https://palexander.substack.com/p/devastating-four-4-graphs-in-uk-that

If anyone is struggling to accept that mass scale iatrogenesis (medically induced) killing was responsible for a great number of care home deaths, please read this. In particular, please review midazolam prescriptions v time.
Then antibiotic prescriptions v time.

The results were predictable. The treatments were the obverse of the ideal. That’s not luck. These treatment guidelines came from the top in each healthcare system.

Best wishes
Mike

https://palexander.substack.com/p/devastating-four-4-graphs-in-uk-that

If anyone is struggling to accept that mass scale iatrogenesis (medically induced) killing was responsible for a great number of care home deaths, please read this. In particular, please review midazolam prescriptions v time.
Then antibiotic prescriptions v time.

The results were predictable. The treatments were the obverse of the ideal. That’s not luck. These treatment guidelines came from the top in each healthcare system.

Best wishes
Mike

WHO’s Pandemic Accord Will Give It Control Over U.S. Livestock and Food Supply

"The WHO is already letting us know they’re going to start with poultry—and you’re either going to allow your flocks to be controlled, surveilled, and vaccinated, or they’ll be killed so the viruses they don’t have won’t spread to people (or harm the environment). They are already laying the groundwork for this, and the authority they’ll derive this power from is the pandemic accord.

If you read through the 32-page draft of the accord, you’ll see how this document gives the WHO the authority to take control over U.S. agriculture and our food supply:

By signing onto the accord, a country acknowledges that “most emerging infectious diseases originate in animals, including wildlife and domesticated animals, then spill over to people.” (See p. 6)

From the outset, they’re laying the foundation that “most infectious diseases” begin in animals; thus, their ability to regulate animals is within their purview.
Parties must reaffirm the importance of a “One Health approach” to detect and prevent health threats at the animal and human interface, “in particular zoonotic spill-over and mutations, and to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems.” (See p. 6)

In other words, a member state that signs on to the accord has to agree to drink the Kool-Ade. They don’t want member states dissenting, so everyone needs to “reaffirm” their loyalty to an initiative called the “One Health Approach,” whose scope includes the health of people, animals, AND ecosystems.
Parties must acknowledge “the creation of the Quadripartite” to “better address any One Health-related issue.”

Here, you see who will have the “authority” over food and agriculture. It’s not the United States Department of Agriculture, Congress, your states, landowners, or farmers. It’s not even your elected officials or U.S. citizens.

The draft states explicitly that the “Quadripartite” consists of the WHO—whose top three donors include the U.S., Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the People’s Republic of China—the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health, and the United Nations Environment Programme.

By signing this accord, a country must commit to integrating a “One Health surveillance system [. . .] to identify and assess the risks and emergence of pathogens and variants with pandemic potential, in order to minimize spill-over events, mutations and the risks associated with zoonotic neglected tropical and vector-borne diseases, with a view to preventing small-scale outbreaks in wildlife or domesticated animals from becoming a pandemic (page 24).

The WHO’s website further states:

“Critical areas this panel addresses include food production and distribution, urbanization and infrastructure development, international travel and trade, activities that lead to biodiversity loss and climate change, and those that put increased pressure on the natural resource base — all of which can lead to the emergence of zoonotic diseases.”

https://earlking56.family.blog/2023/02/24/whos-pandemic-accord-will-give-it-control-over-u-s-livestock-and-food-supply/

The use of Midazolam in NHS Guideline NG163 was challenged and warnings were raised by leading expert medical Professors and Doctors but were ignored by the UK Government, so who authorised NG163 using Midazolam to ‘treat’ Covid19?

Managing COVID-19 symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community: summary of NICE guidelines
BMJ 2020; 369 doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1461 
(Published 20 April 2020)

"The combination of opioid, benzodiazepine and/or neuroleptic is used in specialist palliative care settings for symptom control and for ‘palliative sedation’ to reduce agitation at the end of life.[15] It takes great skill and experience to use palliative sedation proportionately so that extreme physical and existential distress are palliated, but death is not primarily accelerated. NG163 states: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.” If COVID-19 infection were uniformly fatal, this would be an acceptable statement. But for people not previously known to be at the end of life, there is potential risk of unintended serious harm, if these medications are used incorrectly and without the benefit of specialist palliative care advice.

