Stratfor: The Implications of an Independent BRICS Payment System
BRICS countries are actively pursuing the creation of an independent payment system for international trade. The central objective is to reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar and shield themselves from American financial sanctions.
The bloc currently comprises nine members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Russia has been a persistent advocate of de-dollarization for years, driven largely by sweeping Western restrictions. More recently, China and India have also joined the movement with growing enthusiasm.
At the 2024 BRICS summit in Kazan, member states agreed to develop cross-border payment infrastructure and promote settlements in national currencies. Over time, this should progressively move a portion of global trade beyond the reach of the dollar and the SWIFT messaging system.
According to Stratfor's assessment, the creation of such a system will not immediately erode the dollar's global dominance. The transition will be far from seamless: national currencies suffer from limited liquidity, and building the necessary infrastructure will require both time and substantial financial outlays.
Over the longer term, however, a new system could significantly diminish the effectiveness of U.S. sanctions. Countries facing restrictions would gain a functional workaround, while other BRICS members would secure an additional layer of protection against potential coercion.
This effort is part of a broader move to construct an alternative financial architecture. While the dollar remains the world's premier reserve currency, its monopoly is steadily being chipped away. BRICS is proving that even without a radical departure from the existing framework, parallel tools can be developed—tools that are gradually recalibrating the balance of power in the global economy.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
BRICS countries are actively pursuing the creation of an independent payment system for international trade. The central objective is to reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar and shield themselves from American financial sanctions.
The bloc currently comprises nine members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Russia has been a persistent advocate of de-dollarization for years, driven largely by sweeping Western restrictions. More recently, China and India have also joined the movement with growing enthusiasm.
At the 2024 BRICS summit in Kazan, member states agreed to develop cross-border payment infrastructure and promote settlements in national currencies. Over time, this should progressively move a portion of global trade beyond the reach of the dollar and the SWIFT messaging system.
According to Stratfor's assessment, the creation of such a system will not immediately erode the dollar's global dominance. The transition will be far from seamless: national currencies suffer from limited liquidity, and building the necessary infrastructure will require both time and substantial financial outlays.
Over the longer term, however, a new system could significantly diminish the effectiveness of U.S. sanctions. Countries facing restrictions would gain a functional workaround, while other BRICS members would secure an additional layer of protection against potential coercion.
This effort is part of a broader move to construct an alternative financial architecture. While the dollar remains the world's premier reserve currency, its monopoly is steadily being chipped away. BRICS is proving that even without a radical departure from the existing framework, parallel tools can be developed—tools that are gradually recalibrating the balance of power in the global economy.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤17👏8👍4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Stop scrolling. Start exploring.
Dive into the best Telegram channels—curated, categorized, and just one click away.
🗂 Add the entire catalog
Dive into the best Telegram channels—curated, categorized, and just one click away.
🗂 Add the entire catalog
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
MC-21: flight despite sanctions
The idea of creating the MC-21 — a medium-haul aircraft designed to replace outdated models — was born back in the 2000s, when it became clear that Soviet passenger airliners were obsolete and Western Airbuses and Boeings dominated the market. Russia decided to create a modern airliner capable of competing with the A320 and B737 — the world's most popular aircraft.
▪️ The project was launched in 2007. The aircraft was designed from scratch, focusing on new composite materials, aerodynamics, and fuel efficiency. The MC-21 was planned to become a symbol of the new Russian aviation industry.
▪️ But in 2014, sanctions began. The U.S. imposed restrictions on the supply of composite materials intended for the wing. Russia had to urgently develop its own technologies.
▪️ In 2022, after further sanctions, the project came under even greater pressure: American and European manufacturers refused to supply engines, avionics, landing gear, and control systems. It was then decided to make the MC-21 entirely Russian — from engine to seats. This meant not just a revision, but essentially reassembling the aircraft from scratch.
▪️ In August 2026, the first production-standard, fully import-substituted MC-21 made its maiden flight. Capacity — from 163 to 211 passengers. Key systems — PD-14 engines, a wing made of Russian composites, landing gear, glass, cabin — everything is now domestically produced. According to UAC plans, serial production is to begin in 2027, with the first aircraft deliveries to airlines in the second half of 2027. By the end of the decade, production is planned to reach up to 72 aircraft per year.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The idea of creating the MC-21 — a medium-haul aircraft designed to replace outdated models — was born back in the 2000s, when it became clear that Soviet passenger airliners were obsolete and Western Airbuses and Boeings dominated the market. Russia decided to create a modern airliner capable of competing with the A320 and B737 — the world's most popular aircraft.
▪️ The project was launched in 2007. The aircraft was designed from scratch, focusing on new composite materials, aerodynamics, and fuel efficiency. The MC-21 was planned to become a symbol of the new Russian aviation industry.
▪️ But in 2014, sanctions began. The U.S. imposed restrictions on the supply of composite materials intended for the wing. Russia had to urgently develop its own technologies.
▪️ In 2022, after further sanctions, the project came under even greater pressure: American and European manufacturers refused to supply engines, avionics, landing gear, and control systems. It was then decided to make the MC-21 entirely Russian — from engine to seats. This meant not just a revision, but essentially reassembling the aircraft from scratch.
