Forwarded from The Twitter Files
14. As reported, The Aspen Institute combined WaPo, NYT, Rollingstone, NBC, CNN, Twitter, Facebook, Stanford, and "anti-disinfo" NGOs like FirstDraft to practice an oddly prescient "hack and leak" exercise on the Hunter Biden laptop BEFORE its release.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🤨24🤔5🤬3❤1👍1
Forwarded from The Twitter Files
17. "LOL! Ok, off the record, what's our working theory here of what happened?" replies Noah Shachtman, current Rolling Stone Editor-in-Chief.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
❤14👍5🔥3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Founding member of Greenpeace Dr. Patrick Moore explains in layman's terms why :
a) carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, but is actually a nutrient necessary for all lifeforms, and
b) nuclear energy and natural gas is preferable over wind and solar energy.
"The scientific method has not been applied in such a way as to prove that carbon dioxide is causing the Earth to warm."
"I am firmly of the belief that the future will show that this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication."
a) carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, but is actually a nutrient necessary for all lifeforms, and
b) nuclear energy and natural gas is preferable over wind and solar energy.
"The scientific method has not been applied in such a way as to prove that carbon dioxide is causing the Earth to warm."
"I am firmly of the belief that the future will show that this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication."
💯248🔥27👏23👍12❤11🤬2
A very good article from an author who took the trouble to attend the public meetings that U.K. medicines regulator MHRA holds on a cyclical basis. This time she submitted a question & it was called to be asked & answered at the most recent meeting. See article for details.
It’s abundantly clear that the adverse effects being reported post c19 injections are causal, not casual.
Best wishes
Mike
Causality:
My second piece of information throws light on Causality, regarding which the MHRA, especially in response to FoI requests, continually states:
An adverse drug reaction or a fatal outcome does not mean that the vaccine was the cause of SAEs [serious adverse effects] or death.
The WHO accepts the Bradford-Hill Criteria as confirmation of causation if at least five of the criteria are met. These vaccines meet all the criteria. This is confirmed in the presentation Understanding 'Vaccine' Causation by Dr Jessica Rose, Dr Peter McCullough and others.
Dr Rose explains that the WHO uses a ten-criterion list, the Bradford Hill criteria, to prove causality. She goes through all ten criteria and provides evidence accordingly.
It’s abundantly clear that the adverse effects being reported post c19 injections are causal, not casual.
Best wishes
Mike
Causality:
My second piece of information throws light on Causality, regarding which the MHRA, especially in response to FoI requests, continually states:
An adverse drug reaction or a fatal outcome does not mean that the vaccine was the cause of SAEs [serious adverse effects] or death.
The WHO accepts the Bradford-Hill Criteria as confirmation of causation if at least five of the criteria are met. These vaccines meet all the criteria. This is confirmed in the presentation Understanding 'Vaccine' Causation by Dr Jessica Rose, Dr Peter McCullough and others.
Dr Rose explains that the WHO uses a ten-criterion list, the Bradford Hill criteria, to prove causality. She goes through all ten criteria and provides evidence accordingly.
❤40👍21🔥4
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/taking-on-the-mhra-part-1
It’s very commonly said by bad actors & by people ignorant about causation analysis that “Correlation does not equal causation”, as if that means “You can disregard MHRA Yellow Card and FDA VAERS reports”.
That’s not at all what the saying means.
It means precisely what it says, that you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY assume causation just because there are reports of harms after exposure to these injections.
But you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY disregard the possibility of causation, either.
There’s a matching but more or less never used phrase:
“Where there is causation, there will be correlation”.
So what these enormous numbers of reports of injuries and deaths post c19 injections demand is done, by way of follow up, is to explore how strong is the evidence of causation.
There are widely accepted methods for conducting such an analysis, in the form of the Bradford Hill criteria.
These are accepted by WHO as well as by the medicines regulators.
Cont/
It’s very commonly said by bad actors & by people ignorant about causation analysis that “Correlation does not equal causation”, as if that means “You can disregard MHRA Yellow Card and FDA VAERS reports”.
That’s not at all what the saying means.
It means precisely what it says, that you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY assume causation just because there are reports of harms after exposure to these injections.
But you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY disregard the possibility of causation, either.
There’s a matching but more or less never used phrase:
“Where there is causation, there will be correlation”.
So what these enormous numbers of reports of injuries and deaths post c19 injections demand is done, by way of follow up, is to explore how strong is the evidence of causation.
There are widely accepted methods for conducting such an analysis, in the form of the Bradford Hill criteria.
These are accepted by WHO as well as by the medicines regulators.
Cont/
👍47❤11😁2
If just five of the ten Bradford Hill criteria are met, causality is accepted.
Here’s the kicker. ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports.
It’s DEFINITELY causation. Without question, these injections CAUSE the majority of the injuries experienced & occasionally reported.
