https://youtube.com/shorts/Y31sRgiF0pY
This funny looking Superman model aeroplane is powered by electric motors.
While it is amusing, the basics at work here are sobering. I don’t think people understand the arithmetrical nature of battery EVs and why practical heavy goods vehicles are quite impossible. A number of laws of physics & chemistry would have to be broken for that to happen. Do many people understand this?
Best wishes
Mike
This funny looking Superman model aeroplane is powered by electric motors.
While it is amusing, the basics at work here are sobering. I don’t think people understand the arithmetrical nature of battery EVs and why practical heavy goods vehicles are quite impossible. A number of laws of physics & chemistry would have to be broken for that to happen. Do many people understand this?
Best wishes
Mike
👍105👏5😁5🔥1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Aseem Malhotra on Laurence Fox’s GB News program.
The only thing I’d have added (instead of the details on heart harms which I neither have at my fingertips nor am I expert upon) is that the harms from the injections was inevitable and burned into the design.
Any mRNA product, which are intended to cause your body to manufacture whatever is encoded, WILL induce autoimmune reactions.
What we’re seeing is the inevitable consequences of making & injecting billions of people with materials which cannot but induce autoimmune disorders.
As Aseem said, and he gave a list of adverse effects, the nature of the disorder turns upon where in the body the particular dose lands, plus a number of other variables (such as update & transcription efficiency, stability of the message in the vial and others).
I’d be unequivocal: the perpetrators knew this would happen before a single vial was produced.
The only uncertainty would have been what proportion of people would be noticeably affected.
Best wishes
Mike
The only thing I’d have added (instead of the details on heart harms which I neither have at my fingertips nor am I expert upon) is that the harms from the injections was inevitable and burned into the design.
Any mRNA product, which are intended to cause your body to manufacture whatever is encoded, WILL induce autoimmune reactions.
What we’re seeing is the inevitable consequences of making & injecting billions of people with materials which cannot but induce autoimmune disorders.
As Aseem said, and he gave a list of adverse effects, the nature of the disorder turns upon where in the body the particular dose lands, plus a number of other variables (such as update & transcription efficiency, stability of the message in the vial and others).
I’d be unequivocal: the perpetrators knew this would happen before a single vial was produced.
The only uncertainty would have been what proportion of people would be noticeably affected.
Best wishes
Mike
👍171🤬38💯29😢10😁1
This one is just offensive, explicitly prohibiting safety concerns, REAL or not, about the polio vaccine that had been in use since 1962.
I expect this has been a model ever since. Expect never to gain official acceptance that any vaccine is systematically harmful. There is a compensation system, paid for by the taxpayer, certainly in USA & U.K. (perhaps elsewhere?).
I’m guessing that no legal challenge to the automatic assumption that “vaccines are safe & effective” has ever been mounted. No regulatory body has ever required a manufacturer to run the appropriate studies needed to demonstrate the claim.
That was something I only came to learn since 2020. Vaccine units were separate in the two large companies I worked for, perhaps conveniently to minimise risk of cross fertilisation of questions.
Vaccine clinical trials to this day don’t use placebo in the comparator arm, rather, another vaccine.
That way, a new vaccine needs only to be not worse than something already approved.
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/25589
I expect this has been a model ever since. Expect never to gain official acceptance that any vaccine is systematically harmful. There is a compensation system, paid for by the taxpayer, certainly in USA & U.K. (perhaps elsewhere?).
I’m guessing that no legal challenge to the automatic assumption that “vaccines are safe & effective” has ever been mounted. No regulatory body has ever required a manufacturer to run the appropriate studies needed to demonstrate the claim.
That was something I only came to learn since 2020. Vaccine units were separate in the two large companies I worked for, perhaps conveniently to minimise risk of cross fertilisation of questions.
Vaccine clinical trials to this day don’t use placebo in the comparator arm, rather, another vaccine.
That way, a new vaccine needs only to be not worse than something already approved.
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/25589
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
I was just sent this. An entry in the Federal Register, which I think may be the official record of how & why certain things happened in congress.
👍65🔥13❤1😁1🤯1
In long run email exchanges with friends and acquaintances, I sometimes receive something so immediately useful that I’ll post it here, with the authors approval (they’re not shy, but aren’t looking for acknowledgement).
I start with a preface, which some of you may be bored (or maddened, if you think I’m wrong) to read again: I’m *no longer satisfied that the evidence supports there having been a new respiratory virus causing massive scale illnesses and deaths.