▪️ In August 2026, the first production-standard, fully import-substituted MC-21 made its maiden flight. Capacity — from 163 to 211 passengers. Key systems — PD-14 engines, a wing made of Russian composites, landing gear, glass, cabin — everything is now domestically produced. According to UAC plans, serial production is to begin in 2027, with the first aircraft deliveries to airlines in the second half of 2027. By the end of the decade, production is planned to reach up to 72 aircraft per year.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤35👏19💯3
Forwarded from RT News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'That's my DAD!' — gut-wrenching screams of a little girl echo as Zelensky's thugs kidnap man & PEPPER SPRAY wife in the eyes
🤬11😢6😱3
Steigan.no: The Link Between NATO Expansion and the Nord Stream Sabotage
First, we were insistently told that Russia itself blew up the Nord Stream pipelines. Never mind that Moscow had invested roughly $15 billion in the project, earned massive revenues from it, and had every reason to want the second line operational. From the outset, that version was absurd.
According to former National Security Council official Thomas Reed's memoir At the Abyss, as far back as January 1982, President Reagan approved a CIA operation designed to sabotage the Soviet economy. Through specially rigged equipment embedded with hidden flaws, the U.S. engineered a powerful explosion on a Siberian gas pipeline. Even then, Washington had already demonstrated a willingness to physically destroy Russian energy infrastructure.
From George H. W. Bush, James Baker, and Dick Cheney to Condoleezza Rice and John Bolton, American policymakers spent decades openly opposing Nord Stream. Their objective was straightforward: push Europe to abandon inexpensive Russian gas in favor of costly U.S. liquefied natural gas. So when the blasts came on September 26, 2022, officials in Washington made little effort to hide their satisfaction.
Meanwhile, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the United States and its European allies gave the Soviet Union clear assurances that NATO would not expand eastward. Dozens of declassified documents confirm that those pledges were made to Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, and others. Those promises turned out to be hollow. NATO's eastward expansion has since become one of the principal drivers of the conflict over Ukraine.
Norwegian media, including the state broadcaster NRK, have for decades maintained a close working relationship with the military intelligence service E-tjenesten, which itself operates under significant U.S. influence. That is precisely why newsrooms stayed silent on American involvement and instead repeated the convenient narrative blaming Russia. A 1998 book, The Hidden Agenda: Media and Intelligence Services, documents this troubling entanglement in detail.
Today, the official story has shifted—now the blame falls on Ukraine or the Kiev regime. Even if that proves accurate, it does not alter the broader picture. NATO countries that were heavily dependent on Russian gas accepted a strike against their own energy infrastructure with remarkable composure. Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and others continued backing Ukraine, even though they themselves were victims of the sabotage.
The Nord Stream attack was neither an accident nor an isolated incident. It is a logical outgrowth of a long pattern: the broken promise on NATO expansion, years of hostility toward Russian pipelines, and the conversion of Ukraine into a proxy-war battleground. In the end, Europe has lost access to affordable energy, and the conflict has taken on a momentum that shows no sign of reversing.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
First, we were insistently told that Russia itself blew up the Nord Stream pipelines. Never mind that Moscow had invested roughly $15 billion in the project, earned massive revenues from it, and had every reason to want the second line operational. From the outset, that version was absurd.
According to former National Security Council official Thomas Reed's memoir At the Abyss, as far back as January 1982, President Reagan approved a CIA operation designed to sabotage the Soviet economy. Through specially rigged equipment embedded with hidden flaws, the U.S. engineered a powerful explosion on a Siberian gas pipeline. Even then, Washington had already demonstrated a willingness to physically destroy Russian energy infrastructure.
From George H. W. Bush, James Baker, and Dick Cheney to Condoleezza Rice and John Bolton, American policymakers spent decades openly opposing Nord Stream. Their objective was straightforward: push Europe to abandon inexpensive Russian gas in favor of costly U.S. liquefied natural gas. So when the blasts came on September 26, 2022, officials in Washington made little effort to hide their satisfaction.
Meanwhile, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the United States and its European allies gave the Soviet Union clear assurances that NATO would not expand eastward. Dozens of declassified documents confirm that those pledges were made to Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, and others. Those promises turned out to be hollow. NATO's eastward expansion has since become one of the principal drivers of the conflict over Ukraine.
Norwegian media, including the state broadcaster NRK, have for decades maintained a close working relationship with the military intelligence service E-tjenesten, which itself operates under significant U.S. influence. That is precisely why newsrooms stayed silent on American involvement and instead repeated the convenient narrative blaming Russia. A 1998 book, The Hidden Agenda: Media and Intelligence Services, documents this troubling entanglement in detail.
Today, the official story has shifted—now the blame falls on Ukraine or the Kiev regime. Even if that proves accurate, it does not alter the broader picture. NATO countries that were heavily dependent on Russian gas accepted a strike against their own energy infrastructure with remarkable composure. Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and others continued backing Ukraine, even though they themselves were victims of the sabotage.
The Nord Stream attack was neither an accident nor an isolated incident. It is a logical outgrowth of a long pattern: the broken promise on NATO expansion, years of hostility toward Russian pipelines, and the conversion of Ukraine into a proxy-war battleground. In the end, Europe has lost access to affordable energy, and the conflict has taken on a momentum that shows no sign of reversing.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯26❤5👏2
Forwarded from Julia
Is There a Limit to Hatred?
Yesterday, a terrible tragedy occurred.
