This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Carl Sagan warned us..
🔥144💯100👍49❤27👏10
A local MP of someone I know replied to a question of sovereignty associated with the WHO treaty and IHR.
Their MP reassured them but I don’t think they’re correct. Here’s my take.
Please do share widely.
I’m completely open to challenge on this, but think I’m close to the truth.
If that treaty and the associated but legally separate International Health Regulations are approved, we have transferred sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable body.
Now, there’s no reason to do this. In the face of a new pathogen, WHO doesn’t know what the best responses are. Nobody does. It’s NOVEL. The way humanity has solved these novel problems throughout history is to make best choices where you are, at the level of community up to country, communicating outcomes as we go, and from these differing outcomes, picking the optimum responses.
If one body has power to decide, two things are inevitable. First, we won’t have the optimum response, because we’ll never know what that was. The trial wouldn’t have been run. So we’ll stop learning. Secondly, it’s entirely possible that what’s optimal for Nigeria is different from what’s optimal for Norway. We'll have sacrificed autonomy and democracy for no upside.
Do not permit this.
There’s an even more paradoxical problem. Mild illnesses spread without restriction, because people with them aren’t much slowed down by them. Common colds are a case in point. So these can easily go “pandemic”, but no one cares.
Moderate illnesses like severe influenza spread less readily because the most infectious people are also really quite sick & automatically (without being instructed by government) withdraw from general social mixing. That slows infection.
Take the most serious illnesses. Ebola does not spread extensively. Through its earliest emergence it’s never been seen as a sizeable outbreak in more than two countries at once and has always burned out swiftly. This isn’t luck. These diseases make those infected so seriously unwell that they stop interacting and possibly spreading it in the first few days. They’re self terminating. Add some precautions but no more than awareness and distance & it is stopped in its tracks. It cannot be otherwise. That’s how human immune systems work and they’ve developed over millennia and more by being in this soup of pathogens.
I’m saying severe disease global pandemics are immunologically implausible. Perhaps impossible.
WHO knows this. Your national public health officials know this. Pharma and the regulators know this.
So why are they all pretending there’s suddenly some huge risk that requires something that’s NEVER happened before in history?
Giving up the power to decide things in your country is the worst form of treachery I can imagine.
It’s totally unnecessary and completely unacceptable.
You know why they’re doing it?
No, neither do I.
But I’ve demonstrated there’s no good reason to do this.
If somebody wanted to undermine democracy and put in place a supranational system, well, this would be a darned good way to start.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Their MP reassured them but I don’t think they’re correct. Here’s my take.
Please do share widely.
I’m completely open to challenge on this, but think I’m close to the truth.
If that treaty and the associated but legally separate International Health Regulations are approved, we have transferred sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable body.
Now, there’s no reason to do this. In the face of a new pathogen, WHO doesn’t know what the best responses are. Nobody does. It’s NOVEL. The way humanity has solved these novel problems throughout history is to make best choices where you are, at the level of community up to country, communicating outcomes as we go, and from these differing outcomes, picking the optimum responses.
If one body has power to decide, two things are inevitable. First, we won’t have the optimum response, because we’ll never know what that was. The trial wouldn’t have been run. So we’ll stop learning. Secondly, it’s entirely possible that what’s optimal for Nigeria is different from what’s optimal for Norway. We'll have sacrificed autonomy and democracy for no upside.
Do not permit this.
There’s an even more paradoxical problem. Mild illnesses spread without restriction, because people with them aren’t much slowed down by them. Common colds are a case in point. So these can easily go “pandemic”, but no one cares.
Moderate illnesses like severe influenza spread less readily because the most infectious people are also really quite sick & automatically (without being instructed by government) withdraw from general social mixing. That slows infection.
Take the most serious illnesses. Ebola does not spread extensively. Through its earliest emergence it’s never been seen as a sizeable outbreak in more than two countries at once and has always burned out swiftly. This isn’t luck. These diseases make those infected so seriously unwell that they stop interacting and possibly spreading it in the first few days. They’re self terminating. Add some precautions but no more than awareness and distance & it is stopped in its tracks. It cannot be otherwise. That’s how human immune systems work and they’ve developed over millennia and more by being in this soup of pathogens.
I’m saying severe disease global pandemics are immunologically implausible. Perhaps impossible.
WHO knows this. Your national public health officials know this. Pharma and the regulators know this.
So why are they all pretending there’s suddenly some huge risk that requires something that’s NEVER happened before in history?
Giving up the power to decide things in your country is the worst form of treachery I can imagine.
It’s totally unnecessary and completely unacceptable.
You know why they’re doing it?
No, neither do I.
But I’ve demonstrated there’s no good reason to do this.
If somebody wanted to undermine democracy and put in place a supranational system, well, this would be a darned good way to start.
