Robert Kennedy Jr has one eye open (pharmaceutical regulators) and one eye still closed (climate change).

I disagree with him on the idea that the US military are in Ukraine to do anything good, on climate change being due to humans, that technology can be the answer to any of our problems rather than culture, and that there can ever be safe vaccines.

Please also note that due to reasons beyond my control I am no longer an advisor to Children's Health Defense UK, although I am still in close contact with Children's Health Defense Europe who have recently recorded an interview with me, that will be aired soon.

@RobinMG

🇬🇧 LONDON UK 22.04.23

We will not win this by pitching science against "science", because they control the mainstream.

But their culture is awful. That is their Achilles heel. You don't need a PhD to see that.

@RobinMG

Freedom Follows Culture
Robin Monotti

The problem is that too many of the doctors and scientists on our side are incapable of understanding anything that is metaphorical, meaning not literal, yet only the metaphorical will make it to the other side and recruit those sitting on the fence.

Some of our "Superstar" doctors and scientists are actually holding us back by keeping us on a battlefield we do not have enough resources to win.

Change battlefield.

Choose culture.

Freedom will follow.

@RobinMG

David Clews:

'This country has huge problems but if World War 3 breaks out then nothing else really matters'!

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/reflections-from-finland

This is a compelling read, by a person who’s character I recognise. You will, too, I expect.
Milgram authority & Asch conformity resistant people all.
Read his story and reflect on what we need to do individually and collectively when - not if - the authorities pull their next stunt upon us.

It’s literally life and death now. “Live not by lies”.
- Solzhenitsyn.
“Every word matters.
Every silence, too”
- J-P Sartre.

When that next lie is sprung on us, if we’re not to be buried, we absolutely must call it out for what it is, early, often & giving no quarter.

How did those who know deep inside themselves that we NEVER experiment upon pregnant women remain silent? That was among the most disturbing moments of 2021, the official lies which were largely complied with, often with enthusiasm that I found appalling.

Remember that the covid nonsense was rather complicated and we weren’t expecting a wall of lies.

The next fraud can only work by being simple and by daring people to do anything than comply.

Be that non-compliant person. You won’t be thanked for questioning everything & pointing out lies, but you’ll know you couldn’t have done more.

Best wishes and thank you,
Mike

From Ted Nugent. American guitarist.

Good news: no mention of "climate" in Kennedy's Earth Day address.

@RobinMG

My Earth Day Message to America | Kennedy24
https://www.kennedy24.com/rfk-jr-earth-day-message-to-america

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/744

Is this Sucharit Bhakdi’s last video message?

He closes by saying goodbye and take care. I know he planned eventually to relocate to Thailand.

It’s a dense 30 minutes and, as I often do, I disagree with him about the existence of a novel respiratory pathogen. Other than this, I could have (& indeed have said) the meat of his warning about current and future “vaccines”

From 25 minutes 30seconds onwards for very interesting points about pandemics. Sucharit explains why they don’t happen except by fraud. The alleged “vaccines” are as dangerous as I have been saying.

Best wishes
Mike

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/744

Is this Sucharit Bhakdi’s last video message?

He closes by saying goodbye and take care. I know he planned eventually to relocate to Thailand.

It’s a dense 30 minutes and, as I often do, I disagree with him about the existence of a novel respiratory pathogen. Other than this, I could have (& indeed have said) the meat of his warning about current and future “vaccines”

From 25 minutes 30seconds onwards for very interesting points about pandemics. Sucharit explains why they don’t happen except by fraud. The alleged “vaccines” are as dangerous as I have been saying.

Best wishes
Mike

2015: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
Vineet D Menachery, Boyd L Yount, Jr, [...], and Ralph S Baric

"To examine the emergence potential (the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein -from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats —in the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone..we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV

"Pseudotyping experiments were similar to those using an
👉HIV-based pseudovirus, prepared as previously described10, and examined on HeLa cells (Wuhan Institute of Virology) that expressed ACE2 orthologs."

"In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/#!po=46.9512

What Does "Novel" Really Mean?
Robin Monotti

Robin's comment and questions on the 2015 paper by Menachery, Yount & Baric.