However, the official narrative is that there is, and that an important measure of the threat it presents to the population is the Infection Fatality Ratio. This is the proportion of a representative sample of the whole population which, if they were all infected, would die.
Putting aside *differences for a moment, I put it to you that, in order for what’s happened to even halfway make any sense in public health terms, the threat to the population from this alleged virus would need to be VERY much greater than, say, a seasonal influenza outbreak.
Do you agree? Please note that it’s definitely not true that:
“Covid19 is uniquely nasty, quite aside from whatever it’s killing power is”. Influenza-like illnesses, whatever causes them, can be nasty already.
“Covid19 might not kill so very many people, but it’s the long COVID aspects that will destroy the health of survivors”. There’s absolutely no objective evidence for this. If you’re a adherent, I urge you not to review published evidence. It’ll hurt.
“If allowed to spread, the causative pathogen, SARS-CoV-2, might or will mutate into a much worse infection”. Again, no evidence whatsoever to support this contention. The very opposite is the received wisdom and whether or not it’s true, it fits the historical observations that diseases come & then go. They don’t come & then get worse.
Anyway, that was NOT listed as a factor in March 2020, when much of the world was shoved into “lockdown”, a NEVER before used term or practise. And this happened almost EVERYWHERE at almost the SAME TIME.
It’s my contention that it was the nearly simultaneous imposition of the unprecedented “lockdown” all around the world, accompanied by the use of the weird phrase “Build Back Better” that proves that a malign, supranational agency was in play that spring. There’s no other way that makes sense. At least, I don’t buy any other reasons, like “they panicked”. Give me a break. You don’t all but shut an economy without extremely strong reasons to do so. There were no reasons, let alone strong enough reasons.
As for “Building Back Better”, what was there then to build back? Nothing was broken. And how was it that lots of important people were saying it, all around the world?
With that, here’s the message my friend sent. I encourage you to share this preface & the referenced commentary below with those still inclined to believe lying politicians & their public health advisors.
Encouraging readers to look at this new paper by Science Direct (Jan 1st 2023) paper on infection fatality rates (IFR) that dropped today.
It shows if you are under the age of 60yrs, your chances of fatality are/were 0.034% and if under 70yrs your chances of fatality are/were 0.095%. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X
In early 2020 the World Health Organisation trumpeted a Case Fatality Rate of 3.4% which would understandably create panic. They (The WHO) either lied, are exempt from misinformation, or both.
The WHO (CDC, or NIH) never ran extensive press releases to advise the population that the IFR was more like 0.5% or lower...even though they knew that by May 2020. Stanford Study https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/stanford-study-suggests-coronavirus-might-not-be-as-deadly-as-flu/
The mainstream legacy news media continued to push the fear into our eyeballs. They still do. All the more reason to get your news from Telegram, Substack, or (now) Twitter.
The thing that really disturbs me about this IFR data is the children. We all knew/know they are at such a low risk. This study says 0.0003%.
I start with a preface, which some of you may be bored (or maddened, if you think I’m wrong) to read again: I’m *no longer satisfied that the evidence supports there having been a new respiratory virus causing massive scale illnesses and deaths.
However, the official narrative is that there is, and that an important measure of the threat it presents to the population is the Infection Fatality Ratio. This is the proportion of a representative sample of the whole population which, if they were all infected, would die.
Putting aside *differences for a moment, I put it to you that, in order for what’s happened to even halfway make any sense in public health terms, the threat to the population from this alleged virus would need to be VERY much greater than, say, a seasonal influenza outbreak.
Do you agree? Please note that it’s definitely not true that:
“Covid19 is uniquely nasty, quite aside from whatever it’s killing power is”. Influenza-like illnesses, whatever causes them, can be nasty already.
“Covid19 might not kill so very many people, but it’s the long COVID aspects that will destroy the health of survivors”. There’s absolutely no objective evidence for this. If you’re a adherent, I urge you not to review published evidence. It’ll hurt.
“If allowed to spread, the causative pathogen, SARS-CoV-2, might or will mutate into a much worse infection”. Again, no evidence whatsoever to support this contention. The very opposite is the received wisdom and whether or not it’s true, it fits the historical observations that diseases come & then go. They don’t come & then get worse.
Anyway, that was NOT listed as a factor in March 2020, when much of the world was shoved into “lockdown”, a NEVER before used term or practise. And this happened almost EVERYWHERE at almost the SAME TIME.
