Forwarded from The Wellness Company
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
COVID-19 Community Corps: "The Largest Government Bribe in History"
"The US Health and Human Services and the White House had a program called the COVID Community Corps. And that program infused over $13 billion to 276 agencies," reported Dr. McCullough.
"And that explains why Obstetricians and Gynecologists went along with vaccination in pregnant women. They were bribed by the US government."
Dr. Peter A. McCullough is a world-renowned MD — fighting against censorship and reprisal. He has teamed up with The Wellness Company, where he now serves as Chief Scientific Officer.
https://twc.health/
Follow us @TheWellnessCompany
"The US Health and Human Services and the White House had a program called the COVID Community Corps. And that program infused over $13 billion to 276 agencies," reported Dr. McCullough.
"And that explains why Obstetricians and Gynecologists went along with vaccination in pregnant women. They were bribed by the US government."
Dr. Peter A. McCullough is a world-renowned MD — fighting against censorship and reprisal. He has teamed up with The Wellness Company, where he now serves as Chief Scientific Officer.
https://twc.health/
Follow us @TheWellnessCompany
❤1
Forwarded from Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Of those found dead at home within 20 days of taking it, 71% of autopsies found fatal conditions caused by them including myocarditis, blood clots, and neurological injury. #courageousdiscourse https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/336961-2022-12-13-german-study-of-autopsies-of-people-found-dead-at-home.htm
Freedomsphoenix
German Study of Autopsies of People Found Dead at Home following COVID Vaccination
German pathologists performed a study of autopsies on 35 people who died within 20 days of injection of a COVID 'vaccine' and found that 25 of
mRNA Behind the Reoccurrence of COVID-19 Symptoms in Fully Vaccinated Individuals?
Unintended consequences potentially explain vaccine failure from the outset
"The authors point out that SARS-CoV-2 utilizes more than just the ACE2 receptor to gain entry into the fused cells and by overlooking this possibility, vaccine developers have made a blunder. This is further complicated by the choice of lipid nanoparticles and polyethylene glycol which facilitate entry into organs were syncytia as well as Spike protein will incite inflammation and immune system regulation.
"Sfera also considers pregnancy: “Several studies demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 can activate HERV-W, an ancestral gene that encodes for the physiological placental fusogen syncytin-1 responsible for the merger of trophoblasts during the early pregnancy. This suggests that the reproductive post-vaccine events may be triggered by the furin cleavage site pathology.” Such processes could occur in the gravid uterus and compound the bleeding and clotting risks of ill-advised vaccination is this special population.
In summary Sfera et al point out the following blind spots of well-funded DARPA consultants, BARDA funded academic researchers, and later by Pfizer and Moderna in mRNA vaccine development:
1) pathologic syncytia formation,
2) use of lipid nanoparticles with PEG,
3) failure to consider SARS-CoV-2 could use alternative points of cell entry other than ACE2 (metalloprotease pathway, antibody dependent enhancement, cell penetrating peptides, viroporins).
With billions of people rushed into indiscriminate mRNA vaccination, virologists and immunologists will be picking up the pieces of a failed vaccine campaign that has left so many at risk for more SARS-CoV-2 infections and progressive complications over the months and years to come."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/mrna-behind-the-reoccurrence-of-covid-19-symptoms-in-fully-vaccinated-individuals_4921326.html
Unintended consequences potentially explain vaccine failure from the outset
"The authors point out that SARS-CoV-2 utilizes more than just the ACE2 receptor to gain entry into the fused cells and by overlooking this possibility, vaccine developers have made a blunder. This is further complicated by the choice of lipid nanoparticles and polyethylene glycol which facilitate entry into organs were syncytia as well as Spike protein will incite inflammation and immune system regulation.
"Sfera also considers pregnancy: “Several studies demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 can activate HERV-W, an ancestral gene that encodes for the physiological placental fusogen syncytin-1 responsible for the merger of trophoblasts during the early pregnancy. This suggests that the reproductive post-vaccine events may be triggered by the furin cleavage site pathology.” Such processes could occur in the gravid uterus and compound the bleeding and clotting risks of ill-advised vaccination is this special population.
In summary Sfera et al point out the following blind spots of well-funded DARPA consultants, BARDA funded academic researchers, and later by Pfizer and Moderna in mRNA vaccine development:
1) pathologic syncytia formation,
2) use of lipid nanoparticles with PEG,
3) failure to consider SARS-CoV-2 could use alternative points of cell entry other than ACE2 (metalloprotease pathway, antibody dependent enhancement, cell penetrating peptides, viroporins).
