The event we've all been waiting for…

Russia's president has outlined approaches to updating our country's nuclear doctrine. The main changes are as follows:

1. Aggression against Russia by a non-nuclear State, but with the support or participation of a nuclear-armed country, will be considered a joint attack. It is clear to everyone which countries we are talking about.

2. To the joy of Poland and numerous NATO pygmies, equivalent nuclear protection will be established for our closest ally, Belarus.

3. Under certain conditions, a massive launch of enemy air power, including airplanes, missiles, and UAVs, resulting in a violation of our border may be justification for the use of nuclear weapons. Something to reflect upon for not only the rotten neo-Nazi regime, but also all the enemies of Russia who are pushing the world towards a nuclear catastrophe.

It is clear that every situation that could constitute grounds for a nuclear response should be evaluated in conjunction with other factors, and any decision to use nuclear weapons must be made by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. However, this change in our country's guidelines for using nuclear weapons, in and of itself, may cool the ardor of those of our opponents who have not yet lost their sense of self-preservation. As for the dim-witted, only the Roman maxim remains: caelo tonantem credidimus Jovem Regnare …

In an effort to help his brainless protégé, Biden blurted out that he's ready to negotiate with Russia on reducing SNF without any preconditions. Another instance of the Muricans’ insolence. Think about it: the U.S. is waging an almost full-scale (and certainly not hybrid) war against us and seeks our country's strategic defeat. Therefore, negotiating nuclear arms reduction with America would be no more useful than negotiating a truce with Hitler in 1945.

On the eve of the 16th BRICS Summit

Remember: "... there can be no alliance between Russia and the West, neither for the sake of interests nor principles; that there is not a single interest in the West, not a single aspiration, that would not plot against Russia, especially against its future, or that would not try to harm it. And that is why Russia's sole approach towards Western powers cannot not lie in forming an alliance with one or another of these powers, but in separating them, in sowing division. For it is only when they are divided that they cease to be hostile to us – out of impotence, of course – never out of conviction." Fyodor Ivanovich Tyutchev, 1864.

Unfortunately, nothing has changed in the past 160 years. And the tasks remain the same – to maximally weaken and humiliate the West, including Europe. The United States itself is helping us in this endeavour. After all, their goal is to impose their domination over the Old World (as well as the rest of the world). 

And, then, there can be only one goal – the collapse of the United States itself. Or, at least, the creation of a full-fledged counterweight to America, as was the case with the USSR and the Warsaw Pact. And here, the prospects for a new balance are already visible: the SCO, BRICS, other regional groupings, as well as a comprehensive relationship with the Global South.

After all, the alternative to returning to a balance of power is total war, which will last until the complete extermination of mankind.

Under today's realities, a world without balance will not last even a decade. If the West does not realise this simple truth, everyone is finished. And this is not a situation where the death of some will mean victory for others…

Germany's Rheinmetall has launched the first of its four weapons manufacturing plants in Ukraine. As promised, we're looking forward to seeing some Russian fireworks on the premises.

The whole world stands frozen in uneasy anticipation, waiting for the results of the presidential election in the distant land of 'Us.

There is no reason why we should have high expectations about it.

1. The outcome of the election will not change anything for Russia, as both candidates share the same bipartisan consensus that ‘Russia must be defeated’.

2. Kamala is dumb, inexperienced, and easy to control, as she will be terrified of everyone around her. All the real decision-making will be done by a coterie of top ministers and advisors plus (indirectly) the Obamas.

3. A low-energy Trump, spewing clichés like “I'll offer them a deal” and “I have a very good relationship with...”, will be forced to comply with the system and its rules. He won't stop the war. Not in one day, not in three days, not in three months. And if he actually attempts to do it, he could end up becoming the new JFK.

4. The only thing that matters is how much cash the new POTUS can squeeze out of Congress to finance someone else's war, fought in a far-off land. Cash to feed the American military-industrial complex and to line the pockets of the Banderite scum in Ukraine.

5. That is why, if we want to please both candidates for the highest American office, the best thing to do on November 5 is keep pummeling the Nazi regime in Kiev!

