Forwarded from Covid Vaccine Victim Awareness Month
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'I no longer live, I merely exist.'
Adrian Walker suffered a severe adverse reaction to the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine.
The COVID vaccines have caused unprecedented harm to Adrian and thousands more.
The deaths are real, the injuries are real.
Stand with Adrian and support TRUTH BE TOLD throughout January.
Join us in Sheffield on the 3rd Januray at 1 pm in Sheffield City Centre at The Peace Gardens where Adrian will be speaking.
#TruthBeTold
We will be heard... it's time they listened.
Help us give a voice to the injured and bereaved by donating to the campaign: fund.freewick.com/campaign/3/truth-be-told
Adrian Walker suffered a severe adverse reaction to the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine.
The COVID vaccines have caused unprecedented harm to Adrian and thousands more.
The deaths are real, the injuries are real.
Stand with Adrian and support TRUTH BE TOLD throughout January.
Join us in Sheffield on the 3rd Januray at 1 pm in Sheffield City Centre at The Peace Gardens where Adrian will be speaking.
#TruthBeTold
We will be heard... it's time they listened.
Help us give a voice to the injured and bereaved by donating to the campaign: fund.freewick.com/campaign/3/truth-be-told
👍76😢47💔7❤1
https://youtu.be/CoVRqqO6qeI
Those of you from UK will remember David Icke. His premonitions or whatever it was in 1991 led to his not only being humiliated but outcast. Critics called it “crucifixion by media”. A sympathetic person wouldn’t have interviewed him on live TV back then. He did rather walk into trouble & he got plenty. Not only was he saying outlandish things but he was close to what the people I now call the perpetrators were actually doing.
Interviewed again in 2016, you can see the frustration pouring out of him.
I’ve had just a three year introduction. It’s not a burden to wish on anybody.
Unfortunately, he was right. His earliest prognostications were incoherent but they’ve got so crisp over recent years that, when I realised covid was a global crime, long in the planning & connected to other global crimes, I did think of David.
He’s a good person.
Best wishes
Mike
Those of you from UK will remember David Icke. His premonitions or whatever it was in 1991 led to his not only being humiliated but outcast. Critics called it “crucifixion by media”. A sympathetic person wouldn’t have interviewed him on live TV back then. He did rather walk into trouble & he got plenty. Not only was he saying outlandish things but he was close to what the people I now call the perpetrators were actually doing.
Interviewed again in 2016, you can see the frustration pouring out of him.
I’ve had just a three year introduction. It’s not a burden to wish on anybody.
Unfortunately, he was right. His earliest prognostications were incoherent but they’ve got so crisp over recent years that, when I realised covid was a global crime, long in the planning & connected to other global crimes, I did think of David.
He’s a good person.
Best wishes
Mike
👍217❤73👏14🔥3🤔2
Journalist and Irish Times contributor Brian Hutton dies suddenly – The Irish Times
Hutton (46) wrote extensively as a journalist and was a founding co-director of an independent radio production company
https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2023/01/02/journalist-and-irish-times-contributor-brian-hutton-dies-suddenly/
Hutton (46) wrote extensively as a journalist and was a founding co-director of an independent radio production company
https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2023/01/02/journalist-and-irish-times-contributor-brian-hutton-dies-suddenly/
The Irish Times
Journalist and Irish Times contributor Brian Hutton dies suddenly
Hutton wrote extensively as a journalist and was a founding co-director of an independent radio production company
😢95👍24🔥3🥴2
The policy for testing Chinese arrivals poses three fundamental questions.
Is this the start of further “lockdown laws”?
If we now don’t trust Chinese data, why did we trust it so much at the beginning of the pandemic?
If we now don't trust the data coming out of China, how can we trust the testing used to get on the plane?
If we can bring back public health restrictions so quickly, what’s next?
https://trusttheevidence.substack.com/p/the-policy-for-testing-chinese-arrivals
Is this the start of further “lockdown laws”?
If we now don’t trust Chinese data, why did we trust it so much at the beginning of the pandemic?
If we now don't trust the data coming out of China, how can we trust the testing used to get on the plane?
