"Just as we're moving beyond Covid restrictions there's a push to bring them back.

"There's an industry of people who want to keep this in the news & being an issue"

Prof Carl Heneghan is right

Enough damage done already

We aren't doing this again Sunak

https://rumble.com/v1twn2s-infertility-by-vaccines-a-diabolical-agenda-chd-films.html

If you’ve not seen this short (30minute) film by Children’s Health Defense, I strongly urge that you do so now.

What was uncovered in Kenya, involving WHO & later on, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is truly shocking.

For a number of years, there was an official if unpublicised campaign out of WHO to develop then deploy vaccines designed to induce infertility in African girls and women of childbearing age.

WHO publicly stated the vaccination campaigns were against tetanus. However, careful analytical work undertaken by a number of independent companies and universities confirmed the presence in batches of vaccines destined for use in the field contained not only tetanus toxoid (as expected) but hCG, a essential hormone of pregnancy. It’s also the hormone detected in urine & is the basis of widely-used pregnancy test kits you can buy in any pharmacy.

The government officials claimed there was contamination and that the Catholic Doctors association were scheming in some way.

They failed to anticipate the quality of the analytical work. If the presence of hCG was a contaminant, it would easily be separated from the tetanus toxoid.

Horrifyingly, they found that the hCG was CHEMICALLY JOINED to the tetanus toxoid. This leaves no room for doubt that it was like this at the time of manufacture. It cannot be made like this afterwards, by adding it to finished vaccine vials.

There is absolutely no doubt that the WHO & the BMGF have for many years been surreptitiously developing & deploying sterilising injections masquerading as needed vaccines in girls and women in Africa. There was an additional, separate scandal in rural villages in India, also involved the BMGF.

I share this again in case anyone doubts that powerful people are cold and diabolical enough to inject innocent people with materials designed to harm them.

It’s not a stretch to see that “Covid19 vaccines” are designed to be toxic. There’s no doubt in my mind as a trained toxicologist and experienced new drug designer & former pharmaceutical company R&D executive that this is the central intention of these vaccines.

PLEASE SHARE this note & the film.

Anyone with uncertainties will find this very helpful.

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

“Turbo Cancer”: Dr. Charles Hoffe Says 2/3 of His Patients’ New Cancer Diagnoses are Stage 4

“In my practice now it’s approximately 2/3 of all cancer diagnoses since the Vaxx rollout are Stage 4…So this has been nicknamed ‘Turbo Cancer’”

https://rumble.com/v23c0y8-turbo-cancer-dr.-charles-hoffe-says-23-of-his-patients-new-cancer-diagnoses.html

@ChiefNerd

Happy New Year!

Let's hope it's a bad one for the Babylon system.

Robin

"Bob Marley Babylon System"
https://youtu.be/uZKMVq4mf0A

Now why would the oligarchy meet at the home of a Nobel Prize winning biochemist in their drive to curb "overpopulation"? 🤔🔎

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation (2009)

"They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings".

Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority."

https://t.me/robinmg/21998

Aseem Malhotra on Laurence Fox’s GB News program.
The only thing I’d have added (instead of the details on heart harms which I neither have at my fingertips nor am I expert upon) is that the harms from the injections was inevitable and burned into the design.
Any mRNA product, which are intended to cause your body to manufacture whatever is encoded, WILL induce autoimmune reactions.
What we’re seeing is the inevitable consequences of making & injecting billions of people with materials which cannot but induce autoimmune disorders.
As Aseem said, and he gave a list of adverse effects, the nature of the disorder turns upon where in the body the particular dose lands, plus a number of other variables (such as update & transcription efficiency, stability of the message in the vial and others).
I’d be unequivocal: the perpetrators knew this would happen before a single vial was produced.
The only uncertainty would have been what proportion of people would be noticeably affected.
Best wishes
Mike

I was just sent this. An entry in the Federal Register, which I think may be the official record of how & why certain things happened in congress.

This one is just offensive, explicitly prohibiting safety concerns, REAL or not, about the polio vaccine that had been in use since 1962.
I expect this has been a model ever since. Expect never to gain official acceptance that any vaccine is systematically harmful. There is a compensation system, paid for by the taxpayer, certainly in USA & U.K. (perhaps elsewhere?).
I’m guessing that no legal challenge to the automatic assumption that “vaccines are safe & effective” has ever been mounted. No regulatory body has ever required a manufacturer to run the appropriate studies needed to demonstrate the claim.
That was something I only came to learn since 2020. Vaccine units were separate in the two large companies I worked for, perhaps conveniently to minimise risk of cross fertilisation of questions.
Vaccine clinical trials to this day don’t use placebo in the comparator arm, rather, another vaccine.
That way, a new vaccine needs only to be not worse than something already approved.
Mike

https://t.me/robinmg/25589

In long run email exchanges with friends and acquaintances, I sometimes receive something so immediately useful that I’ll post it here, with the authors approval (they’re not shy, but aren’t looking for acknowledgement).