I work with language, namely I worked on academic papers for many years as University lecturer and researcher. I have an MA in History and Theory, and attended several years of a language based PhD. I am a published translator. I work with film scripts on a daily basis, including writing them. Therefore I am experienced with words. This analysis is word based, not science based. I believe words are shared across professions, therefore people who work with words like me are more than legitimized in asking questions of the words used by scientists for whom words come generally after experiments are allegedly conducted, like in the case below. These are my language based questions. I believe language is used to both reveal and conceal:

The paper claims that the bat CoVs were "circulating". Does this mean they were already circulating in humans? Circulating to me means not new: not novel.

Then it mentions they built a "chimeric" virus. Chimeric, from the word chimera, means a virus that contains at least two different parts of different viruses. Essentially the circulating virus is mixed with another part of a circulating virus, in this case, is it a part of the HIV virus mentioned in the context of "pseudotyping"? Does this make it a "novel" virus given both parts were in circulation? The paper claims not a novel virus, but a "novel, zoonotic" CoV spike protein. If the spike protein in question is novel, then how can it be zoonotic already?

Zoonotic means already present in another species. This opens up the question of time: when does the virus jump species as claimed? Could it have been thousands of years ago? In which case "novel" and "zoonotic" are contradictions?

The specific bat virus used as a base is mentioned and named: RsSHCO14, isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats.

The part added is described as an HIV-based pseudovirus?

Note that the government funding via USAID & EcoHealth Alliance to "Z.-L.S." was initially omitted. Are these not the initials of Zhengli-Li Shi at Wuhan Lab?

Was the funding originally omitted from the paper reinstated because gain of function was banned within US territory so they had to cover themselves and say it was done in Wuhan?

Please note that where the "chimeric" virus was assembled is NOT necessarily the same thing as where the virus was released. Both may be untrue, but please do not confuse the claim the virus was assembled in Wuhan with the claim the virus was released in Wuhan. Both maybe false, or one may be true and one false, or both maybe true.

I generally believe reality to be more complex than: all is a lie, or all is true.

Robin Monotti

@RobinMG

https://t.me/robinmg/27532

https://twitter.com/janiesaysyay/status/1649912456863703040

I appreciate this because apart from Mike, Dr Simon, Vigilant Fox, and few others, none of the "Superstar" doctors are giving me the credit of speaking out long before they woke up.

When I talk to some of these doctors privately, they talk down at me, even if I said the Covid19 "vaccine" was not going to be safe long before they did: back in 2020 long before it was even in circulation, and I began work on The Book of Vision in 2017.

The "Superstar" doctors woke up in 2021, 2022, some 2023.

But they still talk down at me.. 🤷‍♂️

Will they ever really learn..?

@RobinMG

Mr Big Stuff - Jean Knight
https://youtu.be/9oqOom6axX8

Neil Oliver asks the big question: "Why do we finance what we know to be wrong": why do we pay taxes to immoral people in government?

There are no facts, only interpretations | by Daniel Hill | Towards Data Science (2020)

“There are no facts, only interpretations”, according to Nietzsche anyway. That may seem odd: data, with its apparent precision, structure, and clarity, may seem the very definition of objective certainty, but that’s an illusion. The reality is that data is always a subjective and imperfect expression of how the people who collected it view the world.

The Coronavirus outbreak has proved an excellent case in point."

https://towardsdatascience.com/there-are-no-facts-only-interpretations-abc70a48014b

Language as a Path to Freedom
Robin Monotti

The route to make scientists accountable to all of us, not only to a few other scientists, is through language, not science. The same applies to doctors.

Always question the words they use not from the point of view of science and medicine, but from the point of view of the meaning of the words used in their language. Question that meaning. Point out the inconsistencies. They are there throughout the language they use.

This is more effective than saying: my science is better than yours or my medicine is better than yours.

When I say Freedom Follows Culture, I also mean language as the shared building block of our culture. Use it and challenge it.

Where they obfuscate with discipline specific terminology to gain authority over you, question the meaning of those terms, then question the answers.

Regain control of language when facing assumed "authority" in science or medicine.

@RobinMG

"We have not lost faith, but we have transferred it from God to the medical profession."

George Bernard Shaw
Irish dramatist & socialist (1856 - 1950)

(via Dr Clare Craig)

I'm not someone, who knows a lot about the bible.
But I am still stunned, when I think about the many times of "Do not fear!" is mentioned there.
When you fear, you cannot think properly.
You fall for the fearmonger.
This is, why we should always be very suspicious, when someone is trying, to make us afraid of something.
People, who mean well, are encouraging us.
Not making us fearful.

Do Not Fear.