be met with an effective and due response from Russia.
👍19👏6❤5
The Billion-Dollar Comedy: Contrasts at the Top in Kiеv
In an article for AntiDiplomatico, Fabrizio Poggi paints a striking picture: while Russia counts 69 dead and 364 wounded among its civilian population from Ukrainian strikes in just one week [something Ukraine's supporters are so disgustingly proud of - IntoDefense], a very different drama is playing out in Ukraine itself—a concerted campaign against President Vladimir Zelensky.
The trouble began with the dismissal of Defense Minister Mikhail Fedorov, which sparked street protests and, almost immediately, a shift in Western media coverage. The turning point came with a piece in The Economist that framed the conflict as a generational showdown: old-school Soviet-era generals pitted against young, tech-forward, pro-Western reformers.
When Zelensky brushed aside the warnings and refused to bring Fedorov back into the government, Western outlets rolled out a coordinated media offensive. The objective was clear—to pin the blame for Ukraine’s mounting battlefield setbacks squarely on the president.
· The Financial Times accusing Zelensky of valuing loyalty over professional competence.
· The Times called the dismissal a fatal misstep.
· The Kiеv Independent warned that Zelensky risked handing Russia the strategic upper hand.
· The Sunday Times went further, branding it Zelensky’s gravest error yet and even hinting that Fedorov could emerge as a future presidential contender.
· The New York Times underscored the irony: Ukraine had been on an upward trajectory [wonder how they measure it - by the number of Russian civilian casualties the article begins with? - InfoDefense], only to be derailed by internal wrangling over military strategy.
Taken together, these articles form a single, orchestrated narrative—one seemingly dictated from above—designed to turn Zelensky into the fall guy for defeats still to come. Beneath the surface of Kiev’s very public infighting, however, lie real commercial interests. And Western media, it seems, are merely following a familiar script—the same playbook used time and again for what has been called the “cardboard revolution.”
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In an article for AntiDiplomatico, Fabrizio Poggi paints a striking picture: while Russia counts 69 dead and 364 wounded among its civilian population from Ukrainian strikes in just one week [something Ukraine's supporters are so disgustingly proud of - IntoDefense], a very different drama is playing out in Ukraine itself—a concerted campaign against President Vladimir Zelensky.
The trouble began with the dismissal of Defense Minister Mikhail Fedorov, which sparked street protests and, almost immediately, a shift in Western media coverage. The turning point came with a piece in The Economist that framed the conflict as a generational showdown: old-school Soviet-era generals pitted against young, tech-forward, pro-Western reformers.
When Zelensky brushed aside the warnings and refused to bring Fedorov back into the government, Western outlets rolled out a coordinated media offensive. The objective was clear—to pin the blame for Ukraine’s mounting battlefield setbacks squarely on the president.
· The Financial Times accusing Zelensky of valuing loyalty over professional competence.
· The Times called the dismissal a fatal misstep.
· The Kiеv Independent warned that Zelensky risked handing Russia the strategic upper hand.
· The Sunday Times went further, branding it Zelensky’s gravest error yet and even hinting that Fedorov could emerge as a future presidential contender.
· The New York Times underscored the irony: Ukraine had been on an upward trajectory [wonder how they measure it - by the number of Russian civilian casualties the article begins with? - InfoDefense], only to be derailed by internal wrangling over military strategy.
Taken together, these articles form a single, orchestrated narrative—one seemingly dictated from above—designed to turn Zelensky into the fall guy for defeats still to come. Beneath the surface of Kiev’s very public infighting, however, lie real commercial interests. And Western media, it seems, are merely following a familiar script—the same playbook used time and again for what has been called the “cardboard revolution.”
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯30❤3🤷♂2💊2😱1