It’s my contention that it was the nearly simultaneous imposition of the unprecedented “lockdown” all around the world, accompanied by the use of the weird phrase “Build Back Better” that proves that a malign, supranational agency was in play that spring. There’s no other way that makes sense. At least, I don’t buy any other reasons, like “they panicked”. Give me a break. You don’t all but shut an economy without extremely strong reasons to do so. There were no reasons, let alone strong enough reasons.
As for “Building Back Better”, what was there then to build back? Nothing was broken. And how was it that lots of important people were saying it, all around the world?
With that, here’s the message my friend sent. I encourage you to share this preface & the referenced commentary below with those still inclined to believe lying politicians & their public health advisors.
Encouraging readers to look at this new paper by Science Direct (Jan 1st 2023) paper on infection fatality rates (IFR) that dropped today.
It shows if you are under the age of 60yrs, your chances of fatality are/were 0.034% and if under 70yrs your chances of fatality are/were 0.095%. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X
In early 2020 the World Health Organisation trumpeted a Case Fatality Rate of 3.4% which would understandably create panic. They (The WHO) either lied, are exempt from misinformation, or both.
The WHO (CDC, or NIH) never ran extensive press releases to advise the population that the IFR was more like 0.5% or lower...even though they knew that by May 2020. Stanford Study https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/stanford-study-suggests-coronavirus-might-not-be-as-deadly-as-flu/
The mainstream legacy news media continued to push the fear into our eyeballs. They still do. All the more reason to get your news from Telegram, Substack, or (now) Twitter.
The thing that really disturbs me about this IFR data is the children. We all knew/know they are at such a low risk. This study says 0.0003%.
The Spectator
Stanford study suggests coronavirus might not be as deadly as flu
One of the great unknowns of the Covid-19 crisis is just how deadly the disease is. Much of the panic dates from the moment, in early March, when the World Health Organisation (WHO) published a mortality rate of 3.2 per cent – which turned out to be a crude…
👍152🔥10❤3👏1
So why are we forcing synthetic RNA strands into our children? The sad truth about the children is well documented by those that understand the liability shields for pharma and of course the brilliant work of Bobby Kennedy Jnr and Childrens health Defense. It really is a crooked old world.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X
👍94😢22❤2🤔2
If you were confident you always had access to a good doctor, naturopath, nutritionist, or healer who can help you prevent, diagnose & treat most illnesses, why would you risk the effects of a vaccine to a disease you may never even have? It doesn't make any sense. Lose the fear.
Modern doctors have been subcontracting their healing work to vaccines, putting their patients at risk of adverse events for imagined worst case scenarios that more often than not never materialize, and if they do can be turned around by treatment protocols.
The fear seems to belong to a pre-modern era when the understanding of disease was very primitive, and the antibiotic effects of penicillin had not yet been discovered. Yet the entire mass vaccination industry depends on this fear to make people make irrational decisions.
Robin
https://youtu.be/8f8wAXDZ9D0
Modern doctors have been subcontracting their healing work to vaccines, putting their patients at risk of adverse events for imagined worst case scenarios that more often than not never materialize, and if they do can be turned around by treatment protocols.
The fear seems to belong to a pre-modern era when the understanding of disease was very primitive, and the antibiotic effects of penicillin had not yet been discovered. Yet the entire mass vaccination industry depends on this fear to make people make irrational decisions.
Robin
https://youtu.be/8f8wAXDZ9D0
YouTube
Ian Brown - F.E.A.R. (Official Video)
Music video by Ian Brown performing F.E.A.R.. (C) 2007 Polydor Ltd. (UK)
#IanBrown #FEAR #Vevo
#IanBrown #FEAR #Vevo
👍75🔥19❤6💯5
https://unlockthelockdown.com/the-1918-pandemic-was-caused-by-a-vaccine-absolute-bombshell/
This is very interesting. I wasn’t aware that “influenza” in 1918 didn’t mean what it does now, nor that the pathogen involved in the massed deaths was almost certainly a pneumonia causing bacterium. Which is why it killed preferentially young men. No naturally occurring respiratory pathogen has this fatality profile before or since. Neither H1N1 influenza or any other virus was ever definitively identified in post mortal tissue.
There’s a more parsimonious explanation. The cause & the named individual are both shocking, though I am not aware in the latter case of any linkage (nor am I making one).
The current article fits better to Sasha Latypova’s failure to find, in the original Russian language report on infectious diseases in a 1922 trade & travel update, any mention of respiratory illnesses.
Yet another thing you’ve been lied to about all your life?