With billions of people rushed into indiscriminate mRNA vaccination, virologists and immunologists will be picking up the pieces of a failed vaccine campaign that has left so many at risk for more SARS-CoV-2 infections and progressive complications over the months and years to come."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/mrna-behind-the-reoccurrence-of-covid-19-symptoms-in-fully-vaccinated-individuals_4921326.html
👍2
The sinister future foreseen by the Covid insider set to run the WHO, Sir Jeremy Farrar
"On March 14, two days before a scheduled G7 Covid-19 fundraising teleconference, Sir Jeremy emailed Whitty and Vallance. ‘I felt action was needed within 24 hours, basically lockdown, plus all the other measures that had been modelled, like Italy and other European countries,’ he told them, implying it would be very brave to continue with Plan A.
Cummings is not the Machiavelli of this story, but in the end he was the one primed to deliver the ‘very courageous speech’ to the Prime Minister that resulted in the lockdown. According to Sir Jeremy, Cummings told Johnson that if he didn’t impose a lockdown, the NHS would collapse, he’d kill half a million people, that there wasn’t even a plan to bury all the dead, and that ‘in the chaos the whole grip of government might collapse and all sorts of other terrible consequences’.
The day after the lockdown began, Sir Jeremy wrote to his Wellcome colleagues that ‘the UK Covid-19 policy finally aligned with global efforts’. The UK government announced an additional £210million in funding for CEPI.
Dr Hatchett called Covid a watershed that would lead to a very different world. The re-ordered world he, Farrar and their associates want is no utopia. It is an outline for supranational biosecurity fascism and the infrastructure required for it is now in place. As Spike shows, some smooth-tongued, cold-eyed, hard-nosed people orchestrated a policy coup to realise this dark future. It is they who imperil humanity, not the microbes. This nightmare vision needs to be staked through the heart."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-sinister-future-foreseen-by-the-covid-insider-set-to-run-the-who-sir-jeremy-farrar/
"On March 14, two days before a scheduled G7 Covid-19 fundraising teleconference, Sir Jeremy emailed Whitty and Vallance. ‘I felt action was needed within 24 hours, basically lockdown, plus all the other measures that had been modelled, like Italy and other European countries,’ he told them, implying it would be very brave to continue with Plan A.
Cummings is not the Machiavelli of this story, but in the end he was the one primed to deliver the ‘very courageous speech’ to the Prime Minister that resulted in the lockdown. According to Sir Jeremy, Cummings told Johnson that if he didn’t impose a lockdown, the NHS would collapse, he’d kill half a million people, that there wasn’t even a plan to bury all the dead, and that ‘in the chaos the whole grip of government might collapse and all sorts of other terrible consequences’.
The day after the lockdown began, Sir Jeremy wrote to his Wellcome colleagues that ‘the UK Covid-19 policy finally aligned with global efforts’. The UK government announced an additional £210million in funding for CEPI.
Dr Hatchett called Covid a watershed that would lead to a very different world. The re-ordered world he, Farrar and their associates want is no utopia. It is an outline for supranational biosecurity fascism and the infrastructure required for it is now in place. As Spike shows, some smooth-tongued, cold-eyed, hard-nosed people orchestrated a policy coup to realise this dark future. It is they who imperil humanity, not the microbes. This nightmare vision needs to be staked through the heart."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-sinister-future-foreseen-by-the-covid-insider-set-to-run-the-who-sir-jeremy-farrar/
The Conservative Woman
The sinister future foreseen by the Covid insider set to run the WHO, Sir Jeremy Farrar - The Conservative Woman
👍4❤1
Forwarded from Together Declaration
WHO Pandemic Treaty:
We're concerned the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty is a major threat to our national sovereignty and democracy.
In particular, we are alarmed by:
1. Overreach of WHO, a non-governmental organization
2. Conflicts of interest
3. Loss of oversight
4. Censorship
5. Loss of nationhood
6. Side-stepping the democratic process
6. Conflation of distinct global challenges
To help raise awareness, Together has co-signed the letter linked to below to:
House of Lords International Agreements Committee
House of Lords Constitution Committee
Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
MPs
Please read & share:
https://www.hartgroup.org/open-letter-to-hoc-hol-scrutiny-committees/
We're concerned the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty is a major threat to our national sovereignty and democracy.
