Robin Monotti
67.2K subscribers
15.7K photos
8.7K videos
625 files
30K links
Official Robin Monotti Channel
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Rule: Be polite & respectful.
Download Telegram
It really doesn't matter if you agree with Malone/me or Rancourt on the epidemiological textbook definitions of "virus" & "pandemic". Maneuvering in the dark to attack key scientific leaders of the freedom movement is information warfare against the Freedom Movement as a whole. Focus on Bill Gates, Tedros, the WEF, GAVI, Moderna, Pfizer, DARPA, EcoHealth Alliance, Whitty, Farrar etc. instead.

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘80πŸ’―35πŸ‘9❀8πŸ€”2
FEVER IS AN ANTI-VIRAL 🌑🦠

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘71❀14πŸ”₯12πŸ‘1
TO THE "VIRUS/NO VIRUS/PANDEMIC/NO PANDEMIC" THEORISTS:

It really does NOT matter to anyone but a few isolated scientific nerds and other borderline delusional schizophrenics who have placed all their emotional stakes on nothing existing other than what neatly fits their self constructed hyper-simplistic models of a very complex world and reality, if you agree with Robert Malone/me or Dennis Rancourt on the epidemiological textbook definitions of "virus" & "pandemic".

It DOES matter a lot to Big Pharma, globalists, WEF, war and CBDC pushers to see the people in the Freedom Movement fight each other instead of fighting them.

Manoeuvring in the dark to attack key scientific leaders of the freedom movement, and whether you like it or not Robert Malone is one of the most credentialled and influential scientific figures of the Freedom Movement, is information warfare against the Freedom Movement as a whole. This needs to be both called out and stopped. It is a mass formation in itself. Its origin may not be benign. Have you thought about that?

I really don't care if you agree with me on scientific details. That is why I spend large periods of time not addressing your scientific claims and once in several months I address everything like this: not personally. Because it makes no difference to me what you think of my scientific beliefs, and I could not care less about yours. That stage is long past. We all know we were manipulated by fear-mongering propaganda, fake solutions, and harmful injections. What I care about is that we all fight the right people. The people who did this to us, our family members, our communities, our countries, our world.

Your time and focus on attacking people would be much better spent attacking Bill Gates, Tedros, the WEF, GAVI, Moderna, Pfizer, DARPA, EcoHealth Alliance, Whitty, Farrar etc. instead.

THINK in whose interests your energies are going towards, and whether perhaps people in your group are being manipulated by personal ambition instead of team play. It is these personally ambitious people who tend use technology like podcasts, twitter/X spaces, group tagging in posts, to walk all over everyone else who has different views to them, ganging people up against other people's views and opinions, manipulating their words, and so on. This then creates a show for which other people buy the ticket, and soon enough the freedom movement becomes a spin-off of a Jerry Springer show where people spend all their time in-fighting instead of out-fighting the globalist fraudulent pharma and digital ID, data stealing gene modifying injection pushers and other warmongers.

Don't become part of that. Don't become the monster that you claim to be fightingn by fighting us instead of them. You may be used by a group psychology you are not even aware of, whether or not bad actors are consciously involved or not, they soon will be your allies if you continue like this, and you may not be able to spot them being so caught up in your ego battling everybody else.

Just leave Robert Malone alone, excuse the pun, and leave anybody else who is doing a great service for freedom alone too. Stop attacking our most influential figures because some mate of yours doesnt like them, nobody claimed perfection, or purity.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1748032134340583499

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ”₯41πŸ‘34❀30πŸ‘7🀨4😁3πŸ’―3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DISEASE X: The next terror campaign on the world is already being planned, says Dr. David Martin

"What they're doing right now is they're planning the sequence of events where they can actually cascade another terror campaign, which then triggers not only the need for allegedly another medical countermeasure, but it also, this time, is going to involve the other piece that they failed to achieve with the COVID campaign, which is the eradication of cash-based transactions ..."