You decide.
Best wishes
Mike
This is very interesting. I wasn’t aware that “influenza” in 1918 didn’t mean what it does now, nor that the pathogen involved in the massed deaths was almost certainly a pneumonia causing bacterium. Which is why it killed preferentially young men. No naturally occurring respiratory pathogen has this fatality profile before or since. Neither H1N1 influenza or any other virus was ever definitively identified in post mortal tissue.
There’s a more parsimonious explanation. The cause & the named individual are both shocking, though I am not aware in the latter case of any linkage (nor am I making one).
The current article fits better to Sasha Latypova’s failure to find, in the original Russian language report on infectious diseases in a 1922 trade & travel update, any mention of respiratory illnesses.
Yet another thing you’ve been lied to about all your life?
You decide.
Best wishes
Mike
👍125😱7❤5🔥3😁3🤬1
I am transferring some of my research you read months ago from Telegram to twitter. Seems the new owner has noticed this one..
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1609524744830738434
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1609524744830738434
🔥167👍76👏19🤔6❤5👀5🥴2
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
Club of Rome founder Aurelio Peccei in "The Chasm Ahead" London 1969
The global elite have wanted to bring population growth down for a long time. Club of Rome founder Aurelio Peccei gives 3 solutions for the problem in 1969:
1. Biological "germ or virus"
2. "Mass sterilization"
3. "Elimination of all surplus humans"
Are we living out 1, 2, or all 3?
https://archive.org/details/chasmahead0000pecc/page/174/mode/2up?q=control&view=theater
The global elite have wanted to bring population growth down for a long time. Club of Rome founder Aurelio Peccei gives 3 solutions for the problem in 1969:
1. Biological "germ or virus"
2. "Mass sterilization"
3. "Elimination of all surplus humans"
Are we living out 1, 2, or all 3?
https://archive.org/details/chasmahead0000pecc/page/174/mode/2up?q=control&view=theater
👍88😱32🤬31🔥6
Forwarded from Emma Sansom
I read this in Stanley Johnson’s ( Boris Johnson’s dad) book “life without birth” - 1970.
🤬156👍29🤯14💔8😱5👀3
Yesterday I posted on the WHO & BMGF involvement in an illegal anti-fertility vaccine in Kenya and India.
Mr Musk might find that interesting.
Gates was ejected from both countries but money got him back in a few years later.
Mr Musk might find that interesting.
Gates was ejected from both countries but money got him back in a few years later.
👍107🤬71💔7
Ethical questions surround vaccine to reduce fertility (2018)
"The prestigious journal Nature Medicine, in its February issue reported that the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is to do a clinical trial of a tetanus toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with a pregnancy hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). It is to be studied on 120 women in India.
This “vaccine” against pregnancy was developed by Dr G.P. Talwar in 1972. The idea is to produce antibodies to the pregnancy hormone, such that the women would not be able to carry a normal pregnancy. Women who were pregnant would abort and those not pregnant would be rendered infertile. The report is indeed disturbing. A few months earlier an article entitled “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World” was published by Oller and colleagues in the Open Access Library Journal.
The Oller report described young women in Kenya who were vaccinated with this “Talwar vaccine” on the pretext of preventing maternal and neonatal (baby) tetanus. Many of the samples of the tetanus vaccine that tested positive for hCG was sourced from the Serum Institute of India.
The vaccine programme was promoted by the WHO and the Kenyan government, funded by the Gates Foundation. Mothers-to-be were encouraged to take the vaccine to prevent tetanus in their unborn babies, without being told that the vaccine would prevent the baby from ever being born. The Oller report highlights some interesting aspects of the campaign. The vaccines used in the campaign were not stored locally, but were distributed directly from Nairobi and the vaccines were guarded by the police. Every used vaccine vial was returned under police escort to Nairobi at considerable expense. 👉It was advised that the vaccine is taken five times at six monthly intervals.👈 This is unlike the tetanus toxoid schedule anywhere in the world and is exactly the schedule recommended for the “Talwar vaccine”. WHO publications apparently describe a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries” and they are working on a more potent anti-fertility vaccine, using recombinant DNA."
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/ethical-questions-surround-vaccine-reduce-fertility
"The prestigious journal Nature Medicine, in its February issue reported that the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is to do a clinical trial of a tetanus toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with a pregnancy hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). It is to be studied on 120 women in India.
