CHURCH TIMES: βStop the slaughterβ says Christian Aid, as Gaza ceasefire calls gain momentum
"UK POLITICIANS must vote to stop the slaughter and vote for an immediate and permanent ceasefire,β Christian Aid told Parliament on the eve of a crucial debate and vote on the Israel-Hamas conflict on Wednesday.
βWhen they step into the chamber to vote, MPs and ministers must put aside politics and imagine it were their own mother or father, son or daughter, trapped in Gaza facing injury or death,β Christian Aidβs head of UK advocacy and campaigns, Jennifer Larbie, said.
βUK politicians must vote to stop the slaughter and vote for an immediate and permanent ceasefire. In doing so, they will undoubtedly save lives. By failing to do so, they will continue to ensure the UK is complicit in the suffering of the Palestinian people.β
Calls for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war have increased since the House of Bishops issued its statement, calling for an immediate ceasefire, on Tuesday of last week (News, 16 February). The debate and vote on the Commons motion took place at the time of going to press.
On a visit to the Holy Land this week, the general secretary of the World Council of Churches, the Revd Professor Jerry Pillay, met separately with religious and political leaders to press for a ceasefire.
βAs a worldwide fellowship of Churches, we continue to express our compassion and prayers for the ending of the war, the healing of deep wounds, and respect for human lives and rights,β Professor Pillay said.
βWe urge all parties and powers concerned to seek an immediate ceasefire and enter dialogues to establish just peace, safety, and security in both Israel and Palestine. We call on the international community, especially political leaders, to support these endeavours and to act urgently.β
https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2024/23-february/news/world/stop-the-slaughter-says-christian-aid-as-gaza-ceasefire-calls-gain-momentum
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
"UK POLITICIANS must vote to stop the slaughter and vote for an immediate and permanent ceasefire,β Christian Aid told Parliament on the eve of a crucial debate and vote on the Israel-Hamas conflict on Wednesday.
βWhen they step into the chamber to vote, MPs and ministers must put aside politics and imagine it were their own mother or father, son or daughter, trapped in Gaza facing injury or death,β Christian Aidβs head of UK advocacy and campaigns, Jennifer Larbie, said.
βUK politicians must vote to stop the slaughter and vote for an immediate and permanent ceasefire. In doing so, they will undoubtedly save lives. By failing to do so, they will continue to ensure the UK is complicit in the suffering of the Palestinian people.β
Calls for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war have increased since the House of Bishops issued its statement, calling for an immediate ceasefire, on Tuesday of last week (News, 16 February). The debate and vote on the Commons motion took place at the time of going to press.
On a visit to the Holy Land this week, the general secretary of the World Council of Churches, the Revd Professor Jerry Pillay, met separately with religious and political leaders to press for a ceasefire.
βAs a worldwide fellowship of Churches, we continue to express our compassion and prayers for the ending of the war, the healing of deep wounds, and respect for human lives and rights,β Professor Pillay said.
βWe urge all parties and powers concerned to seek an immediate ceasefire and enter dialogues to establish just peace, safety, and security in both Israel and Palestine. We call on the international community, especially political leaders, to support these endeavours and to act urgently.β
https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2024/23-february/news/world/stop-the-slaughter-says-christian-aid-as-gaza-ceasefire-calls-gain-momentum
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
Church Times
βStop the slaughterβ says Christian Aid, as Gaza ceasefire calls gain momentum
βUK POLITICIANS must vote to stop the slaughter and vote for an immediate and permanent ceasefire,β ...
π44π12β€9π€2π₯1
Standing for peace: MPs urged to act for Gaza ceasefire - Christian Aid
https://www.christianaid.org.uk/news/middle-east-crisis-appeal/mps-urged-act-gaza-ceasefire
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
https://www.christianaid.org.uk/news/middle-east-crisis-appeal/mps-urged-act-gaza-ceasefire
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
www.christianaid.org.uk
Standing for peace: MPs urged to act for Gaza ceasefire - Christian Aid
It is imperative that the UK Government takes immediate action to support an immediate and permanent ceasefire.