Dr. David Martin continued:

"They blundered their way into Covid, and unfortunately (for them), they did not do the full control takeover that they wanted, which is exactly what is on the agenda for Davos this week."

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
πŸ”₯65πŸ‘13😨13❀9πŸ™3❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ‘2πŸ€”2
The objective of "DISEASE-X" is "the eradication of cash-based transactions" - Dr David Martin.

t.me/robinmg/33692

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘37πŸ’―18🀯4❀3πŸ™2πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1
It seems to me that the UK & US are NOT bombing Yemen because of its anti-genocide blockade on Israeli ships, but are doing it for these reasons:
1. To disrupt even further a key supply chain route
2. The disrupted supply chain route will increase prices of goods
3. The increased prices will result in inflation
4. This will impoverish the affected working & middle classes yet make no difference to the oligarchy
5. To escalate war further and distract from the Israeli genocide

"If the Red Sea were to remain closed to shipping for several months, however, and shipping freight costs stayed around twice the level of mid-December, this could add 0.7ppts to annual CPI inflation rates by the end of 2024."
https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/red-sea-shipping-attacks-add-to-inflation-risks/

All part of the US-UK economic total war attack against Europe. And that's the real reason no European country (except the more Northern Netherlands) is joining in the bombing of Yemen.

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘55πŸ”₯8❀6🀬3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"You will own nothing and you will be happy"...

How are they planning to strip you of everything you have? By eroding its value through inflation. Inflation is the intended result of supply chain routes disruption.

Klaus' WEF and supply chain routes don't mix well.

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
🀬61❀4πŸ‘4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Biden makes perfect sense when you understand that the bombing of Yemen was NEVER about stopping the Houthis, it is about raising global inflation levels by increasing the costs of shipping. This is both part of the attack on Europe and the attack on the working and middle classes as a whole.

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘72🀬37πŸ’―18πŸ€”3❀1
US scientists proposed making viruses with features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan

"American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from that city, according to documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know.

Specifically, the scientists sought to insert furin cleavage sites at the S1/S2 junction of the spike protein; to assemble sysetic viruses in six segments; to identify coronaviruses up to 25 percent different from SARS; and to select for receptor binding domains adept at infecting human receptors.

The genome of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, matches the viruses described in the research proposal:

SARS-CoV-2 emerged highly infectious without evolving much in humans. The virus β€œcame out of the box ready to infect.” The receptor binding domain appeared β€œfinely tuned” for the human ACE2 receptor yet had little genetic variation when first spilling over into humans, presenting a difficult β€œparadox” to virologists who sought to prove it emerged naturally. The documents confirm the scientists working with the Wuhan lab sought to select for receptor binding domains that bind well to human ACE2 in their research.
The genome of SARS-CoV-2 falls within the range of a 25 percent genetic difference from SARS.

The documents reveal for the first time that a virologist working with the Wuhan lab planned to engineer new spike proteins – in contrast with the collaboration’s public work to insert whole spike proteins into viral backbones. Language in the proposal indicates this work may have involved unpublished viruses, generating unpublished engineered spike proteins.

This American virologist, University of North Carolina Prof. Ralph Baric, was set to engineer twenty or more β€œchimeric” SARS-related viral spike proteins per year of the proposal, and two to five full-length engineered SARS-related viruses.

Documents previously reported by U.S. Right to Know show that some of the experimentation would secretly occur in Wuhan at a lower biosafety level than specified in the grant, apparently to save costs."

https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
🀬34πŸ‘18❀15πŸ”₯1πŸ€”1
As I always said, SARSCoV2, was one of many gain of function chimeric SARS viruses. The other 20 had/have different spike proteins. This is why they hid isolation sequences to not show there are different ones. Confirmed by the documents above. Gain of function virus deniers have now been proved wrong on all counts by the documents above. Stop listening to them. They are chaos agents who are unable to accept they got it all wrong.

https://t.me/robinmg/33697

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘49😐4❀1
Robin Monotti pinned Β«US scientists proposed making viruses with features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan "American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from that…»
"This American virologist, University of North Carolina Prof. Ralph Baric, was set to engineer twenty or more β€œchimeric” SARS-related viral spike proteins per year of the proposal, and two to five full-length engineered SARS-related viruses.

