I confess I hadn’t thought about the distal end of impact on ovaries from the fake, deliberately toxic vaccines. I’d concentrated on my concerns for the potential for impacts on fertility. Turns out that probably was correct.
However, the ovaries are the major regulator & it’s not unreasonable to expect premature ovarian failure ie early menopause to increase.
Here, Jikky provides prescribing evidence that indicates that this, too, is occurring.
Unfortunately it won’t only cause early menopause but all the other consequences such as uterine cancer (if corrected in the way they’re apparently doing at present) or general frailty (if they don’t).
I often say to people that in all likelihood, the majority of people who’ve displayed no side effects are probably going to be ok, the longer the symptom-free, post-jab interval, the better. Badly made injectables vary hugely, so you might have been lucky. Please do not even consider having any more of these mRNA injections.
Having worked using so-called rational drug design for over 30 years and having studied mechanistic toxicology, I’m absolutely certain that these injections were explicitly designed to injure, to maim and to kill.
There’s nobody else than me in the freedom movement sufficiently qualified to make this judgement. There’s no reason for me to reach this conclusion & to tell you about it other than all my training and experience tells me that this is true.
That is furthermore why I’m all but certain if we walk meekly into a world of totalitarian, digital control, the end-game is going to involve requiring you to maintain the validity of your then mandatory digital ID by accepting whatever “vaccines” you’re told are necessary to protect the public. It’ll all be lies.
Actively decline digital ID, no matter the consequences.
This decision, to take & to use digital ID is, in my opinion the last great choice humans are going to get to make.
The undoubted inconvenience is but nought compared with what’ll happen if you weaken & accept it, “just for now”.
We must break the system together. There’s no escape later.
Orientate yourself to the light and do the right thing.
Best wishes and God bless you,
Mike

https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1671836504153554945?s=46&t=WSMLCQNckomGtNidcKiTmw

You may have seen this before, but even if you have, this could refresh your memory as to what has gone on in the recent past, involving anti-fertility “vaccines” in Africa and India.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/infertility-a-diabolical-agenda-chd-wakefield-documentary-who-vaccines-global-population-cola/

There is an accompanying film which is shocking, as much for the information that you learn as the quality of the testimony. In this world of lies, it’s uncommon to find a piece of information that is so coherent that I at least found it rang true, compellingly.

I think disrupting bringing new life into the world is one of the mechanisms whereby the perpetrators intend to drive down the human population.

https://infertilitymovie.org/

Please have a read and also watch the movie.

Dr Stephen Karanja:
“When they’re through with Africa, they’re coming for you.”

Best wishes
Mike

https://www.hartgroup.org/dismissed/
I don’t mind anything they wrote, but boy, they missed an open goal by 180 degrees.
Damning by faint praise and picking a weak example of testimony.
I improved it below.
Cheers,
Mike

To believe in vaccination is anti-science & anti-history:

@RobinMG

https://odysee.com/@RomanBystrianyk:1/Charles-Creighton:a?

It is my considered opinion that Dr Denis Rancourt should be a candidate for a Free People’s Liberty Award.
He has persistently put himself in harms way merely by examining the all causes mortality data in the USA and several other countries, proving beyond reasonable doubt that the entire covid19 pandemic episode was and continues to be an unprecedented PsyOp upon the people’s of the world.
If this is not widely understood as soon as possible, it seems to me very likely that almost all of humanity (& shortly after that, all of humanity) will become subject to a technological totalitarian tyranny the likes of which we have never seen in world history and from which no escape is even plausible.
Unlike religious or military tyrannies, Aldous Huxley (Brave New World) feared that technological tyrannies have no natural ending and instead, he anticipated that, if established, they would indefinitely become ever stronger, because they do not depend in any way for their maintenance upon the loyalty, belief or concerted actions of its supporters.

Tell everybody you know. Share this short report & its links. Warn them in terms you find most compelling.

The survival of free humanity really does depend in large part on YOU.

Why? You’re reading this. Others in your network who are not reading this at present will never be reached by me or anyone else this side of understanding what is happening. The main media will NEVER hint at the truth because their incentives come from agents of the perpetrators.

That’s it. That’s why it falls to you. There’s no other way. If you try, at least you’ll be able to look yourself in the mirror and say you couldn’t have done more.

For my part I will continue to think, research and communicate as best I can.

With no undue immodesty, I have been largely correct in my earliest insights & impressions. Logically, if couldn’t have been otherwise, when pretty much the entire world was stopped in the same few weeks using the same unprecedented and ludicrous grounds. This implied a supranational organization, evidence for which had only shown itself ever more clearly in the 3.5y subsequent.