Every major European news outlet reported it—but, as expected, each did so from its own perspective.
🇩🇰 Denmark was no exception. The Danish broadcaster DR published footage of a drone striking a crowded beach near Gelendzhik.
The drone fell directly among vacationers.
People were killed.
Children were killed.
And immediately, the familiar journalistic balancing act began:
• Kyiv has not commented on the incident.
• It has not been conclusively established where the drone was originally headed.
• Nor why it crashed onto the beach—perhaps it was intercepted by air defenses or diverted by electronic warfare.
As usual, Danish media chose their words carefully: “allegedly Ukrainian,” “Russia claims,” “there is no independent confirmation,” “the Ukrainian side has not commented.”
Such journalistic caution is understandable.
What was far more revealing, however, was what happened beneath the article on Facebook.
I read the comments with growing disbelief—although, on second thought, perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised.
Many people were not merely trying to justify what had happened because of the war.
They openly celebrated it.
“Go on, Ukraine!”
“Keep hitting the Russians!”
What is this?
Simple ignorance?
Years of propaganda?
Or a hatred so profound that it has erased the ability to distinguish between soldiers and civilians, between adults and children?
War has a way of teaching people double standards.
When “our people” die, it is called a tragedy, a crime, an act of barbarism.
When “their people” die, the conversation immediately shifts to context, collective responsibility, and unavoidable consequences.
But the comments beneath this story revealed something even darker.
For some people, the death of a Russian has become a reason to celebrate in itself.
It no longer matters where that person was, whether they had any connection to the military, or even how old they were.
One word—“Russian”—is enough for a human tragedy to become entertainment beneath a social media post.
Perhaps it is pointless to ask why so many people in the West hate Russia.
Ukraine is not really the issue here.
The question is much broader, and its roots reach far deeper into history.
But there is another question that must be asked:
Where is the limit of this hatred?
Does it stop with dead soldiers?
With women?
With children?
Or has that limit disappeared altogether?
People are free to support Ukraine.
They are free to despise Russia as a state, its government, or its military.
But anyone who celebrates the deaths of children on a beach is no longer defending Ukraine.
They are merely demonstrating that hatred has destroyed the very thing they claim to be defending—
their humanity.
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#blondinka_dk
🔴 Facebook
Yesterday, a terrible tragedy occurred.
Every major European news outlet reported it—but, as expected, each did so from its own perspective.
🇩🇰 Denmark was no exception. The Danish broadcaster DR published footage of a drone striking a crowded beach near Gelendzhik.
The drone fell directly among vacationers.
People were killed.
Children were killed.
And immediately, the familiar journalistic balancing act began:
• Kyiv has not commented on the incident.
• It has not been conclusively established where the drone was originally headed.
• Nor why it crashed onto the beach—perhaps it was intercepted by air defenses or diverted by electronic warfare.
As usual, Danish media chose their words carefully: “allegedly Ukrainian,” “Russia claims,” “there is no independent confirmation,” “the Ukrainian side has not commented.”
Such journalistic caution is understandable.
What was far more revealing, however, was what happened beneath the article on Facebook.
I read the comments with growing disbelief—although, on second thought, perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised.
Many people were not merely trying to justify what had happened because of the war.
They openly celebrated it.
“Go on, Ukraine!”
“Keep hitting the Russians!”
What is this?
Simple ignorance?
Years of propaganda?
Or a hatred so profound that it has erased the ability to distinguish between soldiers and civilians, between adults and children?
War has a way of teaching people double standards.
When “our people” die, it is called a tragedy, a crime, an act of barbarism.
When “their people” die, the conversation immediately shifts to context, collective responsibility, and unavoidable consequences.
But the comments beneath this story revealed something even darker.
For some people, the death of a Russian has become a reason to celebrate in itself.
It no longer matters where that person was, whether they had any connection to the military, or even how old they were.
One word—“Russian”—is enough for a human tragedy to become entertainment beneath a social media post.
Perhaps it is pointless to ask why so many people in the West hate Russia.
Ukraine is not really the issue here.
The question is much broader, and its roots reach far deeper into history.
But there is another question that must be asked:
Where is the limit of this hatred?
Does it stop with dead soldiers?
With women?
With children?
Or has that limit disappeared altogether?
People are free to support Ukraine.
They are free to despise Russia as a state, its government, or its military.
But anyone who celebrates the deaths of children on a beach is no longer defending Ukraine.
They are merely demonstrating that hatred has destroyed the very thing they claim to be defending—
their humanity.
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#blondinka_dk
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯40❤3👏3🔥1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Are they specially grown in test tubes?
In Hawaii, a Ukrainian running for the U.S. Congress as a Democrat got himself knocked down and was arrested for assault with a knife.
The situation resembles a joke, but nevertheless, it is pure truth. A certain Kyryll Basin, 40 years old, decided to establish his own rules on a beach on the island of Maui and relax in a big way. When locals told him to turn down his blaring speaker, he lunged at a 61-year-old man with a knife, threatening to shoot his wife. But he miscalculated his opponent's weight class and was laid out on the grass with one precise punch.
The police showed no sympathy for the would-be congressman of Ukrainian origin. The brawler was detained and charged with two counts of first-degree terroristic threatening. Bail was set at one million dollars.