In summary, we welcome NICE’s rapid production of practical guidelines to help community practitioners prescribe medication to ease the distress of people with serious COVID-19 infection. However, as current or retired consultants in palliative medicine, we respectfully suggest that some recommendations in NG163 should be revised to prevent inadvertently adding to that suffering."

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1461/rr-1

A reminder about our music channel.

DJs Robin Monotti & Eric Clapton

t.me/lovenotfearmankind

Ontario Judge Rules In Favor of Dad Trying To Prevent Kids From Getting COVID Jab Despite Mother’s Insistence

A Canadian judge, Honorable Richard T. Bennett, has ruled in favor of a father who challenged vaccine effectiveness and safety in a fight to keep his children, aged 4, 5 & 10, from getting jabbed.   

“When it comes to the issue of government messaging and COVID-19 vaccines, it would appear that most courts have not questioned the messaging of governments,” Bennett stated in his ruling. “History has taught us that governments and the media does not always act in a manner that promotes public health.” 

READ MORE
@childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

"But when it comes to the population-level benefits of masking, the verdict is in: Mask mandates were a bust. Those skeptics who were furiously mocked as cranks and occasionally censored as “misinformers” for opposing mandates were right. The mainstream experts and pundits who supported mandates were wrong. In a better world, it would behoove the latter group to acknowledge their error, along with its considerable physical, psychological, pedagogical and political costs.

Don’t count on it..."

https://web.archive.org/web/20230222000304/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/21/opinion/do-mask-mandates-work.html/

"This is why I am asking the Government questions about NG163 and the use of Midazolam and Morphine on elderly patients in care homes and hospitals during the Covid 19 pandemic. We will get to the truth on this matter."
[Andrew Bridgen, twitter]
Listen to the audio attached to the tweet here:
https://m.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=144&width=448&referrer=www.twitter.com&share_id=NS-UNK-UNK-UNK-IOS_GK0T-GK1C&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FAndrewBridgenMP%2Fvideos%2Fimportant-sound-on-3-minute-sound-clipthis-is-why-i-am-asking-the-government-que%2F224351520063220%2F

More on NG163:
t.me/robinmg/26536

Robin Monotti laughs out loudly at the mere mention of "15 Minute Cities"..

Channel @RobinMG

YouTube link:
https://youtu.be/7qr0cmOA_rw

https://globalwalkout.com/step-19/

Of all the things you can do that definitively adds friction to the takeover by the totalitarians, using cash as much as is possible is well up there.

The central bankers know exactly who spent how much, where and on what if you use a card, phone app or bank (especially direct debit).

When they choose the moment to reset the financial system, the one thing they hate is uncertainty.

When cash is used, they may of may not have a record of individual items purchased. Smaller shops may well not use automated ordering that large supermarkets definitely do. They don’t go round doing manual stock taking like they did when I was a supermarket employee (after school and at weekends for years).

The more times cash is used & the greater amount in aggregate cash is used, the larger their blind spot.

It may seem futile, but collectively it’s anything but that, it’s instead like a handful of dust thrown in the perpetrators’ eyes.

When you pay cash, you personally get anonymity.

The greater the number of transactions about which the perpetrators are completely blind, the greater the uncertainty they’ll have as they approach the moment to “throw the switch”. Our goal is to make the timing & certainty as difficult as possible. Because they don’t know what cash is being used for & who’s using it, they cannot accurately predict the impact of curtailing cash usage (which will certainly happen as part of their total control agenda).

Please make the criminals' task as uncertain as possible and get into the groove of paying cash for as many transactions as you can.

If you can eschew the discounts please favour small, independent businesses over chain stores. Disregard the rewards they offer for using cards in supermarkets and petrol.

