Given no huge errors, one man's science is another man's science fiction. It's a subjective choice, based on feelings, tribalism, group dynamics, power struggles, dominant narratives, experience, empathy, intuition, which sounds more truthful to us. This is how it really works.

@RobinMG

Here's the full video of my itvw on Sputnik's new show, New Rules.

When it comes to the virus versus no virus camps, both are scientific fictions. I choose the virus camp not because of "isolation" rhethoric, but because the word describes historically the onset of unusual disease I experienced: it's a language based choice first: communication.

Both theories (scientific fictions) can have their own scientific validity without claiming either one as absolute truth or "better" than the other.

@RobinMG

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: We Now Have a Pandemic of Misinformed Doctors and Unwittingly-Harmed Patients

Professor John Ioannidis, the most cited medical researcher in the world, once said, "The greater the financial interests or prejudices in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true."

"Unfortunately, well before the pandemic, evidence-based medicine has become an illusion," expressed @DrAseemMalhotra. "It has been hijacked by very powerful vested interests."

"As a result of this, we have now a pandemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed and unwittingly-harmed patients, based upon a number of factors."

• biased funding of research (research for profit, not health outcomes)
• biased reporting in the media
• biased patient pamphlets
• defensive medicine
• medical curricula that fail to teach doctors how to comprehend and communicate health statistics

Watch the full roundtable discussion held by Dartmouth College Alumni here:

https://dailyclout.io/robert-kennedy-jr-to-be-special-guest-at-college-covid-19-vaccine-mandates-scientific-ethical-and-legal-considerations-a-roundtable-discussion-and-dinner-event/

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Socials

"Individuals with COVID-19 vaccination had a higher risk of all forms of retinal vascular occlusion in 2 years after vaccination.. The risk.. significantly increased during the first 2 weeks after vaccination and persisted for 12 weeks."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7

"One-third of US teen girls seriously considered attempting suicide in 2021: CDC"

April 27 2023

"Although suicide is the 11th leading cause of death overall in the United States, it is the third among U.S. high school students between the ages 14 and 18, accounting for one-fifth of all deaths among this age group, the report said.

The authors said the findings in the report are consistent with trends before the COVID-19 pandemic, but the rising rates of suicide risk among teen girls may be linked to how measures, such as social distancing and remote learning, may have increased students' social isolation and anxiety.

Common risk factors for suicide include a history of depression and other mental illness, bullying, loss of relationships, and social isolation, according to the CDC."

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/us-teen-girls-considered-attempting-suicide-2021-cdc/story?id=98901688

The masses believe in corporate "science" divulgated by corporate media not because it's accurate, but because it creates a new social bond between them. Covers their anxiety. This is because they have an underlying loneliness & emptiness, a spiritual void.

@RobinMG

“Monsters exist, but they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the common men, the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions.”

Primo Levi

THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD is the process of uncovering the subjective scientific fictions & biases scientists previously denied & hid in their scientific theories, methods, data collection, presentation, & conclusions. It is the exposure & revelation of hidden scientific fictions.

@RobinMG

The difference between art and science is that artists are not in denial of the fictional components they use to arrive at truth, while scientists deny them.

@RobinMG

The Coronation spectacle is a mass formation event, as was the coronavirus "pandemic" spectacle, the lockdown virtual spectacle mediated by an obligatory digital screen, and the "vaccination" spectacle and ritualistic self sacrifice at the altar of primitive "science" fiction.

@RobinMG

London “Eerily Quiet” on the Coronation Eve of a WEF Puppet King

In memory of the lovely Diana Frances Spencer...

https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/london-eerily-quiet-on-the-coronation

The coronation of King Charles is likely to be a sombre, if not menacing, affair if the mood in London this week is anything to go by. Roads around central London are closed and lined with police vehicles of all descriptions, with hundreds if not thousands of police in layered high visibility and bulletproof vests wielding machine guns and manning checkpoints in preparation for the coronation of this unpopular man. Grim officials look briefed to expect the worst; sturdy wire metal barriers will certainly keep the ‘riffraff’ a good distance away.

One reason for London’s gloomy atmosphere is no doubt due to additional concerns about the new King of England’s allegiance to the World Economic Forum.

In case you are unaware of the WEF, this is the unsavoury bunch that calls us ‘hackable animals’. It appears that Charles is part of this club that would have us reduced, chipped, prodded and subdued with unlimited genetic modifications and surveillance; the club that wants to rob us of our possessions, our personal data and our sovereignty.

