USA – Covid-19 Injection Deaths
Table shows the number of deaths that have been reported to VAERS following a vaccination since 1990.
Over 77% of all deaths reported from vaccines in the last 32 years have been reported following a Covid injection
Link: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Table shows the number of deaths that have been reported to VAERS following a vaccination since 1990.
Over 77% of all deaths reported from vaccines in the last 32 years have been reported following a Covid injection
Link: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
🤬25👍16
USA- Covid-19 Injection Deaths
Table shows the number of days after a Covid-19 injection that the 33,591 deaths now reported to VAERS occurred.
21% of all deaths reported were within 1 day of a Covid injection, 50% within just 28 days.
Link : https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Table shows the number of days after a Covid-19 injection that the 33,591 deaths now reported to VAERS occurred.
21% of all deaths reported were within 1 day of a Covid injection, 50% within just 28 days.
Link : https://openvaers.com/covid-data
👍26🤬16😱14
USA- Covid-19 Injection Deaths
Table shows the average number of deaths reported per year following a vaccination since the 1990’s and the number of deaths reported in just two years from the Covid-19 injections
Link: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Table shows the average number of deaths reported per year following a vaccination since the 1990’s and the number of deaths reported in just two years from the Covid-19 injections
Link: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
😱20🤬8👍7😭3🥰1
"James Roguski Shows Us How To Nag Congress To Stop International "Health" Mandates"
https://youtu.be/cNwkK-xJaTo
https://youtu.be/cNwkK-xJaTo
YouTube
James Roguski Shows Us How To Nag Congress To Stop International "Health" Mandates
You can be a real nag by clicking on a red button. And you can get local by finding the multiple locations where your congress person is hiding out. This is next generation warfare against the world medical industrial complex. Anybody can do this! Even you!
👍71👏6
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
JUST IN - New Zealand's PM Jacinda Ardern suddenly resigns.
Labour leader says she "‘no longer had enough in the tank" to do the job as prime minister.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/1615867812676780035/
@disclosetv
Labour leader says she "‘no longer had enough in the tank" to do the job as prime minister.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/1615867812676780035/
@disclosetv
🎉322👍73👏25🤡23❤20🤔19🔥9😁5💯1
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥 Rebel News grills Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla about his ineffective and unsafe mRNA shots.
Why did you keep it secret that the vaccines do not stop transmission?
How many boosters for you to be happy enough with your earnings?
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1615782109872021504
@KanekoaTheGreat
Why did you keep it secret that the vaccines do not stop transmission?
How many boosters for you to be happy enough with your earnings?
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1615782109872021504
@KanekoaTheGreat
🔥229👍69👏26❤20🤬3🤣2
Forwarded from Children’s Health Defense
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: German Court Orders Forced Vaccination of Holocaust Survivor ☝️☝️☝️
"This is opening the floodgates potentially to mass incarceration of people who refuse to be injected with experimental products"
Watch the FULL report with holocaust survivor Vera Sharav on #CHDTV
⏯️ https://bit.ly/3CZkTER
"This is opening the floodgates potentially to mass incarceration of people who refuse to be injected with experimental products"
Watch the FULL report with holocaust survivor Vera Sharav on #CHDTV
⏯️ https://bit.ly/3CZkTER
🤬182😱26👍16🤡6🥰1😁1
Thank you to those who came to the Q&A last night!
The next Q&A with Charles Dance after a screening of #TheBookofVision is at the Rex Cinema in Berkhamsted (UK) on 28th January.
https://therexberkhamsted.com
The next Q&A with Charles Dance after a screening of #TheBookofVision is at the Rex Cinema in Berkhamsted (UK) on 28th January.
https://therexberkhamsted.com
❤49👍26
NHS Reform Means a Fundamental Rebalancing of Power Away From Doctors and Managers and Towards the Paying Public
"Most commentators consider the foundation of the NHS in 1948 as the key date in the history of medicine in the U.K. My view is that the passage of the National Insurance act in 1911 is a more significant moment. The centrality of this date is admirably explained in David Green’s important book Working class patients and the Medical establishment. I commend it to interested readers.
