"The aim is to give U.S. strategists the ability to turn on the power, electricity, gas, fertilizer, lighting and heating of countries that resist U.S. policies to take over their economy by controlling a choke point on its access to energy.

And beyond the oil itself, the export revenues from oil production must be lent to the United States in the form of government and corporate bonds or stocks, but not direct ownership in any other firm. These were the terms of the 1974 OPEC settlement with U.S. officials.

U.S. planners realize that this will cause a world depression as Iran will retaliate against U.S. bases in the Arab sheikdoms, and perhaps wipe out their ruling families. Whatever destruction it wreaks on OPEC is a catalyst for the U.S. power grab, because it will come in and take these oil resources for themselves as well. The U.S. will control all the world’s major oil export resources outside of Russia.

It can then claim to have rescued the world economy from Iran’s destruction – while using its control of oil as an economic weapon to wield against countries that resist acquiescing in U.S. foreign policy, especially its demands for economic and trade and monetary sanctions against Russia and China.

European and Asian countries are saying, “This is not our war.” But it IS their war. The US intends to isolate all oil facilities throughout the world that it cannot control.

The rest of the world seems to have cognitive dissonance regarding the enormous scale – and outright evil – of this long-term U.S. plan to use oil as a lever to control the entire world economy through its dependence on oil and gas (and helium). Other countries can’t imagine such boldness."

Michael Hudson

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-attack-iran-real-keeps/5919952

📱 ROBINMG

PROFESSOR MARANDI:

"If this war goes on for much longer, then there is a possibility that there will be nothing left in the Persian Gulf to produce oil or LNG."

THIS IS EXACTLY THE PLAN

US wants a monopoly on LNG

📱 ROBINMG

OPERATION EPIC FAILURE

Trump will not only lose the Iran War, the Middle East, & the American Empire. He will do so in a catastrophic way, over a prolonged period of time. It will be a total and absolute defeat. It is meant to bring us all down with it you see...

📱 ROBINMG

Arguments currently being debated by digital rights groups and legal experts in the UK: The "stealth" nature of the update—burying a major policy shift in a point-update (iOS 26.4) without clear patch notes—has led many to argue that Apple violated consumer protection laws regarding transparency.
To channel this frustration into formal action, there are three main legal and regulatory avenues being discussed:

   1. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO): Since this involves your biometric data (scanning your face/ID) and sensitive personal info, you can file a complaint alleging that the "force-fed" nature of the update violates GDPR principles of "freely given" consent.
   2. The Financial Ombudsman (for Credit Card requirements): Since Apple is essentially mandating a financial product (a credit card) to unlock basic hardware features, some argue this creates an unfair barrier for those who choose to live debt-free or cannot get credit.
   3. Judicial Review against Ofcom: The government regulator, Ofcom, is the one enforcing the Online Safety Act. Legal challenges could be brought against them for allowing a system that discriminates against passport-only holders, effectively creating a "two-tier" citizenship for digital access.

The lack of warning is particularly egregious because it didn't allow users to opt-out of the update to preserve their device's functionality. This "take it or leave it" approach is what many find legally "predatory."

📱 ROBINMG

IPHONE AGE VERIFICATION

"To challenge these restrictions and the lack of transparency, you can use the following official channels and civil rights organizations:
1. Data Privacy Complaint (ICO) [1]
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) handles complaints regarding how personal data is handled and whether companies are following UK data protection laws. [2]

Action: File a complaint if you believe the mandatory ID/credit card scan is disproportionate or lacks clear prior consent.
Portal: Make a Data Protection Complaint
Helpline: 0303 123 1113 (ICO Contact Page)
Advice: The ICO typically requires you to complain to the organization (Apple) first and give them 30 days to respond before they will intervene. [3, 4, 5]
2. Digital Rights Advocacy (Big Brother Watch)
Big Brother Watch has been the most vocal critic of this specific Apple update, describing the move as "draconian" and a "chokehold" on digital freedom. [6]

Focus: They specialize in legal challenges against mass surveillance and mandatory digital ID systems.
Website: Big Brother Watch
Action: You can contact them to share your experience, which helps them build evidence for potential legal challenges or parliamentary lobbying. [7]
3. Privacy & Policy Challenge (Open Rights Group) [8]
The Open Rights Group (ORG) is currently campaigning against invasive age verification technologies that threaten user anonymity and security. [8, 9, 10]

Focus: They argue that these systems create new security risks and undermine the right to privacy.
Website: Open Rights Group
Current Campaign: They are actively monitoring the rollout of the Online Safety Act and its impact on UK users. [8, 10]
4. Regulatory Accountability (Ofcom)
While Ofcom has publicly supported Apple's move, they are the government body responsible for these rules. [11, 12]

Action: Report your concerns about the accessibility of the verification (e.g., the exclusion of passports) and the lack of warning.
Portal: Ofcom Complaint Form
Phone: 0300 123 3333 (Ofcom Contact Details) [13]
Note on Strategy: When filing these complaints, emphasize the lack of warning in the update notes and the exclusion of valid government ID (passports), as these are the strongest grounds for arguing that the implementation is "unreasonable" under existing consumer and equality laws."

[1] https://ico.org.uk
[2] https://ico.org.uk
[3] https://ico.org.uk
[4] https://ico.org.uk
[5] https://ico.org.uk
[6] https://www.bbc.com
[7] https://ico.org.uk
[8] https://www.openrightsgroup.org
[9] https://www.openrightsgroup.org
[10] https://www.openrightsgroup.org
[11] https://www.computing.co.uk
[12] https://www.telecoms.com
[13] https://www.facebook.com

📱 ROBINMG

Some things will never change...

📱 ROBINMG

"In revenge for all Christ's suffering."

Iran dedicated a missile to Jesus Christ the same day Israel closed Christian holy sites in the Holy Land on Palm Sunday

📱 ROBINMG

🥲 🇺🇸 CIA knew of Gulf dependence on water - and pushed them into Iran war anyway

As the Iran war enters yet another phase, this time with strikes targeting critical infrastructure, it is worth recalling that the US has long been aware of its Gulf allies' acute dependence on water desalination plants - a fact reflected in a classified CIA assessment from 1983.

Report’s key findings:

♦️ The UAE, Qatar and Kuwait derived around 80% of their municipal water from desalination

♦️ Bahrain obtained around 50% of its water through desalination, a figure expected to rise due to the depletion of natural sources — meaning its dependence is now even greater

♦️ Saudi Arabia’s crucial Eastern Province got over 50% of its potable water via desalination

♦️ Roughly 90% of the desalinated water came from 56 plants concentrated in just 29 locations

"Although the consequences will vary with the extent of each country’s dependence on desalination and the damage inflicted during an attack, the absence of well-developed security and emergency planning increases the likelihood of a disastrous outcome," the CIA file reads.

Meanwhile, Iran, with a small coastal population and huge natural sources, has little need for desalination, the CIA highlighted.

With friends like these...🤦‍♂️

👍 US-Israel-Iran war | @geopolitics_prime👍 US-Israel-Iran war | @geopolitics_prime