In particular, we are alarmed by:
1. Overreach of WHO, a non-governmental organization
2. Conflicts of interest
3. Loss of oversight
4. Censorship
5. Loss of nationhood
6. Side-stepping the democratic process
6. Conflation of distinct global challenges
To help raise awareness, Together has co-signed the letter linked to below to:
House of Lords International Agreements Committee
House of Lords Constitution Committee
Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
MPs
Please read & share:
https://www.hartgroup.org/open-letter-to-hoc-hol-scrutiny-committees/
HART
Open letter to parliamentary scrutiny committees
The WHO Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty threatens our national sovereignty and parliamentary democracy. The Thinking Coalition, HART, Not Our Future, Time for Recovery, Together Declaration, and Freedom Alliance have all joined ranks…
👍3
Forwarded from UK Citizen
💥💥Letter 11 – Andrew Bridgen Parliamentary Speech 13.12.22💥💥
This is letter you can send to your MP following the speech in Parliament on 13th December 2022 by Andrew Bridgen MP. Please note that if you did not write to your MP following the publication of Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s papers on 26th September 2022, then you will need to amend your email slightly. It is always better to personalise your letters to suit your circumstances anyway.
Please remove this and the preceding two paragraphs before sending and remember to let us know of any replies you receive – northeast@ukcitizen2021.org.
Dear [insert name of MP],
A few months ago, I wrote to you raising questions about the accuracy of the government and NHS mantra, “safe and effective’, with regard to the Covid-19 “vaccine”. I attached a copy of the peer-reviewed paper, by Dr. Aseem Malhotra, “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on Covid-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1 and Part 2”, which was published on 26th September 2022.
On Tuesday 13th December 2022, three months after Dr. Malhotra’s research was published, Andrew Bridgen MP for North West Leicestershire, in a debate in the House of Commons entitled “Vaccines: Potential Harms”, drew attention to the said paper and stated, “interestingly, there has so far not been a single rebuttal of Dr. Malhotra’s findings in the scientific literature despite their widespread circulation and the fact that they made international news.”
In his speech, Andrew Bridgen reminded us that this peer-reviewed research had concluded that the administration of the Covid-19 “vaccine” should be halted as a direct consequence of real world data indicating significant harms associated with the “vaccine” and little ongoing benefit. He also reminded us that Dr. Malhotra described the BioNTech-Pfizer “vaccine” as “perhaps the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, damage to population health, and erosion of trust in medicine that we will witness in our lifetime”.
Why have you not acknowledged these facts? Is it because of what Andrew Bridgen refers to as the psychological phenomena of “wilful blindness”? I urge you to watch the debate here (it starts at around 19:04:00):
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/d0cc6561-6ab9-46ea-8d6d-f07ac0cf136d?agenda=True
And here is the transcript of that debate:
Vaccines: Potential Harms - Hansard - UK Parliament
Andrew Bridgen provided numerous references to key evidence to substantiate his claim that the Covid-19 “vaccine” is neither “safe” nor “effective”. Maria Caulfield MP, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, strongly disagreed about the content of Andrew Bridgen’s speech, but failed to provide any evidence in support of her position that, to the contrary, the Covid-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective”. I would therefore be grateful if you could provide the evidence of the following:
1. the evidence to support Maria Caulfield’s claim that it is the Covid-19 “vaccine” which has allowed the country to “open-up” again;
2. the evidence to support her claim “that all the vaccines used in the UK are safe” and “have some of the highest safety standards in the world”;
3. evidence of the placebo used in the trials for the Covid-19 “vaccine”;
4. evidence that random controlled trials were utilised in the trials for the Covid-19 “vaccine”;
5. evidence that the trials at 4 above were double blinded;
6. evidence of the “robust standards of effectiveness, safety and quality” as mentioned by Maria Caulfield in her rebuttal of Andrew Bridgen’s position;
7. evidence of the “extensive data” that Maria Caulfield claims illustrates the “vaccine is safe and highly effective in reducing deaths”;
This is letter you can send to your MP following the speech in Parliament on 13th December 2022 by Andrew Bridgen MP. Please note that if you did not write to your MP following the publication of Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s papers on 26th September 2022, then you will need to amend your email slightly. It is always better to personalise your letters to suit your circumstances anyway.
Please remove this and the preceding two paragraphs before sending and remember to let us know of any replies you receive – northeast@ukcitizen2021.org.