It was once said to me by a supervisor who didn’t like me very much that if I had one unusually good skill it was this: to discern faint patterns in sparse data before others. I think that’s fair. I’m otherwise unremarkable as a scientist or in any other way.

Thank you & best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=130&name=2023_06_22_there_was_no_pandemic_essay

I was aware that Dr Denis Rancourt has collaborators.
Here are their names. Thanks to them all, too!
Mike

Midazolam WAS the "pandemic":

'Did care homes use powerful sedatives "to speed Covid deaths"? [what a euphemism]. Number of prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during height of the "pandemic"'.

@RobinMG

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8514081/Number-prescriptions-drug-midazolam-doubled-height-pandemic.html

NEW - ECB President Lagarde now claims that "climate change affects inflation, and inflation is the beast that all central bankers — whether they wear a 'green jacket' or not — want to tame and discipline" while wearing a green jacket.

@disclosetv

They've lost the plot of their made up narrative. Will anybody still believe them? Surrealism at its best.

@RobinMG

https://t.me/robinmg/28744

This is an excellent, brief piece by Steve Kirsch.
Steve and I don’t agree about everything in the madness we’re living in, but we’re shoulder to shoulder in exposing what we can see is wrong or misleading in the official narrative.
Steve outlines some powerful things you can do, as well as some things to look out for which perpetrators & their allies often do.
One thing I often see people not realising. If the most comprehensive sample imaginable has been obtained and shows clearly that treatment X is highly likely to be the cause of Y, that cannot easily be dismissed or superseded.
In particular, what is illegitimate to do is to take a smaller & less representative sample, claim or even show that X & Y are unrelated and use that pile of pants data to pretend that they’ve proven that the original claim is wrong. All they’ve done is shown that small, unrepresentative samples cannot be relied upon.
Colour me purple.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/if-they-try-to-gaslight-you-with

From my colleague in Australia, Elizabeth Hart, independent researcher.
Looks like Australian injectors do not have liability protection, which they do in several countries, especially USA.
If correct, gene-based injection victims or their relatives ought to seek redress in court. It could be awkward for the authorities. They can’t protect individuals from their legal failings. Yet they don’t want a precedent to be set.
Best wishes
Mike


Hi Mike - Charles Kovess kindly invited me onto his TNT Mind Medicine program recently to discuss the Covid vax debacle, starts around seven minutes in on this link: https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/elizabeth-hart-on-mind-medicine-with-charles-kovess-24-june-2023/ (Charles' intro to his program also includes reference to other interesting topics...)


We had a broad-ranging discussion on the disastrous Covid vaccination issue, particularly about voluntary informed consent in Australia and vaccination mandates. 

I’ve transcribed the last bit of our discussion, during which Charles highlights ‘valid consent’ - please see transcript excerpt below.

Our discussion referred to my recent notification/complaint to AHPRA, the regulator of medical practitioners, about Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the violation of voluntary informed consent via Covid vaccination mandates, at the behest of then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, see: Notification to AHPRA re medical practitioner Paul Kelly... 16 June 2023.

A catastrophe is looming for the medical profession when people wake up to what's been done to them via vaccination mandates - vaccination without valid/voluntary informed consent... 

Please see transcript excerpt below.

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net 

TNT Radio discussion excerpt:

Charles Kovess: We've got four minutes left, what about the liability of doctors now, what about people that have been harmed by these Covid jabs? And with no informed consent. What's your advice to people who have either lost loved ones, or who have been, had serious adverse events? What's the liability of the doctors?

Elizabeth Hart: Well I mean it's clear, they're supposed to be getting informed consent, we've got that in writing, I've got it in writing from the government. Because my colleague Emma McArthur and I, we asked for clarification from both the Morrison Government, and now the Albanese Government - do they have protection? Because that's what the Morrison Government announced. And they had to confess that, no, they don't have it. There's a vaccine claims scheme, but the individual practitioners do not have liability protection. Now the way the courts are at the moment, which is highly biased and skewed - what we need is, we need this out in the court of public opinion. For people to find out what is going on, about what we've been talking about today, about how informed consent has been trashed. That's what we need, to get this talked about. And I've written to the medical insurers, as well as these doctors' organisations, and I've made it clear to them what's going on. These people - I think it's negligence that they're just ignoring what I'm saying.

Charles Kovess: Elizabeth, I want to take it one step further, ok. And here's an important distinction that I bring to your attention, and to listeners' attention. A patient can only be jabbed if they have given informed, voluntary informed consent. But, a doctor is only allowed to jab someone if they have valid consent, ok. An important distinction in terms. So as a matter of law I'm telling you this. So, a valid consent. So, first the patient has to give informed consent. And the patient might say, "look, I'm here, I know this is risky, but I'm having it" and then he says, or she says, to the doctor, "but I'm here under coercion...I'm here under coercion". Now suddenly, that means that the doctor has not got valid consent.