It’s acknowledged in peer reviewed journal articles that only a small minority, between 1-10%, of adverse events experienced after taking a prescribed medication are reported. This is for a variety of reasons. Often the person doesn’t link the events so they never consider reporting it. Other times they do suspect causation but someone else, such as their family doctor, dismisses such a claim and they give up. Many people believe that side effects only occur soon after exposure to a toxic substance occurs. While it’s true that some kinds of toxicity occur shortly after exposure (such as acute allergic reactions) others, by their nature, can take weeks, months or even years to manifest themselves (such as heart damage, autoimmunity, cancer etc).
Please take a look at the article, both to understand how dreadfully badly served we are currently by MHRA and especially to at least scan these causality criteria. They’re well thought through but they’re not high science. Anyone with reasonable linguistic abilities will be able to follow the examples given.
In closing, the author points out that MHRA knows perfectly well that the gene-based injections have caused tremendous harms, and if they claim not to know this, they will have had to not look at their own data. It’s that blatant.
Of course, they’re not telling the public, because they’ve been captured by those I call the perpetrators. They might be complying with strict orders or they might be enthusiastic supporters of what’s going on.
Please onboard enough information to be able to inform others of the risks & to push back on the lazy “Correlation is not causation” trope.
Best wishes and thanks!
Mike
Here’s the kicker. ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports.
It’s DEFINITELY causation. Without question, these injections CAUSE the majority of the injuries experienced & occasionally reported.
It’s acknowledged in peer reviewed journal articles that only a small minority, between 1-10%, of adverse events experienced after taking a prescribed medication are reported. This is for a variety of reasons. Often the person doesn’t link the events so they never consider reporting it. Other times they do suspect causation but someone else, such as their family doctor, dismisses such a claim and they give up. Many people believe that side effects only occur soon after exposure to a toxic substance occurs. While it’s true that some kinds of toxicity occur shortly after exposure (such as acute allergic reactions) others, by their nature, can take weeks, months or even years to manifest themselves (such as heart damage, autoimmunity, cancer etc).
Please take a look at the article, both to understand how dreadfully badly served we are currently by MHRA and especially to at least scan these causality criteria. They’re well thought through but they’re not high science. Anyone with reasonable linguistic abilities will be able to follow the examples given.
In closing, the author points out that MHRA knows perfectly well that the gene-based injections have caused tremendous harms, and if they claim not to know this, they will have had to not look at their own data. It’s that blatant.
Of course, they’re not telling the public, because they’ve been captured by those I call the perpetrators. They might be complying with strict orders or they might be enthusiastic supporters of what’s going on.
Please onboard enough information to be able to inform others of the risks & to push back on the lazy “Correlation is not causation” trope.
Best wishes and thanks!
Mike
👍89❤26🙏1
COUNTER SLOGANS
Of the Resistance
Safe and effective?
UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE
Correlation is not causation?
CAUSATION LEADS TO CORRELATION
Trust the science?
RESEARCH THE SCIENCE
Feel free to add as comments.
@RobinMG
Of the Resistance
Safe and effective?
UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE
Correlation is not causation?
CAUSATION LEADS TO CORRELATION
Trust the science?
RESEARCH THE SCIENCE
Feel free to add as comments.
@RobinMG
🔥56👍23💯14❤6😁1
Forwarded from Jerm Warfare (Jerm)
Give this a listen because it will challenge everything you think you know about the history of vaccines.
No vaccine, in history, has vaccinated against anything.
https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/a-beginners-guide-to-vaccines-and-germ-theory
No vaccine, in history, has vaccinated against anything.
https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/a-beginners-guide-to-vaccines-and-germ-theory
👍77💯36❤13🔥2👏2
I went back on Jerm Warfare with Jeremy Nell to discuss approaches to take about 15 minute cities.
@RobinMG
@JermWarfare
https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/robin-monotti-graziadei-on-jerm-warfare-with-jeremy-nell-27-april-2023/
@RobinMG
@JermWarfare
https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/robin-monotti-graziadei-on-jerm-warfare-with-jeremy-nell-27-april-2023/
Podbean
Robin Monotti Graziadei on Jerm Warfare with Jeremy Nell - 27 April 2023 | TNT Radio
GUEST OVERVIEW: Robin Monotti Graziadei is a Rome born architect and film producer based in London. He is the managing partner of Robin Monotti Architects, a firm that he founded in 2007. In 2010, Monotti won the RIBA and Royal Parks Foundation's International…
👍57❤14👏2🤔1
Graeme MacQueen has passed away.
Graeme MacQueen was a member of the Religious Studies Department at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, where he was Associate Professor. His academic specialization was Buddhist Studies, in which he received his doctorate from Harvard University. In 1989 Graeme helped found McMaster’s Centre for Peace Studies, of which he became director from 1989 until 1996.
