No new vote updates on LA Mayor race since 7pm EST last night and about 8:30pm for the Governor's race.

We could have hand counted the whole county 3 times by now. So glad we have machines to do it quickly.

So many people are talking about it its getting boring.

I hear Karen Bass has offered to "light a fire" under the people counting. (That's a joke).

Nothing has happened to make me believe any of the top 2 results are going to change in these races. If, at this point, Pratt or Hilton were to fall out of the top 2 of their races it would expose election fraud 10x what has come before. They know we are watching. Don't let them forget it.

Check the current California reported results (or any other state which has had a primary) at the Raccoonamatic results site: https://votedatabase.com/2026/currentresults?state=CA (replace the CA with any state abbreviation).

The Raccoonamatic race history site, where you can see each update made during the race in graphical and tabular format, is at https://votedatabase.com/2026.

I built this for you, please at least check it out.

Thank you.

Good God, I am tempted to say that if I see one more Polymarket prediction graph on a political race I will slit my throat, but a couple hundred people would immediately post one.

Think, people, you are letting the same people who lost their house on a bad Superbowl bet do your thinking for you.

It Means. Absolutely. Nothing.

This zip file has an excel file that shows every update in the Governor race (for the top 3 candidates) and the number of votes in that update. FYI.

https://votedatabase.com/cagov642026.zip

This zip file has an excel sheet showing every reported update from the CA Mayor Primary.

https://votedatabase.com/camayor462026.zip

All data in this and the Governor file come from constant monitoring of the AP results as reported by the New York Times data site. You can see other races in other states at votedatabase.com/2026 (individual race analysis) or https://votedatabase.com/2026/CurrentResults?state=CA (replace the state abbreviation for other states).

It’s abundantly clear that the Democrats actively wanted DC, and this nation as a whole, to be a dump.

They went out of their way to destroy this nation’s beauty and culture.

It was not an accident.

They attempted to conquer and destroy us from within.

Never again.

Trump’s beautification efforts for DC are more important than people realize.

Past administrations treated this nation like conquerors treat conquered land.

They intentionally removed the statues, the culture, the history, etc., so they could remove the national identity.

Psychological demoralization of the conquered peoples. That’s what the Democrats were doing to our nation, because they are represented by foreign interests attempting to conquer and overthrow this nation from within.

All of the attacks on everything America, is not an accident. It’s part of the Globalist Left’s broader plot to subvert this nation and eradicate the American People.

NEW — Dan Scavino shares video of a wolf in a pack of sheep at night. The text on the video reads: "STAY IN THE SHADOWS, UNTIL IT’S TIME."

They are printing Ballots out for DEMOCRATS‼️😡

And now the ballot drops favor Raman (who was polling really low the last entire election)… COINCIDENCE⁉️ NOPE‼️

R I G G E D‼️‼️‼️

@nomaskmandates

ONE WEEK AWAY. 🔥🥊

@ufc X WHITE HOUSE.

Buckle up. It’s about to go DOWN.

Observation on Changes in Election Data Reporting
During the 2026 primary season, I observed a notable change in the structure of New York Times / Associated Press election data feeds.

In previous cycles (2020–2024), each JSON update file typically contained complete, simultaneous vote count increments for all candidates in a race. In multiple states this cycle (including California, Georgia, Kentucky, and South Dakota), the AP now frequently delivers partial incremental updates. One JSON file may show significant new votes for only one or two candidates, while a subsequent file (typically 1–30 minutes later) supplies the remaining candidates’ updates.

This caused claims of fraud early in the California counting when one update showed no votes for Spencer Pratt. A minute or so later, the next update contained only votes for Spencer Pratt.

Per my research, this behavior is consistent with the new AP Elections API v3 design, which uses “nextrequest” links to return only data that has changed since the previous request for improved performance. While the data eventually reconciles, these incomplete intermediate states are highly visible to the public and have contributed to widespread confusion and premature claims of irregularities on social media. This change in data presentation methodology, while technically legitimate for real-time processing, materially increases public suspicion and distracts attention from other substantive election integrity issues that warrant scrutiny.

I have reached out to the Election Desk at the Associated Press to see if I can get a statement from them. Remember that this data isn't supposed to be used by us, so they likely did not consider the ramifications of this change on private citizens viewing the data.

Per my 6 years of research, there are many types of election fraud, and the one(s) that get used in any county or state are the ones most likely to work in that county or state.

That being said, make no mistake, this California nonsense is driven primarily by absentee ballot fraud. And it should be waking up everyone still asleep.

Not secret systems in poorly lit buildings in Serbia, not Maduro plotting from prison, not Italian satellites in space, not a high-tech computer in Maryland, no secret algorithm from the Associated Press... absentee ballot fraud, with its conjoined twin, registration fraud (can't really have one without the other).

As a bonus, we are seeing first hand in (slow) real time the ridiculousness of the claim that machines speed up anything in the process.

DO NOT misunderstand me, other elections use different cheating methods. The Venezuelan Smartmatic computers in Los Angeles are, I am sure, adding their own special sauce (muy caliente!). Other mischief could be at play. If anyone remembers, many counties, including Los Angeles, were Mesa Pattern counties in 2020.

But in this instance please don't bury the lede. California absentee ballots and the reckless laws surrounding their counting are the #1 issue here. This debacle will give the President all the reason he needs to publish an executive order to demand one day of voting... in person. If you want to push a narrative, push this one as it happens to be true.

These are my informed, researched opinions, I am entitled to them, and I have earned the right to make them.

Thoughts….

Judicial Watch Tom Fitton broke some news that would be Trump Assassin Thomas Crooks “emailed local law enforcement before the Butler attempt”

The FBI Rapid response team as well as Kash Patel himself debunked this, calling Judicial Watch Fake News— stating the files are interviews of Thomas Crooks’ by College Instructors, not law enforcement, regarding “course work”.

Damn…

FOIA

So I just read through this thing and it appears Judicial Watch dropped the Ball and owes this FBI an apology … bigly

This FD-302 form page is what Judicial Watch used to claim that Thomas Crooks emailed local law enforcement before the assassination attempt.

In it, a college instructor (someone who taught or oversaw Crooks in an academic program) is being interviewed by the FBI.

The instructor mentions they only had two email exchanges with Crooks — and both were about normal course work (syllabus stuff, assignments, etc.).

There is zero mention of any police officer, deputy, sheriff’s office, or law enforcement contact in that interview.

Judicial Watch had also included a separate cover sheet in the same file that listed “interviews of 5 Deputies” from Butler County — but that sheet is just paperwork. It doesn’t contain any emails or quotes from Crooks at all.

Basically, because everything was blacked out with privacy redactions, Judicial Watch (and a lot of people who read the headline) assumed the person emailing Crooks was a deputy. They weren’t. It was just a college instructor talking about class stuff.

Basically, Judicial Watch turned a boring, routine interview with one of Crooks’ college instructors into a dramatic “he emailed the cops!” fake headline.

The FBI in this case is correct..

ReTWEET

There was actually new interesting detail in the FOIA Judicial Watch obtained that previously wasn’t known about Thomas Crooks

On the roof where Crooks was killed, officers found in his right pocket “a gray remote device with numerical push buttons and an antenna” along with his cell phone. Bomb techs (EOD) immediately checked it out and a canine had a “hit” on the building beneath them, so they evacuated the roof.

That specific description of a great remote device with an antenna hadn’t been public before, but the FBI hasn’t said what the device actually was or if it mattered.

Trust. https://twitter.com/espn/status/2064145404988461187#m