RFK Jr. is Launching His Campaign in Boston Next Week.

I will be there, come hell or high water!

"Bobby asked to to attend his opening campaign event at Boston Park Plaza in Boston, MA next Wednesday, April 19th at 10:00 AM, and I have carved time in an already busy week to do so. I hope to see you all there too!

If this event is well attended, if may force the legacy media to pay attention not only to his campaign, but to the issues that are being highlighted in his campaign. That would be a win for all of us." Robert Malone

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-is-launching-his-campaign?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=114459045&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

The Indoctrinators, Part 4: David Attenborough - The Conservative Woman

"The WEF could not have created a better spokesman for their mission. From their platform Attenborough lectures global elites on how to stop climate change. A eugenicist, neo‐Malthusian dogma is never far below the surface. Humans take a distinctly secondary place in Attenborough’s order of life.  This goes down well at the WEF where he was honoured in 2019 with Hilde Schwab’s Crystal Award and a shared stage with the Duke of Cambridge (now the Prince of Wales). Later the same year he was back at the WEF promoting ‘a better kind of capitalism’, aka digital slavery, along with the High Priestess of climate change, Greta Thunberg. 

One of the most worrying aspects of the Indoctrinators’ war on humanity is their terrorising of children into believing that the world is going to end because of climate change. A letter sent by Attenborough to a school in Dubai, congratulating them their efforts in ‘saving the planet’, was used to promote a Global Social Leader’s schools’ ‘action project’. School children’s belief that the world is going to end because of climate change, and their resultant climate anxiety, has been shown to have a seriously detrimental affect on their mental health."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-indoctrinators-part-4-david-attenborough/

What you are not being told about outrageous plans to give the WHO power over your life

Please do read and share my new article...

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/what-you-are-not-being-told-about-outrageous-plans-to-give-the-who-power-over-your-life/

The first step in combating this unacceptable ceding of governmental authority to an unelected supranational organisation (and by default to the special interests that have compromised it) is to raise public awareness. The World Council for Health (WCH) and Children’s Health Defense, working closely with other concerned organisations and people’s movements, are launching a campaign called The Great Freeset with suggested actions that we can take to address this global threat to our health and sovereignty.

The WCH, a people’s health and sovereignty initiative, has raised a petition to hold a parliamentary vote in the UK on whether to object to previously and quietly passed 2022 amendments and also calling for a vote to reject most of the additional 307 amendments under negotiation. We have achieved the 10,000 signature mark, which requires the UK Government to respond. However, it would be helpful to achieve 100,000 signatures and oblige the Government to consider holding a debate in Parliament. Details of this petition can be found here and any UK citizen can sign.

We cannot stand by while outrageous monopoly powers over public health are given away to the WHO. We have been warned by Biden that ‘a second pandemic is coming’. The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, as well as the Pandemic Accord, are being sold to us as improving future pandemic responses, when in reality they would lead to the same mistakes as seen during Covid being made all over again.

Let us ever be mindful of the adage ‘The welfare of mankind has long been the alibi of tyrants’.

For a link to the aforementioned petition please click here.

For a link to a letter you can send to your MP click here.

The WCH’s policy brief, Rejecting Monopoly Power over Global Health, can be found here and the press release for it, here.

Read the rest of my article:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/what-you-are-not-being-told-about-outrageous-plans-to-give-the-who-power-over-your-life/

📌 Follow:
➨ @DrTessLawrie

Letter template to raise objection to the proposed pandemic treaty of the World Health Organization - PANDA

"A template letter to alert your MP to your concerns regarding the proposed WHO pandemic treaty. The letter is intended to stimulate discussion within parliaments on key issues."

https://pandata.org/raise-objection-to-proposed-pandemic-treaty-of-the-who/

Meet Brock Chisholm, the first Director-General of the WHO.

https://twitter.com/kanekoathegreat/status/1644116706544189441

Horrible person with her absurdly hubristic version of why the world of money must be as she ordains.

There’s no good reason for withdrawing cash. None.

That cash might be used for an illegal transaction is not a reason to remove cash & replace it with CBDC. Anyone with a strong enough reason to evade the controls of CBDC will use some other means of exchange, like gold. In organised crime, money is rarely used. Instead, barter, such as a million cigarettes in exchange for whatever goods or services are being traded. So cashless CBDC has this ostensible reason.

CBDC will control only the ordinary members of the public. That’s the real reason they’re doing it.

Do not stand idly by & let the executive delete cash, which has existed in some form since humans began stamping things on discs of metal.