+++
"When you are ready
And the day dawns
Remember how love
Wraps you in its arms
And the sweet sound
Of grace lifts you up
Lighter than a feather
And places you onboard
The silent ship that sails
Calmly out to sea.
Listen To us calling,
'Bon Voyage, Let us know when you arrive'"
– Edward Curtin
+++
Fantastic interview with MacQueen By Whitney Webb published on 09/21/21:
"Whitney is joined by author, academic and researcher Graeme MacQueen to reflect on the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 and anthrax attacks, why those events still matter today and why there remains such a stigma in many circles when it comes to questioning the official stories of those events. Published on 09/21/21."
https://soundcloud.com/unlimited-hangout/911-and-anthrax-20-years-on-with-graeme-macqueen
Graeme MacQueen was a member of the Religious Studies Department at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, where he was Associate Professor. His academic specialization was Buddhist Studies, in which he received his doctorate from Harvard University. In 1989 Graeme helped found McMaster’s Centre for Peace Studies, of which he became director from 1989 until 1996.
+++
"When you are ready
And the day dawns
Remember how love
Wraps you in its arms
And the sweet sound
Of grace lifts you up
Lighter than a feather
And places you onboard
The silent ship that sails
Calmly out to sea.
Listen To us calling,
'Bon Voyage, Let us know when you arrive'"
– Edward Curtin
+++
Fantastic interview with MacQueen By Whitney Webb published on 09/21/21:
"Whitney is joined by author, academic and researcher Graeme MacQueen to reflect on the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 and anthrax attacks, why those events still matter today and why there remains such a stigma in many circles when it comes to questioning the official stories of those events. Published on 09/21/21."
https://soundcloud.com/unlimited-hangout/911-and-anthrax-20-years-on-with-graeme-macqueen
SoundCloud
9/11 and Anthrax 20 Years On with Graeme MacQueen
Whitney is joined by author, academic and researcher Graeme MacQueen to reflect on the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 and anthrax attacks, why those events still matter today and why there remains such
❤44👍17😢2
Artist Hiroyuki Hamada writes: "How did we come to live in an upside down world where right is wrong and wrong is normal? Well, before we answer that question, I have a few other questions. How can social institutions driven by profits allow themselves to serve people? How can people with their livelihoods taken hostages by the social institutions truly act according to their interests? How can we organize ourselves so that we can grasp our collective powers from the hands of oligarchs? For one thing, if we live in an upside down world where right is wrong and wrong is normal, we don’t have to worry about any of those. We are simply told that’s the new normal in the post truth world. Where is our outrage? Aesthetic Resistance podcast #84."
https://soundcloud.com/aestheticresistance/podcast-84
https://soundcloud.com/aestheticresistance/podcast-84
SoundCloud
PODCAST #84
with Cory Morningstar, Hiroyuki Hamada, Varun Mathur, Johan Eddebo and John Steppling
--relevant links--
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/child-literacy-nb-decade-reading-1.6654092
--relevant links--
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/child-literacy-nb-decade-reading-1.6654092
🔥34👍12❤7👏3🤣1
April 27, 2023
"In the 20 years since the birth of social media, child sexual exploitation has become one of the biggest challenges facing tech companies. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the internet is used by human traffickers as “digital hunting fields”, allowing them access to both customers and potential victims, with children being targeted by traffickers on social media platforms. The biggest of these, Facebook, is owned by Meta, the tech giant whose platforms, which also include Instagram, are used by more than 3 billion people worldwide. In 2020, according to a report by US-based not-for-profit the Human Trafficking Institute, Facebook was the platform most used to groom and recruit children by sex traffickers (65%), based on an analysis of 105 federal child sex trafficking cases that year. The HTI analysis ranked Instagram second most prevalent, with Snapchat third."
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/apr/27/how-facebook-and-instagram-became-marketplaces-for-child-sex-trafficking
"In the 20 years since the birth of social media, child sexual exploitation has become one of the biggest challenges facing tech companies. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the internet is used by human traffickers as “digital hunting fields”, allowing them access to both customers and potential victims, with children being targeted by traffickers on social media platforms. The biggest of these, Facebook, is owned by Meta, the tech giant whose platforms, which also include Instagram, are used by more than 3 billion people worldwide. In 2020, according to a report by US-based not-for-profit the Human Trafficking Institute, Facebook was the platform most used to groom and recruit children by sex traffickers (65%), based on an analysis of 105 federal child sex trafficking cases that year. The HTI analysis ranked Instagram second most prevalent, with Snapchat third."
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/apr/27/how-facebook-and-instagram-became-marketplaces-for-child-sex-trafficking
the Guardian
How Facebook and Instagram became marketplaces for child sex trafficking
The long read: Our two-year investigation suggests that the tech giant Meta is struggling to prevent criminals from using its platforms to buy and sell children for sex
❤22🤬20😨13👍11😢6🤔1