https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/fda-acknowledges-that-pulmonary-embolism?r=gop0d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Excellent piece here from the indefatigable Steve Kirsch.

Blood clots in the lungs, or pulmonary embolism is always very concerning and is potentially life-threatening. The lungs are the only organ which takes the entire cardiac output. That means that if small blood clots form in the circulation then, provided they make it back from other tissues, they’ll enter the lungs and very likely be caught there.

Continued/
It’s a good design because the pulmonary microvasculature is very good at dissolving small clots. Nevertheless, because of the realities of plumbing, incidents that trigger thromboembolic events are likely to be reflected in pulmonary embolisms.
In light of that, what do you make of the truly astonishing incidence of PE in VAERS associated with c19 vaccination?
If I reminded you that it was known before 2020 that analogous spike proteins in other pathogens were known to promote blood coagulation, what interpretation do you make of the motives of pharmaceutical companies, all four of which chose spike protein as the business end of their “vaccines”?
Mine cannot be spoken in polite company.
Best wishes,
Mike

As an Oncologist I Am Seeing People With Stable Cancer Rapidly Progress After Being Forced to Have a Booster

There follows a letter from Dr. Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St George’s University of London, to Dr. Kamran Abbasi, the Editor in Chief of the BMJ. It was written in support of a colleague’s plea to Dr. Abbasi that the BMJ make valid informed consent for Covid vaccination a priority topic.

Dear Kamran Abbasi,

Covid no longer needs a vaccine programme given the average age of death of Covid in the U.K. is 82 and from all other causes is 81 and falling.

The link with clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is now well accepted, as is the link with myelitis and neuropathy. (We predicted these side effects in our June 2020 QRBD article Sorensen et al. 2020, as the blast analysis revealed 79% homologies to human epitopes, especially PF4 and myelin.)
However, there is now another reason to halt all vaccine programmes. As a practising oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel.

Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters. They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster – one developing leukaemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long Covid since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder.

I am experienced enough to know that these are not the coincidental anecdotes that many suggest, especially as the same pattern is being seen in Germany, Australia and the USA.
The reports of innate immune suppression after mRNA for several weeks would fit, as all these patients to date have melanoma or B cell based cancers, which are very susceptible to immune control – and that is before the reports of suppressor gene suppression by mRNA in laboratory experiments.

This must be aired and debated immediately.

Angus Dalgleish MD FRACP FRCP FRCPath FMedSci
Angus Dalgleish is a Professor of Oncology at St George’s, University of London.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/11/26/as-an-oncologist-i-am-seeing-people-with-stable-cancer-rapidly-progress-after-being-forced-to-have-a-booster/

Breaking 🇬🇧

Top orthopaedic doctor Mr Ahmad Malik has to resort to Twitter to reveal he is being asked by medical bodies to stop speaking of his jab concerns, and to remove his recent video from Twitter where he asked for a cessation of the jab roll out.

Medical censorship is rife.

He is standing his ground and asking for a petition to be signed to support Medical Freedom of Speech on the Covid Vaccines.

https://www.change.org/p/support-medical-freedom-of-speech?utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=custom_url&recruited_by_id=bc2c2a80-ce99-11e9-b3b4-6910e82b11d2

King Charles giving a knighthood to the CEO of Astrazeneca on behalf of the late Queen. This will not age well in the history books.

English schoolkids were ordered masked in school just to avoid "a big spat with the Scots

"Far-reaching policy decisions, especially international travel restrictions and the timing of lockdowns, were distorted by what Sturgeon was doing or what No. 10 feared she might do. Hancock describes her move to mandate mask-wearing in secondary schools in late August 2020 as ‘one of her most egregious attempts at one-upmanship to date’, admitting the UK government was left ‘scrabbling around to formulate a response’. The UK government’s own guidance on face coverings had specifically excluded schools. Faced with an unpleasant choice between wheeling out the chief medical or scientific officer to say that the Scots were wrong or performing a U-turn, Downing Street chose the latter. That, rather than any medical reason, is why millions of schoolchildren were forced to spend months with grubby bits of material stuck to their faces."

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-truth-about-matt-hancock/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5#Tab1

This peer reviewed journal article reports detailed histopathological examination of the hearts of 20 people who’d “died suddenly” after covid19 vaccination.

In 4-5 cases, the evidence was clear that by far the most likely explanation was that they’d died because of the injection.

It’s necessary to read very carefully to pull this out, though. I sense the hand of the peer reviewer and/or the journal editor. In brief, in order to get published at all, it’s necessary to diminish your own findings. Throw cold water on them, as it were. Thus you often see a horrifyingly informative paper like this one including in its discussion a disclaimer like this:
“ Finally, we cannot provide a definitive functional proof or a direct causal link between vaccination and myocarditis“.
You’ll then often see some smart Alec dismissing your having shared the paper in question with the inserted disclaimer, saying “It appears you’ve not understood the science at all, look, even the authors don’t agree with your wild conspiracy theories!”
I can see how very effective this could be.
Continued/