Documents previously reported by U.S. Right to Know show that some of the experimentation would secretly occur in Wuhan at a lower biosafety level than specified in the grant, apparently to save costs."

Emily Kopp

https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1748228279708840201

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘29🀬27❀5πŸ”₯1
Following from above, the "variants" were in fact these 20-a-year lab created chimeric "SARS" coronaviruses with different spike proteins all modified by Ralph Baric et al in these Chinese low safety labs, or even elsewhere.

This explains why some of the more frail people died, some had severe disease, while some had a mild cold: it was all viruses with different spike proteins which had varying potential to create severe disease, or not.

This also explains why it was possible to get infected by "SARSCoV2" more than once: it was different viruses.

What is likely to have been circulating between 2019 & 2022, was a series of different chimeric viruses: SARSCoV2, SARSCoV3, SARSCoV4 all the way to SARSCoV20, and that was 20 in a single year...

This is all in the documents:
https://t.me/robinmg/33678

Related article
t.me/robinmg/33700

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘23πŸ€”14❀5😒2πŸ”₯1
'German scientists have uncovered startling evidence that a substantial portion of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine deployed in the European Union may in fact have consisted of placebos – and hence were not even subjected to quality-control testing by the German agency which was in principle responsible for approving their release.'

"The scientists, Dr. Gerald Dyker, Professor of Organic Chemistry at the Ruhr University Bochum, and Dr. JΓΆrg Matysik, Professor of Analytical Chemistry at the University of Leipzig, are part of a group of five German-speaking scientists who have been publicly raising questions about the quality and safety of the BioNTech vaccine (as it is known in Germany) for the last year and a half. 
They recently appeared on the Punkt.Preradovic online program of the German journalist Milena Preradovic to discuss batch variability. Their starting point was the recent Danish study showing enormous variation in the adverse events associated with different batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or BNT162b2 per its scientific codename."

https://brownstone.org/articles/scientists-uncover-evidence-eu-pfizer-biontech-batches-included-placebos/

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘46❀11🀯8πŸ”₯3
Covid Deaths in Pregnancy Rose 300 Percent During Delta. Blame The Toxic Combination of Covid Plus Vaccines.

"The campaign to vaccinate pregnant women in the heat of the second Covid wave may have combined to make infections worse in the vaccinated. The phenomenon, often minimized as β€œbreakthrough infection,” is called vaccine-associated enhanced disease or VAED and has been documented in measles, respiratory syncytial virus, and dengue fever.
The 429 women who died from pregnancy-related Covid in 2021 are a tiny fraction of those who birthed 3.6 million babies in 2021. But their role in the nation’s 40 percent increase in maternal deaths deserves official scrutiny. When we looked at deaths of women for whom Covid was the prime killerβ€”the underlying causeβ€”we found an increase of 2,000 percent, from 16 mothers who died in 2020 to 335 in 2021.
Since the rollout of Covid vaccines in late 2020, a concerted effort has been made to minimize vaccine failures of efficacy and safety while overstating vaccine success. We contend that this awful chapter in Covid history, when more than 400 families lost wives and mothers, is instructive. It may also offer insight into vaccine-driven sickness and death in the general population that has been studiously ignored."