About stubborn Trump

A couple of days ago, I wrote a Telegram post about the viciously anti-Russian bipartisan consensus on Capitol Hill. This is a fair assessment, which still holds true after the GOP gained control of the Senate.

Trump has one quality that’s useful for us, though. As a dyed-in-the-wool businessman he hates wasting money on all sorts of freeloaders and tagalongs: on wacko allies, misguided grandiose charity projects, and insatiable international organisations.

Toxic Banderite Ukraine neatly fits the description. The only question is, how much will Trump be forced to fork out on the war? He’s stubborn, but the system is more powerful.

Anyway, the green scumbag in Kiev will get up to his ears in blow today…

European leaders are experiencing a seasonal mental breakdown after Trump’s victory. Their goal is to push the conflict with Russia into an irreversible stage. One moment, the Frenchman is squawking about supporting Kiev in case America steps back; the next, NATO bosses are showing off their ‘wisdom’ by discussing how to escalate the fight with us even further.

Now, Germany’s chancellor candidate Merz is joining in with ultimatums. His message? Either you end your Special Military Operation, or I’ll hand Taurus missiles over to the Ukies the very next day. Obviously, such ‘ultimatums’ are nothing but election posturing. Clearly, these missiles won’t fundamentally alter the conflict’s trajectory. Sending them would simply prolong the suffering of the Banderite regime. What’s concerning, however, is that deploying such missiles would significantly increase the risk of this conflict reaching its most dangerous phase, as our President has warned.

It’s remarkable, really, how eager today’s European politicians seem to be to invite war onto their own soil. Notably, doing so pleases the Americans and goes against the wishes of their own people. The vaccine of World War II seems to have worn off completely. Europe’s smart, experienced leaders are gone, replaced by pathetic figures with inflated egos. And so, the worst-case scenario remains all too possible.

About the unconfirmed decision regarding strikes “deep into Russia" and the confirmed Russian presidential decision on Russia's nuclear policy:

As the dust raised by Western newspapers begins to settle, it is becoming evident that, despite the apparent propagandistic intent behind these publications, this development could carry very serious consequences.

1. It's not so important who made the decision to use NATO countries' tactical ballistic and long-range cruise missiles "deep into the territory" of Russia or when it was made — especially since such attempts against our country have already occurred.
2. It's not so important how many of these missiles the adversary currently possesses or that their use, according to our enemies, is intended to have — not only military but also informational impact.
3. It's not so important that these missiles are unlikely to significantly advance the enemy’s military objectives.
4. It's not so important that such decisions by the current U.S. administration will deliberately escalate the conflict, leaving the consequences for the Trump team to handle.
5. The one thing that is truly important is the statement made by the Head of the Russian State on September 12. Following this, a new version of the Foundations of State Policy in the Area of Nuclear Deterrence was approved today. The use of alliance missiles in this way could be classified as an attack by bloc countries on Russia. In such a scenario, Russia reserves the right to retaliate with weapons of mass destruction against Kiev and key NATO facilities, wherever they may be located. This would amount to World War III.

Perhaps old Biden truly intends to leave this life in dramatic fashion, taking a significant part of humanity with him...

SUNDAY REVIEW
Five events that have already happened

1. First on the list, of course, is the firing of the ‘Oreshnik,' Russia's new hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile carrying a MIRV payload, used (this time) with non-nuclear warheads. Europe is at a loss, speculating how much damage the missile would cause with nuclear warheads, whether it can be shot down at all, and how quickly the missiles would reach the capitals of the Old World. Let me answer all three: the damage would be catastrophic; no, you cannot shoot them down using current-day systems; and it will be a matter of minutes. No, bomb shelters will not save you. The only hope is that Russia, out of the kindness of its heart, gives advanced warning about the launch.
So how about you stop supporting the war, instead.

2. Responding to the launch of the Oreshnik missile, Ukrainian propagandists came up with their own special ‘missile defense' of the imaginary kind: according to them, the missile simply doesn't exist. Who needs rocket science, anyway? Just shut your eyes and nothing bad will happen. If you can't see the problem, it doesn't exist!

3. The Western media are tripping over themselves to insist the United States arm puppet-state Ukraine with nuclear weapons. An excellent idea, especially in light of Russia's updated nuclear deterrence doctrine.
Now let's come up with a list of Washington's potential enemies with whom we could share our own nuclear technologies.