Dr Mike Yeadon
❤156💯77👍50👏7🔥5
"Disease for Paracelsus was "a natural growth, a spiritual, living thing, a seed." We may safely say that for him a disease was a proper and necessary constituent of life that lived together with man, and not a hated "alien body" as it is for us."
Carl Jung on Paracelsus
@RobinMG
Carl Jung on Paracelsus
@RobinMG
👍71❤21🔥4🤡1
“We have to create culture, don't watch TV, don't read magazines, don't even listen to NPR. Create your own roadshow. The nexus of space and time where you are now is the most immediate sector of your universe, and if you're worrying about Michael Jackson or Bill Clinton or somebody else, then you are disempowered, you're giving it all away to icons, icons which are maintained by an electronic media so that you want to dress like X or have lips like Y. This is shit-brained, this kind of thinking. That is all cultural diversion, and what is real is you and your friends and your associations, your highs, your orgasms, your hopes, your plans, your fears. And we are told 'no', we're unimportant, we're peripheral. 'Get a degree, get a job, get a this, get a that.' And then you're a player, you don't want to even play in that game. You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world.”
Terence McKenna
Terence McKenna
👍132❤48🔥40👌3🤔2
I’ve spoken with Dr Naomi Wolf when I was in Florida. She’s a good character. While apt to get some details in scientific terms wrong from time to time (she’s an English major not a medic or scientist) she’s worked with solid people to conduct a unique review and summary of the 55,000 documents per month that Pfizer was ordered by the judge to release.
This speech covers the main findings of this project.
It’s every bit as appalling and harrowing as you’d expect from what we’ve learned about these injections.
I conclude that a very large number of people know that these products are broken at best and some know that they’re explicitly toxic.
I don’t understand why do few whistleblowers have appeared.
Well worth having this speech on in the background while you do something practical and undemanding.
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/naomiwolf/p/almost-a-million-views-of-my-hillsdale
This speech covers the main findings of this project.
It’s every bit as appalling and harrowing as you’d expect from what we’ve learned about these injections.
I conclude that a very large number of people know that these products are broken at best and some know that they’re explicitly toxic.
I don’t understand why do few whistleblowers have appeared.
Well worth having this speech on in the background while you do something practical and undemanding.
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/naomiwolf/p/almost-a-million-views-of-my-hillsdale
Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf
Almost a Million Views of my Hillsdale College Speech: "What is in the Pfizer Documents?"
I guess people want some answers about the greatest crime against humanity in history.
👏99👍43❤23❤🔥6
Frontiers | Physio-metabolic and clinical consequences of wearing face masks—Systematic review with meta-analysis and comprehensive evaluation
A systematic review of 2,168 studies on adverse medical mask effects
"We found significant effects in both medical surgical and N95 masks, with a greater impact of the second.
In the absence of strong empirical evidence of effectiveness, mask wearing should not be mandated let alone enforced by law."
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1125150/full
A systematic review of 2,168 studies on adverse medical mask effects
"We found significant effects in both medical surgical and N95 masks, with a greater impact of the second.
In the absence of strong empirical evidence of effectiveness, mask wearing should not be mandated let alone enforced by law."
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1125150/full
Frontiers
Frontiers | RETRACTED: Physio-metabolic and clinical consequences of wearing face masks—Systematic review with meta-analysis and…
Background: As face masks became mandatory in most countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, adverse effects require substantiated investigation. Methods: A s...
👍55❤8🤔3
Forwarded from InfoDefenseENGLISH
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
On Easter night, Nazis launched an MLRS attack on the center of Donetsk. They hit the Preobrazhenskiy Cathedral, where a festive service was going on at the time of the shelling, and one priest was wounded.
A market and a newly rebuilt kindergarten were also hit. As a result, a woman was killed.
These are just demons. Only devil worshippers are capable of such a crime, beating on a church during Easter service.
Source: @rtrdonetsk
📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense
A market and a newly rebuilt kindergarten were also hit. As a result, a woman was killed.
These are just demons. Only devil worshippers are capable of such a crime, beating on a church during Easter service.
Source: @rtrdonetsk
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬83👍37🙏32😢26😱16❤5
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
He added that “as a result of a Ukrainian projectile hitting a kindergarten, a fire broke out. Destruction is recorded at the Covered Market, in nearby shops, and a pharmacy.”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬85😢29🙏5👍4❤2🤨1
The bombing of the area of Donetsk Transfiguration Cathedral during (apparently mass had just finished) Orthodox Easter service (today is Orthodox Easter) also reported by Italian correspondent Rangeloni. Difficult to pass it as "Russian propaganda" at this stage.
https://t.me/vn_rangeloni/1509
https://t.me/vn_rangeloni/1510
https://t.me/vn_rangeloni/1509
https://t.me/vn_rangeloni/1510
Telegram
RangeloniNews
Donetsk, una manciata di minuti fa è stato colpito il centro della città. Diversi razzi sono caduti nei pressi del mercato e della Cattedrale, quando era da poco terminata la funzione religiosa della Pasqua Ortodossa
😢62🤬22👍11😱7❤5🙏5🕊2
We are in one of the greatest battles between good & evil of all time. Evil manipulates people's fear of daily things like disease, weather, foreign people & cultures: fear of others. It hates spirituality & true religion. It sees the body as matter not spirit. It is materialist.