If we can bring back public health restrictions so quickly, what’s next?
https://trusttheevidence.substack.com/p/the-policy-for-testing-chinese-arrivals
Trust the Evidence
The policy for testing Chinese arrivals poses three fundamental questions.
Is this the start of further “lockdown laws”?
👍79🤬28🤯9🔥6
There are many more people with Covid19 illness in our/your country than the total amount of people including the fully healthy vast majority who flies in from China. Variants are home-grown. Makes no difference to endemic disease. So what is the passenger testing really about?
Robin
https://t.me/robinmg/25610
Robin
https://t.me/robinmg/25610
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
The policy for testing Chinese arrivals poses three fundamental questions.
Is this the start of further “lockdown laws”?
If we now don’t trust Chinese data, why did we trust it so much at the beginning of the pandemic?
If we now don't trust the data coming…
Is this the start of further “lockdown laws”?
If we now don’t trust Chinese data, why did we trust it so much at the beginning of the pandemic?
If we now don't trust the data coming…
🤔64👍35🔥9🤬5❤1
"I disagree with Novak Djokovic completely" Martina Navratilova still not impressed with Serbian star's vaccination stance » FirstSportz
https://firstsportz.com/tennis-news-i-disagree-with-novak-djokovic-completely-on-one-thing-martina-navratilova-still-not-impressed-with-serbian-stars-vaccination-stance/
https://firstsportz.com/tennis-news-i-disagree-with-novak-djokovic-completely-on-one-thing-martina-navratilova-still-not-impressed-with-serbian-stars-vaccination-stance/
FirstSportz
“I disagree with Novak Djokovic completely” Martina Navratilova still not impressed with Serbian star’s vaccination stance
Tennis great Martina Navratilova has clarified her stance on former World No.1 Novak Djokovic, saying that she still disagrees with him when it comes to
🤡270👍34😁10🙈7😢4🤔1
Wimbledon great Martina Navratilova, 66, is diagnosed with throat and breast cancer | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11592179/Wimbledon-great-Martina-Navratilova-66-diagnosed-throat-breast-cancer.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11592179/Wimbledon-great-Martina-Navratilova-66-diagnosed-throat-breast-cancer.html
Mail Online
Billie Jean King leads support for Martina Navratilova, 66, calling the Wimbledon legend 'as brave as she is strong' after throat…
Today, Wimbledon's greatest ever singles champion, Martina Navratilova announced that doctors had diagnosed her with two forms of cancer.
😢71👍47🤡44🤔34😁21🏆2👏1🙏1
Return of the MASKS: Now health chiefs say face coverings should be brought back | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11592439/Return-MASKS-health-chiefs-say-face-coverings-brought-back.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11592439/Return-MASKS-health-chiefs-say-face-coverings-brought-back.html
Mail Online
Return of the MASKS: Health chiefs urge people to wear face coverings and say anyone feeling ill should 'stay at home' in echo…
The advice, issued by the UK Health Security Agency, also urges parents to keep their child out of school or nursery if they are ill and have a high temperature.
🤬189🤡133🤣24👍8🙈7🥴5
NEW Covid variant XBB.1.5 that is already behind one in 25 cases in the UK | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11591623/Experts-claim-NEW-Covid-variant-named-XBB-1-5.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11591623/Experts-claim-NEW-Covid-variant-named-XBB-1-5.html
Mail Online
NEW Covid variant XBB.1.5 that is already behind one in 25 cases in the UK is a 'wakeup call' and could worsen the NHS crisis,…
The strain, which is a sub-variant of Omicron, has mutations that help it to better infect people and dodge protection from vaccination and prior infection.
🤡230😁21🥴14👍5🤩2🤨2
All looks like a big deja-vu.. they are testing our resolve to oppose them and the resolve of the brainwashed to comply and oppose us.
Robin
Robin
👍286🔥36🤣7😁5🤬1🤡1
Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
The virus appears to be evolving in ways that evade immunity.
"A Cleveland Clinic study that tracked its healthcare workers..
Notably, workers who had received more doses were at higher risk of getting sick.
Those who received three more doses were 3.4 times as likely to get infected as the unvaccinated, while those who received two were only 2.6 times as likely.