4. Speaking in the Rada, the green-rag wearing banderite announced his new ten-point 'resilience plan' for Ukraine. What they really need is a 1-point plan that just says, "Stop snorting white stuff and face facts." Ukraine's parliament is full of sellouts ready and waiting to pack their bags when faced with a tough scenario (see paragraph 1).

5. And last but not least. US Senator Lindsey Graham, a die-hard Russophobe and overall degenerate (listed in Russia’s register of terrorists and extremists), said Washington should sanction and destroy the economies of countries assisting the ICC with the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.
So, it appears that the US recognizes the power of the ICC – a totally illegitimate organization, by the way – when it comes to specific countries and leaders, but is willing to go absolutely medieval on any other nation that complies with the ICC's rulings, especially when they're aimed at US satellites and their public figures.

Nothing quite like a consistent and honest stance.

US politicians and journalists are discussing the consequences of providing Kiev with nuclear weapons in earnest. Looks like my sad joke about crazy senile Biden, who’s eager to go out with a bang and take a substantial part of humanity with him, is becoming dangerously real. Giving nukes to a country that’s at war with the greatest nuclear power? The idea is so absurd it makes one suspect Joe The Walking Dead and all those weighing the pros and cons of such a step have massive paranoid psychosis.

As ludicrous as these proposals are, here’s my take:
1) the very threat of transferring nuclear weapons to the Kiev regime will be seen as preparation for nuclear conflict with Russia;
2) the fact of transferring such weapons may be considered as the launch of an attack against our country in accordance with Paragraph 19 of the “Basic Principles of State Policy on Nuclear Deterrence”.

The consequences are obvious.

Three developments in Europe at the onset of winter

1. What do you know? The British have acknowledged at last that Mr. z’s popularity has nosedived and most Ukrainians want him gone. According to The Times, only 16% of them would vote for him, come elections, while about 60% don't even want him to run again. The survey results mean the regime will keep pushing for total war till the last Ukrainian, and postpone elections for as long as possible. This is the only way to for the illegitimate junkie to remain in power, so the Trump administration shouldn’t expect easy negotiations on this issue with the Banderite regime. A halt to the war is a death sentence for the the likes of zelensky & Co. - as it means the end to their bloody grip on power.

2. António Costa, the new head of the European Council, and Kaja Kallas, the Estonian Russophobe who, together with her husband, made some dough in Russia before becoming the EU’s “top diplomat,” visited Kiev on their first day of work. This means only one thing: their priority is not ensuring the wellbeing of the European Union, achieving economic growth or easing social pressures. Their main goal is to continue the war to the last Ukrainian. Are you happy now, Europeans? Great choice! Just the right guys to protect democracy!

3. Another attempt at a “color (“rose”, “orange”, you name it) revolution” in Georgia. Some are out yelling, wreaking havoc, and setting fires in the streets. Others are watching in silence. Crazy old lady Salome, the French “president” of Georgia with an expired mandate and a diligent student of Zbigniew Brzezinski, mumbled something about not giving up her seat because she doesn’t recognize the election results. Back in the day, you’d be hanged on a lamp post for stuff like that, but we’re living in more humane times, so she’ll do fine. It looks like everything is in place for plunging Georgia once again into civil unrest, forcing it to choose between the increasingly brazen EU, NATO, and ‘Murica' on the one hand and the ancient land of Sakartvelo on the other. In short, our neighbors are going down the Ukrainian road into a dark abyss, and fast. That usually ends very badly.

"All Meetinged Out"
(Not-Mayakovsky, prose on current events)

Yoon Suk Yeol must go. He declared martial law, which parliament overturned and then demanded his resignation. A traitor. Backed by the U.S. - future uncertain.

French President Macron has failed to manage the government crisis and must go. A weakling. Backed by the U.S. - future uncertain.

Georgian President Zourabichvili should step down after her term ends but she's refusing. A brazen fool. Backed by the U.S. - future uncertain.

The expired, illegitimate president of former Ukraine must step down and disappear. A criminal, addict, scumbag. Backed by the U.S. - his future is pretty clear: disgraced political exile or public execution.