This “vaccine” against pregnancy was developed by Dr G.P. Talwar in 1972. The idea is to produce antibodies to the pregnancy hormone, such that the women would not be able to carry a normal pregnancy. Women who were pregnant would abort and those not pregnant would be rendered infertile. The report is indeed disturbing. A few months earlier an article entitled “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World” was published by Oller and colleagues in the Open Access Library Journal.
The Oller report described young women in Kenya who were vaccinated with this “Talwar vaccine” on the pretext of preventing maternal and neonatal (baby) tetanus. Many of the samples of the tetanus vaccine that tested positive for hCG was sourced from the Serum Institute of India.
The vaccine programme was promoted by the WHO and the Kenyan government, funded by the Gates Foundation. Mothers-to-be were encouraged to take the vaccine to prevent tetanus in their unborn babies, without being told that the vaccine would prevent the baby from ever being born. The Oller report highlights some interesting aspects of the campaign. The vaccines used in the campaign were not stored locally, but were distributed directly from Nairobi and the vaccines were guarded by the police. Every used vaccine vial was returned under police escort to Nairobi at considerable expense. 👉It was advised that the vaccine is taken five times at six monthly intervals.👈 This is unlike the tetanus toxoid schedule anywhere in the world and is exactly the schedule recommended for the “Talwar vaccine”. WHO publications apparently describe a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries” and they are working on a more potent anti-fertility vaccine, using recombinant DNA."
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/ethical-questions-surround-vaccine-reduce-fertility
🤬89👍33🔥3😁1
Open Access Library Journal > Vol.4 No.10, October 2017
HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World
"In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine.
Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility.
Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”.
By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present. In October 2014, 6 additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors and were tested in 6 accredited laboratories. Again, hCG was found in half the samples. Subsequently, Nairobi’s AgriQ Quest laboratory, in two sets of analyses, again found hCG in the same vaccine vials that tested positive earlier but found no hCG in 52 samples alleged by the WHO to be vials of the vaccine used in the Kenya campaign 40 with the same identifying batch numbers as the vials that tested positive for hCG.
Given that hCG was found in at least half the WHO vaccine samples known by the doctors involved in administering the vaccines to have been used in Kenya, our opinion is that the Kenya “anti-tetanus” campaign was reasonably called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for population growth reduction."
https://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=81838
HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World
"In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine.
Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility.
Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”.
By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present. In October 2014, 6 additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors and were tested in 6 accredited laboratories. Again, hCG was found in half the samples. Subsequently, Nairobi’s AgriQ Quest laboratory, in two sets of analyses, again found hCG in the same vaccine vials that tested positive earlier but found no hCG in 52 samples alleged by the WHO to be vials of the vaccine used in the Kenya campaign 40 with the same identifying batch numbers as the vials that tested positive for hCG.
Given that hCG was found in at least half the WHO vaccine samples known by the doctors involved in administering the vaccines to have been used in Kenya, our opinion is that the Kenya “anti-tetanus” campaign was reasonably called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for population growth reduction."
https://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=81838
👍56😱15🤯2🤔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The COVID Jab: "We Made a Big Mistake ... Will We Be Rendering Young People Infertile?"
Dr. Mike Yeadon: "When you vaccinate a person, they may make antibodies that might lead to an attack on the placenta. I am not saying that if you take these vaccines, it will cause infertility, but I will say that none of the manufacturers should give you any assurances whatsoever that it won't, because they have not bothered to measure whether the similarity is enough to produce on any occasions, any antibody at all that might bind to your own Syncytin hormone. And if it does, yeah, it could stop you getting pregnant or prevent your placenta from functioning properly. That's the concern."
'Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda' - infertilitymovie.org/a-diabolical-agenda/
@VigilantFox | Rumble | ReTruth
Dr. Mike Yeadon: "When you vaccinate a person, they may make antibodies that might lead to an attack on the placenta. I am not saying that if you take these vaccines, it will cause infertility, but I will say that none of the manufacturers should give you any assurances whatsoever that it won't, because they have not bothered to measure whether the similarity is enough to produce on any occasions, any antibody at all that might bind to your own Syncytin hormone. And if it does, yeah, it could stop you getting pregnant or prevent your placenta from functioning properly. That's the concern."
'Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda' - infertilitymovie.org/a-diabolical-agenda/
@VigilantFox | Rumble | ReTruth
😢69👍34🔥11🙏6❤1🤯1
ARE "VACCINES" THE "ACTION TO CREATE CONDITIONS FOR FERTILITY DECLINE" THAT KISSINGER ADVOCATED IN 1974?