β€26π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ahead of tomorrow's UK Parliament vote, @MuntherIsaac of Christmas Church Bethlehem calls on UK Christians to push their MPs to call for a #CeasefireNOW.
βοΈ Take action today and write to your MP: caid.org.uk/ALG
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
βοΈ Take action today and write to your MP: caid.org.uk/ALG
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
π55β€3
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak Media
Clair Dobbin, for the Crown Prosecution Service, which is representing the US government, is arguing that Assangeβs activity is distinguishable from that of a journalist. She cites the fact that Mr. Assange helped whistleblower Chelsea Manning in cracking a hash.
However, this was Mr. Assangeβs attempt as a journalist to help Manning conceal her identity when accessing classified material. This was done to protect Manning, a whistleblower, from harm. It is not just good practice but an obligation of journalists to protect their sources.
Dobbin continues to argue that WikiLeaks published the names of informants, which may have put their lives at risk. However, there is no evidence that anyone was harmed. Moreover, one of the judges intervened and said - by the time Mr. Assange published the documents through WikiLeaks, (which were redacted) the unredacted files were already published by several organizations.
However, this was Mr. Assangeβs attempt as a journalist to help Manning conceal her identity when accessing classified material. This was done to protect Manning, a whistleblower, from harm. It is not just good practice but an obligation of journalists to protect their sources.
Dobbin continues to argue that WikiLeaks published the names of informants, which may have put their lives at risk. However, there is no evidence that anyone was harmed. Moreover, one of the judges intervened and said - by the time Mr. Assange published the documents through WikiLeaks, (which were redacted) the unredacted files were already published by several organizations.
π41π―9β€3
ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE, UK
Hearing on the extradition of Julian Assange:
"I have been a journalists for the last 23 years and I never experienced such unfair conditions for the press in any case I have followed in the Western world."
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
Hearing on the extradition of Julian Assange:
"I have been a journalists for the last 23 years and I never experienced such unfair conditions for the press in any case I have followed in the Western world."
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
π45π€¬13π₯2β€1
Doctors warn more young people are having heart attacks
βWe do see probably younger patients with heart attacks. I think younger patients with risk factors are opportunities to probably start preventative therapy,β said Dr. Gupta."
https://www.wkyt.com/2024/02/05/doctors-warn-more-young-people-are-having-heart-attacks/
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
βWe do see probably younger patients with heart attacks. I think younger patients with risk factors are opportunities to probably start preventative therapy,β said Dr. Gupta."
https://www.wkyt.com/2024/02/05/doctors-warn-more-young-people-are-having-heart-attacks/
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
WKYT
Doctors warn more young people are having heart attacks
Doctors warn more young people are having heart attacks
π€¬46π8π4β€1
That's one way of describing the Pfizer "vaccine" of course, which according to reports Navalny had taken 4 doses of.
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
π60π35π₯5β€2
Forwarded from Foreign Agent Intel
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π137π19π±8β€3π€3π€1π1
Pastor says Welby would not meet him if he spoke at Palestine rally with Corbyn
Archbishop said he could not meet Bethlehem Lutheran Munther Isaac if he shared platform with former Labour leader, Isaac says
"The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, cancelled plans to meet the Bethlehem-based Lutheran pastor Munther Isaac, saying he could not meet him if he shared a platform with the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn at a pro-Palestinian rally, the pastor has said.
Isaac, the pastor of the Christmas Evangelical Lutheran church in Bethlehem, who has been highly critical of Israel in Gaza, saw his Christmas sermon go viral when he said if Jesus Christ was born today it would have been under the rubble.
He spoke at a Palestinian Solidarity Campaign rally at the weekend where Corbyn was also a speaker after being invited by the Palestinian ambassador to the UK, Husam Zomlot.