It’s impossible to ignore the editorial published in The Times, where the bastards called the terrorist attack on Igor Kirillov and his assistant a "legitimate act of defence."

Well, then... According to this logic:
1. All NATO decision-makers from countries that provided military assistance to Bandera Ukraine are participating in a hybrid or conventional war against Russia. There's a whole legion of them. There’s not even enough space to list them, but all these individuals can and should be considered legitimate military targets for the Russian state. And for all Russian patriots, for that matter.
2. The people who committed the crimes against Russia named above always have accomplices. And they, too, are now legitimate military targets. These may include the lousy jackals from The Times, who cowardly hid behind an editorial. Meaning, the publication’s entire management team.

Logical? Very! So, be careful! After all, anything goes in London…

The president of a large country should always comport themselves extremely politely and properly (I know this from my own experience). This was brilliantly demonstrated yesterday by Vladimir Putin, who radiated cool confidence during his annual 'Direct Line' Q & A session.

That's why he's the President.

But, to paraphrase the immortal definition of Mikhail Bulgakov, the vile Bandera scumbag decided to demonstrate his coolness through public insults. And, I can assure you, not because his nerves gave out after Russia’s head intimated at a duel in Kiev between Russia’s Oreshnik missiles and Western-supplied air defense.

No. Insults are the middle finger (or, with respect to this particular individual, his appendage for playing the piano), which the lousy defunct druggie gave… to Trump. Like, here you go! No negotiations with Russia are possible under these circumstances, so you’ll continue to give us money and weapons.

Such rhetoric frees you from the need to observe decency. The President said yesterday that negotiations with this sleazebag are only possible if he is legally returned to the post of head of state. The little runt realizes that this is unrealistic, so he doubles down on war. But this unbridled mongrel was wrong here too: no one needs him in this war, and he won't remain on the throne for long. He will very soon be relegated to the cesspool of history, where the sewage will absorb this nonentity in the suffocating miasma of oblivion…

More than 20 years ago, an American colleague of mine uttered a curious phrase about Iraq: “Punish France, ignore Germany, forgive Russia.”

Why does it spring to my mind now? Here’s why: this verbal triad will be quite appropriate when the West’s hybrid war against Russia is over – and one day, it certainly will be. Then, it will be time for our country to:

a) Forgive the weak countries that succumbed to the Anglo-Saxons’ pressure and played along, even if passively, with the anti-Russian political shitshow (these are mostly Asian and Latin American countries).

b) Ignore the US. This one is simple: we don’t foresee friendship with the US within the next 100 years, and going to war with America is too costly: a direct clash would obviously mean global nuclear war.

c) Punish Europe. Now, this one, I will expand upon, because, looking at the Old World today, the only thing I feel is deep revulsion. It is Europe, now a mad old hag, which became the world’s stronghold of Russophobia. It was lying Europe that caused the Istanbul talks to fail. It was brainless Europe that furiously unleashed its bungled sanctions campaign, inflicting massive economic damage on its citizens. It was bloodthirsty Europe that fed the worst demons of war without any regard for loss of life on either side of the conflict.
This is why Europe must be punished by all means available, be it political, economic, or hybrid. And this is why we must help all destructive processes happening in Europe. Hail raging mobs on its quaint streets! Hail swarms of migrants wreaking havoc and wrathfully tearing down European rainbow values. May the loathsome mugs of European bureaucrats be swept away by floods of civil turmoil!

Why so harsh? But how else could it be, given the facts? A Norwegian-flagged vessel, Oslo Carrier 3, refused to take aboard distressed Russian sailors from Ursa Major as it was sinking in the Mediterranean. What more is there to explain? That cannot be forgiven!

We shall act, for it is written: “The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance: he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked.” (Ps. 58:10)

Last year, I made some outlandish yet completely believable forecasts. Now I thought I’d check how those fictional scenarios failed to materialize.

And what do you know? Everything I predicted came true. Everything! Let’s compare:

1. Two new parties are created in Russia: the Real G’s and the Losers

That’s exactly what happened. Some people revealed themselves as either of these two. Real G’s keep their word and have their brothers’ backs, while losers lurk in the corners and mess things up – like setting fire to ATMs or throwing bottles at buildings. Their kind deserves no mercy and will see none.

