The Village at the Edge of WORLD WAR THREE

Featuring Robin Monotti

By @freedomtirade

https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/AT-THE-EDGE:f?

https://thephaser.com/2023/02/tucker-carlson-interviews-ed-dowd-complete-unedited-interview/

I recommend this free flowing discussion. Ed Dowd is a highly plausible witness & he’s cautious and measured. His Wall Street experience ironically gives him kudos before he even speaks. Historically, he’s encountered fraud a number of times. He noticed language suggestive of cover up all around. He says that where there is cover up, there’s fraud.

Best wishes
Mike

Ed Dowd: "This Has Been a War"

"The people who have died from COVID, vaccine deaths, and early treatment denial is greater than all the world wars we've experienced as a nation. ... It's much larger than World War II, World War I, Vietnam War, Korean War — this has been a war."

Full Video: https://nation.foxnews.com/watch/ba6326d71f33abbb03afbd5b4ee4605c/

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Other Socials

Neil Oliver on Food rationing.
Stop buying the lies...

Woody Harrelson hosted Saturday Night Live and used his opening monologue to criticize Big Pharma's response to COVID-19:

"The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over."

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1629724451234549761

@KanekoaTheGreat

https://palexander.substack.com/p/devastating-four-4-graphs-in-uk-that

If anyone is struggling to accept that mass scale iatrogenesis (medically induced) killing was responsible for a great number of care home deaths, please read this. In particular, please review midazolam prescriptions v time.
Then antibiotic prescriptions v time.

The results were predictable. The treatments were the obverse of the ideal. That’s not luck. These treatment guidelines came from the top in each healthcare system.

Best wishes
Mike

https://palexander.substack.com/p/devastating-four-4-graphs-in-uk-that

If anyone is struggling to accept that mass scale iatrogenesis (medically induced) killing was responsible for a great number of care home deaths, please read this. In particular, please review midazolam prescriptions v time.
Then antibiotic prescriptions v time.

The results were predictable. The treatments were the obverse of the ideal. That’s not luck. These treatment guidelines came from the top in each healthcare system.

Best wishes
Mike

https://palexander.substack.com/p/devastating-four-4-graphs-in-uk-that

If anyone is struggling to accept that mass scale iatrogenesis (medically induced) killing was responsible for a great number of care home deaths, please read this. In particular, please review midazolam prescriptions v time.
Then antibiotic prescriptions v time.

The results were predictable. The treatments were the obverse of the ideal. That’s not luck. These treatment guidelines came from the top in each healthcare system.

Best wishes
Mike

WHO’s Pandemic Accord Will Give It Control Over U.S. Livestock and Food Supply

"The WHO is already letting us know they’re going to start with poultry—and you’re either going to allow your flocks to be controlled, surveilled, and vaccinated, or they’ll be killed so the viruses they don’t have won’t spread to people (or harm the environment). They are already laying the groundwork for this, and the authority they’ll derive this power from is the pandemic accord.

If you read through the 32-page draft of the accord, you’ll see how this document gives the WHO the authority to take control over U.S. agriculture and our food supply:

By signing onto the accord, a country acknowledges that “most emerging infectious diseases originate in animals, including wildlife and domesticated animals, then spill over to people.” (See p. 6)

From the outset, they’re laying the foundation that “most infectious diseases” begin in animals; thus, their ability to regulate animals is within their purview.
Parties must reaffirm the importance of a “One Health approach” to detect and prevent health threats at the animal and human interface, “in particular zoonotic spill-over and mutations, and to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems.” (See p. 6)

In other words, a member state that signs on to the accord has to agree to drink the Kool-Ade. They don’t want member states dissenting, so everyone needs to “reaffirm” their loyalty to an initiative called the “One Health Approach,” whose scope includes the health of people, animals, AND ecosystems.
Parties must acknowledge “the creation of the Quadripartite” to “better address any One Health-related issue.”

Here, you see who will have the “authority” over food and agriculture. It’s not the United States Department of Agriculture, Congress, your states, landowners, or farmers. It’s not even your elected officials or U.S. citizens.

The draft states explicitly that the “Quadripartite” consists of the WHO—whose top three donors include the U.S., Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the People’s Republic of China—the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health, and the United Nations Environment Programme.

By signing this accord, a country must commit to integrating a “One Health surveillance system [. . .] to identify and assess the risks and emergence of pathogens and variants with pandemic potential, in order to minimize spill-over events, mutations and the risks associated with zoonotic neglected tropical and vector-borne diseases, with a view to preventing small-scale outbreaks in wildlife or domesticated animals from becoming a pandemic (page 24).