Would Charles be king in service to the British people, or would this king be a WEF puppet king? In attempting to add royal legitimacy to this megalomaniac cabal and ‘The Great Reset’ in Davos in 2022, he has shown where his loyalties truly lie, in my opinion – and it is not with the British people. A clear illustration of this is his recent royal assent to new UK laws that allow gene-edited foods for us, the common people, to go unlabelled, despite eating only strictly organic food himself.

The British people are sovereign, and I wonder whether this has been forgotten by the British monarchy. Sovereign beings are unique, stand-alone beings; we are our own land, our own territory, not to be bought or sold. We manage ourselves and solve our own problems and do not subscribe to the corporate cabal’s anti-human ideology disguised as a “think tank”. We act on our conscience and know right from wrong. We know that we are all equal and no one is above the law. We know that people are innocent until proven guilty.

JP Sears captures the mindset of King Charles’ WEF friends in this humorous clip. Sadly, Charles appears to be integral to The Great Reset, in which it is planned that we the people who pay for everything will own less and less until we own nothing at all and are happy slaves, none the wiser about our true power and purpose here on this beautiful earth.

Our current options as humanity, according to Charles’ WEF associate Yuval Noah Harari are either to be destroyed or upgraded.

If Charles has pledged allegiance to the WEF cabal, and we are now being asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury, a man with no scientific expertise whatsoever, who gaslit many into taking experimental covid vaccinations in the name of Jesus: “Trust (the scientists) ….they may be wrong, but they know what they’re doing better than we do”, and more recently appears to have been caught in a serious lie to colleagues, to pledge allegiance to him, in a so-called “homage of the people”…where does this leave us if we comply?

To help navigate the answer to this question, I will leave you with gentle words borrowed posthumously from Diana, Queen of Hearts, “Only do what your heart tells you.”

Please do read the rest of my article:
➨ https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/london-eerily-quiet-on-the-coronation

📌 Follow:
➨ @DrTessLawrie

Depopulation is the real hidden core ideology of the contemporary Western oligarchy. Once you are able to accept this as reality everything else that happened in the last three years makes perfect sense.

@RobinMG

"WALL STREET JOURNAL, 2009

"Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says

The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.
There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.

"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."
Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.
But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WHB-1322

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation

"The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.

Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America's wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.

They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings".

Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority."

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/billionaire-club-in-bid-to-curb-overpopulation-d2fl22qhl02

Bill Gates, 2010: “If we do a really good job with new vaccines, health care and reproductive health services, we can lower that [world population] by 10-15%”

The C19 "vaccines" are a weapons system to sterilize 10-15% of the population.

Modern totalitarianism ALWAYS uses science as its justification

@RobinMG

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1654011196717113345

SCIENCE IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. The scientific formula below may be true, yet it justifies depopulation, & gives a veneer of rationality to eugenics. Scientific truth can be highly immoral and inhuman. It is not the answer. Morality is.

https://t.me/robinmg/27866

As I said from early 2020, what killed people who contracted "Covid19" was bacterial pneumonia, easily treated with antibiotics. No deep science required here now, or then. It was obvious as this happens with all severe respiratory infections.

@RobinMG

What really killed COVID-19 patients: It wasn't a cytokine storm, suggests study

"Those who were cured of their secondary pneumonia were likely to live, while those whose pneumonia did not resolve were more likely to die," Singer said. "Our data suggested that the mortality related to the virus itself is relatively low, but other things that happen during the ICU stay, like secondary bacterial pneumonia, offset that."

"The study findings also negate the cytokine storm theory, said Singer, also the Lawrence Hicks Professor of Pulmonary Medicine at Feinberg."

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-05-covid-patients-wasnt-cytokine-storm.html

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1654418944567005186

This reposting of a year old article may seem out of place.
The reason I’m posting it is that it shows that what is happening with c19 vaccines isn’t without precedent.
On the contrary, it’s happened several times before. Medics are either unaware or remain silent in the face of prescription drugs with negative risk benefit (does more harm than good).
SSRI antidepressants is one such category. They combine lack of efficacy in almost everyone with a side effect profile so bad that they’re a significant part of the homicide timeline in USA. The corruption is business as usual between the drug companies and regulatory agencies, indicating worldwide & total regulatory capture, and of necessity involving the highest levels of government.
Similar things have happened with cholesterol lowering statins.
There are probably others, in addition to c19 vaccines.
In a sense, it makes acceptance by the public more likely once they’re shown the same bunch of crooks have done similar things recently.
It dispatches the “But they wouldn’t do that!” counter that we often get.
Best wishes
Mike

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-evidence-for-antidepressants