Dear [insert name of MP],
A few months ago, I wrote to you raising questions about the accuracy of the government and NHS mantra, “safe and effective’, with regard to the Covid-19 “vaccine”. I attached a copy of the peer-reviewed paper, by Dr. Aseem Malhotra, “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on Covid-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1 and Part 2”, which was published on 26th September 2022.
On Tuesday 13th December 2022, three months after Dr. Malhotra’s research was published, Andrew Bridgen MP for North West Leicestershire, in a debate in the House of Commons entitled “Vaccines: Potential Harms”, drew attention to the said paper and stated, “interestingly, there has so far not been a single rebuttal of Dr. Malhotra’s findings in the scientific literature despite their widespread circulation and the fact that they made international news.”
In his speech, Andrew Bridgen reminded us that this peer-reviewed research had concluded that the administration of the Covid-19 “vaccine” should be halted as a direct consequence of real world data indicating significant harms associated with the “vaccine” and little ongoing benefit. He also reminded us that Dr. Malhotra described the BioNTech-Pfizer “vaccine” as “perhaps the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, damage to population health, and erosion of trust in medicine that we will witness in our lifetime”.
Why have you not acknowledged these facts? Is it because of what Andrew Bridgen refers to as the psychological phenomena of “wilful blindness”? I urge you to watch the debate here (it starts at around 19:04:00):
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/d0cc6561-6ab9-46ea-8d6d-f07ac0cf136d?agenda=True
And here is the transcript of that debate:
Vaccines: Potential Harms - Hansard - UK Parliament
Andrew Bridgen provided numerous references to key evidence to substantiate his claim that the Covid-19 “vaccine” is neither “safe” nor “effective”. Maria Caulfield MP, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, strongly disagreed about the content of Andrew Bridgen’s speech, but failed to provide any evidence in support of her position that, to the contrary, the Covid-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective”. I would therefore be grateful if you could provide the evidence of the following:
1. the evidence to support Maria Caulfield’s claim that it is the Covid-19 “vaccine” which has allowed the country to “open-up” again;
2. the evidence to support her claim “that all the vaccines used in the UK are safe” and “have some of the highest safety standards in the world”;
3. evidence of the placebo used in the trials for the Covid-19 “vaccine”;
4. evidence that random controlled trials were utilised in the trials for the Covid-19 “vaccine”;
5. evidence that the trials at 4 above were double blinded;
6. evidence of the “robust standards of effectiveness, safety and quality” as mentioned by Maria Caulfield in her rebuttal of Andrew Bridgen’s position;
7. evidence of the “extensive data” that Maria Caulfield claims illustrates the “vaccine is safe and highly effective in reducing deaths”;
parliamentlive.tv
House of Commons
👍5
Forwarded from UK Citizen
8. evidence showing that the adverse events reported to the Yellow Card reporting system have been investigated by the MHRA as Maria Caulfield claims;
9. evidence to support the decision to leave the Covid-19 “vaccine” on the market contrary to action taken in the past with respect to safety signals for other vaccines all of which had significantly less adverse events reported than the Covid-19 “vaccine”;
10. evidence to support the claim (which Marie Caulfield would like put on record) “that the Covid-19 vaccines have saved tens of thousands of lives and prevented hundreds of thousands of people from being hospitalised”; and
11. evidence of the risk/benefit analysis conducted by the government in relation to the Covid-19 policies.
I have repeatedly reminded you of the Nolan Principles, but I feel the need to do so once again. You will, of course, be aware that The Ministerial Code requires Ministers to uphold the seven principles of public life: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership!
Clause 1.3 c of The Ministerial Code provides:
“It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity. Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the Prime Minister.”
Do you believe Maria Caulfield has upheld The Ministerial Code with respect to her position on the Covid-19 “vaccines”? If so, how?
Do you believe you have upheld the Ministerial Code in your interaction with me with respect to the Covid-19 “vaccine”? If so, how?
If Maria Caulfield is correct, then Dr. Malhotra, along with numerous other eminent scientists and doctors across the world, is wrong, as are the thousands of people (no doubt some of whom are your constituents) who have reported adverse events to the Yellow Card reporting system. Is their harm just coincidental? I would welcome your thoughts on this.
I shall leave you with this study to ponder (maybe you should forward it to Maria Caulfield for her consideration too), “Covid-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities”. (https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449.full.pdf)
Finally, I once again remind you of the inalienable right of bodily autonomy.