“This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19,” the authors noted."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/are-vaccines-fueling-new-covid-variants-xbb-northeast-antibodies-mutation-strain-immune-imprinting-11672483618
The virus appears to be evolving in ways that evade immunity.
"A Cleveland Clinic study that tracked its healthcare workers..
Notably, workers who had received more doses were at higher risk of getting sick.
Those who received three more doses were 3.4 times as likely to get infected as the unvaccinated, while those who received two were only 2.6 times as likely.
“This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19,” the authors noted."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/are-vaccines-fueling-new-covid-variants-xbb-northeast-antibodies-mutation-strain-immune-imprinting-11672483618
👍125🤡30😁4💯3❤1
The Wall Street Journal arrived in 2023 at what Geert Vanden Bossche said in 2021, as I published on my website:
"Mass vaccination.. will eventually drive the propagation of more infectious variants."
- Geert Vanden Bossche
So we always knew this was going to happen.
The mainstream media is only about two years behind us in understanding what is going on.
Robin
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/09/13/why-mass-vaccinations-prolong-and-make-epidemics-deadlier-real-vaccine-expert-calls-out-flawed-government-pandemic-strategy/
"Mass vaccination.. will eventually drive the propagation of more infectious variants."
- Geert Vanden Bossche
So we always knew this was going to happen.
The mainstream media is only about two years behind us in understanding what is going on.
Robin
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/09/13/why-mass-vaccinations-prolong-and-make-epidemics-deadlier-real-vaccine-expert-calls-out-flawed-government-pandemic-strategy/
No Place Without Spirit
Why Mass Vaccinations Prolong & Make Epidemics Deadlier: Vaccines Expert Calls Out Governments
Geert Vanden Bossche Geert Vanden Bossche is a real independent vaccinologist. He is not an improvised expert coming from a different field rather than the pure study of the effect of vaccinations.…
💯163👍52🤡14🔥8
This is a very good quote from Vanden Bossche from 2021:
"Mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the middle of a viral pandemic will, for generations to come, become the most sobering example of the boundaries of human intervention in nature in general and of the boundaries of conventional vaccinology in particular. This irrational experiment will unambiguously highlight the clear-cut limitations of conventional vaccine approaches. It will convincingly illustrate that – unlike natural acute self-limiting infection or disease – ‘modern’ technologies alone do not suffice to develop vaccines that are capable of preventing viral transmission or immune escape. For that matter, even ‘modern’ vaccines will not allow conventional B or T cell-directed antigens to generate herd immunity when massively administered in the heat of a pandemic of a highly mutable virus.
Because of the disastrous consequences the current mass vaccination campaign will entail, I cannot imagine that the word ‘vaccine’ will continue to persist in the medical vade-mecum. In order to highlight the short-comings of all vaccines eliciting conventional B- or T cell-centered immune responses I propose to coin a new term for these vaccines and refer to them as ‘conditionally immune protection-inducing formulations’ (CIPIFs).
While the word ‘vaccine’ may be banned, the word ‘fact checker’ will only gain traction as a general term used for any scientifically illiterate person who uses arrogance to vilify those who speak the truth and promotes – in exchange for dirty money – a narrative and groupthink mentality that are merely inspired by the interests of the stakeholders they blindly support.
For lack of insight, international and public health authorities will continue to blame lack of success on the more infectious variants and propose (impose?) boosters as a never-ending strategy to chasing new emerging variants. This should ring a bell to people and make them understand that the mass vaccination program is nothing else but a big experiment. For how much longer is the public going to believe the treacherous narrative? One can only hope that more and more people will begin to realize that the outcome of this experiment is being evaluated on a purely empirical basis and fully unpredictable, at least in the mind of those who’re overstepping their competence and authority to impose vaccine mandates on never-ending booster shots and thereby trample on human rights while humiliating independent scientists who fight back with rational arguments out of passion for the truth. Only a mind that has lost its grasp on reality can fail to see how pathetic all this has become…."