The inserted disclaimer here though is absurd.
Let’s look at what they found.
“In general, a causal link between myocarditis and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is supported by several considerations: (A) a close temporal relation to vaccination; all cases were found dead within one week after vaccination, (B) absence of any other significant pre-existing heart disease, especially ischaemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy, (C) negative testing for potential myocarditis-causing infectious agents, (D) presence of a peculiar CD4 predominant T-cell infiltrate, suggesting an immune mediated mechanism.“
I don’t think any other explanation is faintly likely, in cases meeting these criteria, that they died for any other reason than c19 vaccine damage to their hearts.
Of 20 people who’d “died suddenly” within 20 days of c19 vaccination, at least 4 & arguably 5 in all met these criteria.
That doesn’t mean only 25% of sudden deaths were due to these evidently dangerous injections. It means at least 25% were killed by the vaccines. Remember there are several pathologies associated with these gene-based agents. Pulmonary embolism is raised by a extraordinary extent, I recall 650x background.
Blood clots in the lung can certainly kill a person, and might have happened in any of the “died suddenly” cases. We don’t know because the paper focuses only on myocarditis.
Not only can these injections kill or injure a previously healthy person in several different ways, but some of those ways aren’t to do with “spike proteins” themselves. While spike has been detected in tissues of some people who’ve died after injection (not this paper), what’s most important I think is the setting up of autoimmune attack on your own body by your own immune system. This risk resides inherently with this gene-based technology and is the main reason why it can NEVER be suited to mass immunisation against other potentially important infections diseases. Your body is forced to use its own cells to manufacture non-self proteins. That description alone is sufficient for your immune system to now consider many cells in your body to be infected and this leads to intense auto-attack by your immune system upon this tissues apparently so infected. If you’ve a powerful immune system, it’ll damage if not destroy any tissue into which the “vaccines” have penetrated & been expressed.
The purpose of this message is to add to the scales of public knowledge and public opinion that these gene-based injections are inherently dangerous. There’s top quality evidence of that from highly qualified pathologists.
Makes you even more angry when you recall that there was a rather successful global effort to put autopsies on hold all around the world from early in 2020. I think that strong discouragement is still in force. They’re very good at informing us about how an individual died. The perpetrators didn’t want “Covid19 deaths” examined any more than they wanted “died suddenly” after alleged vaccines examined.
For those who might harbour a remaining reluctance to accept the extent of evil required to have done what I’m saying has happened and continues to happen, this final quote from that myocarditis paper is instructive:
“During the last 20 years of autopsy service at Heidelberg University Hospital we did not observe comparable myocardial inflammatory infiltration. This was validated by histological re-evaluation of age- and sex-matched cohorts from three independent periods, which did not reveal a single case showing a comparable cardiac pathology.“

Please share with any of your network who, for example, have been told that cardiac consultant,Dr Aseem Malhotra doesn’t know what he’s talking about or likewise, Tory MP Andrew Brigden has fallen victim to conspiracy theories. Neither are true.
Best wishes
Mike

The political establishment is strangling Britain
By
Ewen Stewart

"BRITAIN should be booming. Our economy is structurally biased to globally growing industries from financial and professional services to elite education, from media and cultural assets to racing cars, from bio and medical technology to logistics, from niche engineering to tourism. These are all industries growing more rapidly than most. Britain should be a beacon of success. Unfortunately it is not.

In terms of Net Zero the UK approach is the most extreme and prescriptive of any country on earth as far as I can see, even though what the UK does makes the square root of almost zero difference given that Britain accounts for less than 1 per cent of global emissions.

Equally, in terms of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) the UK has taken a more draconian position than Brussels, replacing the simple prosperity motive with myriad complex and often contradictory goals, clearly adding cost and undermining the country’s competitive position.

As Britain’s opportunity has declined, the public sector has grown to become the overwhelmingly important actor in the UK economy. In the early 1990s public spending accounted for 35 per cent of GDP. It peaked in 2020-1 at 52 per cent of GDP, during lockdown. This is the Big State without the Swedish service to match. Lose-lose.

The bottom line is that the UK political establishment, rather than encouraging enterprise and growth which would in turn support the tax base, have captured the nation. They have controlled almost every aspect of it either directly through spending, or indirectly through grossly excessive regulation and control and rather unsurprisingly there are neither any good at it, nor understand how success is created."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-political-establishment-is-strangling-britain/

🇺🇦#Breaking Ukraine fires on center Donetsk again hitting and burning a restaurant near Donbass Arena. We we arrived on site With fire fighters Ukraine fired 2 my rockets. They hit 50-100 meters away from me

⚡️📣Main Street and low income housing hit again by Ukraine rocket attacks on center Donetsk⚡️📣

"The madness of the ‘15-minute city’"

"The green agenda is taking inspiration from the illiberal days of lockdown."

Important read from James Woudhuysen

James is speaking at our Manchester event, 12 Jan

https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/10/25/the-madness-of-the-15-minute-city/

Neil Oliver
GB News

‘Strong Stuff Indeed’

Neil shares his opinions on MP Andrew Bridgen’s brave speech to a virtually empty House of Commons this week.

CHD UK 🇬🇧

Please share 💻

Main Channel
https://t.me/ChildrensHealthDefenseUK

Discussion Channel
https://t.me/ChildrensHealthDefenseUK