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/ask-why-429-moms-died-a305d67b

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
😒36πŸ‘17🀬15❀6πŸ™6πŸ’”1
βš—πŸ¦  LAB LEAK SMOKING GUN: πŸ”«

"Excellent layperson explanation of the relevance of the BsmBI purchase proposed in DEFUSE by
@john_bumblebee, translated from Dutch:

I have to explain this because I don't think the interested layman realizes how incredibly important this find is. In fact, this is finding a gun with the fingerprints of the perpetrator in a murder. In October 2022, @tony_vandongen @VBruttel and @WashburneAlex published a preprint, in which they described a number of striking features of #SARSCoV2 . There were a number of cutting sites in the virus's genome that ensured that the virus could be cut into pieces making it possible to easily exchange them with another gene, as if it were a module. Moreover, these cutting sites were much more regularly distributed across the genome than in comparable viruses such as BANAL52 and RaTG13. This would fit well with a 'reverse genetics' system, which allows one to quickly and easily create an artificial virus. Because you could easily exchange each of those six pieces for another piece from a different virus. Including the part containing the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site. The latter is unique to SARSCoV2 and does not occur in any other sarbecovirus. They had the entire clan of the zoonati thrown at them, with the utmost nonsense, but the conclusions still stood. The entire makeup of SARSCoV2 could very well fit a 'reverse genetics system'. One point of criticism was why the trio focused on only two of those molecular scissors, while there are many more. This was due to the fact that Ralph Baric published an article in 2017 using those scissors, thus writing a manual, as it were, for this reverse genetics system. I wrote about this before in @AndereKrant.
https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuws/steeds-meer-bewijs-sars-cov-2-virus-kwam-uit-lab-2022-11-18
Now we go to DEFUSE, the application to the American defense organization DARPA by
@EcoHealthNYC. It was proposed to incorporate a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses. What now turns out? The DEFUSE application proposes to be able to cut artificial viruses into SIX parts. And which molecular scissors did they order for that? That's right: the two pairs of scissors that the trio of VanDongen, Bruttel and Washburne discussed. In other words, not only did DEFUSE propose building a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses, they also described exactly how they wanted to do this and using which molecular scissors. And exactly that method fits seamlessly with what SARSCoV2 looks like. This is the gun. With the fingerprints. Literally. Apparently something has happened, and Bruttel has shown something that was not yet intended to be published. Emily Kopp's account from the
@USRightToKnow has strangely disappeared. We'll see how this turns out. But this is 'pretty much case closed'."

https://twitter.com/john_bumblebee/status/1747928491478135049

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘37❀11πŸ”₯5😁1πŸ€”1
Lab Leak Working Model by Tony VanDongen

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘18😁1
βœ‚οΈπŸ¦  HOW SARSCoV2 WAS MADE:

"To construct synthetic variants of natural coronaviruses in the lab, researchers often use a method called in vitro genome assembly. This method utilizes special enzymes called restriction enzymes to generate DNA building blocks that then can be β€œstitched” together in the correct order of the viral genome. To make a virus in the lab, researchers usually engineer the viral genome to add and remove stitching sites, called restriction sites. The ways researchers modify these sites can serve as fingerprints of in vitro genome assembly.
We found that SARS-CoV has the restriction site fingerprint that is typical for synthetic viruses. The synthetic fingerprint of SARS-CoV-2 is anomalous in wild coronaviruses, and common in lab-assembled viruses. The type of mutations (synonymous or silent mutations) that differentiate the restriction sites in SARS-CoV-2 are characteristic of engineering, and the concentration of these silent mutations in the restriction sites is extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution. Both the restriction site fingerprint and the pattern of mutations generating them are extremely unlikely in wild coronaviruses and nearly universal in synthetic viruses. Our findings strongly suggest a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2."

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756v1

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ”₯19πŸ‘11❀5😁1
πŸ¦ πŸ¦„"There are >800 commercially available restriction enzymes. Only one--BsmBI--is named in EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal (P<0.002)

There are >800 known sarbecoviruses. Only one--SARS-CoV-2--contains a furin cleavage site, as planned for insertion in EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal (P<0.002)

The probability of both of the above facts being the result of chance is the product of the two probabilities (P < 0.000004).

And there are additional lines of evidence indicating lab origin.

There is no basis for reasonable doubt."

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘30πŸ”₯11🀬4❀2
BALLOUX CONCEDES LAB LEAK. IT'S OVER. 🦠

➑️ Boost RobinMG πŸš€
πŸ‘30πŸ€”1