JoesCrypt
9.32K subscribers
33 photos
32 links
Nothing posted or shared in this channel should be considered financial advice.

Disclaimer: bit.ly/asymm-disclaimer
Download Telegram
A cool $110 billion volatility trap

@Nomura estimates that a 2% SPX decline could trigger approximately $110 billion in mechanical selling across dealers, leveraged ETFs and volatility-control strategies.

At a 3% decline, that figure rises to almost $178 billion.

With systematic equity exposure already near the 95th percentile, the market is increasingly vulnerable to a self-reinforcing feedback loop.

Selling creates volatility.

Volatility creates more selling.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116332404709433491
🫡6👍2❤1💩1
Expect more bodies to float to the trading floor surface in the coming weeks

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116390120840643039
❤5💩1👻1
Hedge funds net bought US equities for the first time in 4 weeks

Hedge funds returned to net buying, led by Macro Product short covers, according to @GoldmanSachs' October 30, 2026 rundown.

Mag 7 was still net sold in 4/5 sessions amid earnings volatility.

The Russell 2K outperformance had a similar driver. @GoldmanSachs attributes it to orderly short covering, with a $2.1B decline in open interest. Fresh longs weren't the driver. Rate sensitivity remains a constraint.

The S&P 500 is testing its 100dma (7614) and CTA threshold (7554). Those are the technical levels @GoldmanSachs flags alongside the covering activity.

@GoldmanSachs also describes constrained appetite for AI amid election uncertainty.

Investors are seeking names it calls AI-resistant, including $IBM, $AAPL and $SPOT.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116591145690206486
Gold sees $8bn of bearish flows in 5th straight week

The $8bn outflow was driven by Other/Non-Reportable positions (~95%).

Gold slipped 1.6% despite an 11bp yield drop.

Net positions peaked before the futures price. @GoldmanSachs reads the subsequent decline in net longs as reduced hedging support, with more downside risk during corrections as hedgers exit.

The tactical concern is persistent selling pressure and less support if gold falls further.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116591794347708796
❤1💩1
Financial Markets, not Prediction Markets, now suggest a split Congress, not a Democratic sweep.

The @goldmansachs Affordable Care Act (ACA) Basket (GSHLCACA) divided by the S&P 500 ex-AI (SPXXAI) vs. a Democratic Sweep Odds on @Kalshi.

The two series tracked closely from April through mid-October 2026, both rising as Democratic sweep odds climbed from ~40 to ~65+.

However, we are now seeing a stark divergence in the last two weeks.

The ACA ratio (black) peaked near 115 around Oct 14-16, then sold off hard to 106.41 -- a roughly 8-point drop.

The Dem sweep odds (blue) held at 65-66 and actually ticked up slightly over the same window.

That decoupling is the signal, in my opinion.

Three probable reasons for the divergence:

1. Profit-taking / position unwind

The ACA basket had an outsized run (~+15% relative to ex-AI S&P since September). Institutions that rode the political trade are harvesting gains ahead of Nov 4 elections, regardless of current odds. I see this as a sensible but low probability.

2. Sweep odds vs. implementation risk

Kalshi House odds sit at ~91% Dem, Senate at ~64% Dem (Kalshi News, Oct 27-28). A full sweep is priced in on the House but the Senate is a coin flip with 36% GOP. Markets may be pricing the scenario where Dems win the House but not the Senate; ACA expansion stalls in a split Congress.

I see this as most likely.

3. $XLV flow context

Dark pool data shows heavy distribution on Oct 30 (buy ratio dropped to 0.30, strongest sell signal in the 20-day window).
Options flow remains strongly bullish (put/call premium ratio 0.19), so there is a split: institutional blocks distributing while options desks stay long vol into the election. That kind of conflict typically signals hedging, not conviction.

Also a sensible explanation, but again, seems less likely

In short, the ACA basket is repricing from a "full sweep, full expansion" multiple toward a "House only" multiple.

Sweep odds have not moved, but the marginal value of the Senate seat is being discounted.

The divergence is the market saying that a House win is in the price, Senate is the variable, and the trade already had a 15% run.

https://kalshiview.com/markets/midterms-2026/

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116597717162148069
🔥3💩1
Momentum demolished and the index goes nowhere.

S&P 500
-0.13% (July)
+2.62% (August)
-0.45% (September)
-0.93% (October)

GSPRHIMO (Goldman Sachs Momentum Basket)
-30.19% (July)
-13.67% (August)
+26.96% (September)
-18.60% (October)

-- @GoldmanSachs

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116612752177594746
$GOOGL's one day drop was the 2nd largest decline in market cap in a single day in history

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2116616195982213134
History says buy the rotation

The last five rotations into Tech saw the sector gain an average 38%, outperforming the rest of the S&P 500 by 33 percentage points.

The broader market joined the party, with the S&P 500 gaining nearly 20% on average over those episodes.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2117006566667014442
🍾2
YTD IG issuance is $2 Trillion.

Investment-grade issuance hit $60bn, including $25bn from Microsoft, in @GoldmanSachs' 1 Nov 2026 credit update.

Cash spreads widened to 90bps as Treasuries rallied.

Concentrated supply is testing appetite, with incremental issuance and spread concessions the risk to watch.

High-yield option-adjusted spreads widened to 312bps, the widest since May 2025.

All-in yields reached 8.31%. Earnings and AI-related weakness reversed the rally. $VRRM bonds fell 9pts on Avis uncertainty.

@GoldmanSachs's desk bias is to sell rallies, with tactical length at wides.

The desk is willing to buy wider spreads while keeping its broader sell-rallies bias.

Next week's calendar includes US midterms, Treasury refunding and October payrolls, alongside heavy supply and AI financing uncertainty.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2117042380599967753
Not euphoric

Discretionary investors are essentially neutral on equities, despite S&P 500 earnings growth running at roughly 31%.

Positioning looks unusually cautious relative to the earnings backdrop.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2117042791947919712
👍5
Nothing like price to change sentiment.

Current positioning is consistent with Tech earnings growth of roughly 10%, compared with 47% in Q3 and consensus expectations of 36% by the end of next year.

That's a remarkable amount of pessimism for a sector still delivering incredible growth.

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2117058106295521363
❤1
Massive pennant for $MU on the weekly

https://x.com/joemccann/status/2117086959822884963