Geert Vanden Bossche, (DVM, PhD)
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/09/13/why-mass-vaccinations-prolong-and-make-epidemics-deadlier-real-vaccine-expert-calls-out-flawed-government-pandemic-strategy/
"Mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the middle of a viral pandemic will, for generations to come, become the most sobering example of the boundaries of human intervention in nature in general and of the boundaries of conventional vaccinology in particular. This irrational experiment will unambiguously highlight the clear-cut limitations of conventional vaccine approaches. It will convincingly illustrate that – unlike natural acute self-limiting infection or disease – ‘modern’ technologies alone do not suffice to develop vaccines that are capable of preventing viral transmission or immune escape. For that matter, even ‘modern’ vaccines will not allow conventional B or T cell-directed antigens to generate herd immunity when massively administered in the heat of a pandemic of a highly mutable virus.
Because of the disastrous consequences the current mass vaccination campaign will entail, I cannot imagine that the word ‘vaccine’ will continue to persist in the medical vade-mecum. In order to highlight the short-comings of all vaccines eliciting conventional B- or T cell-centered immune responses I propose to coin a new term for these vaccines and refer to them as ‘conditionally immune protection-inducing formulations’ (CIPIFs).
While the word ‘vaccine’ may be banned, the word ‘fact checker’ will only gain traction as a general term used for any scientifically illiterate person who uses arrogance to vilify those who speak the truth and promotes – in exchange for dirty money – a narrative and groupthink mentality that are merely inspired by the interests of the stakeholders they blindly support.
For lack of insight, international and public health authorities will continue to blame lack of success on the more infectious variants and propose (impose?) boosters as a never-ending strategy to chasing new emerging variants. This should ring a bell to people and make them understand that the mass vaccination program is nothing else but a big experiment. For how much longer is the public going to believe the treacherous narrative? One can only hope that more and more people will begin to realize that the outcome of this experiment is being evaluated on a purely empirical basis and fully unpredictable, at least in the mind of those who’re overstepping their competence and authority to impose vaccine mandates on never-ending booster shots and thereby trample on human rights while humiliating independent scientists who fight back with rational arguments out of passion for the truth. Only a mind that has lost its grasp on reality can fail to see how pathetic all this has become…."
Geert Vanden Bossche, (DVM, PhD)
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/09/13/why-mass-vaccinations-prolong-and-make-epidemics-deadlier-real-vaccine-expert-calls-out-flawed-government-pandemic-strategy/
No Place Without Spirit
Why Mass Vaccinations Prolong & Make Epidemics Deadlier: Vaccines Expert Calls Out Governments
Geert Vanden Bossche Geert Vanden Bossche is a real independent vaccinologist. He is not an improvised expert coming from a different field rather than the pure study of the effect of vaccinations.…
👍158💯36👏9🔥4❤3🤡3😁1
ICAN Obtains Disturbing Information About AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 Vaccine from the UK Equivalent of the FDA - ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network
AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.
"One of these studies investigated biodistribution of the AstraZeneca vaccine, meaning where it goes in the body after injection, in mice. This study revealed that the viral vector DNA did not remain localized in the injection site but instead migrated to other organs. Disturbingly, the study found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs, and spleens of the mice following vaccination.
The study documents further revealed that, in early 2021, AstraZeneca was forced to amend its data sheet for the vaccine after concluding that there may have been a causal association between the vaccine and serious hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis.
A final shocking revelation in the documents was the heavily redacted discussion of two individuals who developed serious immune-mediated neurological demyelinating conditions following vaccination. Although it states there was “no evidence suggesting a causal relationship” between the vaccine and these events, the UK’s clinical overview conceded that “vaccinations could be associated with immune-mediated neurological conditions” and therefore these adverse events were included as an important potential risk in the vaccine’s risk management plan."
https://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-obtains-disturbing-information-about-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-from-the-uk-equivalent-of-the-fda/
AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.
"One of these studies investigated biodistribution of the AstraZeneca vaccine, meaning where it goes in the body after injection, in mice. This study revealed that the viral vector DNA did not remain localized in the injection site but instead migrated to other organs. Disturbingly, the study found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs, and spleens of the mice following vaccination.
The study documents further revealed that, in early 2021, AstraZeneca was forced to amend its data sheet for the vaccine after concluding that there may have been a causal association between the vaccine and serious hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis.