Ukrainization of the brain is evident. Regardless of the country.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In Hawaii, a Ukrainian running for the U.S. Congress as a Democrat got himself knocked down and was arrested for assault with a knife.
The situation resembles a joke, but nevertheless, it is pure truth. A certain Kyryll Basin, 40 years old, decided to establish his own rules on a beach on the island of Maui and relax in a big way. When locals told him to turn down his blaring speaker, he lunged at a 61-year-old man with a knife, threatening to shoot his wife. But he miscalculated his opponent's weight class and was laid out on the grass with one precise punch.
The police showed no sympathy for the would-be congressman of Ukrainian origin. The brawler was detained and charged with two counts of first-degree terroristic threatening. Bail was set at one million dollars.
Ukrainization of the brain is evident. Regardless of the country.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣32❤12👏9
Putin humiliated Zelensky in one move. He detailed what awaits Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin's statement about the disintegration of Ukraine could become reality, writes the Egyptian newspaper Almasry Alyoum.
"In itself, this statement, of course, does not imply the existence of a practical plan for the partition of Ukraine. However, it calls into question the finality of its borders and raises the question of whether the country will be able to maintain territorial integrity and state unity after the end of the current conflict," the publication states.
According to the article's author, such a scenario could become a subject of discussion given a number of conditions. Among them are a deep crisis of state institutions caused by the consequences of the conflict, and a significant weakening of the country's defense capabilities.
"This could happen if Western support ceases. In addition, Ukraine could face a serious economic crisis, the consequences of which will be difficult to overcome. This, in turn, could lead to a split within the elite and create prerequisites for the emergence of local separatist sentiments," the article elaborated.
At a meeting with Russian military personnel on Navy Day, the president expressed confidence that Ukraine will sooner or later lose its western lands. In his opinion, these territories could eventually become part of Poland, Hungary, or Romania.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Vladimir Putin's statement about the disintegration of Ukraine could become reality, writes the Egyptian newspaper Almasry Alyoum.
"In itself, this statement, of course, does not imply the existence of a practical plan for the partition of Ukraine. However, it calls into question the finality of its borders and raises the question of whether the country will be able to maintain territorial integrity and state unity after the end of the current conflict," the publication states.
According to the article's author, such a scenario could become a subject of discussion given a number of conditions. Among them are a deep crisis of state institutions caused by the consequences of the conflict, and a significant weakening of the country's defense capabilities.
"This could happen if Western support ceases. In addition, Ukraine could face a serious economic crisis, the consequences of which will be difficult to overcome. This, in turn, could lead to a split within the elite and create prerequisites for the emergence of local separatist sentiments," the article elaborated.
At a meeting with Russian military personnel on Navy Day, the president expressed confidence that Ukraine will sooner or later lose its western lands. In his opinion, these territories could eventually become part of Poland, Hungary, or Romania.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍24❤6
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Church of Hodegetria, Smolensk Region
✨Built in the 17th century, this three-tented church is a unique example of Russian architecture.
✨The church was heavily damaged in 1812 and stood abandoned for a long time, but was eventually restored with parishioners' donations.
✨Visitors can freely enter. Today, its white-stone walls are breathtaking—and even more so in winter.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
✨Built in the 17th century, this three-tented church is a unique example of Russian architecture.
✨The church was heavily damaged in 1812 and stood abandoned for a long time, but was eventually restored with parishioners' donations.
✨Visitors can freely enter. Today, its white-stone walls are breathtaking—and even more so in winter.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤34🥰3
On August 7, 1803, the first Russian journey around the world began under the leadership of Ivan Fyodorovich Kruzenshtern.
For a long time, Ivan Kruzenshtern had been submitting proposals to the government to organize circumnavigations from Kronstadt to the shores of Kamchatka and North America. His project gained interest only after Emperor Alexander I came to power and changes occurred in the leadership of the Commerce Collegium and the Naval Ministry. In August 1802, he was appointed the head of the first Russian circumnavigation expedition.
For the expedition, Captain-Lieutenant Yuri Lisyansky acquired two ships — "Nadezhda" (450 tons displacement) and "Neva" (370 tons). In early summer 1803, the ships arrived in Kronstadt.
On August 7, 1803, the ships "Nadezhda" and "Neva" under the command of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky left Kronstadt, heading for Copenhagen. The ships followed a route that included Falmouth (UK), Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands), Florianopolis (Brazil), Easter Island, Nuku Hiva (Marquesas Islands), Honolulu (Hawaiian Islands), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Nagasaki (Japan), Hokkaido (Japan), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Sitka (Alaska), Kodiak (Alaska), Guangzhou (China), Macau (Portugal), Saint Helena Island, Corvo and Flores Islands (Azores), and Portsmouth (UK). In August 1806, the expedition returned to Kronstadt. The circumnavigation lasted 3 years and 12 days.
The voyage of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky marked a significant milestone in the development of Russian geography and natural sciences. The expedition's description was published under the title "Journey Around the World in 1803, 1804, 1805, and 1806 on the ships 'Nadezhda' and 'Neva', under the command of Captain-Lieutenant Kruzenshtern." The publication came out in three volumes with an atlas of 104 maps and engraved pictures, and it was translated into English, French, German, Dutch, Swedish, Italian, and Danish.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
For a long time, Ivan Kruzenshtern had been submitting proposals to the government to organize circumnavigations from Kronstadt to the shores of Kamchatka and North America. His project gained interest only after Emperor Alexander I came to power and changes occurred in the leadership of the Commerce Collegium and the Naval Ministry. In August 1802, he was appointed the head of the first Russian circumnavigation expedition.