@RobinMG
@RobinMG
❤140💯68👍29🙏21😢14🔥2
The battleground runs through all our hearts but to defeat this great evil we will need to unite and bury our differences.
This is the goal of our group:
t.me/robinmggroup
This is the goal of our group:
t.me/robinmggroup
Telegram
👥 UNITED NON COMPLIANCE 🚫
United non compliant community linked to the Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar Channel @robinmg
Posts are by channel readers & group members, and are not pre-selected, edited or necessarily endorsed by channel administrators.
Rule: Be polite.
Posts are by channel readers & group members, and are not pre-selected, edited or necessarily endorsed by channel administrators.
Rule: Be polite.
❤96👍36
Forwarded from UKR LEAKS_eng
The Pope spoke for peace between Russia and Ukraine
Congratulating all Orthodox Christians on Easter, the pontiff admitted that he was thinking about Russian and Ukrainian brothers and sisters who celebrate Easter today.
"I wish the Lord to be close to them and help them achieve peace," he said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
Congratulating all Orthodox Christians on Easter, the pontiff admitted that he was thinking about Russian and Ukrainian brothers and sisters who celebrate Easter today.
"I wish the Lord to be close to them and help them achieve peace," he said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
👍47🤡20❤12😱5🥴5😐1😨1
Rather than being an endorsement of Pope Francis, the above is meant to illustrate how far from Christianity all other "Christian" religious "leaders" have strayed when it comes to the war in Ukraine: either silence or support of one side only in the fratricidal war. Of course Pope Francis is a globalist Pope and was part of the corona scam and depopulation operation.
He however remembers what the Christian message should be: not calling for weapons including depleted uranium to be sent to a war zone, bankrupting the working classes and middle classes of both Ukraine & the West through an insane war effort in a war that can't be won, but calling for peace instead.
@RobinMG
He however remembers what the Christian message should be: not calling for weapons including depleted uranium to be sent to a war zone, bankrupting the working classes and middle classes of both Ukraine & the West through an insane war effort in a war that can't be won, but calling for peace instead.
@RobinMG
👍83❤22🥴2🙏1
Forwarded from Ukraine Watch
The UK should not be involved in the war in Ukraine, says English author, broadcaster, journalist, and commentator Peter Hitchens.
First of all, what interest does the United Kingdom have in continuing and sustaining this war? A powerful faction in Washington DC, with supporters in the West Wing of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, have long wanted a proxy war with Russia. They believe passionately that Russia must never be allowed to rise again. ...
They are almost exactly the same people who created the Iraq War out of nothing, who got the West into the Afghanistan quagmire, and who backed Islamist fanatics in Syria ...
If nobody in the USA will stand up to them, they will get their repeated stupid wars and the rest of us will have to watch, weep and receive the fleeing multitudes.
But we do not have to take part. Why are we in this? How does Britain benefit from war between Russia and Ukraine? How, for that matter, has poor Ukraine benefited from it, its cities wrecked, its economy half-dead, untold numbers of its young men gone to graveyards? Why should any British soldiers be there at all? If Parliament does not debate this, then we are not a democracy. And if any critical voices are drowned out with slander and abuse, then we are not a free country.
Link
First of all, what interest does the United Kingdom have in continuing and sustaining this war? A powerful faction in Washington DC, with supporters in the West Wing of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, have long wanted a proxy war with Russia. They believe passionately that Russia must never be allowed to rise again. ...
They are almost exactly the same people who created the Iraq War out of nothing, who got the West into the Afghanistan quagmire, and who backed Islamist fanatics in Syria ...
If nobody in the USA will stand up to them, they will get their repeated stupid wars and the rest of us will have to watch, weep and receive the fleeing multitudes.
But we do not have to take part. Why are we in this? How does Britain benefit from war between Russia and Ukraine? How, for that matter, has poor Ukraine benefited from it, its cities wrecked, its economy half-dead, untold numbers of its young men gone to graveyards? Why should any British soldiers be there at all? If Parliament does not debate this, then we are not a democracy. And if any critical voices are drowned out with slander and abuse, then we are not a free country.
Link
Mail Online
PETER HITCHENS: Why are the SAS in Ukraine – and do we have a clue why we're involved in this war?
PETER HITCHENS: Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them?
🔥130👍63❤30👏4🥴1