Intuitively obvious.

Every single one of these servers needs to be combed through for co-conspirators and enablers.

Even members who didn't interact with him directly promote ideology and behavior that leads to this sort of thing.

RICO these domestic terrorists immediately.

I'll address something since people are asking me about it:

No, I did not know that Christopher Cantwell was a closeted homosexual or that concealing his Grindr activity was among the primary motives for his retarded behavior over the last decade.

If I HAD known, I never would have helped him remain in contact with the outside world through his multiple incarcerations.

I already regretted helping him before I found this out because 1.) the opportunity costs of having done so were exorbitant (home visits from the FBI, harassment and death threats from his detractors, the loss of social media accounts and financial services, hundreds of sacrificed man hours while I was working full time and starting a family), and 2.) he never seems to learn from his poor decisions no matter how much support, sympathy, or charity he gets. To the contrary, he tends to repay people for such acts of kindness by getting himself in more trouble, or even actively maligning them when they caution him against doing so.

I now have better insight as to why that is.

Learning that he had confessed to a decades-long amphetamine habit was bad enough; finding out that he is a literal faggot who was making bad decisions out of fear of being found out is nothing short of infuriating, and also a little embarrassing.

For the record, I didn't talk to the FBI about him because I didn't have any information to give them that wasn't already in the public domain. I've likewise never communicated with, nor do I have any first hand knowledge of, any of the people he claims are stalking him.

I've already recommended to others that they not further enable Chris through handouts. I'd like to reiterate and further emphasize that recommendation.

Don't do it. His behavior is aberrant, degenerate, and not something worthy of anyone's support.

Https://t.me/foccantwell/68

Words are powerful. Some words can cast spells. Some words can break them. Some people in this world are spellcasters and some are spellbreakers. Spellbreakers words are so powerful and righteous they cut through the false reality and straight to the truth. Charlie Kirk was a spellbreaker. His words cut through the false realities of Leftists. Instead of "speaking truth to power" (which is spellcasting), he just spoke the truth, and that was powerful. That's why the Left hates him. His words crumbled the false reality bubbles they live in. They were tired of having their bubble popped. Tired of having their spells broken. So they did the only thing they could do. Kill the messenger. They couldn't defeat the truth with false realities, so they killed the messenger of truth with a bullet. Spellbreakers have appeared all throughout history. The most renowned and loved being Jesus Christ. Charlie based his life around the teachings of Jesus and learned how to break spells with the truth. I don't think we realize what was taken from us. From the nation. From his family. From his friends and colleagues. From history. Spellbreakers usually do great things with their lives before they're killed for speaking the truth. Charlie did great things. He laid a tremendous amount of groundwork for the youth of America to get engaged with politics. We must honor him by defeating the people who created the environment for his assassination to become a reality. We must find the next great spellbreaker and make sure to promote him to a status of power. We need him more than ever if we're going to win against evil. Rest in peace Charlie. Thank you for your service. We love you.

Very poor attempt by Mediate to debunk the Antifa and LGBT engravings on Robinson's bullet casings.

I don't like or trust Bannon but this is the appropriate response.

Robinson's high school friend confirms that he was the only member of his family who was pretty far to the left and that it got worse over time.

Pretending that Charlie Kirk's murderer Tyler Robinson was a Groyper is probably not the best or smartest CYA strategy leftists have ever come up with.

If a Groyper had planned this particular murder, the bullet casings would most likely have NOT been inscribed with the words "Hey Fascist, Catch!"

In place of "Fascist", a Groyper would have written "Jew", "Zionist", or "Shabbos Goy".

If Kirk had actually been a fascist, Nick and his Groypers most likely wouldn't have taken issue with Charlie at all, as they historically have prior to his murder.

LARPing as fascist for the sake of being myopically critical of Jews, even when no Jews are present or involved in the object of their criticism, is their whole shtick.

There's also the tiny inconvenient detail that Nick Fuentes himself is not celebrating Kirk's death, as a significant portion of the left happens to be doing.

It doesn't really seem like most Groypers are, either.

Let's say for the sake of argument, however, that Robinson WAS a Groyper.

Other than swapping fascist ideology for communist ideology, there's not really a lot of breathing room left between the politics of Groypers and the politics of Antifa.

They're both:

- Pro-Palestine
- Anti-Trump
- Anti-Republican
- Anti-market
- Accelerationist
- Racially and ethnically diverse
- LGBT Friendly
- Immersed in "furry culture"
- Third worldist
- Promoted by Drudge

There are maybe a few nuanced differences between the two groups, but no distinction is meaningful enough to put them into entirely separate quadrants of the political compass.

Groypers would of course object to what I'm saying because they like to present and think of themselves as right wing, but my humble opinion is that they are really only promoted as such to artificially limit the scope of the Overton Window to the left side of the political compass.

And so saying it was a Groyper rather than an Antifa is essentially a distinction without a difference -- again, assuming for the sake of argument that Fuentes and the Groypers were the ones celebrating Kirk's death rather than Democrats and Antifa.

Very poor deflection tactic either way.

Imagine celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk for like 48 hours straight, publicly commending the killer on a job well done, asking if the bullet is okay, etc. -- and then turning around to blame it on supporters of the deceased.

Why do they need to blame it on the ideological influence of someone else if they genuinely believe the murder is something to celebrate?

Why not just own it?

Because they are terrified of the consequences, as they should be.

They don't feel guilty; they fear responsibility.

My account is finally unlocked but I'm still left without any explanation whatsoever as to why it was locked in the first place while leftists were allowed to dance on Charlie Kirk's grave.

My statement on it.

https://x.com/SirJaredofHowe/status/1966880741741994313?t=7ihWz-bojdtm1dkcGyeSOQ&s=19

Surprise surprise

Seems like Ziggers have joined in on the attempts to blame Nick Fuentes for the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Are the shielding leftists and their gay race communist ideology from scrutiny?

Makes you think.

Fuentes addresses the murder of Charlie Kirk

Still unclear whether this furry was Robinson's troon boyfriend

Jackson Hinkle has moved on from the "Israel killed Charlie Kirk" phase of his Active Measure to the "Israel is killing Palestinians because of Charlie Kirk" phase.

Correct response.

Leftoids: "Is this... right wing? 🦋"