In an interview with the Guardian, Isaac said he was told by the archbishopβs aides that if he shared a platform with Corbyn, no meeting could happen. Isaac said: βItβs shameful. Itβs not my type of Christianity not to be willing to meet another pastor because you donβt want to explain why you met him.
βThis sums up the Church of England. They danced around positions, and ended up saying nothing. They lack the courage to say things.β
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/21/pastor-says-welby-would-not-meet-him-if-he-spoke-at-palestine-rally-with-corbyn
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
Archbishop said he could not meet Bethlehem Lutheran Munther Isaac if he shared platform with former Labour leader, Isaac says
"The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, cancelled plans to meet the Bethlehem-based Lutheran pastor Munther Isaac, saying he could not meet him if he shared a platform with the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn at a pro-Palestinian rally, the pastor has said.
Isaac, the pastor of the Christmas Evangelical Lutheran church in Bethlehem, who has been highly critical of Israel in Gaza, saw his Christmas sermon go viral when he said if Jesus Christ was born today it would have been under the rubble.
He spoke at a Palestinian Solidarity Campaign rally at the weekend where Corbyn was also a speaker after being invited by the Palestinian ambassador to the UK, Husam Zomlot.
In an interview with the Guardian, Isaac said he was told by the archbishopβs aides that if he shared a platform with Corbyn, no meeting could happen. Isaac said: βItβs shameful. Itβs not my type of Christianity not to be willing to meet another pastor because you donβt want to explain why you met him.
βThis sums up the Church of England. They danced around positions, and ended up saying nothing. They lack the courage to say things.β
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/21/pastor-says-welby-would-not-meet-him-if-he-spoke-at-palestine-rally-with-corbyn
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
the Guardian
Pastor says Welby would not meet him if he spoke at Palestine rally with Corbyn
Archbishop said he could not meet Bethlehem Lutheran Munther Isaac if he shared platform with former Labour leader, Isaac says
π€¬40π7β€4
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak Media
Yesterday evening, after the first day of Julian Assange's appeal hearing, I hosted a panel with special guests including former British ambassador Craig Murray, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chirs Hedges, journalists Mohamed Elmaazi, Cathy Vogan, Joe Lauria and Ecuadorian consul Fidel Narvaez to discuss the latest developments in the case.
WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/live/GZMzlnqaVU8?si=_DNnLEF1rUAo5Xr_
WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/live/GZMzlnqaVU8?si=_DNnLEF1rUAo5Xr_
YouTube
Truth Defence: LIVE - On the Julian Assange extradition hearing - PART I
*** WATCH NEW DIRECTOR'S CUT WITH IMPROVED AUDIO: https://youtu.be/X4TFz_FGE78 ***
A panel of journalists, lawyers, diplomats and more discuss the case of Julian Assange on the first day of his his "permission to appeal" hearings filed with the High Courtβ¦
A panel of journalists, lawyers, diplomats and more discuss the case of Julian Assange on the first day of his his "permission to appeal" hearings filed with the High Courtβ¦
π23β€7π€1
Julian Assange Hearing Day 2 Prosecution Rests | Redacted w Natali & Clayton Morris
https://youtube.com/live/Jrx_d8-VBb0?feature=shared
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
https://youtube.com/live/Jrx_d8-VBb0?feature=shared
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
YouTube
BREAKING! Julian Assange Hearing Day 2 Prosecution Rests | Redacted w Natali and Clayton Morris
The prosecution in the Julian Assange case presented their argument that the Wikileaks founder should be extradited to the U.S. where he will die in a supermax prison.
β Sign up for our Free DAILY newsletter, delivered right to your inbox first thing inβ¦
β Sign up for our Free DAILY newsletter, delivered right to your inbox first thing inβ¦
π’32π11β€3
People are saying that they're feeling like they're going crazy. I want to congratulate you on displaying great courage and conviction. And I will tell you why: because in the past few months you have been mostly successfully withstanding a psychological warfare campaign of a massive, massive scale.
