Forwarded from Geopolitics Prime
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Iranian news agency Tasnim publishes video of the moment of finding the wreckage of the helicopter, which had Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi on board.
Boost us! | Subscribe to @geopolitics_live
Boost us! | Subscribe to @geopolitics_live
๐ค22๐3
Forwarded from Zeee Media ๐
The bodies of those who died in the Iran helicopter crash have been burnt and cannot be identified.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
๐ค38โค2๐1๐1๐คจ1
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
๐ฎ๐ท The helicopter, on which Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and the Foreign Minister crashed, was an American Bell 212.
According to the Iranian agency Tasnim, the aircraft was manufactured in the USA.
The helicopter could carry up to 14 people and had a cruising speed of 190 km/h.
๐ด @DDGeopolitics
According to the Iranian agency Tasnim, the aircraft was manufactured in the USA.
The helicopter could carry up to 14 people and had a cruising speed of 190 km/h.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ค20โค1๐1๐1
๐ฎ๐ท Is the helicopter on which Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and the Foreign Minister crashed, an American Bell 212, manufactured in the USA?
Do they have a "back door" through which they can be remote controlled?
ROBINMG ๐
Do they have a "back door" through which they can be remote controlled?
ROBINMG ๐
๐ค42๐ฅ6โค4๐1๐ก1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How powerful and moving it was to see the strength and unity of people from all Abrahamic faiths standing side by side all united by Conscience.
All are united by The Conscience which brings us together as human beings. If you lose The Conscience, the human being is gone.
Yusuf / Cat Stevens
Photo: Haroon Malik
ROBINMG ๐
All are united by The Conscience which brings us together as human beings. If you lose The Conscience, the human being is gone.
Yusuf / Cat Stevens
Photo: Haroon Malik
ROBINMG ๐
โค52๐13๐คจ2๐ค1๐1
"Love, sympathy and self-sacrifice certainly play an immense part in the progressive development of our moral feelings. But it is not love and not even sympathy upon which Society is based in mankind. It is the conscience โ be it only at the stage of an instinct โ of human solidarity."
Prince Peter Kropotkin
ROBINMG ๐
Prince Peter Kropotkin
ROBINMG ๐
๐25โค14
LIVE: Julian Assange's Extradition Hearing
https://youtube.com/live/pgLUWl4jjN4?feature=shared
ROBINMG ๐
https://youtube.com/live/pgLUWl4jjN4?feature=shared
ROBINMG ๐
YouTube
LIVE: Julian Assange's Extradition Hearing
Join us as we bring you live coverage from outside the Royal Courts of Justice on the day of Julian Assange's final UK appeal hearing. With interviews and speeches from key figures who have shown their unrelenting support for Julian's freedom.
06:30 BSTโฆ
06:30 BSTโฆ
๐53โค6
๐จ LIVE coverage from the Royal Courts of Justice of today's decisive Julian Assange court hearing on my X channel:
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1792460333753458960
ROBINMG ๐
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1792460333753458960
ROBINMG ๐
X (formerly Twitter)
Robin Monotti (@robinmonotti) on X
LIVE coverage from the Royal Courts of Justice of today's decisive Julian Assange court hearing
https://t.co/QcBA9qLlUO
https://t.co/QcBA9qLlUO
๐20โค3
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
"Just by listening to a gut feeling, weโve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what itโs coming from: climate fearmongering. We know itโs coming from there, but we also know that thereโs more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say:
โI am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is whatโs happening.โ
And weโd all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If youโve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didnโt get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Whoโs profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasnโt always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. Thatโs the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: itโs what needs to be said. Itโs what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence.
So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasnโt from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and weโre seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because thereโs less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that itโs time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about.
One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: itโs there, itโs written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?
Itโs morality.
You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?
1/2
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
"Just by listening to a gut feeling, weโve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what itโs coming from: climate fearmongering. We know itโs coming from there, but we also know that thereโs more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say:
โI am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is whatโs happening.โ
And weโd all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If youโve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didnโt get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Whoโs profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasnโt always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. Thatโs the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: itโs what needs to be said. Itโs what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence.
So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasnโt from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and weโre seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because thereโs less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that itโs time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about.