For the expedition, Captain-Lieutenant Yuri Lisyansky acquired two ships — "Nadezhda" (450 tons displacement) and "Neva" (370 tons). In early summer 1803, the ships arrived in Kronstadt.
On August 7, 1803, the ships "Nadezhda" and "Neva" under the command of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky left Kronstadt, heading for Copenhagen. The ships followed a route that included Falmouth (UK), Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands), Florianopolis (Brazil), Easter Island, Nuku Hiva (Marquesas Islands), Honolulu (Hawaiian Islands), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Nagasaki (Japan), Hokkaido (Japan), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Sitka (Alaska), Kodiak (Alaska), Guangzhou (China), Macau (Portugal), Saint Helena Island, Corvo and Flores Islands (Azores), and Portsmouth (UK). In August 1806, the expedition returned to Kronstadt. The circumnavigation lasted 3 years and 12 days.
The voyage of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky marked a significant milestone in the development of Russian geography and natural sciences. The expedition's description was published under the title "Journey Around the World in 1803, 1804, 1805, and 1806 on the ships 'Nadezhda' and 'Neva', under the command of Captain-Lieutenant Kruzenshtern." The publication came out in three volumes with an atlas of 104 maps and engraved pictures, and it was translated into English, French, German, Dutch, Swedish, Italian, and Danish.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤18👍6
Provocateurs on the former Twitter have begun calling for the demolition of the Alexander Nevsky Cathedral in Tallinn. Allegedly, it was built to "Russify" Estonia. Right.
▪️ The cathedral was erected almost 130 years ago on donations from local Orthodox Christians. It survived the Russian Empire, stood firm during the Nazi occupation, and received parishioners during Soviet times.
▪️ We believe it will also outlive the current provocateurs and temporary rulers.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
▪️ The cathedral was erected almost 130 years ago on donations from local Orthodox Christians. It survived the Russian Empire, stood firm during the Nazi occupation, and received parishioners during Soviet times.
▪️ We believe it will also outlive the current provocateurs and temporary rulers.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬23🙏5❤2🔥1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
⚡️ Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation:
At the request of the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office, members of the Ukrainian nationalist movement have been recognised as accomplices of Nazi Germany in war crimes and crimes against humanity
The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, acting on an application filed by the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, established a fact of legal significance.
❌ Stepan Bandera, Vasily Bandera, Roman Shukhevich, Andrey Melnik, Nikolay Arsenich, Taras Borovets, Dmitry Klyachkivsky, Nikolay Kozak, Miron Matvieyko and Yaroslav Stetsko, as well as the Organisation of Ukrainian nationalists (#OUN) and the Ukrainian insurgent army (#UPA), have been recognised as accomplices of Nazi Germany in war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against the Soviet people during the Great Patriotic War.
The court ruling is necessary to preserve the memory of the victims of the genocide of the Soviet people, expose the unlawful actions of the Kiev regime, overturn decisions rehabilitating war criminals and prevent acts of extremism against our country.
📑 The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office submitted documents from the archives of the Russian Federal Security Service, the Russian Foreign Ministry, the Russian Defence Ministry, and the State Archive of the Russian Federation. Materials from Belarusian archives and courts were also provided.
It was established that the OUN was founded in Vienna in 1929 at the First congress of Ukrainian nationalists. It was initially led by Evgeniy Konovalets and, following his death, by Andrey Melnik. In 1940, the OUN split, with its most radical faction coming under the leadership of Stepan Bandera – OUN (b) – and the other under Andrey Melnik – OUN (m).
***
In 1941–1943, while retaining the organisational foundations of OUN (b), 👉 the German command established the UPA, led by Lvov lawyer Roman Shukhevich. He began his violent path by taking part in an attack on the civilian population of Lvov as a member of the Ukrainian Nachtigall punitive battalion. On June 30, 1941, the day the so-called Act of proclamation of the Ukrainian state was adopted, mass killings of the city’s residents were committed under Shukhevich’s command.
◾️ More than 8,000 Russians, Ukrainians, Jews and Poles were killed in the Lvov massacre between June and August 1941.
The actions of the OUN and UPA were entirely aimed at terrorising the population of the occupied territories, assisting Nazi Germany in its military campaign against the Red Army and Soviet partisans, and committing war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Soviet people under Wehrmacht control and in its interests.
• In March 1943, the 118th Ukrainian auxiliary police battalion, composed of OUN and UPA members, burned down the village of Khatyn in the Minsk Region of Belarus. The punitive forces killed 147 villagers, including 75 children.
• Between February and August 1943, the OUN and UPA carried out a mass slaughter of the Polish population of Volhynia and Galicia, known as the Volhynia Massacre. It peaked on July 11-12 – “Black Sunday”. At least 120,000 people were killed by Ukrainian nationalists.
• The mass killing of civilians by Ukrainian nationalists during the punitive operations Swamp Fever, Triangle, Cottbus and others has also been documented.