 Now, that is where I urge every single person who told their doctor or their health professional that they're here under coercion, that they should complain to AHPRA about that injecting person. Because they broke the law applying to them - they're not allowed to just jab someone without valid consent.

Elizabeth Hart: That's the major point - once they knew the person was there under a mandate, they should have stood back and said "I can't do this under a mandate".

Charles Kovess: “I can't do this by law. I cannot do this.”

Elizabeth Hart: But this is important, if we can just fit this in, because it's really important. We're talking about doctors here - it's often not going to be doctors. It's often going to be nurses and pharmacists. And this is a much more subtle thing that we've got to get into, to think about Rogers v Whitaker. This is not a medical expert discussing a medical intervention with a patient. These people aren't 'patients'. Most of the people were not going to be badly affected by Covid. They've been called upon and dictated to by governments and employers and what have you to front up in front of a practitioner. This is complicated now. We've got to say these practitioners have been sort of menaced into giving these interventions themselves. AHPRA has threatened these practitioners not to question anything. This has all got to be teased out for the public. It's really quite complicated. But those practitioners are not qualified to get informed consent, because they're not, nobody is an expert in Covid, and nobody is an expert in Covid injections.

Charles Kovess: Well, well they could arguably say, it's informed, "I know I'm taking the risk, but I have to keep my job". As soon as they say "I have to keep my job", then there's no valid consent from the doctor's perspective. Now, we've got one more minute, what do you, in fact I've got 30 seconds with you, what do you say about these public servants, these bureaucrats, who refuse to answer your questions? Or ministers of government! They're our servants Elizabeth, how dare they not answer your letters!

Elizabeth Hart: They've got to be accountable. And I'm coming for them. I'm going after the individuals who are accountable. That's what we've got to do. Hold them to account. 

Charles Kovess: Absolutely. Everybody, we have to hold them to account. And these, the fraud that's been perpetrated on humanity is so egregious, we all have to decide - do not comply, because these government bodies, these public servants are not acting lawfully.

https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/on-brownstone-coverage-of-global

I’m a huge fan of Katherine Watt, a legal scholar who has disinterred the changes in the law over several decades pertaining to public health emergencies.

As she says: (see screen shot).

Interesting that the law changes are so obviously fraudulent when you look at them as a body of work.

Because from a design perspective, note that I’ve long ago concluded that these injections were also fraudulent and toxic-by-design.

It’s a full on crime scene.

Best wishes
Mike

Do you see it, yet?

🔥 Robert F. Kennedy Jr Calls Out Bill Gates & Peter Hotez at PorcFest 2023 for Their 'Pump-and-Dump' Scheme

"That same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing this [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock, 87%, two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1672949155998707713

https://rumble.com/v2wd3qo--rfk-jr-calls-out-bill-gates-and-peter-hotez-at-porcfest-2023-for-their-pum.html

@ChiefNerd

"Round 4 - Residents vs Colchester Council - Green Deception"

https://youtu.be/k4npxHiOA8s

We are the virus that is causing the climate change. Example: Our talking and breathing about truth and so called conspiracies is heating (their) world up. (Their ) greatest fear is us waking up! They need to stop (US), humanity from waking up. We are the co2 they fear, we are the virus on the earth that has to be exterminated. (They) fear us, as one unified group, unifying against THEM. (They) are correct.

This person, Peter Hotez, is a despicable character. Some people are simply too weak to resist the instructions they receive in relation to vaccine science. Many actually believe what they tell you, for example that c19 injections are necessary, safe and effective in pregnant women, despite there being no complete package of reproductive toxicology results.
In other words, they couldn’t possibly know whether or not these agents are safe in pregnancy at the they made these declaratory statements.
At best, misleading & at worst, lying.
Did none of them question the appropriateness of injecting novel, gene-based agents in pregnancy? For the last 60 years, we’ve applied the precautionary principle in this setting.
Hotez is the worst. Misusing the commonplace trust that many give to doctors, he presumably persuaded many to get the jabs that their correct instincts would otherwise have guided them to pass on. This undoubtedly will have been followed by a number of deaths, at least some of which were entirely avoidable.
When you knowingly take actions that predictably result in deaths, what would you call that? Yes, I agree.
It’s murder.
Hotez is a murderer for money.
A truly revolting person.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/truth613/p/peter-hotez-the-evil-clown-comes