By way of background, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I filed a detailed petition with the European Medicines Agency on Dec 1, 2020. In it, we warned about a range of safety concerns which we expected to see if EMA prematurely gave Emergency Use Authorisation to these gene-based “vaccines”.
One related to reproductive health harms.
Several others have been confirmed or suspected.
Recently, a paper was published demonstrating EXACTLY the concern we’d written about.
A team undertook a study of the Pfizer vaccine in a small number of women, measuring antibodies to spike protein & to syncytin-1. The results are shocking. From the earliest time after the injection, all women had measurable levels of antibodies against the placental protein, syncytial-1, even before antibodies to spike protein increased.
Worse, the authors proceeded to cover up & lie about their results.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.23.21257686v1.full.pdf
They misleadingly state more than once that no increase was observed. They claimed this by placing a wholly arbitrary threshold on the graph, them stating “our results are all below this”.
I had read a leaked report, conducted for Pfizer in relation to their regulatory submission in Japan. This was a study of distribution of the vaccine “envelope” after injection into rats. This showed very unusual tissue distribution. There was 10X more in ovaries & spleen than in most other tissues. Then a real shocker. I came across a paper from 2012, stating that these lipid nanoparticle formulations ALL accumulated in ovaries of several species.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
I find the concatenation of evidence, all pointing to a risk for reproductive health harms.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
By way of background, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I filed a detailed petition with the European Medicines Agency on Dec 1, 2020. In it, we warned about a range of safety concerns which we expected to see if EMA prematurely gave Emergency Use Authorisation to these gene-based “vaccines”.
One related to reproductive health harms.
Several others have been confirmed or suspected.
Recently, a paper was published demonstrating EXACTLY the concern we’d written about.
A team undertook a study of the Pfizer vaccine in a small number of women, measuring antibodies to spike protein & to syncytin-1. The results are shocking. From the earliest time after the injection, all women had measurable levels of antibodies against the placental protein, syncytial-1, even before antibodies to spike protein increased.
Worse, the authors proceeded to cover up & lie about their results.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.23.21257686v1.full.pdf
They misleadingly state more than once that no increase was observed. They claimed this by placing a wholly arbitrary threshold on the graph, them stating “our results are all below this”.
I had read a leaked report, conducted for Pfizer in relation to their regulatory submission in Japan. This was a study of distribution of the vaccine “envelope” after injection into rats. This showed very unusual tissue distribution. There was 10X more in ovaries & spleen than in most other tissues. Then a real shocker. I came across a paper from 2012, stating that these lipid nanoparticle formulations ALL accumulated in ovaries of several species.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
I find the concatenation of evidence, all pointing to a risk for reproductive health harms.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
THE KISSINGER REPORT, 1974
"ACTION TO CREATE CONDITIONS FOR FERTILITY DECLINE"
"Since inception of the program in 1965, AID has obligated nearly $625 million for population activities. These funds have been used primarily to (1) draw attention to the population…
"ACTION TO CREATE CONDITIONS FOR FERTILITY DECLINE"
"Since inception of the program in 1965, AID has obligated nearly $625 million for population activities. These funds have been used primarily to (1) draw attention to the population…
👍106👏10🤬8❤6
Forwarded from Covid Vaccine Victim Awareness Month
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'I no longer live, I merely exist.'
Adrian Walker suffered a severe adverse reaction to the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine.
The COVID vaccines have caused unprecedented harm to Adrian and thousands more.
The deaths are real, the injuries are real.
Stand with Adrian and support TRUTH BE TOLD throughout January.
Join us in Sheffield on the 3rd Januray at 1 pm in Sheffield City Centre at The Peace Gardens where Adrian will be speaking.
#TruthBeTold
We will be heard... it's time they listened.
Help us give a voice to the injured and bereaved by donating to the campaign: fund.freewick.com/campaign/3/truth-be-told
Adrian Walker suffered a severe adverse reaction to the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine.
The COVID vaccines have caused unprecedented harm to Adrian and thousands more.
The deaths are real, the injuries are real.
Stand with Adrian and support TRUTH BE TOLD throughout January.
Join us in Sheffield on the 3rd Januray at 1 pm in Sheffield City Centre at The Peace Gardens where Adrian will be speaking.
#TruthBeTold
We will be heard... it's time they listened.
Help us give a voice to the injured and bereaved by donating to the campaign: fund.freewick.com/campaign/3/truth-be-told
👍76😢47💔7❤1