Meanwhile, for more than 12 years, the authorities of modern-day Ukraine have pursued a deliberate state policy aimed at distorting the role of the Soviet Union and its people in the Great Patriotic War and World War II. Collaborators and organisations associated with Nazi criminals are being glorified. Western countries openly exploit these actions in their efforts to obstruct the special military operation in Ukraine.
❗️ In view of the above, the court granted the application filed by the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office in full and recognised these individuals and organisations as accomplices of Nazi Germany in war crimes and crimes against humanity.
#NoStatuteOfLimitations
At the request of the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office, members of the Ukrainian nationalist movement have been recognised as accomplices of Nazi Germany in war crimes and crimes against humanity
The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, acting on an application filed by the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, established a fact of legal significance.
❌ Stepan Bandera, Vasily Bandera, Roman Shukhevich, Andrey Melnik, Nikolay Arsenich, Taras Borovets, Dmitry Klyachkivsky, Nikolay Kozak, Miron Matvieyko and Yaroslav Stetsko, as well as the Organisation of Ukrainian nationalists (#OUN) and the Ukrainian insurgent army (#UPA), have been recognised as accomplices of Nazi Germany in war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against the Soviet people during the Great Patriotic War.
The court ruling is necessary to preserve the memory of the victims of the genocide of the Soviet people, expose the unlawful actions of the Kiev regime, overturn decisions rehabilitating war criminals and prevent acts of extremism against our country.
📑 The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office submitted documents from the archives of the Russian Federal Security Service, the Russian Foreign Ministry, the Russian Defence Ministry, and the State Archive of the Russian Federation. Materials from Belarusian archives and courts were also provided.
It was established that the OUN was founded in Vienna in 1929 at the First congress of Ukrainian nationalists. It was initially led by Evgeniy Konovalets and, following his death, by Andrey Melnik. In 1940, the OUN split, with its most radical faction coming under the leadership of Stepan Bandera – OUN (b) – and the other under Andrey Melnik – OUN (m).
***
In 1941–1943, while retaining the organisational foundations of OUN (b), 👉 the German command established the UPA, led by Lvov lawyer Roman Shukhevich. He began his violent path by taking part in an attack on the civilian population of Lvov as a member of the Ukrainian Nachtigall punitive battalion. On June 30, 1941, the day the so-called Act of proclamation of the Ukrainian state was adopted, mass killings of the city’s residents were committed under Shukhevich’s command.
◾️ More than 8,000 Russians, Ukrainians, Jews and Poles were killed in the Lvov massacre between June and August 1941.
The actions of the OUN and UPA were entirely aimed at terrorising the population of the occupied territories, assisting Nazi Germany in its military campaign against the Red Army and Soviet partisans, and committing war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Soviet people under Wehrmacht control and in its interests.
• In March 1943, the 118th Ukrainian auxiliary police battalion, composed of OUN and UPA members, burned down the village of Khatyn in the Minsk Region of Belarus. The punitive forces killed 147 villagers, including 75 children.
• Between February and August 1943, the OUN and UPA carried out a mass slaughter of the Polish population of Volhynia and Galicia, known as the Volhynia Massacre. It peaked on July 11-12 – “Black Sunday”. At least 120,000 people were killed by Ukrainian nationalists.
• The mass killing of civilians by Ukrainian nationalists during the punitive operations Swamp Fever, Triangle, Cottbus and others has also been documented.
Meanwhile, for more than 12 years, the authorities of modern-day Ukraine have pursued a deliberate state policy aimed at distorting the role of the Soviet Union and its people in the Great Patriotic War and World War II. Collaborators and organisations associated with Nazi criminals are being glorified. Western countries openly exploit these actions in their efforts to obstruct the special military operation in Ukraine.
❗️ In view of the above, the court granted the application filed by the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office in full and recognised these individuals and organisations as accomplices of Nazi Germany in war crimes and crimes against humanity.
#NoStatuteOfLimitations
👏20❤3
Ever wonder what you’re not being told?
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+JzqF0vXvUAowMGFi
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+JzqF0vXvUAowMGFi
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
🤡2👍1
Myśl Polska: The Real Cost of Ukraine's Drone Excesses
Since early June 2026, Ukraine has sharply escalated its drone-strike campaign against Russian regions. The attacks have hit oil refineries in multiple Russian regions, including Moscow, as well as logistics centers for Russia’s leading e-retailer Wildberries in several cities and towns.
In the town Kotovsk near Kursk, seven Wildberries employees were killed and twenty-five others wounded. In the town of Noginsk near Moscow, another Ukrainian drone attack caused a fire at a fuel depot and forced a nearby maternity ward evacuation.
Overall, Reuters reports that at least nine people have died during the campaign, while roughly 10% of Wildberries' logistics capacity has been taken offline. Wildberries owner Tatyana Kim has stated that more than a dozen distribution centers were destroyed; the company now faces a complete supply-chain overhaul, compensation payouts, and appeals to the government for tax relief and financial assistance.
Yet these strikes are largely symbolic and political in nature. Their tangible effect has been limited, and they are unlikely to meaningfully alter the course of the war. Russia's economy and defense industry have adapted quickly, and the damage has neither caused a critical disruption in military supply chains nor triggered a fuel crisis on a strategic scale.