A final shocking revelation in the documents was the heavily redacted discussion of two individuals who developed serious immune-mediated neurological demyelinating conditions following vaccination. Although it states there was “no evidence suggesting a causal relationship” between the vaccine and these events, the UK’s clinical overview conceded that “vaccinations could be associated with immune-mediated neurological conditions” and therefore these adverse events were included as an important potential risk in the vaccine’s risk management plan."
https://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-obtains-disturbing-information-about-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-from-the-uk-equivalent-of-the-fda/
ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network
ICAN Obtains Disturbing Information About AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 Vaccine from the UK Equivalent of the FDA - ICAN - Informed Consent…
AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.
👍84😱27🔥11❤1
Forwarded from Coronavirus Plushie
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Allegory of Plato's Cave . . .
With his new perception of the world, the man will of course want to return to his friends to share his incredible discoveries, but the prisoners cannot recognise their own friend.
With his new perception of the world, the man will of course want to return to his friends to share his incredible discoveries, but the prisoners cannot recognise their own friend.
👍67💯22🔥5😢2
Q&A #25 : Children's hospitals in the USA are experiencing a major surge of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). Parents are worried. Why is this happening and should we be concerned? | Voice for Science and Solidarity
"In my opinion, the reason for the surge is that vaccinees now serve as an asymptomatic reservoir for RSV and other viral infections.
Of course, the part of the population that has weakened or untrained innate immunity and is not vaccinated will suffer most from the higher infectious pressure caused by the C-19 vax’ed segments of the population (i.e., young children and elderly people). Furthermore, young children may start out developing asymptomatic infection due to their innate immune protection. However, re-exposure at a time where they’re still sitting on nonneutralizing polyreactive IgM (as a result of previous asymptomatic infection) may increase their susceptibility to RSV infection (due to IgM Ab-mediated enhancement of viral infectiousness) and is therefore likely to cause more serious disease symptoms. The likelihood of re-exposure to RSV shortly after the first asymptomatic infection increases with higher RSV infection rate and the latter increases with higher rates of asymptomatic RSV transmission which, in turn, is high in highly C-19 vaccinated populations.
So, both enhanced asymptomatic transmission and enhanced susceptibility to RSV subsequent to previous asymptomatic infection are linked to mass vaccination."
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/q-a-25-childrens-hospitals-in-the-usa-are-experiencing-a-major-surge-of-respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv-parents-are-worried-why-is-this-happening-and-should-we-be-concerned
"In my opinion, the reason for the surge is that vaccinees now serve as an asymptomatic reservoir for RSV and other viral infections.
Of course, the part of the population that has weakened or untrained innate immunity and is not vaccinated will suffer most from the higher infectious pressure caused by the C-19 vax’ed segments of the population (i.e., young children and elderly people). Furthermore, young children may start out developing asymptomatic infection due to their innate immune protection. However, re-exposure at a time where they’re still sitting on nonneutralizing polyreactive IgM (as a result of previous asymptomatic infection) may increase their susceptibility to RSV infection (due to IgM Ab-mediated enhancement of viral infectiousness) and is therefore likely to cause more serious disease symptoms. The likelihood of re-exposure to RSV shortly after the first asymptomatic infection increases with higher RSV infection rate and the latter increases with higher rates of asymptomatic RSV transmission which, in turn, is high in highly C-19 vaccinated populations.
So, both enhanced asymptomatic transmission and enhanced susceptibility to RSV subsequent to previous asymptomatic infection are linked to mass vaccination."
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/q-a-25-childrens-hospitals-in-the-usa-are-experiencing-a-major-surge-of-respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv-parents-are-worried-why-is-this-happening-and-should-we-be-concerned
www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org
Q&A #25 : Children's hospitals in the USA are experiencing a major surge of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). Parents are worried.…
Although I do acknowledge the current surge in RSV cases, I don’t think it’s a critical priority. I’ve written several contributions on othe
👍103🙏12🤔10🤬6👏2
How many lives did the Covid vaccines really save?
"Any claims about the vaccine reducing the number of covid deaths are therefore irrelevant in assessing efficacy without considering the overall impact on all-cause mortality. Even if the vaccines really did save 20 million from covid deaths then it would not be effective if it led to more than 20 million deaths from adverse events.
In fact, not only is there now strong evidence of an increase in all-cause mortality among the vaccinated, but we do not believe there is any objective reliable evidence that the covid vaccines saved any PREVENTABLE deaths from covid.