To summarise Green’s book, 1911 marked the moment where the state first became involved in healthcare provision via a general taxation levy. Prior to that, medical provision for working people had largely been provided through the ‘friendly societies’ – mutual ‘self-help’ subscription organisations run by the working class to spread the risk and cost of medical treatment. The destitute were provided for by the multiple iterations of the Poor Laws. Friendly societies directly employed doctors on modest rates and were not universally popular with the medical profession – partly due to the low pay, but also due to the perception in some quarters that being beholden to working people reduced doctors’ social status. Doctors generally preferred providing services to the middle and upper classes who could pay more. But economic reality forced most to sign up to friendly societies’ remuneration structures. Economic power was with the societies and their members because they paid doctors’ wages.
1911 marked the point where economic power tilted from the consumer to the provider. The state inserted itself as an intermediary between the citizen and the providers of medical care. Medical remuneration rates increased, eventually very significantly, because of effective professional lobbying of the Government. Friendly societies participating in the National Insurance scheme were sidelined. The mass of the working public were deprived of economic power in the medical arena and excluded from active participation in deciding how their money was spent. 1948 marked further encroachment by the state in the administration and centralisation of healthcare.
Attempts during the 1980s and 1990s to rebalance the system in favour of the taxpayer failed, not least because of vocal and sustained opposition from the BMA.
..Until the mid-1990s, a paternalistic medical establishment made most of the decisions. Since that point it has been an increasingly assertive but ineffective managerial cadre incorporating politically malleable former clinicians co-opted into the managerial structure as human shields for the executive. The taxpaying public has consistently footed the bill for multiple failed experiments masquerading as ‘reforms’, which in reality have been motivated by political ‘optics’ rather than meaningful beneficial change. Like non-player characters in a video game, the section of society paying for the NHS has been relegated to the role of impotent bystanders as the entire edifice collapses under the weight of its internal contradictions.
NHS reform does not mean adjusting the number of patients seen per clinic session, or arguments about maternity leave provision. Meaningful reform means a fundamental rebalancing of power in the system away from doctors and managers and towards the people who pay for medical care in this country. It requires disintermediation – the removal of middle men between the person paying for a service and the professional providing it.
Meaningful reform is obviously necessary. My expectation is that the NHS and medical establishment will adopt a ‘consent and evade’ strategy. Sensing public dissatisfaction with the manifest failure of the NHS socialist model, they will vocally endorse change. while simultaneously preventing any real shift in where economic power lies. We risk ending up with the worst case scenario of an inadequate politicised NHS run by and for the provider interest and a ruthlessly exploitative private medical sector. I rest my case."
https://dailysceptic.org/?p=152975
"Most commentators consider the foundation of the NHS in 1948 as the key date in the history of medicine in the U.K. My view is that the passage of the National Insurance act in 1911 is a more significant moment. The centrality of this date is admirably explained in David Green’s important book Working class patients and the Medical establishment. I commend it to interested readers.
To summarise Green’s book, 1911 marked the moment where the state first became involved in healthcare provision via a general taxation levy. Prior to that, medical provision for working people had largely been provided through the ‘friendly societies’ – mutual ‘self-help’ subscription organisations run by the working class to spread the risk and cost of medical treatment. The destitute were provided for by the multiple iterations of the Poor Laws. Friendly societies directly employed doctors on modest rates and were not universally popular with the medical profession – partly due to the low pay, but also due to the perception in some quarters that being beholden to working people reduced doctors’ social status. Doctors generally preferred providing services to the middle and upper classes who could pay more. But economic reality forced most to sign up to friendly societies’ remuneration structures. Economic power was with the societies and their members because they paid doctors’ wages.
1911 marked the point where economic power tilted from the consumer to the provider. The state inserted itself as an intermediary between the citizen and the providers of medical care. Medical remuneration rates increased, eventually very significantly, because of effective professional lobbying of the Government. Friendly societies participating in the National Insurance scheme were sidelined. The mass of the working public were deprived of economic power in the medical arena and excluded from active participation in deciding how their money was spent. 1948 marked further encroachment by the state in the administration and centralisation of healthcare.
Attempts during the 1980s and 1990s to rebalance the system in favour of the taxpayer failed, not least because of vocal and sustained opposition from the BMA.
..Until the mid-1990s, a paternalistic medical establishment made most of the decisions. Since that point it has been an increasingly assertive but ineffective managerial cadre incorporating politically malleable former clinicians co-opted into the managerial structure as human shields for the executive. The taxpaying public has consistently footed the bill for multiple failed experiments masquerading as ‘reforms’, which in reality have been motivated by political ‘optics’ rather than meaningful beneficial change. Like non-player characters in a video game, the section of society paying for the NHS has been relegated to the role of impotent bystanders as the entire edifice collapses under the weight of its internal contradictions.