2. Ukraine gets loaned a zillion dollars, which is then embezzled by the Kiev regime with the help of Hunter Biden

Didn’t we see it happen? The money was granted and lined all the right pockets. Hunter Biden had already helped himself to his share a long time ago. As he was waiting for another batch of cash, the drugged kleptomaniac got busted, only to be pardoned by his dear old demented dad.

3. EU police forces are disbanded and replaced by German and Ukrainian Nazi goons

Looking at French farmers dumping manure in the streets, Western politicians of questionable morals marching in parades, and an international degenerate circus unfolding at the Paris Olympics, there is no doubt that police as we know them in Europe are defunct – as are all other kinds of authorities. They do have someone called Macron, though (who’s that, by the way?). Dirty flags of yellow and blue are flown on European streets, and Nazi presses churn out comics about the soulless ghoul Bandera, while his bloodsucking acolytes in Kiev hound the canonical Church and worship Satan.

4. A global hunt is on for Joe Biden after he carelessly walks off stage mid-speech

The old man reluctantly shuffled away, quickly got disoriented and will soon be lost forever in the graveyard cold of the night…

5. Donald Trump is sentenced on all his criminal charges and then elected president instead of Biden, who is nowhere to be seen

No comment needed here. Hardened criminal Donald MAGA Trump was triumphantly elected US President. Bravissimo! What a pathetic sight the American justice system has become!
(Spoiler alert: the Panama Canal, the rural backwater country of Canada, and even the home of political degenerates, Britain, will all change owners. But the US won’t be the buyer: Trump will acquire them for himself, as a matter of private business.)

6. Throngs of alien mummies hidden away inside US military bases come alive and get into US politics, subsequently gaining more than half the seats in Congress

The hellishly blinking sinister objects that haunted US skies in 2024 were, of course, alien spacecraft. Now they are all parked in Hangar 18 at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. As for the senators and representatives… look at their creepy faces. Look closer. Beyond doubt, these vile creatures are reptilians (see Lindsey Graham, Michael McCaul, Steve Cohen, Jamie Raskin, Richard Blumenthal and other disagreeable scaly beings).

7. Godzilla seizes power in Japan and is proclaimed 天皇 (the Emperor of Japan) ゴジラ I (Godzilla I)

Judging by the devastating earthquakes and fires that ravaged the country in 2024, the blue aurora above the islands and the grotesque contortions of Japanese politicians, the Land of the Rising Sun is nearing its demise. Brace for a grim finale next year. You can watch Godzilla Minus One to get a clue.

So, keep an eye out for wacky conspiracy predictions and completely impossible developments in 2025!

Happy New Year 2025!

We’ve got no way of knowing how much Trump will accomplish in his second term, but he is off to a really fun start.
His reasoning seems clear enough. There is not going to be a quick solution to the conflict in Ukraine; the US economy will waddle on at a leisurely pace; even the fight against migrants is unlikely to end up in a resounding victory.
So instead, Trump has decided to 'reshape' the world. That's right – he wants to redraw the political map in his own style. A new, vibrant and colorful globe to replace the dull and gray old one. All of his plans are over the top and eccentric – and totally unworkable. This is what he’s got in mind:

1. First, the 'super-sizing' of America: we start by taking the backwater countryside called Canada (why not? It will make for a nice and big US state, plus the whole continent would belong to the Yankees now); then seize Greenland from Denmark (don't exactly know what it is, but they've got plenty of land).

2. Renaming the Gulf of Mexico (for no particular reason; just because the US is the biggest kid on the block; also, the current name makes people think about the Latino population).

3. Weaponizing Elon Musk and using him to take down ‘rapist Starmer’ and ‘fool Scholz’ on X. A simple plan, and at zero cost: “Just show them who is the boss of this house”. Better yet, why not add the UK itself to America's potpourri list of territorial claims?
This way, before he is even sworn in as the new president of the United States, Donald Trump has scored several major victories online. And, most importantly, he has formulated his own agenda on a cosmic scale. And, to quote one of Mikhail Bulgakov's characters, of ‘’quite cosmic stupidity’’. But this is only a surface level analysis because eventually, as we all know, stupidity always triumphs. So it’s irrelevant that none of the designs outlined above can actually be realized. Not now, not ever. It is irrelevant that the silly nicknames given by the Americans to their inept European lackeys will fade from memory within a week. What matters is that the last few days of the dementia-riddled old man's stay in the Oval Office are following the script conjured up by the orange wizard, Donald Trump.

