Multilevel testida eng ko'p tushadigan xat turlari:
🔖Complain letter
🔖Apology letter
🔖Complain letter
🔖Apology letter
👍6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#idpIELTS #OfficialExpertTip
IELTS Reading: True, False, Not Given! Which one is it?
If you have found that you're interested in learning more about the 'true, false or not given' question type from the IELTS Reading test, then this video should help to explain what exactly each option means when responding to the given text.
🔰@multilevel_study🔰
IELTS Reading: True, False, Not Given! Which one is it?
If you have found that you're interested in learning more about the 'true, false or not given' question type from the IELTS Reading test, then this video should help to explain what exactly each option means when responding to the given text.
🔰@multilevel_study🔰
👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Watch this Official Speaking test sample, where Mauricio from Colombia talks about 'Famous people'.
Use the timestamps below:
0:00 -
0:10 -
1:30 -
2:08 -
2:51 -
3:15 -
What score would you give to Mauricio's performance?
Use the timestamps below:
0:00 -
Introduction0:10 -
What kind of people become famous in your country?1:30 -
Are politicians more famous than other types of people in your country?2:08 -
Do you think people who are famous today different from people who were famous in the past?2:51 -
What kind of people will become famous in the future?3:15 -
Are there more advantages or disadvantages to being famous?What score would you give to Mauricio's performance?
👍1
MULTILEVEL STUDY
Watch this Official Speaking test sample, where Mauricio from Colombia talks about 'Famous people'. Use the timestamps below: 0:00 - Introduction 0:10 - What kind of people become famous in your country? 1:30 - Are politicians more famous than other types…
What score would you give to Mauricio's performance?
Anonymous Poll
4%
4.0
13%
5.0
26%
6.0
33%
7.0
7%
8.0
17%
9.0
Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most prevalent trends in the contemporary world is the cumulative increase in donations to charity. Many people argue that donating to the community is better for locals. It is completely disagreed, some families cannot afford a fixed amount due to their financial situations. This stance will be proven by carefully analysing the financial situations of the families.
Firstly, unaffordability of finances, some individuals are doing jobs others do not have work. Some unemployed population don’t have money to fulfil household commitments. So, they cannot pay a fixed amount. For example, a casual worker sometimes has work and sometimes doesn’t. In that case, he cannot promise to pay the requested money to the culture. As a result, it is evident that they do not have the finances to pay for the culture.
Secondly, family responsibilities, due to the competitive market crowd have other targets to complete. Sometimes in a family, somebody gets sick and needs school fees. In that situation, the person will give priority to his personal things , not the company. For instance, some expenses are unavoidable such as family emergencies, hospitalised or sudden requirement of cash, the family head gives support to his family first, not the public and if he has the commitment to pay fixed cash to the community, it will be an extra burden on him.
In conclusion, folk want to pay back to the nation for human well-being, but it should not put pressure to pay fixed, On some occasions they do not have cash , due to other responsibilities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most prevalent trends in the contemporary world is the cumulative increase in donations to charity. Many people argue that donating to the community is better for locals. It is completely disagreed, some families cannot afford a fixed amount due to their financial situations. This stance will be proven by carefully analysing the financial situations of the families.
Firstly, unaffordability of finances, some individuals are doing jobs others do not have work. Some unemployed population don’t have money to fulfil household commitments. So, they cannot pay a fixed amount. For example, a casual worker sometimes has work and sometimes doesn’t. In that case, he cannot promise to pay the requested money to the culture. As a result, it is evident that they do not have the finances to pay for the culture.
Secondly, family responsibilities, due to the competitive market crowd have other targets to complete. Sometimes in a family, somebody gets sick and needs school fees. In that situation, the person will give priority to his personal things , not the company. For instance, some expenses are unavoidable such as family emergencies, hospitalised or sudden requirement of cash, the family head gives support to his family first, not the public and if he has the commitment to pay fixed cash to the community, it will be an extra burden on him.
In conclusion, folk want to pay back to the nation for human well-being, but it should not put pressure to pay fixed, On some occasions they do not have cash , due to other responsibilities.
👍2