NHS reform does not mean adjusting the number of patients seen per clinic session, or arguments about maternity leave provision. Meaningful reform means a fundamental rebalancing of power in the system away from doctors and managers and towards the people who pay for medical care in this country. It requires disintermediation – the removal of middle men between the person paying for a service and the professional providing it.
Meaningful reform is obviously necessary. My expectation is that the NHS and medical establishment will adopt a ‘consent and evade’ strategy. Sensing public dissatisfaction with the manifest failure of the NHS socialist model, they will vocally endorse change. while simultaneously preventing any real shift in where economic power lies. We risk ending up with the worst case scenario of an inadequate politicised NHS run by and for the provider interest and a ruthlessly exploitative private medical sector. I rest my case."
https://dailysceptic.org/?p=152975
The Daily Sceptic
NHS Reform Means a Fundamental Rebalancing of Power Away From Doctors and Managers and Towards the Paying Public – The Daily Sceptic
NHS reform does not mean merely increasing patients per session or cutting maternity leave. It means a fundamental rebalancing of power away from doctors and managers and towards the public who pay for medical care.
👍55👏35🤬4🤔1
Working-class Patients and the Medical Establishment: Self-help in Britain from the mid-nineteenth century to 1948
"The working classes of nineteenth-century Britain organised for themselves an extraordinarily effective scheme of medical care. Through local friendly societies and medical institutes, they engaged doctors to care for them, and did so with a degree of success which this pioneering study reveals for the first time. A surprisingly high proportion of working men were covered.
These schemes were consistently opposed by the medical establishment. They obliged doctors to compete for positions, so keeping down their charges; still worse, they put doctors in the position of paid professional servants of working-class clients.
Nevertheless, so long as the doctors worked within the ‘medical marketplace’, their patients proved well able to get good service from them. It was not until the British Medical Association was backed by government action, in the 1911 Act, that the professionals were able to make their own terms and dictate to their patients. The setting-up of the National Health Service in 1948 kept, in this respect, firmly to the spirit of 1911. David Green’s book is a work of history that opens up a neglected area."
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Working-class-Patients-Medical-Establishment-mid-nineteenth-ebook/dp/B00TP14KWY/
"The working classes of nineteenth-century Britain organised for themselves an extraordinarily effective scheme of medical care. Through local friendly societies and medical institutes, they engaged doctors to care for them, and did so with a degree of success which this pioneering study reveals for the first time. A surprisingly high proportion of working men were covered.
These schemes were consistently opposed by the medical establishment. They obliged doctors to compete for positions, so keeping down their charges; still worse, they put doctors in the position of paid professional servants of working-class clients.
Nevertheless, so long as the doctors worked within the ‘medical marketplace’, their patients proved well able to get good service from them. It was not until the British Medical Association was backed by government action, in the 1911 Act, that the professionals were able to make their own terms and dictate to their patients. The setting-up of the National Health Service in 1948 kept, in this respect, firmly to the spirit of 1911. David Green’s book is a work of history that opens up a neglected area."
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Working-class-Patients-Medical-Establishment-mid-nineteenth-ebook/dp/B00TP14KWY/
Amazon
Working-class Patients and the Medical Establishment: Self-help in Britain from the mid-nineteenth century to 1948
The working classes of nineteenth-century Britain organised for themselves an extraordinarily effective scheme of medical care. Through local friendly societies and medical institutes, they engaged doctors to care for them, and did so with a degree of success…
👍49🔥5👏3
If you watched the film last night, thank you for coming! Do feel free to rate it on Imdb. It helps us get it to more screens.
IMDb: : The Book of Vision
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4016312/
IMDb: : The Book of Vision
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4016312/
IMDb
The Book of Vision (2020) ⭐ 7.1 | Drama, Mystery
1h 39m
❤31👍23
Forwarded from The Daily Sceptic
NHS Reform Means a Fundamental Rebalancing of Power Away From Doctors and Managers and Towards the Paying Public
➥ Read this article
@LockdownSceptics
➥ Read this article
@LockdownSceptics
The Daily Sceptic
NHS Reform Means a Fundamental Rebalancing of Power Away From Doctors and Managers and Towards the Paying Public – The Daily Sceptic
NHS reform does not mean merely increasing patients per session or cutting maternity leave. It means a fundamental rebalancing of power away from doctors and managers and towards the public who pay for medical care.