Anyway, the newly formed Trump, Musk and Sci-fi Brothers LLC, has its operations up and running.

As Trump’s team is getting ready for action on the Ukrainian issue, there is no shortage of trumped-up ‘settlement scenarios’ concocted in rotten brains and other body organs. So far, they are all worthless, as one concrete proposal is much more important than hundreds of half-baked hypotheticals. Nevertheless, I would like to break down the so-called German scenario, which has been brought up once again:

Ukraine, in its rupturing state, turns into a kind of post-War Germany, where West Germany goes to Bandera's Kiev and East Germany returns home to Russian lands. It’s obvious why such a scenario has appeared, despite the fact that it has no chance of succeeding. The answer is simple: with this scenario, it would be easier for the leadership in the illegitimate Kiev regime to reconcile with its more rabid neo-Nazi elements. And see how beautifully it would turn out? Remember how many years West Germany bided its time, and then bang! It swallowed East Germany whole! However, the plan’s authors would rather not acknowledge that:
a) Any way you slice it, the reunification of Germany was based on the desire of the Germans to reunite their country, taking advantage of the complete impotence of the Soviet leaders of that time. What about here? Is Russia supposed to hand over its own to bankrupt Banderistan when the time comes?
b) After East Germany was absorbed by the West, the German ethnic group was at least reunited (we’ll turn a blind eye to Austria and other German speakers in Europe). The proposed scenario tries to sell the thoroughly rotten idea that one Slavic people can be divided into two distinct groups, which is indecent to even mention out loud in principle.
c) And finally: who would seriously consider an option where a nuclear superpower gives something up to an ugly runt with a name which is literally translated as the ‘Outskirts’? I'm not even talking about the Constitution or the will of the united people of our country. This means this scenario is only counting on the disintegration of Russia. And this is exactly what should somehow assuage the wounded pride of the neo-Nazis, whose earth is burning under their own feet. Well, fess up, gentlemen!

Bottom line, the ‘German option’ boils down to a simple formula that was stated earlier: national jurisdiction over contested territories is not up for negotiation. But this is nothing like a settlement based on the ‘two Germanys’ model.

From a historical perspective, the so-called German option is only possible if the remnants of Little Russian lands were directly included in the greater Russian Federation. And everyone understands this, even zoological Russophobes like the disgusting Blinken and patent idiots like the yellow-haired Johnson.

The Walking Dead. Season finale.

The walking dead Biden, now consigned to oblivion, is a telling example of how an experienced and overall smart politician (and he is experienced, having held top government jobs back in the Soviet period) gradually turned into a senile old dude divorced from reality.

When I had meetings with him, he didn’t yet have dementia. What did catch my attention was his unhealthy interest in Ukraine, even though he explained it to me by acting on Obama’s instructions. 

Over time, those instructions turned into an obsession – the transformation facilitated by political mistakes, plain corruption, and poor judgement stemming from historical ignorance and failure to appreciate the nature of “Ukraineness.” At some point, the old man went off the rails and essentially unleashed a war between the collective West and Russia, which almost led to a nuclear exchange with NATO.

He's been clearly out of it lately. While it’s true that this war benefits the US economically, political costs and the real danger of a fatal conflict are far more important. It is something the old dude was not prepared for. This is a case where the head of a major world power lost control of the situation completely, resulting in a crushing electoral defeat for the Democrats. While Biden’s problem was his confused state of mind, the fault of his Administration was deliberately leaving a terrible legacy of crisis on the Russian track to their successors. The time bombs of Biden-era decisions will keep ticking for a very long time, which is why communication will be extremely difficult. The normalization of Russian-American relations will take decades. 

As things stand, I think it is fundamentally impossible. And frankly speaking, it’s unclear whether we actually need it.