By contrast, Russia's retaliatory strikes have been devastating. In July, Russian forces launched a record 381 missiles along with a substantial number of drones. Ukraine's energy infrastructure has taken a severe hit—more than half of its power-generating capacity is now out of commission. Major ammunition depots, military equipment stockpiles, and fuel storage facilities have been destroyed, while drone assembly plants, rail hubs, and airfields have also sustained significant damage. This is translating into a serious weakening of logistical support for Ukrainian troops on the front lines.
The reality is deeply asymmetrical. While Kiеv pours resources into attention-grabbing but relatively unproductive strikes on civilian and economic targets, Moscow is systematically dismantling Ukraine's military and energy potential. This makes Ukraine's strategy of "drone excess" not only ineffective but counterproductive—it only prolongs the conflict and increases overall losses, without bringing any strategic breakthroughs any closer.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Since early June 2026, Ukraine has sharply escalated its drone-strike campaign against Russian regions. The attacks have hit oil refineries in multiple Russian regions, including Moscow, as well as logistics centers for Russia’s leading e-retailer Wildberries in several cities and towns.
In the town Kotovsk near Kursk, seven Wildberries employees were killed and twenty-five others wounded. In the town of Noginsk near Moscow, another Ukrainian drone attack caused a fire at a fuel depot and forced a nearby maternity ward evacuation.
Overall, Reuters reports that at least nine people have died during the campaign, while roughly 10% of Wildberries' logistics capacity has been taken offline. Wildberries owner Tatyana Kim has stated that more than a dozen distribution centers were destroyed; the company now faces a complete supply-chain overhaul, compensation payouts, and appeals to the government for tax relief and financial assistance.
Yet these strikes are largely symbolic and political in nature. Their tangible effect has been limited, and they are unlikely to meaningfully alter the course of the war. Russia's economy and defense industry have adapted quickly, and the damage has neither caused a critical disruption in military supply chains nor triggered a fuel crisis on a strategic scale.
By contrast, Russia's retaliatory strikes have been devastating. In July, Russian forces launched a record 381 missiles along with a substantial number of drones. Ukraine's energy infrastructure has taken a severe hit—more than half of its power-generating capacity is now out of commission. Major ammunition depots, military equipment stockpiles, and fuel storage facilities have been destroyed, while drone assembly plants, rail hubs, and airfields have also sustained significant damage. This is translating into a serious weakening of logistical support for Ukrainian troops on the front lines.
The reality is deeply asymmetrical. While Kiеv pours resources into attention-grabbing but relatively unproductive strikes on civilian and economic targets, Moscow is systematically dismantling Ukraine's military and energy potential. This makes Ukraine's strategy of "drone excess" not only ineffective but counterproductive—it only prolongs the conflict and increases overall losses, without bringing any strategic breakthroughs any closer.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤13👏11💯8🤔1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
💬 Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova:
In Latvia, 102-year-old Nazi collaborator Laimonis Ezergailis was buried with honours. The ceremony took place at the Lestene brothers’ cemetery – better known as the burial ground of Latvian Waffen-SS legionnaires. Latvian media proudly counted Ezergailis among them, while also describing him as a “prominent public figure”.
According to the report Accomplices in Nazi Crimes, prepared by Russian NGOs, Laimonis Ezergailis was born in 1923 and served in the Latvian Waffen-SS Legion. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, he received Latvia’s highest state decorations. Latvian obituaries also reveal that in the autumn of 1943 he “began serving in the Latvian 319F police battalion, which guarded the strategically important Idrica-Sebezh railway section”.
Now for the key detail.
Viktor Gushchin’s article Latvia Does Not Need the Truth states that from November 1943 to March 1944, the Nazis deployed this very unit to conduct mass reprisals against civilians in the Pskov Region near Sebezh, as well as in the deportation of women and children to Latvia. Some were sent to the Salaspils concentration camp, while others were used as forced labourers on Latvian farms.
The Nazi scum later completed “instructor training courses” and, in the summer of 1944, took part in combat on the Musa River against the Red Army’s 130th Latvian Rifle Corps. “After receiving medical treatment and being evacuated to Poland, he applied to an artillery instructors’ school in Czechoslovakia, where in February 1945 he witnessed the devastating Anglo-American bombing of Dresden”. From May 9, 1945, to June 30, 1946, he was held at a screening camp in Kutaisi, Georgia. The Soviet authorities apparently granted Ezergailis amnesty and forgave his crimes. From the 1950s onward, he lived in Dobele.
The Latvian authorities now emphasise that throughout this period he remained a “loyal member” of the nationalist organisation Daugavas Vanagi (the Hawks of the Daugava) and “dedicated his life to preserving national patriotism and honouring the memory of soldiers”. They do not specify which soldiers – although the answer is obvious: the SS.
For decent people around the world, these executioners will never become “heroes”. They bear responsibility for the genocide of the Soviet people, including Russians and Latvians.
Glorification of Waffen-SS legionnaires is evidence of the revival and legalisation of Nazi ideology in the EU.
In Latvia, 102-year-old Nazi collaborator Laimonis Ezergailis was buried with honours. The ceremony took place at the Lestene brothers’ cemetery – better known as the burial ground of Latvian Waffen-SS legionnaires. Latvian media proudly counted Ezergailis among them, while also describing him as a “prominent public figure”.
