Grant Shapps to ramp up support for Volodymyr Zelensky
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/09/30/grant-shapps-to-send-uk-troops-to-ukraine/

"We’re seeing BAE [the UK defence firm], for example, move into manufacturing in country, for example.
“I’m keen to see other British companies do their bit as well by doing the same thing. So I think there will be a move to get more training and production in the country.”

British defence giant BAE paves way to building artillery in Ukraine

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/31/british-defence-giant-bae-building-artillery-ukraine/

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”

“I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

Thomas Jefferson

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1708336120654606510

Mr Shapps also:
Suggested Britain should reprise Liz Truss’s pledge to increase defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP, as he said he viewed the Government’s current target of 2.5 per cent as a “staging post”;

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/09/30/grant-shapps-to-send-uk-troops-to-ukraine/

"It is remarkable to notice how similar the contemporary EU green policies, promoted especially by the German Greens, are when compared to those promoted by the Nazis: Wind power, animal rights, vegetarianism, even the EU-2000 Natura directive had a predecessor in the Third Reich, namely Das Reichnaturschutzgesetz (26th June 1935), adopted by Adolf Hitler. Furthermore, although European greens are disguised in the mainstream media as liberals, they share the same authoritarian mentality of the Nazis and communists, by demanding strict obedience to everything they stand for: climate change alarmism, nature conservation, open borders policies, LBGTQ+ rights, animal rights, etc. Even the ever-rising anti-Semitism among the woke red green left is not a coincidence."

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1708345375352877167

"It is remarkable to notice how similar the contemporary EU green policies, promoted especially by the German Greens, are when compared to those promoted by the Nazis: Wind power, animal rights, vegetarianism, even the EU-2000 Natura directive had a predecessor in the Third Reich, namely Das Reichnaturschutzgesetz (26th June 1935), adopted by Adolf Hitler. Furthermore, although European greens are disguised in the mainstream media as liberals, they share the same authoritarian mentality of the Nazis and communists, by demanding strict obedience to everything they stand for: climate change alarmism, nature conservation, open borders policies, LBGTQ+ rights, animal rights, etc. Even the ever-rising anti-Semitism among the woke red green left is not a coincidence."

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1708347040508326298

"Eugenics is the dirty little secret of the British left. The names of the first champions read like a roll call of British socialism’s best and brightest: Sidney and Beatrice Webb, George Bernard Shaw, Harold Laski, John Maynard Keynes, Marie Stopes, the New Statesman even, ..the Manchester Guardian..

Thus George Bernard Shaw could write: “The only fundamental and possible socialism is the socialisation of the selective breeding of man”. Later he mused that “the overthrow of the aristocrat has created the necessity for the Superman”. The revered pacifist, disarmer and philosophical titan, Bertrand Russell, dreamed up a wheeze that would have made even Nazi Germany’s eugenicists blush. He suggested the state issue colour-coded “procreation tickets”. Those who dared breed with holders of a different-coloured ticket would face a heavy fine. That way the high-calibre gene pool of the elite would not be muddied by any proletarian or worse, foreign, muck. The New Statesman agreed, explaining in July 1931: “The legitimate claims of eugenics are not inherently incompatible with the outlook of the collectivist movement. On the contrary, they would be expected to find their most intransigent opponents amongst those who cling to the individualistic views of parenthood and family economics.” The bottom line is bleak but clear. Eugenics, the art and science of breeding better men, is not just the historical problem of Germany and now Scandinavia, nor even of the jackbooted right. It took root right here in Britain – pushed and argued by the left. Indeed, contempt for ordinary people and outright racism were two of the defining creeds of British socialism.

The trouble began with Charles Darwin. His breakthrough work, The Origin of Species, did not restrict its impact to the academy and laboratories. Instead it transformed the very way mankind understood itself in the 19th century, its message fast spilling over into the realm of political ideas. Suddenly the religious notion that all life was equally sacred was under attack. Human beings were like any other species – some were more evolved than others. The human race could be divided into different categories and classes. When Karl Marx took on the task of charting human development and defining the class structure, he acknowledged his debt – dedicating an early edition of Das Kapital to none other than Charles Darwin.