(Keep reading, it's going to be fascinating. And if you're not following me here yet, follow).
I am not talking about trolls and bots and the obvious complicity of mass media. I am talking about something entirely different: a well planned, well executed and heavily budgeted campaign by US and Israeli organs of government responsible entirely for fooling great numbers of people into believing all kinds of nonsense (and not believing the simple truth).
This may sound shady (not to the radicals among us: they're aware), but I'll tell you that in Israel "Management of Consciousness" is a formal activity and department of the IDF. And I guarantee you the US is no different.
And throughout this campaign I have been noticing certain tactics used by Israel for "management of consciousness" being employed, massively, by American representatives (the Europeans are usually just useful idiots: no one needs to even lie to them smartly. And I'm talking about the "leaders").
-
I am by no means saying you have not been lied to before as Americans (or as citizens f another country). But I bet many of you feel you have never been lied to this blatantly, this brazenly, to an actually disorienting effect.
So I'm going to very briefly run through 3 such tactics, and then tell you why they're using them (nothing is ever coincidental about how power speaks). I promise you it's going to make a lot of sense. And you're going to recognize them immediately.
Tactic #1: denying what you know is true, and they know you know they know is true (or seriously claiming what they know you know is a lie). Examples: we did not, or are not attacking, so and so hospital, while people are there filming themselves being bombarded. Also: The IDF claims only militants were targeted in X incident, when you're looking at images of dead women and children. This can be called: lying to your face. repeatedly, even though it is obvious for everybody they're doing it, and you're seeing it.
Tactic #2: claiming, or doing, two things that are mutually exclusive. Examples: claiming to care about people and providing the means to kill them. Talking about the importance of aid while not using any kind of public message to warn Israel it cannot withhold it. Talking about values and democracy while defending and justifying a genocide. There are a million examples of this, I'm sure you'll come up with plenty more.
Tactic #3: saying things like "we'll investigate", "we'll look into it", or "we're waiting for confirmation". Two brothers shot by a sniper a month ago? A man waving a white flag shot in front of a camera? 3 Israeli hostages killed by IDF while waving white flags? A command center under a hospital? 100 People killed in one attack? 400? Who remembers? And by the way: we're still looking into it.
-
Now if you'll notice, these 3 tactics have one very prominent element in common. Because these 3 tactics are used not to convince you of one reality or another. They are not trying to tell Israel is either good or bad, or that civilians die unjustifiably or not. This is not the point of all this, and this is why it feels like a break from previous traditions of political deceit.
The real purpose of these tactics is not to convince or dissuade you of anything in particular. They are meant to destabilize you psychologically. This is the disorientation I was referring to earlier. It is not coincidental, it is the desired effect of this strategy.
Yes, it is strategic.
This is what you do when you want a population confused and disarmed from any psychological certainty, which is the basis for all political motivation and action.
(Keep reading, it's going to be fascinating. And if you're not following me here yet, follow).
I am not talking about trolls and bots and the obvious complicity of mass media. I am talking about something entirely different: a well planned, well executed and heavily budgeted campaign by US and Israeli organs of government responsible entirely for fooling great numbers of people into believing all kinds of nonsense (and not believing the simple truth).
This may sound shady (not to the radicals among us: they're aware), but I'll tell you that in Israel "Management of Consciousness" is a formal activity and department of the IDF. And I guarantee you the US is no different.
And throughout this campaign I have been noticing certain tactics used by Israel for "management of consciousness" being employed, massively, by American representatives (the Europeans are usually just useful idiots: no one needs to even lie to them smartly. And I'm talking about the "leaders").
-
I am by no means saying you have not been lied to before as Americans (or as citizens f another country). But I bet many of you feel you have never been lied to this blatantly, this brazenly, to an actually disorienting effect.
So I'm going to very briefly run through 3 such tactics, and then tell you why they're using them (nothing is ever coincidental about how power speaks). I promise you it's going to make a lot of sense. And you're going to recognize them immediately.