I start with a preface, which some of you may be bored (or maddened, if you think I’m wrong) to read again: I’m *no longer satisfied that the evidence supports there having been a new respiratory virus causing massive scale illnesses and deaths.

However, the official narrative is that there is, and that an important measure of the threat it presents to the population is the Infection Fatality Ratio. This is the proportion of a representative sample of the whole population which, if they were all infected, would die.

Putting aside *differences for a moment, I put it to you that, in order for what’s happened to even halfway make any sense in public health terms, the threat to the population from this alleged virus would need to be VERY much greater than, say, a seasonal influenza outbreak.

Do you agree? Please note that it’s definitely not true that:

“Covid19 is uniquely nasty, quite aside from whatever it’s killing power is”. Influenza-like illnesses, whatever causes them, can be nasty already.

“Covid19 might not kill so very many people, but it’s the long COVID aspects that will destroy the health of survivors”. There’s absolutely no objective evidence for this. If you’re a adherent, I urge you not to review published evidence. It’ll hurt.

“If allowed to spread, the causative pathogen, SARS-CoV-2, might or will mutate into a much worse infection”. Again, no evidence whatsoever to support this contention. The very opposite is the received wisdom and whether or not it’s true, it fits the historical observations that diseases come & then go. They don’t come & then get worse.

Anyway, that was NOT listed as a factor in March 2020, when much of the world was shoved into “lockdown”, a NEVER before used term or practise. And this happened almost EVERYWHERE at almost the SAME TIME.

It’s my contention that it was the nearly simultaneous imposition of the unprecedented “lockdown” all around the world, accompanied by the use of the weird phrase “Build Back Better” that proves that a malign, supranational agency was in play that spring. There’s no other way that makes sense. At least, I don’t buy any other reasons, like “they panicked”. Give me a break. You don’t all but shut an economy without extremely strong reasons to do so. There were no reasons, let alone strong enough reasons.

As for “Building Back Better”, what was there then to build back? Nothing was broken. And how was it that lots of important people were saying it, all around the world?

With that, here’s the message my friend sent. I encourage you to share this preface & the referenced commentary below with those still inclined to believe lying politicians & their public health advisors.


Encouraging readers to look at this new paper by Science Direct (Jan 1st 2023) paper on infection fatality rates (IFR) that dropped today.

It shows if you are under the age of 60yrs, your chances of fatality are/were 0.034% and if under 70yrs your chances of fatality are/were 0.095%. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X

In early 2020 the World Health Organisation trumpeted a Case Fatality Rate of 3.4% which would understandably create panic. They (The WHO) either lied, are exempt from misinformation, or both.

The WHO (CDC, or NIH) never ran extensive press releases to advise the population that the IFR was more like 0.5% or lower...even though they knew that by May 2020. Stanford Study https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/stanford-study-suggests-coronavirus-might-not-be-as-deadly-as-flu/

The mainstream legacy news media continued to push the fear into our eyeballs. They still do. All the more reason to get your news from Telegram, Substack, or (now) Twitter.

The thing that really disturbs me about this IFR data is the children. We all knew/know they are at such a low risk. This study says 0.0003%.

If you were confident you always had access to a good doctor, naturopath, nutritionist, or healer who can help you prevent, diagnose & treat most illnesses, why would you risk the effects of a vaccine to a disease you may never even have? It doesn't make any sense. Lose the fear.

Modern doctors have been subcontracting their healing work to vaccines, putting their patients at risk of adverse events for imagined worst case scenarios that more often than not never materialize, and if they do can be turned around by treatment protocols.

The fear seems to belong to a pre-modern era when the understanding of disease was very primitive, and the antibiotic effects of penicillin had not yet been discovered. Yet the entire mass vaccination industry depends on this fear to make people make irrational decisions.

Robin

https://youtu.be/8f8wAXDZ9D0

https://unlockthelockdown.com/the-1918-pandemic-was-caused-by-a-vaccine-absolute-bombshell/

This is very interesting. I wasn’t aware that “influenza” in 1918 didn’t mean what it does now, nor that the pathogen involved in the massed deaths was almost certainly a pneumonia causing bacterium. Which is why it killed preferentially young men. No naturally occurring respiratory pathogen has this fatality profile before or since. Neither H1N1 influenza or any other virus was ever definitively identified in post mortal tissue.
There’s a more parsimonious explanation. The cause & the named individual are both shocking, though I am not aware in the latter case of any linkage (nor am I making one).
The current article fits better to Sasha Latypova’s failure to find, in the original Russian language report on infectious diseases in a 1922 trade & travel update, any mention of respiratory illnesses.
Yet another thing you’ve been lied to about all your life?
You decide.
Best wishes
Mike