I look forward to receiving your thoughts and the evidence requested above.
Yours sincerely,
[Your name and address]
👍3
Forwarded from UK Citizen
Andrew Bridgen - Parliamentary speech 13.12.22.docx
20.5 KB
Letter to amend and send to your mp, doctors, local councillors.....NHS staff - this is in relation to mp Andrew bridgens speech 13.12.22
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
👍2
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
NEW - Thai King's eldest daughter, Princess Bajrakitiyabha (44), collapsed from a heart condition, Thailand's royal palace says.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/1603362645771436038/
@disclosetv
https://www.disclose.tv/id/1603362645771436038/
@disclosetv
Disclose.tv
Topic
Breaking news from around the world.
Forwarded from Readovka World
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Donetsk shelling begins simultaneously with start of morning service in Transfiguration Cathedral, whose dome pierced through by Ukrainian shell
In Donetsk, the morning of December 15 began with massive shelling. Afterwards, Ukrainian MLRS rockets began frantically striking the center. One of the attacks on the Voroshilov district was at the anti-Orthodox campaign of the Kyiv regime: the shell hit the dome of the cathedral of the Savior and Transfiguration and smashed right through it. Now there is a hole in the dome, and the iconostasis is also damaged.
In Donetsk, the morning of December 15 began with massive shelling. Afterwards, Ukrainian MLRS rockets began frantically striking the center. One of the attacks on the Voroshilov district was at the anti-Orthodox campaign of the Kyiv regime: the shell hit the dome of the cathedral of the Savior and Transfiguration and smashed right through it. Now there is a hole in the dome, and the iconostasis is also damaged.
What is the last post before this one that you can read on this channel and are you able to comment on it?
Comments are not working on previous posts, across other Telegram channels as well. Feel free to comment on previous posts below here under this comment.
Forwarded from Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Only 13.5% taking any more of these. Word is out: not safe, not effective, not durable. Mortality risk may be cumulative. No assurances on long term negative health impacts or future medical problems that may arise. #courageousdiscourse
👍5🔥1
Parliament at its most exposed.
I’m told the upper picture is when they held a debate on c19 vaccine safety, where Andrew Bridgen demanded their complete suspension.
I’m told the lower image was the occasion of voting on their own pay rises (I must say, I thought that task had been moved into the shadows because people were upset that they voted for their own pay rises. That wouldn’t be better, however, because now nobody gets to hear the arguments for or against whatever is proposed).
They disgust me.
Best wishes
Mike
I’m told the upper picture is when they held a debate on c19 vaccine safety, where Andrew Bridgen demanded their complete suspension.
I’m told the lower image was the occasion of voting on their own pay rises (I must say, I thought that task had been moved into the shadows because people were upset that they voted for their own pay rises. That wouldn’t be better, however, because now nobody gets to hear the arguments for or against whatever is proposed).
They disgust me.
Best wishes
Mike
👍4
Note that identity recognition cameras are being installed around the UK.
Whether they’re yet set up to identify individuals caught in their gaze, the important fact is that they’re unlike previous generations of cameras which simply capture moving images.
I note that Canterbury is marked as having one, though clicking on the map reveals that it’s located at the 24h Cooperative supermarket at Dover.
If you’re in UK, you might want to know where your most local camera is.
Best wishes
Mike
https://mailchi.mp/bigbrotherwatch/64956661-6496830?e=c58cf35236
Whether they’re yet set up to identify individuals caught in their gaze, the important fact is that they’re unlike previous generations of cameras which simply capture moving images.
I note that Canterbury is marked as having one, though clicking on the map reveals that it’s located at the 24h Cooperative supermarket at Dover.
If you’re in UK, you might want to know where your most local camera is.
Best wishes
Mike
https://mailchi.mp/bigbrotherwatch/64956661-6496830?e=c58cf35236
Forwarded from G3 News
We Are About To Witness A Major Move Toward A Cashless Society
The war on cash has just gone to an entirely new level. When I heard that the European Union was planning to completely ban all cash transactions above 10,000 euros, I had a hard time believing it. There are so many wild rumors flying around on the Internet these days, and so I wasn’t going to write about this unless I could confirm it. Unfortunately, this particular rumor is quite real.
Under the pretext of fighting “money laundering and terrorist financing”, the European Union will be entirely outlawing all cash payments greater than 10,000 euros.