There are nine reasons for coming to this conclusion:
1. No properly conducted randomized trial has provided evidence of any covid deaths avoided
They were never designed to do so [1]. Even if we accept the flawed Pfizer study results of efficacy based on 162 out of 22,000 placebo recipients getting covid compared to only 8 out of 22,000 vaccine recipients [2] not even one of those 162 placebo recipients in the trial who got covid died of covid.
2. The Pfizer trial actually provides some evidence of increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated
Although the numbers are too small to be statistically significant, in the 6-month Pfizer follow up there were more all-cause deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group (15 vs 14 deaths, later 21 vs 17) with just 3 people in total having covid listed as a cause of death (1 in vaccine group, 2 in placebo group) [3]. Moreover, the Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group [4].
3. Anecdotal evidence: Our own experience shows the vaccines are neither effective nor safe
Since the vaccination programme started, we have observed that it is our vaccinated friends and colleagues who are almost exclusively getting ill from covid. And it is also the vaccinated who we see dying unexpectedly. This anecdotal evidence of increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated is backed up by the only independent survey evidence attempting to determine the difference in all-cause mortality [5].
4. Official government statistics claiming vaccines reduce covid mortality cannot be trusted
The gatekeepers of such data have a major vested interest in claiming success of the vaccine programme. They therefore do not allow access to the raw data and frequently manipulate the data [6]. Moreover, these data are compromised by the flawed definition of what constitutes a covid death (‘anybody dying of any cause within 28 days of a positive PCR test’) and defining a person getting covid within 14 days of vaccination as ‘unvaccinated’ [7], [8]. These various corrupt definition and data integrity problems all create bias in favour of vaccine efficacy and are also evident in all observational studies claiming vaccines reduce covid mortality.
5. Official government statistics claiming vaccines reduce all-cause mortality are demonstrably flawed
In addition to all the definition and data integrity problems, official data (for example from the UK’s office for National Statistics [9] are further compromised in that 1) many deaths shortly after vaccination are misclassified as unvaccinated and 2) grossly underestimate the population proportion of unvaccinated, which inflates the true mortality rate of the unvaccinated [10]. When adjusted for these biases, the data show that since the start of 2022, all-cause mortality in the ever-vaccinated is higher than the never vaccinated in all-age groups [11].
6. Artificially inflated covid death numbers
Many deaths classified as covid deaths were not caused by covid, and many of those that were could have been prevented if demonstrably successful alternative early protocol treatments were provided. Moreover, many covid deaths may ultimately have been caused by denial of antibiotics to treat the resulting bacterial pneumonia that was the ultimate cause of death [12], [13].
7. National comparisons suggest the vaccines do not reduce covid mortality.."
Cont:
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/kirsch-challenge
"Any claims about the vaccine reducing the number of covid deaths are therefore irrelevant in assessing efficacy without considering the overall impact on all-cause mortality. Even if the vaccines really did save 20 million from covid deaths then it would not be effective if it led to more than 20 million deaths from adverse events.
In fact, not only is there now strong evidence of an increase in all-cause mortality among the vaccinated, but we do not believe there is any objective reliable evidence that the covid vaccines saved any PREVENTABLE deaths from covid.
There are nine reasons for coming to this conclusion:
1. No properly conducted randomized trial has provided evidence of any covid deaths avoided
They were never designed to do so [1]. Even if we accept the flawed Pfizer study results of efficacy based on 162 out of 22,000 placebo recipients getting covid compared to only 8 out of 22,000 vaccine recipients [2] not even one of those 162 placebo recipients in the trial who got covid died of covid.
2. The Pfizer trial actually provides some evidence of increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated
Although the numbers are too small to be statistically significant, in the 6-month Pfizer follow up there were more all-cause deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group (15 vs 14 deaths, later 21 vs 17) with just 3 people in total having covid listed as a cause of death (1 in vaccine group, 2 in placebo group) [3]. Moreover, the Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group [4].
3. Anecdotal evidence: Our own experience shows the vaccines are neither effective nor safe
Since the vaccination programme started, we have observed that it is our vaccinated friends and colleagues who are almost exclusively getting ill from covid. And it is also the vaccinated who we see dying unexpectedly. This anecdotal evidence of increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated is backed up by the only independent survey evidence attempting to determine the difference in all-cause mortality [5].