👍43👏6
The new mutual aid based (and not centralised state controlled/corporate stakeholder controlled socialism/capitalism based like the NHS) friendly societies are the community health hubs of the @ThePeoplesHealthAlliance.
Join them:
The People’s Health Alliance - For The People, by The People
https://the-pha.org/
Join them:
The People’s Health Alliance - For The People, by The People
https://the-pha.org/
The People’s Health Alliance
The People’s Health Alliance - For The People, by The People
Explore resources, find holistic practitioners, and discover your local community groups.
👍58❤16🔥4👏1🤔1
Forwarded from Chief Nerd
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NEW — Trump Dismisses COVID Vaccine Safety Concerns, Says They Saved Millions of Lives
“You have many reports that say the vaccines saved tens of millions of lives and without the vaccines you would have had a thing like we had in 1917.”
https://rumble.com/v2689sc-trump-dismisses-covid-vaccine-safety-concerns-says-they-saved-millions-of-l.html
https://twitter.com/thechiefnerd/status/1615957705163784194
@ChiefNerd
“You have many reports that say the vaccines saved tens of millions of lives and without the vaccines you would have had a thing like we had in 1917.”
https://rumble.com/v2689sc-trump-dismisses-covid-vaccine-safety-concerns-says-they-saved-millions-of-l.html
https://twitter.com/thechiefnerd/status/1615957705163784194
@ChiefNerd
🤡290🤬94😢18🤔12👍9🤣7🙈7🤯5❤3😨3🥴2
"Antioxidant drugs, such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), were effective against all variants both in human lung cells, and in a humanised mouse model. Our study strongly supports the immediate use of available antioxidant drugs, such as NAC, as a general and effective anti-COVID-19 approach."
Identification of druggable host dependency factors shared by multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern | bioRxiv
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.09.523209v1
Identification of druggable host dependency factors shared by multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern | bioRxiv
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.09.523209v1
bioRxiv
Identification of druggable host dependency factors shared by multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern
The high mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 leads to emergence of several variants, some of which are resistant to vaccines and drugs targeting viral elements. Targeting host dependency factors – cell proteins required for viral replication - would help avoid resistance.…
👍64🙏12🤡2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qCEGQhrfqaM1/
I’m posting this again, because it’s one of the most important activities in my opinion since this crime began.
If you’re not yet aware of Katherine Watt, it’s highly likely that your understanding of what’s gone on in relation to the “vaccines” is very different from the macabre and frightening reality.
Very smart persons both, interviewer is Sasha Latypova.
Best wishes
Mike
I’m posting this again, because it’s one of the most important activities in my opinion since this crime began.
If you’re not yet aware of Katherine Watt, it’s highly likely that your understanding of what’s gone on in relation to the “vaccines” is very different from the macabre and frightening reality.
Very smart persons both, interviewer is Sasha Latypova.
Best wishes
Mike
Bitchute
Discussion with Katherine Watt on American Domestic Bioterrorism Program
Transcript of this conversation and many relevant links available here: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/ALwKW-DomesticBioteroProg-110422.html
Description: Katherine is an independent journalist and a legal researcher who has created a meticulously…
Description: Katherine is an independent journalist and a legal researcher who has created a meticulously…
👍82🔥14❤1🤔1
IMMUNE TOLERANCE
"Our findings revealed that repeated dosing after the establishment of vaccine response might not further improve the antigen-specific reactivity; instead, it could cause systematic tolerance and inability to generate effective humoral and cellular immune responses to current SARS-CoV-2 variants."
Extended SARS-CoV-2 RBD booster vaccination induces humoral and cellular immune tolerance in mice
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017515
"Our findings revealed that repeated dosing after the establishment of vaccine response might not further improve the antigen-specific reactivity; instead, it could cause systematic tolerance and inability to generate effective humoral and cellular immune responses to current SARS-CoV-2 variants."
Extended SARS-CoV-2 RBD booster vaccination induces humoral and cellular immune tolerance in mice
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017515
👍37🤬10🔥3🤡3