MULTILEVEL STUDY
Watch this Official Speaking test sample, where Mauricio from Colombia talks about 'Famous people'. Use the timestamps below: 0:00 - Introduction 0:10 - What kind of people become famous in your country? 1:30 - Are politicians more famous than other types…
What score would you give to Mauricio's performance?
Anonymous Poll
4%
4.0
13%
5.0
26%
6.0
33%
7.0
7%
8.0
17%
9.0
Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most prevalent trends in the contemporary world is the cumulative increase in donations to charity. Many people argue that donating to the community is better for locals. It is completely disagreed, some families cannot afford a fixed amount due to their financial situations. This stance will be proven by carefully analysing the financial situations of the families.
Firstly, unaffordability of finances, some individuals are doing jobs others do not have work. Some unemployed population don’t have money to fulfil household commitments. So, they cannot pay a fixed amount. For example, a casual worker sometimes has work and sometimes doesn’t. In that case, he cannot promise to pay the requested money to the culture. As a result, it is evident that they do not have the finances to pay for the culture.
Secondly, family responsibilities, due to the competitive market crowd have other targets to complete. Sometimes in a family, somebody gets sick and needs school fees. In that situation, the person will give priority to his personal things , not the company. For instance, some expenses are unavoidable such as family emergencies, hospitalised or sudden requirement of cash, the family head gives support to his family first, not the public and if he has the commitment to pay fixed cash to the community, it will be an extra burden on him.
In conclusion, folk want to pay back to the nation for human well-being, but it should not put pressure to pay fixed, On some occasions they do not have cash , due to other responsibilities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most prevalent trends in the contemporary world is the cumulative increase in donations to charity. Many people argue that donating to the community is better for locals. It is completely disagreed, some families cannot afford a fixed amount due to their financial situations. This stance will be proven by carefully analysing the financial situations of the families.
Firstly, unaffordability of finances, some individuals are doing jobs others do not have work. Some unemployed population don’t have money to fulfil household commitments. So, they cannot pay a fixed amount. For example, a casual worker sometimes has work and sometimes doesn’t. In that case, he cannot promise to pay the requested money to the culture. As a result, it is evident that they do not have the finances to pay for the culture.
Secondly, family responsibilities, due to the competitive market crowd have other targets to complete. Sometimes in a family, somebody gets sick and needs school fees. In that situation, the person will give priority to his personal things , not the company. For instance, some expenses are unavoidable such as family emergencies, hospitalised or sudden requirement of cash, the family head gives support to his family first, not the public and if he has the commitment to pay fixed cash to the community, it will be an extra burden on him.
In conclusion, folk want to pay back to the nation for human well-being, but it should not put pressure to pay fixed, On some occasions they do not have cash , due to other responsibilities.
👍2
DEARS Appelyatsiyaga berishni foydasi yo'q, eng ko'p berilayotgan savol
Bekorga pulingizni va vaqtingizni yo'qotasiz. Yaxshisi qayta o'qib topshiring!!!
🔰@multilevel_study🔰
Bekorga pulingizni va vaqtingizni yo'qotasiz. Yaxshisi qayta o'qib topshiring!!!
🔰@multilevel_study🔰
👍1
‘Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes.’
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
#‘some #people #children #freedom #mistakes #adults
It is evident that there are split opinions regarding whether parents should control children to prevent making mistakes, meanwhile, others believe that they should have to be independent. I support the view that there is no justification for limiting own child.
Those who advocate preventing infants from making mistakes may argue that their child is too little to make his decisions. There might be rational reasons to think that way because nowadays advertisements for drugs and alcohol are all over the environment, and it is available if the teenager has money. So that's why adults want to control their youngsters. For instance, the Times recently reported that 6 boys out of 10 were held on juvenile delinquency, it was proved that they all were away from home and not anyone's supervision.
On the other hand, the other group holds the view that parents cannot make teenager's life by restricting them and saying what to do. To put it more simply even though adults may have more real-life experiences, anyway it does not help youth become responsible for their lives. From my perspective of view, adolescents should be able to make their own lives without the help of their parents. This is to say making mistakes is one of the most valuable lessons for children. Being allowed to make mistakes in their early years is a good practice to help children develop the ability to accept their mistakes and learn from them, building up themselves.
In conclusion, I believe that overprotection may be harmful as it weakens children's ability to learn from their mistakes and stifles their growth.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
#‘some #people #children #freedom #mistakes #adults
It is evident that there are split opinions regarding whether parents should control children to prevent making mistakes, meanwhile, others believe that they should have to be independent. I support the view that there is no justification for limiting own child.
Those who advocate preventing infants from making mistakes may argue that their child is too little to make his decisions. There might be rational reasons to think that way because nowadays advertisements for drugs and alcohol are all over the environment, and it is available if the teenager has money. So that's why adults want to control their youngsters. For instance, the Times recently reported that 6 boys out of 10 were held on juvenile delinquency, it was proved that they all were away from home and not anyone's supervision.
On the other hand, the other group holds the view that parents cannot make teenager's life by restricting them and saying what to do. To put it more simply even though adults may have more real-life experiences, anyway it does not help youth become responsible for their lives. From my perspective of view, adolescents should be able to make their own lives without the help of their parents. This is to say making mistakes is one of the most valuable lessons for children. Being allowed to make mistakes in their early years is a good practice to help children develop the ability to accept their mistakes and learn from them, building up themselves.
In conclusion, I believe that overprotection may be harmful as it weakens children's ability to learn from their mistakes and stifles their growth.
❤2👍1