4. Official government statistics claiming vaccines reduce covid mortality cannot be trusted
The gatekeepers of such data have a major vested interest in claiming success of the vaccine programme. They therefore do not allow access to the raw data and frequently manipulate the data [6]. Moreover, these data are compromised by the flawed definition of what constitutes a covid death (‘anybody dying of any cause within 28 days of a positive PCR test’) and defining a person getting covid within 14 days of vaccination as ‘unvaccinated’ [7], [8]. These various corrupt definition and data integrity problems all create bias in favour of vaccine efficacy and are also evident in all observational studies claiming vaccines reduce covid mortality.
5. Official government statistics claiming vaccines reduce all-cause mortality are demonstrably flawed
In addition to all the definition and data integrity problems, official data (for example from the UK’s office for National Statistics [9] are further compromised in that 1) many deaths shortly after vaccination are misclassified as unvaccinated and 2) grossly underestimate the population proportion of unvaccinated, which inflates the true mortality rate of the unvaccinated [10]. When adjusted for these biases, the data show that since the start of 2022, all-cause mortality in the ever-vaccinated is higher than the never vaccinated in all-age groups [11].
6. Artificially inflated covid death numbers
Many deaths classified as covid deaths were not caused by covid, and many of those that were could have been prevented if demonstrably successful alternative early protocol treatments were provided. Moreover, many covid deaths may ultimately have been caused by denial of antibiotics to treat the resulting bacterial pneumonia that was the ultimate cause of death [12], [13].
7. National comparisons suggest the vaccines do not reduce covid mortality.."
Cont:
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/kirsch-challenge
Substack
How many lives did the Covid vaccines really save?
In response to Steve Kirsch's challenge, we summarise the evidence and list nine reasons that the covid-19 vaccines have not reduced all-cause mortality.
👍115❤2
New data from Israel's HMOs reveals a decline in the number of pregnant women in their first trimester starting in February 2021, immediately after the start of the Covid-19 vaccination rollout
"The new data from Maccabi is particularly concerning in light of a similar and even more dramatic trend, which emerges from data from another HMO – Meuchedet, on the number of women who were in their first trimester each month during the same period, starting in February 2021. This data was also obtained through a FOI request, submitted by attorney Ori Xavi in July 2022. Also According to Muehedat data, the decline began in January 2021 - when the number of women in their first trimester was 8,267 and has since plunged to 6,279 in January 2022 – a 24% decrease during 2021."
“This very alarming signal cannot be explained by Covid-19 infections”, concluded the researchers. "The correlation with the vaccination campaign and the situation at the time suggests that vaccination had physiological influences on the fertility of women or men".
https://rtmag.co.il/english/data-from-israel-s-hmos-reveal-a-decline-in-the-number-of-pregnant-women-in-their-first-trimester-starting-in-february-2021,-immediately-after-the-start-of-the-covid-19-vaccination-rollout
"The new data from Maccabi is particularly concerning in light of a similar and even more dramatic trend, which emerges from data from another HMO – Meuchedet, on the number of women who were in their first trimester each month during the same period, starting in February 2021. This data was also obtained through a FOI request, submitted by attorney Ori Xavi in July 2022. Also According to Muehedat data, the decline began in January 2021 - when the number of women in their first trimester was 8,267 and has since plunged to 6,279 in January 2022 – a 24% decrease during 2021."
“This very alarming signal cannot be explained by Covid-19 infections”, concluded the researchers. "The correlation with the vaccination campaign and the situation at the time suggests that vaccination had physiological influences on the fertility of women or men".
https://rtmag.co.il/english/data-from-israel-s-hmos-reveal-a-decline-in-the-number-of-pregnant-women-in-their-first-trimester-starting-in-february-2021,-immediately-after-the-start-of-the-covid-19-vaccination-rollout
rtmag.co.il
Data from Israel's HMOs reveal: a decline in the number of pregnant wo
New data from Israel's HMOs reveal: a decline in the number of pregnant women in their first trimester starting in
👍48😱19❤3🤔1😢1