From the beginning, socialism regarded itself as the natural ally, even the political version, of science. Just as biologists sought to understand animals and plants, so scientific socialism would master people. According to Adrian Wooldridge, author of Measuring the Mind: Education and Psychology in England 1860-1990, and a recognised authority on early ideas of human merit, progressives believed the only enemies of Darwin were reactionaries, the religious and the superstitious. Science, by contrast, represented progress. Crucially, these early leftists regarded science as an utterly neutral tool; something could not be scientifically right and morally wrong. In this climate, says Wooldridge, “eugenics became the political correctness of its day”. If you were modern, you believed in it.

The result was a Darwinian commitment to improving the quality of the nation’s genetic stock. Many of the reforms admired by today’s leftists were not, in fact, borne of a benign desire to improve the lot of the poor, but rather to make Britons fitter – to guarantee their survival as one of the globe’s foremost races. Thus the Webbs pushed for free milk in schools not because their hearts bled for undernourished kids, but because they were alarmed by Britain’s performance in the Boer war, where troops had taken a good kicking at the hands of the black man: the Webbs believed a daily dose of calcium would improve the bones and teeth of the future working class."

"The contemporary left has a similarly misguided and sentimental view of Marie Stopes’s campaign to bless the women of King’s Cross and the rest of working-class Britain with contraception. The unrosy reality is that Stopes, Mary Stocks and the like were not motivated by a kind of proto-feminism, but rather by the urge to reduce the numbers of the burgeoning lumpenproletariat. This rather awkward fact was exposed earlier this year with the release of a long-suppressed essay by the father of liberal economics, John Maynard Keynes. He endorsed legalised birth control because the working class was too “drunken and ignorant” to be trusted to keep its own numbers down: “To put difficulties in the way of the use of (contraception) checks increases the proportion of the population born from those who from drunkenness or ignorance or extreme lack of prudence are not only incapable of virtue but incapable also of that degree of prudence which is involved in the use of checks.”

Many progressives were drawn to the hope that science could build up the strong parts of the nation, and slowly eliminate the weak. Dozens of them signed up for the Eugenics Society, which in the 1930s rivalled the Fabians as the fashionable salon of London socialism. Labour MP Ellen Wilkinson even wanted the society to form its own committee of Labour sympathisers. HG Wells could not contain his enthusiasm, hailing eugenics as the first step toward the removal “of detrimental types and characteristics” and the “fostering of desirable types” in their place.

For these early thinkers, eugenic socialism posed no contradiction: indeed, it made perfect sense. As Wooldridge points out, “the Webbs supported eugenic planning just as fervently as town planning”. If socialism was about organising and ordering society from the centre, then its most extreme advocates believed in extending that control – all the way into the wombs and testes of society’s weakest members. What they wanted was a neat, clean, planned Utopia: eugenics was just one part of that dream.

One other doctrine was crucial – profound elitism. It strikes the 1990s ear oddly, but these leading lights of British socialism had no patience for equality. The communist and one-time editor of the Daily Worker, JBS Haldane, considered equality a “curious dogma … we are not born equal, far from it”. Many on the left were members of the upper middle-class or lower aristocracy, convinced their higher intellectual capacities had to be preserved from proletarian infection. One popular idea of the time was to encourage artificial insemination – not to help the infertile, but to impregnate working-class women with the sperm of men with high IQs. Beatrice Webb was sure her genetic material was worth preserving, describing herself as “the cleverest member of one of the cleverest families in the cleverest class of the cleverest nation of the world”. She and her fellow travellers envisaged a world run by an elite made up of people like her, able to determine who could reproduce and who could not. Always fond of gazing into the future, HG Wells pictured a caste of all-powerful super-talented Ubermenschen, who would wear Samurai-style dress, and order the affairs of the planet.

In this context, there was only contempt for ordinary people, who were regarded as “sub-men” to be tended and looked after – via the welfare state – like a bovine herd. The Labour cabinet minister Douglas Jay felt no embarrassment in putting the attitude on record in his pamphlet, The Socialist Cause. Famously and loftily he declared, “In the case of nutrition and health, just as in the case of education, the gentleman in Whitehall really does know better what is good for people than the people know themselves”.