One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: itโs there, itโs written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?
Itโs morality.
You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?
1/2
๐ฏ28๐8โค3๐คช1
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 2/2
There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, weโve done away with morality and I donโt think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control. Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue thatโs not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: the preservation of favoured races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but itโs all there in a subliminal sense. Itโs all already there. Itโs all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether."
Robin Monotti
Read the full article here:
https://robinmonotti.substack.com/p/how-science-stripped-morality-from
2/2
ROBINMG ๐
There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, weโve done away with morality and I donโt think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control. Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue thatโs not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: the preservation of favoured races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but itโs all there in a subliminal sense. Itโs all already there. Itโs all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether."
Robin Monotti
Read the full article here:
https://robinmonotti.substack.com/p/how-science-stripped-morality-from
2/2
ROBINMG ๐
Substack
How Science Stripped Morality From Truth
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
๐32โค11๐ฏ7๐คช1
๐จBREAKING:
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has announced applications for arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant with regards to the situation in Palestine.
ROBINMG ๐
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has announced applications for arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant with regards to the situation in Palestine.
ROBINMG ๐
๐96๐27โค13๐ฅ2๐ซก2๐จ1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ BREAKING: ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan QC announces applications for arrest warrants in relation to Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant
Statement of International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim A.A. Khan KC: Applications for arrest warrants in the situation in the State of Palestine
Benjamin NETANYAHU, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yoav GALLANT, the Minister of Defence of Israel and Hamas leaders
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-aa-khan-kc-applications-arrest-warrants-situation-state
ROBINMG ๐
Statement of International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim A.A. Khan KC: Applications for arrest warrants in the situation in the State of Palestine
Benjamin NETANYAHU, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yoav GALLANT, the Minister of Defence of Israel and Hamas leaders
On the basis of evidence collected and examined by my Office, I have reasonable grounds to believe that Benjamin NETANYAHU, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yoav GALLANT, the Minister of Defence of Israel, bear criminal responsibility for the following war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on the territory of the State of Palestine (in the Gaza strip) from at least 8 October 2023:
Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(b)(xxv) of the Statute;
Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health contrary to article 8(2)(a)(iii), or cruel treatment as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
Wilful killing contrary to article 8(2)(a)(i), or Murder as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
Intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population as a war crime contrary to articles 8(2)(b)(i), or 8(2)(e)(i);
Extermination and/or murder contrary to articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(a), including in the context of deaths caused by starvation, as a crime against humanity;
Persecution as a crime against humanity contrary to article 7(1)(h);
Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity contrary to article 7(1)(k).
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-aa-khan-kc-applications-arrest-warrants-situation-state
ROBINMG ๐
๐79๐22๐ฅ8๐ก3โค2๐1
Robin Monotti
๐จ BREAKING: ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan QC announces applications for arrest warrants in relation to Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant Statement of International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim A.A. Khan KC: Applications for arrest warrants in the situationโฆ
Never forget the names and surnames of those in the Medical Freedom Movement who either stayed silent (therefore were tacitly complicit) or even openly supported the most videoed genocide in the history of humanity!
ROBINMG ๐
ROBINMG ๐
๐ฅ69๐15โค5๐ค1
Forwarded from Orwellian Dystopia
Julian Assange wins right to appeal extradition case, says London High Court.
โค159๐56๐16๐4
๐จ BREAKING NEWS: Julian Assange has won the right to a full appeal
WATCH LIVE:
https://youtube.com/live/pgLUWl4jjN4?feature=shared
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1792527683705884874
ROBINMG ๐
WATCH LIVE:
https://youtube.com/live/pgLUWl4jjN4?feature=shared
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1792527683705884874
ROBINMG ๐
YouTube
LIVE: Julian Assange's Extradition Hearing
Join us as we bring you live coverage from outside the Royal Courts of Justice on the day of Julian Assange's final UK appeal hearing. With interviews and speeches from key figures who have shown their unrelenting support for Julian's freedom.
06:30 BSTโฆ
06:30 BSTโฆ
โค112๐44๐ฅ7๐2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐คฌ42๐คฏ8๐1