Best wishes
Mike

Carl Sagan warned us..

A local MP of someone I know replied to a question of sovereignty associated with the WHO treaty and IHR.
Their MP reassured them but I don’t think they’re correct. Here’s my take.
Please do share widely.
I’m completely open to challenge on this, but think I’m close to the truth.

If that treaty and the associated but legally separate International Health Regulations are approved, we have transferred sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable body.
Now, there’s no reason to do this. In the face of a new pathogen, WHO doesn’t know what the best responses are. Nobody does. It’s NOVEL. The way humanity has solved these novel problems throughout history is to make best choices where you are, at the level of community up to country, communicating outcomes as we go, and from these differing outcomes, picking the optimum responses.
If one body has power to decide, two things are inevitable. First, we won’t have the optimum response, because we’ll never know what that was. The trial wouldn’t have been run. So we’ll stop learning. Secondly, it’s entirely possible that what’s optimal for Nigeria is different from what’s optimal for Norway. We'll have sacrificed autonomy and democracy for no upside.
Do not permit this.

There’s an even more paradoxical problem. Mild illnesses spread without restriction, because people with them aren’t much slowed down by them. Common colds are a case in point. So these can easily go “pandemic”, but no one cares.
Moderate illnesses like severe influenza spread less readily because the most infectious people are also really quite sick & automatically (without being instructed by government) withdraw from general social mixing. That slows infection.
Take the most serious illnesses. Ebola does not spread extensively. Through its earliest emergence it’s never been seen as a sizeable outbreak in more than two countries at once and has always burned out swiftly. This isn’t luck. These diseases make those infected so seriously unwell that they stop interacting and possibly spreading it in the first few days. They’re self terminating. Add some precautions but no more than awareness and distance & it is stopped in its tracks. It cannot be otherwise. That’s how human immune systems work and they’ve developed over millennia and more by being in this soup of pathogens.
I’m saying severe disease global pandemics are immunologically implausible. Perhaps impossible.
WHO knows this. Your national public health officials know this. Pharma and the regulators know this.
So why are they all pretending there’s suddenly some huge risk that requires something that’s NEVER happened before in history?
Giving up the power to decide things in your country is the worst form of treachery I can imagine.
It’s totally unnecessary and completely unacceptable.
You know why they’re doing it?
No, neither do I.
But I’ve demonstrated there’s no good reason to do this.
If somebody wanted to undermine democracy and put in place a supranational system, well, this would be a darned good way to start.

Dr Mike Yeadon

"Disease for Paracelsus was "a natural growth, a spiritual, living thing, a seed." We may safely say that for him a disease was a proper and necessary constituent of life that lived together with man, and not a hated "alien body" as it is for us."

Carl Jung on Paracelsus

@RobinMG

“We have to create culture, don't watch TV, don't read magazines, don't even listen to NPR. Create your own roadshow. The nexus of space and time where you are now is the most immediate sector of your universe, and if you're worrying about Michael Jackson or Bill Clinton or somebody else, then you are disempowered, you're giving it all away to icons, icons which are maintained by an electronic media so that you want to dress like X or have lips like Y. This is shit-brained, this kind of thinking. That is all cultural diversion, and what is real is you and your friends and your associations, your highs, your orgasms, your hopes, your plans, your fears. And we are told 'no', we're unimportant, we're peripheral. 'Get a degree, get a job, get a this, get a that.' And then you're a player, you don't want to even play in that game. You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world.”

Terence McKenna

I’ve spoken with Dr Naomi Wolf when I was in Florida. She’s a good character. While apt to get some details in scientific terms wrong from time to time (she’s an English major not a medic or scientist) she’s worked with solid people to conduct a unique review and summary of the 55,000 documents per month that Pfizer was ordered by the judge to release.
This speech covers the main findings of this project.
It’s every bit as appalling and harrowing as you’d expect from what we’ve learned about these injections.
I conclude that a very large number of people know that these products are broken at best and some know that they’re explicitly toxic.
I don’t understand why do few whistleblowers have appeared.
Well worth having this speech on in the background while you do something practical and undemanding.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/naomiwolf/p/almost-a-million-views-of-my-hillsdale

Frontiers | Physio-metabolic and clinical consequences of wearing face masks—Systematic review with meta-analysis and comprehensive evaluation

A systematic review of 2,168 studies on adverse medical mask effects

"We found significant effects in both medical surgical and N95 masks, with a greater impact of the second.

In the absence of strong empirical evidence of effectiveness, mask wearing should not be mandated let alone enforced by law."

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1125150/full