Tactic #1: denying what you know is true, and they know you know they know is true (or seriously claiming what they know you know is a lie). Examples: we did not, or are not attacking, so and so hospital, while people are there filming themselves being bombarded. Also: The IDF claims only militants were targeted in X incident, when you're looking at images of dead women and children. This can be called: lying to your face. repeatedly, even though it is obvious for everybody they're doing it, and you're seeing it.
Tactic #2: claiming, or doing, two things that are mutually exclusive. Examples: claiming to care about people and providing the means to kill them. Talking about the importance of aid while not using any kind of public message to warn Israel it cannot withhold it. Talking about values and democracy while defending and justifying a genocide. There are a million examples of this, I'm sure you'll come up with plenty more.
Tactic #3: saying things like "we'll investigate", "we'll look into it", or "we're waiting for confirmation". Two brothers shot by a sniper a month ago? A man waving a white flag shot in front of a camera? 3 Israeli hostages killed by IDF while waving white flags? A command center under a hospital? 100 People killed in one attack? 400? Who remembers? And by the way: we're still looking into it.
-
Now if you'll notice, these 3 tactics have one very prominent element in common. Because these 3 tactics are used not to convince you of one reality or another. They are not trying to tell Israel is either good or bad, or that civilians die unjustifiably or not. This is not the point of all this, and this is why it feels like a break from previous traditions of political deceit.
The real purpose of these tactics is not to convince or dissuade you of anything in particular. They are meant to destabilize you psychologically. This is the disorientation I was referring to earlier. It is not coincidental, it is the desired effect of this strategy.
Yes, it is strategic.
This is what you do when you want a population confused and disarmed from any psychological certainty, which is the basis for all political motivation and action.
π64π―17β€9π₯7π4π’1
But if you don't know what's happening, and not sure what your government does or stands for, what are you going to fight? How will you convince other to join you?
-
They have been doing it to Israelis for decades: always talking from both sides of their mouth at the same time, denying what everybody watching knows is a complete lie and saying they'll investigate when it is clear it there is never any intention behind it.
-
By always maintaining two opposites in your consciousness, they are always giving you false hope, and always denying it, thus slowly breaking you (after 100 instances of this you stop hoping, and after 200 you forget hope ever lived in you). By always providing a grain of simulated recognition of your fears, they're letting you think that maybe you're heard and maybe not everything is a lie, but only to disappoint you a minute later. And again. Again.
My brothers and sisters, it is intentional. They are not sloppy or confused, but very methodical.
-
This is the very. very short and condensed version of what they're trying to do to us psychologically, which is really to disintegrate us not only as a society, but as individuals as well.
The trick to resisting this strategy is to always trust your instincts (because you are good and they work beautifully), and to always remember that they are using duplicity intentionally, strategically, to destabilize you. So your answer is, as always, clarity and resolve.
Alon Mizrahi
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
-
They have been doing it to Israelis for decades: always talking from both sides of their mouth at the same time, denying what everybody watching knows is a complete lie and saying they'll investigate when it is clear it there is never any intention behind it.
-
By always maintaining two opposites in your consciousness, they are always giving you false hope, and always denying it, thus slowly breaking you (after 100 instances of this you stop hoping, and after 200 you forget hope ever lived in you). By always providing a grain of simulated recognition of your fears, they're letting you think that maybe you're heard and maybe not everything is a lie, but only to disappoint you a minute later. And again. Again.
My brothers and sisters, it is intentional. They are not sloppy or confused, but very methodical.
-
This is the very. very short and condensed version of what they're trying to do to us psychologically, which is really to disintegrate us not only as a society, but as individuals as well.
The trick to resisting this strategy is to always trust your instincts (because you are good and they work beautifully), and to always remember that they are using duplicity intentionally, strategically, to destabilize you. So your answer is, as always, clarity and resolve.
Alon Mizrahi
β‘οΈ Boost RobinMG π
β€50π11π₯11π―7π3