What’s your freedom worth? Is your data worth so little that you’ll sell it for a 1% discount? Now that you know what they’re doing with that “digital exhaust”?

A very short but I found thought provoking article.
To what extent do we think before & while we are speaking?
One clue is the use of stock phrases. High usage implies lack of thought. So it’s proposed. I agree.

Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/mimicking-instead-of-thinking

I was recently asked (by a good journalist from the alternative media) to comment on some complicated issues in relation to birth rates, miscarriage rates etc.
I chose not to get into a foul “debate” going on on Twitter, and I explained why not.

Here’s my note, anonymised.

Best wishes
Mike

I no longer waste any time on details, even important ones.
Why not?
Well, because we’ve established beyond ANY doubt that:
1. *Every single thing we were told is a lie.
2. The “vaccines” not only don’t work to protect people, but they are injurious and have killed millions.
Personally I no longer believe there was any novel respiratory virus, though my beliefs don’t change anything.
See Denis Rancourt’s articles & interviews.

So arguing details just wears us out.

I stick with big picture, because this is the heart of it.

If we can’t persuade people of that, humanity is going down.

Best wishes
Mike

Ps: Wodarg & I were absolutely correct to warn of these toxins. Specifically in relation to pregnant women, we NEVER ever give experimental medical interventions to pregnant women. Not even in cases where she might benefit. Prior to even contemplating that act, we demand full reproductive toxicology reports, three segments in two species. Also, a huge amount of anecdotal evidence from non-pregnant patients and usually some from inadvertently dosed pregnant women. Only then. So blasting all pregnant women using lies to back it up? Censorship & smearing of those simply reminding people what we have done since thalidomide (60 years+) is appropriate? No. It’s more evidence of malign acts of unconscionable evil.

*pps: by which I’m referring to (1) extent of population health threat; (2) who is at special risk & it’s not kids); (3) that lockdown worked; (4) that masking reduces transmission & is harmless; (5) that transmission from people without symptoms was a major driver; (6) that mass testing was useful and necessary; (7) that business & school closures were necessary; (8) that border restrictions were necessary (they’re STILL in force in USA, over three years since the start of this alleged “pandemic”); (9) that vaccination could EVER have been an appropriate response; (10) that early treatment of sick people, uniquely those declared as having COVID, was inappropriate, denying decades of off-label prescribing; (11) that EVERYONE needs to be jabbed, even those not at any risk, or having recovered & thus being immune, or being pregnant); (12) that certification of having been jabbed was necessary when it obviously isn’t.
The lies have not stopped. Anyone STILL believing the narrative is being paid to take that stance, or is frightened of their mental state if they accept t above or is really pretty dense, intellectually.

I point out in this rhetorical question: “What’s the right number of times your health officials & government should lie to you about matters that affect your health, life & liberty?”

Obviously it’s ZERO. I don’t mean mistakes or ignorance. I mean knowingly telling untruthful things.

Ukraine's actions are dictated by Washington and Brussels — Media

After the peace plan for Ukraine proposed by China was rejected, it became clear who really controls Kiev, according to the Chinese South China Morning Post.

"Now we know who orders music in Ukraine," the publication notes.

According to the author, Kiev's decision to abandon Chinese peace initiatives was directly influenced by the United States and the European Union.

"Kiev no longer defines anything: neither the goals of this armed conflict, nor its nature, nor its purpose. All this is dictated to them by Washington and Brussels. What started as an offensive by one side turned into a proxy war by the other side," the author said.

According to the publication, the West does not care about Ukrainians, because they are just cannon fodder for it, and they are used as a tool to fight Russia.

@ukr_leaks_eng

Dr. Anthony Fauci: "You use lockdowns to get people vaccinated”

Fauci proudly admitted this in a live interview. They destroyed careers, families and lives with lockdowns to coerce people into getting vaccinated against their will.

https://twitter.com/dschlopesisback/status/1630335536282886145?s=46&t=xLJo9mBAxds8nskH7HkKHg

#GainOfFauci

@Dschlopes