How long have we waited for this moment— all of them out‼️

Never ever give up— you will never know how close you are to Victory unless you keep going 💪❤️🇺🇸

Keep Going Patriots 🇺🇸❤️💪

@nomaskmandates

JD Vance:

Yes, Ilhan Omar is under investigation for marrying her brother and other things, and if she did anything wrong, she will be prosecuted— but she deserves due process like everyone else.

DO. IT.

https://rumble.com/v7a38fq-jd-vance-ilhan-omar-under-investigation.html

ReTWEET

Senate leader John Thune visibly looks like he’s going to cry when asked how he felt being that President Trump endorsed Ken Paxton over his RINO butt buddy Cornyn..

This guy is no good…

Colorado GOP Candidate for Governor Victor Marx Claims He Was Forced by His Stepfather to Kill a Man at Age 7 in Mississippi— doesn’t remember where it happened, and Sheriff Later Dismissed His Confession as Unprovable

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dkxa9OUA9K8&pp=ygUNQ2FuZGFjZSBvd2Vucw%3D%3D&ra=m

Republican aligned Sarah Warren wins the Georgia State Supreme Court election Per @VoteHub

(This likely preserves the conservative majority until at least 2030)

Breaking: Republican aligned Charlie Bethel wins the Georgia State Supreme Court election

Republicans sweep and win both Supreme Court races in Georgia tonight

“On Tuesday, Cassidy joined GOP Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky in backing the measure. All Democrats voted in favor of the measure except for Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania. Three Republicans were absent.”

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/senate-advances-war-powers-measure-after-gops-cassidy-switches-sides-29a6e7e6?st=bqgKR4

I don’t think this is over. Boebert’s move is way too coincidental with the pending release of Tina Peters.

Speculating that she was desperate to hold onto an ally she had gotten pretty close to.

I have been contacted by someone close to Tina who says they can’t speak until she is safely past that parole board…

https://x.com/truthhammer4eva/status/2056931915660460406?s=46

Oh no! Because Trump refused to endorse the Senators that refused to advance OUR agenda, they are now going to do nothing even harder than they were already doing nothing!

(uh, does that change anything at all??)

I have repeatedly (and lovingly even if a bit hammerishly) tried to tell you people that you will never see the world clearly IF you are obsessed over Israel.

But it's ok, you're gonna be ok. The rest of us will carry America to a new arms-length posture, trim down the foreign aid, while you get therapy or something.

That tiny dot in the middle east doesn't run the world. A bunch of multi-national crime families do (and they aren't all Jewish! shocker, right?), and they would like to thank you for your service and confusion.

IRGC connected islamic terrorist.

Colorado Teacher Allegedly Blocks Student’s Pro-Life Poem Over “Offensive” Content Concerns

A Colorado teacher reportedly refused to allow a 7th-grade student to present a slam poetry assignment with pro-life themes, citing concerns that the content could make other students feel “unsafe.” The student’s family says the poem met all assignment requirements but was ultimately not read aloud because it was deemed “politically charged.” According to the report, the teacher also initially attempted to remove the 13-year-old from class during presentations but later allowed her to remain after pushback. The family says the incident reflects unequal treatment of viewpoints in the classroom.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

Stephen Miller Says Trump Has Brought Cuba Closer Than Ever to Freedom

White House adviser Stephen Miller praised President Donald J. Trump’s leadership, saying America is closer than ever to seeing Cuba become free and transformed from a communist threat into a partner of the United States. Miller warned that Cuba, located just minutes from American shores, has long served as a staging ground for U.S. adversaries and described it as the last remaining outpost of communism and the Cold War, arguing that generations of American presidents have struggled to confront the regime’s presence so close to the United States.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

“You have a rigged vote out there, that’s the problem.” https://x.com/FoxNews/status/2057099544551104628/video/1

@LizHarrington76

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

X LINK