The following comes from the official website of the Council of the European Union…
"By limiting large cash payments, the EU will make it harder for criminals to launder dirty money. An EU-wide maximum limit of €10.000 is set for cash payments. Member states will have the flexibility to impose a lower maximum limit if they wish."
So this means that in some countries the upper limit could potentially be a lot lower than 10,000 euros.
But instead of framing it as a major move toward a cashless society, the EU is trying to claim that this is all about fighting terrorists.
The following is what Zbyněk Stanjura, the Minister for Finance in the Czech Republic, has said about this upcoming change…
"Terrorists and those who finance them are not welcome in Europe. In order to launder dirty money, criminal individuals and organisations had to look for loopholes in our existing rules which are already quite strict. But our intention is to close these loopholes further, and to apply even stricter rules in all EU member states. Large cash payments beyond €10.000 will become impossible. Trying to stay anonymous when buying or selling crypto-assets will become much more difficult. Hiding behind multiple layers of ownership of companies won’t work any more. It will even become difficult to launder dirty money via jewellers or goldsmiths."
Meanwhile, the European Central Bank has been actively considering the possibility of introducing a “digital euro”. The following comes from the official website of the European Central Bank…
"We are working with the national central banks of the euro area to investigate whether to introduce a digital euro. It would be a central bank digital currency, an electronic equivalent to cash. And it would complement banknotes and coins, giving people an additional choice about how to pay."
Well isn’t that convenient?
As they take cash away from the general population, it turns out that they have already been working on the replacement.
Source: Zerohedge
Join us on Minds!
Follow:👇
@G3News
The war on cash has just gone to an entirely new level. When I heard that the European Union was planning to completely ban all cash transactions above 10,000 euros, I had a hard time believing it. There are so many wild rumors flying around on the Internet these days, and so I wasn’t going to write about this unless I could confirm it. Unfortunately, this particular rumor is quite real.
Under the pretext of fighting “money laundering and terrorist financing”, the European Union will be entirely outlawing all cash payments greater than 10,000 euros.
The following comes from the official website of the Council of the European Union…
"By limiting large cash payments, the EU will make it harder for criminals to launder dirty money. An EU-wide maximum limit of €10.000 is set for cash payments. Member states will have the flexibility to impose a lower maximum limit if they wish."
So this means that in some countries the upper limit could potentially be a lot lower than 10,000 euros.
But instead of framing it as a major move toward a cashless society, the EU is trying to claim that this is all about fighting terrorists.
The following is what Zbyněk Stanjura, the Minister for Finance in the Czech Republic, has said about this upcoming change…
"Terrorists and those who finance them are not welcome in Europe. In order to launder dirty money, criminal individuals and organisations had to look for loopholes in our existing rules which are already quite strict. But our intention is to close these loopholes further, and to apply even stricter rules in all EU member states. Large cash payments beyond €10.000 will become impossible. Trying to stay anonymous when buying or selling crypto-assets will become much more difficult. Hiding behind multiple layers of ownership of companies won’t work any more. It will even become difficult to launder dirty money via jewellers or goldsmiths."
Meanwhile, the European Central Bank has been actively considering the possibility of introducing a “digital euro”. The following comes from the official website of the European Central Bank…
"We are working with the national central banks of the euro area to investigate whether to introduce a digital euro. It would be a central bank digital currency, an electronic equivalent to cash. And it would complement banknotes and coins, giving people an additional choice about how to pay."
Well isn’t that convenient?
As they take cash away from the general population, it turns out that they have already been working on the replacement.
Source: Zerohedge
Join us on Minds!
Follow:👇
@G3News
Telegram
G3 News
European Union to Put a 10,000-Euro Limit on Cash Payments; Transactions Over €1,000 in Crypto Will Be Scrutinized
The countries of the European Union have announced a set of new directives to make more difficult the usage of cash and other alternative currencies…
The countries of the European Union have announced a set of new directives to make more difficult the usage of cash and other alternative currencies…
👍1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
BREAKING 🇬🇧
Andrew Brigden continues to tweet today about needing answers with regards to the MRNA jabs, and raises the volume of yellow card data in connection with the same.
He uses the hashtag #completelyunprecedented.
Andrew Brigden continues to tweet today about needing answers with regards to the MRNA jabs, and raises the volume of yellow card data in connection with the same.
He uses the hashtag #completelyunprecedented.