According to the report Accomplices in Nazi Crimes, prepared by Russian NGOs, Laimonis Ezergailis was born in 1923 and served in the Latvian Waffen-SS Legion. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, he received Latvia’s highest state decorations. Latvian obituaries also reveal that in the autumn of 1943 he “began serving in the Latvian 319F police battalion, which guarded the strategically important Idrica-Sebezh railway section”.
Now for the key detail.
Viktor Gushchin’s article Latvia Does Not Need the Truth states that from November 1943 to March 1944, the Nazis deployed this very unit to conduct mass reprisals against civilians in the Pskov Region near Sebezh, as well as in the deportation of women and children to Latvia. Some were sent to the Salaspils concentration camp, while others were used as forced labourers on Latvian farms.
The Nazi scum later completed “instructor training courses” and, in the summer of 1944, took part in combat on the Musa River against the Red Army’s 130th Latvian Rifle Corps. “After receiving medical treatment and being evacuated to Poland, he applied to an artillery instructors’ school in Czechoslovakia, where in February 1945 he witnessed the devastating Anglo-American bombing of Dresden”. From May 9, 1945, to June 30, 1946, he was held at a screening camp in Kutaisi, Georgia. The Soviet authorities apparently granted Ezergailis amnesty and forgave his crimes. From the 1950s onward, he lived in Dobele.
The Latvian authorities now emphasise that throughout this period he remained a “loyal member” of the nationalist organisation Daugavas Vanagi (the Hawks of the Daugava) and “dedicated his life to preserving national patriotism and honouring the memory of soldiers”. They do not specify which soldiers – although the answer is obvious: the SS.
For decent people around the world, these executioners will never become “heroes”. They bear responsibility for the genocide of the Soviet people, including Russians and Latvians.
Glorification of Waffen-SS legionnaires is evidence of the revival and legalisation of Nazi ideology in the EU.
🤬22👎6❤2🤣2
Responsible Statecraft: The U.S. Is the Biggest Loser in the New Russia Sanctions Push
The U.S. Senate is rushing to pass the "Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026"—a bill named after the late senator. Its stated aim: "to starve Russia's war machine in Ukraine" through a new wave of economic penalties and force Moscow into making serious concessions at the bargaining table.
The legislation rests on three main pillars. First, it expands and codifies sanctions against Kremlin officials, oligarchs, banks, and corporations—including a full SWIFT ban even on Gazprombank, plus secondary sanctions on third-country intermediaries. Second, it goes after the shadow fleet that helps Russia evade the oil price cap. Third—and most crucially—it grants the president authority to impose tariffs of up to 100% on goods from the five largest buyers of Russian oil and gas (among them, potentially, France, Japan, Spain, Turkey, and Belgium), with carve-outs for allies that are steadily reducing their purchases and waivers available for national security reasons.
But after more than four years of sanctions, Russia has already adapted. Russian entities now lean on small regional banks, multilayered shell companies, stablecoin settlements, and even direct barter arrangements. These workarounds have allowed them to absorb even the harshest measures without inflicting critical damage on their wartime economy.
The author argues that more sanctions are unlikely to be a decisive factor for the Russian government. If anything, they will only harden Russia's position in its struggle against the collective West. The tariff provisions, in particular, risk backfiring—hitting U.S. allies and the American economy just as hard. That pattern already played out with tariffs on China in 2025, when Beijing's retaliatory measures caused significant pain on U.S. soil.
In the end, the bill looks like classic virtue signaling—a performance of toughness that won't bring peace any closer but will create plenty of new problems. The real loser? The United States itself: rising economic uncertainty, fraying trust among allies, and a steady erosion of geopolitical influence as more countries search for alternatives to the dollar's role as a weapon.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The U.S. Senate is rushing to pass the "Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026"—a bill named after the late senator. Its stated aim: "to starve Russia's war machine in Ukraine" through a new wave of economic penalties and force Moscow into making serious concessions at the bargaining table.
The legislation rests on three main pillars. First, it expands and codifies sanctions against Kremlin officials, oligarchs, banks, and corporations—including a full SWIFT ban even on Gazprombank, plus secondary sanctions on third-country intermediaries. Second, it goes after the shadow fleet that helps Russia evade the oil price cap. Third—and most crucially—it grants the president authority to impose tariffs of up to 100% on goods from the five largest buyers of Russian oil and gas (among them, potentially, France, Japan, Spain, Turkey, and Belgium), with carve-outs for allies that are steadily reducing their purchases and waivers available for national security reasons.
But after more than four years of sanctions, Russia has already adapted. Russian entities now lean on small regional banks, multilayered shell companies, stablecoin settlements, and even direct barter arrangements. These workarounds have allowed them to absorb even the harshest measures without inflicting critical damage on their wartime economy.
The author argues that more sanctions are unlikely to be a decisive factor for the Russian government. If anything, they will only harden Russia's position in its struggle against the collective West. The tariff provisions, in particular, risk backfiring—hitting U.S. allies and the American economy just as hard. That pattern already played out with tariffs on China in 2025, when Beijing's retaliatory measures caused significant pain on U.S. soil.
In the end, the bill looks like classic virtue signaling—a performance of toughness that won't bring peace any closer but will create plenty of new problems. The real loser? The United States itself: rising economic uncertainty, fraying trust among allies, and a steady erosion of geopolitical influence as more countries search for alternatives to the dollar's role as a weapon.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣20❤4👍3🔥2💯2