"Non-Britons came even lower on the Darwinian pecking order. In those times it was the Jews who were regarded as posing the chief threat of alien dilution of English blood. Bernard Shaw described the Jews as “the real enemy, the invader from the East, the ruffian, the oriental parasite”.

JA Hobson, a radical journalist who made his name covering the Boer war for the Guardian, declared that the Transvaal had fallen prey to “Jew power”.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1708354932074537150

This is a very interesting industry report on the global market for internal combustion engines (ICE or reciprocating) predicting robust growth out into the late-2020s.
The driver is said to be industrialisation of the agricultural sector in countries not yet so developed.
This is the backdrop upon which we’re told “the era of privately owned personal transport is ending”. We can deduce this from the malign legislation across The West and it looks like pretty much only The West is being served up the broken glass sandwich of battery electric vehicles.
These are a net worsening of “carbon output”, because the substantial investments to build and operate the entire national fleet are not counterbalanced by reduced carbon emissions during their lives. Variously estimated of lifetime mileage at 40,000 to 80,000 miles, lighter use means worse total carbon emissions than retaining ICE cars, which at a century old, is very mature technology.
The national grid cannot generate, let alone transmit sufficient electrical power necessary to allow the replacement of ICE vehicles with BEVs.
QED, yip won’t own powered, personal transportation of any kind.
Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia, Africa and so on, populations which currently don’t benefit from ICE motifs are to get them.
Best wishes
Mike

A reciprocating engine, also often known as a piston engine, is typically a heat engine although there are also pneumatic and hydraulic reciprocating engines that use one or more reciprocating pistons to convert pressure into a rotating motion.
Continuously increasing motor vehicle production globally, which has witnessed a year-on-year growth continuously since 2010 is one of the most prominent factors driving the reciprocating engines market growth. Moreover, the fact that most of the automobiles manufactured currently has reciprocating engines installed further aids the market growth. Countries around the world are in a zest to mechanize its farming sector in order to improve the production. This impacts the market growth for reciprocating engines positively. Therefore, these factors are expected to drive the demand for reciprocating engines during the forecast period 2018 – 2026.

https://www.businessonlybusiness.com/index.php/2019/04/08/reciprocating-engine-market-piston-engine-market-market-analysis-report-2019-2024/

"The digital control of personal finance through the CBDC seems pretty clear, that's one of the main tensions. That's not necessarily going to succeed in the first version of it. They will be opportunistic, whatever other avenue...it could be social media regulation...it may be smaller steps from one day to the next. But definitely the digital control grid, in whichever way they can achieve it, is one of the key goals." @RobinMG

🔗 https://geopoliticsandempire.com/2023/09/21/monotti-gladio-pandemic-climate-tension

THIS IS THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL 16 MINUTES YOU WILL EVER HEAR, IMO.
PLEASE WATCH & SHARE AS WIDELY AS YOU CAN.
All the “receipts” are in the links in the description or attached to the longer videos by Katherine Watt.
HAVING WATCHED THIS & conducted their own due diligence and thereafter, maintaining that what’s happening is a natural phenomenon is smoking something or working for the enemy.
Best wishes
Mike

https://rumble.com/v27yuj2-you-are-in-a-military-excercise-to-kill-you-off.html

The Central Banks want to centrally and digitally control ALL our personal cash. This explains why cash machines are being removed throughout, and also the limits on cash amounts that can be withdrawn and paid.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1708377004737700180

Both Italian/Spanish Fascism and German/Austrian Nazism were reactions to Socialism/Communism. However, BOTH right & left wing authoritarianisms shared eugenics and Darwinism as their core beliefs:

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1708385779985031210

Superb, brief description of what each nation & town has done so far, out of the sight of their legitimate electorates.
Whether those who followed the clearly illegitimate orders did so because they’d bought the mendacious nonsense that is crisis level global warming, I cannot say.
I’m hazarding a guess that chunks of central bank derived cash helped catalyse their own entrapment.
It’s our money, in yet to be collected taxes, that was used to bribe weak people to crush your freedoms.
Personally I’d rather starve than comply and probably will.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.tiktok.com/@hansonbarry/video/7281609637823139073