The WHO’s website further states:

“Critical areas this panel addresses include food production and distribution, urbanization and infrastructure development, international travel and trade, activities that lead to biodiversity loss and climate change, and those that put increased pressure on the natural resource base — all of which can lead to the emergence of zoonotic diseases.”

https://earlking56.family.blog/2023/02/24/whos-pandemic-accord-will-give-it-control-over-u-s-livestock-and-food-supply/

The use of Midazolam in NHS Guideline NG163 was challenged and warnings were raised by leading expert medical Professors and Doctors but were ignored by the UK Government, so who authorised NG163 using Midazolam to ‘treat’ Covid19?

Managing COVID-19 symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community: summary of NICE guidelines
BMJ 2020; 369 doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1461 
(Published 20 April 2020)

"The combination of opioid, benzodiazepine and/or neuroleptic is used in specialist palliative care settings for symptom control and for ‘palliative sedation’ to reduce agitation at the end of life.[15] It takes great skill and experience to use palliative sedation proportionately so that extreme physical and existential distress are palliated, but death is not primarily accelerated. NG163 states: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.” If COVID-19 infection were uniformly fatal, this would be an acceptable statement. But for people not previously known to be at the end of life, there is potential risk of unintended serious harm, if these medications are used incorrectly and without the benefit of specialist palliative care advice.

In summary, we welcome NICE’s rapid production of practical guidelines to help community practitioners prescribe medication to ease the distress of people with serious COVID-19 infection. However, as current or retired consultants in palliative medicine, we respectfully suggest that some recommendations in NG163 should be revised to prevent inadvertently adding to that suffering."

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1461/rr-1

A reminder about our music channel.

DJs Robin Monotti & Eric Clapton

t.me/lovenotfearmankind

Ontario Judge Rules In Favor of Dad Trying To Prevent Kids From Getting COVID Jab Despite Mother’s Insistence

A Canadian judge, Honorable Richard T. Bennett, has ruled in favor of a father who challenged vaccine effectiveness and safety in a fight to keep his children, aged 4, 5 & 10, from getting jabbed.   

“When it comes to the issue of government messaging and COVID-19 vaccines, it would appear that most courts have not questioned the messaging of governments,” Bennett stated in his ruling. “History has taught us that governments and the media does not always act in a manner that promotes public health.” 

READ MORE
@childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

"But when it comes to the population-level benefits of masking, the verdict is in: Mask mandates were a bust. Those skeptics who were furiously mocked as cranks and occasionally censored as “misinformers” for opposing mandates were right. The mainstream experts and pundits who supported mandates were wrong. In a better world, it would behoove the latter group to acknowledge their error, along with its considerable physical, psychological, pedagogical and political costs.

Don’t count on it..."

https://web.archive.org/web/20230222000304/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/21/opinion/do-mask-mandates-work.html/

"This is why I am asking the Government questions about NG163 and the use of Midazolam and Morphine on elderly patients in care homes and hospitals during the Covid 19 pandemic. We will get to the truth on this matter."
[Andrew Bridgen, twitter]
Listen to the audio attached to the tweet here:
https://m.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=144&width=448&referrer=www.twitter.com&share_id=NS-UNK-UNK-UNK-IOS_GK0T-GK1C&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FAndrewBridgenMP%2Fvideos%2Fimportant-sound-on-3-minute-sound-clipthis-is-why-i-am-asking-the-government-que%2F224351520063220%2F

More on NG163:
t.me/robinmg/26536

Robin Monotti laughs out loudly at the mere mention of "15 Minute Cities"..

Channel @RobinMG

YouTube link:
https://youtu.be/7qr0cmOA_rw

https://globalwalkout.com/step-19/

Of all the things you can do that definitively adds friction to the takeover by the totalitarians, using cash as much as is possible is well up there.

The central bankers know exactly who spent how much, where and on what if you use a card, phone app or bank (especially direct debit).

When they choose the moment to reset the financial system, the one thing they hate is uncertainty.

When cash is used, they may of may not have a record of individual items purchased. Smaller shops may well not use automated ordering that large supermarkets definitely do. They don’t go round doing manual stock taking like they did when I was a supermarket employee (after school and at weekends for years).

The more times cash is used & the greater amount in aggregate cash is used, the larger their blind spot.

It may seem futile, but collectively it’s anything but that, it’s instead like a handful of dust thrown in the perpetrators’ eyes.

When you pay cash, you personally get anonymity.

The greater the number of transactions about which the perpetrators are completely blind, the greater the uncertainty they’ll have as they approach the moment to “throw the switch”. Our goal is to make the timing & certainty as difficult as possible. Because they don’t know what cash is being used for & who’s using it, they cannot accurately predict the impact of curtailing cash usage (which will certainly happen as part of their total control agenda).

Please make the criminals' task as uncertain as possible and get into the groove of paying cash for as many transactions as you can.

If you can eschew the discounts please favour small, independent businesses over chain stores. Disregard the rewards they offer for using cards in supermarkets and petrol.

What’s your freedom worth? Is your data worth so little that you’ll sell it for a 1% discount? Now that you know what they’re doing with that “digital exhaust”?